MisaTV's "response" to the BBC: a ridiculous toxic manipulation (2)

(continued from part 1)

On Sunday, February 16, MisaTV broadcast the second part of the series of shows dedicated to MISA's "response" to the BBC podcast

"Bad Guru" (link), show entitled "A perfect sample of toxic journalism made to order (2)" - ep. 103.

In this episode, those from MisaTV pretended to analyze the second episode of the BBC Radio podcast, entitled "The Technique".

The reason is explained by the producers of the show themselves, I quote:

If in the first episode of the podcast, the aberrations preached by this pseudo-journalist sold out only referred to the esoteric TARA yoga school in London, in the next episode the false accusations extend to MISA.

But instead of analyzing the accusations that the former student with the pseudonym "Miranda" made against MISA and Bivolaru, the MisaTV editors pass them by in silence, reproaching instead so-called "incorrect expressions", which supposedly distort reality!

quote from the MisaTV broadcast:

...The pseudo-victim Miranda begins to pour out countless lies about how she ended up participating in the international camp in Costinești where, because she sent a nude photo to Gregorian Bivolaru, whom she mistakenly called the "spiritual guide of the camp", she benefited from free accommodation and meals. Nothing could be more untrue. First of all, in the international camp in Costinești, there is no and never was the notion of a "spiritual guide of the camp". Therefore, Miranda's statement is a lie and a slander, aimed at defamation and triggering a scandal.

comment: Seriously? That's the scandal, that she called Bivolaru "the spiritual guide of the camp"? But what was she supposed to call him? The MisaTV editors tell us how it would have been "correct", I quote:

MisaTV broadcast:

There are indeed some students who willingly and spontaneously consider Gregorian Bivolaru as their spiritual guide, but this is never a title that is somehow acquired from the outside and which is then used as such, such as the title of doctor or the position of mayor. It is therefore not possible for someone to come and affirm in front of the students "this is your spiritual guide".

In all the books that Gregorian Bivolaru has written, he is mentioned as a yoga teacher and nothing else. He is considered possibly, and only possibly, the spiritual guide of a human being only if that human being, by his own choice and especially following direct spiritual experiences, has chosen to relate to him as someone who guides him through his wise teachings, on the spiritual path on which he advances.

comment: On the official MISA website, in an article that speaks on behalf of the "MISA yoga school", so not just on behalf of the 21 or 22 members of the MISA association, it says, and I quote: 🔗:

An important aspect that brings uniqueness to the MISA yoga school is the one related to the spiritual exemplifications made by our spiritual Guide, yoga teacher Gregorian Bivolaru. The spiritual exemplifications are offered by the Spiritual Guide through the manifestation of a specific, precisely modulated subtle spiritual, telepathic field. The yoga teacher and our spiritual Guide, Gregorian Bivolaru, has always stated, with great humility and modesty, that he manages to do this with the immense help that comes to him from God the Father and that without this help it would be impossible to achieve the telepathic impulse of hundreds or even thousands of people. Each of these spiritual exemplifications is therefore an invaluable gift that God offers us, through our Spiritual Guide, who is in that context the “divine channel” through which this spiritual “gift” reaches us.

Everywhere, on the various pages related to the "MISA school", they talk about the "Spiritual Guide of the school" or "Our Spiritual Guide", either when announcing his anniversary on March 12th every year (link), whether it's about different other actions (link).

It probably bothers those at MISA when Bivolaru is only called "the spiritual guide of the camp", because it's like saying he's the "goblin of the place", although they would very much like to be called "the spiritual guide of the Universe", but the programs of the camps every year say that they are subtly-telepathically supported by "Grieg" (for example 2009, 2014 etc)

The yoga classes at the gym, as well as various meditations, begin with the consecration of the fruits, followed by communion with the spiritual guide Grieg, in order to enter into subtle resonance with him, who supports the meditations with triple occult energy.

Moreover, Bivolaru's photo is displayed everywhere, as the producers of the German podcast "Toxic Tantra", who were at a trial class in Berlin, directly observed, I quote:

"But we also know that he is still revered by his followers. Framed photos of him hang in several yoga schools, as those who abandoned the school tell us. We saw it with our own eyes during our trial session in Berlin. A framed photo of Gregorian Bivolaru was hanging there, surrounded by photos of other spiritual masters." (min9:47sec of the Holy Guru episode, auto scroll)

The reality is that, on the contrary, students are constantly reminded of who the “Spiritual Guide” is and that he is present on a subtle level, in the invisible. Moreover, those who are seized by doubts about him are condemned to hell, I quote 🔗:

The spiritual guide being our only guide on the path that leads to spiritual liberation, our separation from him before truly reaching divine enlightenment would be a cause for regret. Human beings who were on this spiritual path, overcome by doubts, distanced themselves from the spiritual guide and implicitly left the spiritual path, voluntarily giving up the divine chance of transformation. Thus, from beings with minds and hearts open to authentic spiritual experiences, due to the exacerbation of their ego, they began to blame and condemn spiritual teaching, the spiritual school and the spiritual guide.

However the doubt manifested itself, it triggered resonance processes with the terrible world of demons and even hell.

The lost person can no longer accept his spiritual guide as a divine being necessary to transform his limited egoistic personality, in order to free it. Thus, from the authentic aspirants they were at the beginning, they became poor and obvious yogic "waste". 

Therefore, the statement made in the MisaTV broadcast that "it is therefore not possible for someone to come and say in front of the students that this is your spiritual guide" is false and seeks to deceive the BBC podcast host who may not know in detail the reality of the MISA courses and activities, which the association's students experience. And MisaTV's lies continue, taking advantage of the fact that the BBC host is not a student and does not know the situation in detail:

MisaTV broadcast:

Another blatant lie of the false victim Miranda is that she was asked to send a nude photo. Nude photos are never requested in the MISA camps. Furthermore, from what she says in the podcast, it does not appear at all that she took these photos against her will, it only appears that, in this way, she benefited from free accommodation and meals. These advantages, which are an act of kindness, benefit many hundreds of students, who then do not lie insolently about being asked for nude photos in order to participate in the camp.

Within the MISA camps there are many people who benefit from free participation, without ever being asked for nude photos. These are people with low incomes or those who voluntarily get involved in organizing the camp, people who have won yoga competitions or those who have had remarkable spiritual experiences in the previous year.

comment:

Ordinary students who want to participate in the camps are not asked to take nude photos, but in a swimsuit. But in addition to ordinary students (ordinary suckers), there is also the category of "sultan's favorites". These are female students who participate in the so-called "esoteric Shakti groups" (MISA registered trademark 🔗) and who receive invitations to participate in camps for free, based on criteria known only to Bivolaru, and these are subject to special rules, which are "secret" and for which oaths of silence are taken. Also a hotel was built early on in Costinești, which everyone knows is for women "invited for free".

For years, there have been testimonies from former members that these groups ask for nude photos. In fact, in the early years, when Bivolaru was still in Romania, he personally made the selection, during which the aspirants were "viewed" nude!

So this is a vile maneuver by MISA, which hides the secret practice of requesting nude photos from the shakti group after the official practice of requesting photos in a swimsuit, for which contradictory explanations have been given

(semi-nude photos are requested either for "aura reading" 🔗, or for "health check"). 

Here is what Miranda says in the second part of the BBC podcast, I quote::

At the women's villa, she's handed 30 testimonial videos of women who've already met him. The women speaking to the camera are naked. That doesn't shock Miranda. I didn't mention this earlier, but to attend her first weekend retreat with Tara Yoga in England, Miranda says she was asked to supply them with a photograph of herself semi-naked. To attend this holiday camp, she says she had to supply a photo of herself fully naked. The reason given is that the guru, Bivolaru, needs it to read her aura. And since she's been here, she has been filmed naked.

Another vile maneuver of those at MISA is to hide the freebies that the "favorite women" benefit from behind the screen of the freebies granted to the other students, which are divided into the following categories:

- people with a difficult material and financial situation (unemployed, pensioners, etc.) who submit applications for free participation, from which 14 people (7 women and 7 men) are selected by drawing lots 🔗

- people (in the dozens) who sign up as volunteers to provide activities in the camps (karma yoga)

- camp organizers and yoga instructors (Ayurveda teachers do however pay a "contribution" 🔗)

- "favorite" women, at least 150 in number

Participants in the first three categories are asked for swimsuit photos and blood tests (including the instructors!), while the "favorites" are asked for nude photos and blood tests.

Next, MisaTV commits an unparalleled villainy: instead of broadcasting an original audio fragment from the BBC podcast, they pretend to quote Cat McShane, but distort her words:

MisaTV broadcast:

The extraordinary atmosphere of the camp, where thousands of people meditate in unison, is insidiously categorized as sexualizing. It is even aberrantly specified that, while meditating, the people - we do not know which ones because, being in meditation, they all had their eyes closed - simultaneously watched pornographic films.

alleged quote from Cat McShane, intentionally distorted, spoken in Romanian:

Miranda says she was exposed to a highly sexualized atmosphere, which she was not prepared for. This included pornographic films being shown while the students were meditating.

In reality, this is the original passage from the podcast (link min4:sec52):

Miranda joins the long queue which snakes around the tent. As she enters, a security guard checks Miranda's ID. The music is deafening, but the crowd inside is sitting on rows of wooden benches, silently meditating. And the music involved certain sexual noises and moans, and they had this music set as a background to a compilation of soft porn.

(it is obviously about the musical background from the "blessing technique"  🔗  (meditative) which is said to pour out God's grace, but which does indeed contain "sexual moans".)

The MisaTV presenter continues:

The lies of the self-proclaimed victim Miranda continue with the presentation of the Miss Shakti contest. The exaggeration of the reporter, who states with a stupid casualness that the show was about pornographic aspects with women in bikinis, not only smacks of bad intentions, but also of undeniable stupidity. Every adult knows that no pornographic production can be made as long as people have panties on.

comment:

There is an obvious difference between what was actually stated in the podcast and what MISA sought to suggest was stated, in order to create a false, illogical and contradictory statement, which they could then combat, in order to ridicule the victim's testimony! Of course, they allowed themselves to do so, because MISA followers do not verify the "official" statements of the association and assimilate everything that is served to them by their leaders, for fear of being seized by "demonic doubts".

As has been said here and on other occasions, MISA has certainly reached the absolute in at least two respects: debauchery and villainy!

MisaTV broadcast:

As for the so-called highly sexualized atmosphere to which the pseudo-victim Miranda claims to have been exposed, it is indeed necessary to expose the obvious hypocrisy she demonstrates in this regard. There are several people who claim that when she gave sexual massages to men, she caused many of them to ejaculate. We then naturally ask ourselves the question: why did those situations, which were clearly sexual and even very sexualizing, not seem to bother her at all?

comment:

A new anthology own goal, a registered MISA trademark! When exactly did Miranda give men "sexual massage with completion"?

Since only sexual continence is strictly practiced at MISA/ATMAN, it follows that "completion" is only practiced in erotic massage parlors! But MISA doesn't mention anything concrete about this, they just expose themselves, without realizing it!

If Miranda was thus violating the principle of continence, essential for MISA/ATMAN, why wasn't she excluded from the courses?

Obviously, because she was doing "karma yoga" (voluntary work) at those parlors, which belong to MISA/ATMAN itself ("temples of ecstasy")! As long as Miranda was working for the benefit of the sect, she was not violating the moral code at all, but now that she has left it, her actions from that time have suddenly become immoral. Therefore, the sexualizing atmosphere that those at MISA are now accusing Miranda of is actually the fault of those at MISA, because they are the beneficiaries!

Those from MisaTV continue:

MisaTV broadcast:

The tendentious, slanderous, malicious expression "sexualized atmosphere" is also manipulative and incorrect, because within this school, only refined, elevated, uplifting, spiritualizing eroticism is promoted, without exception, which, as the students of this school already know, is the exact opposite of raw, instinctual, often even degrading sexuality. There is also a clear and immense difference between films that are considered porn and erotic films, because the latter illustrate pure aspects. The revolutionary, brilliant teachings we could say, of the yoga teacher Gregorian Bivolaru, regarding erotic amorous continence and pure eros, reveal for the first time to people the exact opposite of sexuality and sexualization.

comment:

Not only did Miranda complain about the "extremely sexualized atmosphere she was not prepared for, due to pornographic films", but also numerous students, saturated with the disgusting pornographic films broadcast endlessly at the camps (see this blog article).

In a message sent to participants in the 2022 summer camp, Bivolaru reproached his followers for being saturated with so much pornography, I quote:

”Despite the efforts that were made to structure and then ensure the special program for adults, which involved making selections from at least 1,000 films that in specialty stores cost between 45 and 60 euros each, we have noticed huge fluctuations in terms of your participation”.

Since only at MISA is pure eros made (as claimed in MISA's response), it means that everyone else is making degrading sexuality, it results that the thousand films broadcast in the camps are in the category of raw and degrading sexuality.

So the spiritual guide of MISA is feeding the students ordinary pornography that they are saturated with, while the MISA leaders are accusing the BBC of "slander" and boldly declaring that they only practice pure eros and that those films, which Miranda complains about, were sublime (and free)! Therefore, a new lie from MISA!

MisaTV broadcast:

However, it is important to specify that, never within this esoteric yoga school, no one was in any way forced to do anything against their own will. It is also essential to point out that, in the case of courses and camps, only theoretical aspects are presented, following that those who aspire to assimilate them more deeply, can subsequently put them into practice at home, obviously with whomever they want. On the other hand, if they are not at all interested in these aspects, they can ignore them completely, being free to leave the room.

comment:

"Within this esoteric yoga school, no one was in any way forced to do anything against their will," but was tricked into doing something they did not want and were not warned about beforehand.

"Those who are not interested in these aspects can leave the room," but they will lose the chance of spiritual evolution and will fall into hell, and the spiritual guide will shame them!

"Only theoretical aspects are presented at the courses and camps, and they will then put them into practice at home, with whomever they want". At home with whom, with Bivolaru, in his apartment in Paris?

MisaTV broadcast:

As for the artistic moment with the nude women appearing briefly on stage, only one such moment in the entire camp, or the so-called simulated sex, in reality a transfiguring erotic love act, these really took place within the Miss Shakti competition show, an artistic show that highlights feminine qualities. In addition, there are no simulated sexual acts there, they are just simply some delightful artistic moments, which include certain symbolic meanings, of which obviously each person understands how much he is capable.

comment:

"No pornographic production can be made as long as people have panties on", which is why the participants take off their panties both on stage and in front of porn webcam! And there is no simulated sex, but only pure symbolism, which only Bivolaru is able to understand, although it is manifested externally, as can be seen below, by clicking on the photos:

https://www.libertatea.ro/stiri/foto-uite-cum-se-alege-o-miss-la-misa-497435

Bivolaru is able to understand, although it is manifested externally, as can be seen below, by clicking on the photos:

https://www.libertatea.ro/stiri/foto-uite-cum-se-alege-o-miss-la-misa-497435

Also, as can be seen, the women participating in the Miss MISA contest appear nude on stage "only once", in a group,
if we don't count the individual appearances (a personal number for the spirit guide, so that #hetoo can be delighted):

But those that reach the "secret test" appear once more, but this can only be seen if you are the spirit guide:

https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/701867-to-pee-or-not-to-pee-for-ecstasy

The first time ever showed urinary pleasure on screen, join and learn this pleasure. It's the long adventure of hours from the urinary orgasm show in 2002, the girls spend this long two and a half hours pissing to see who gets the better orgasm and becomes the "Miss Shakti"..or should I say "Piss Shakti". It's not a compilation.

MisaTV broadcast:

Cat McShane: I've spoken to two other people who have attended stages of the Miss Shakti competition, and I've read accounts from four others. Accounts vary as to what happens at each stage, but it seems to get progressively more sexually explicit. Two people told me they'd seen women parading naked on stage, and two people told me that people simulated sex.

comment:

Since some contestants did not advance to the higher stages of the Miss Shakti competition, some of which were "secret" (such as the "secret test" of urinary orgasm), they did not witness all the horrors, and as for the simple spectators, not even that much. Those from MISA use this to cast doubt on the accounts describing orgies, although the internet is full of such photos and even films made and sold at MISA itself (acknowledgment statement - video). 

MisaTV broadcast:

All of this takes place in a private setting only, and both participants and spectators are all adults. There is never anything forced or immoral about what happens there, and participation in the room is optional.

comment:

See the photos above, as well as the video sequences here. According to the law, the dictionary, and common sense, exposing genitals (especially on stage) constitutes pornography and is immoral.

MisaTV broadcast:

All of this happens, without exception, only in a private setting. A simple internet search will find tens of thousands of photos or videos from Gay Pride events, which are even more sexually explicit and which are events in public space. For many people, these are downright disgusting, which once again shows the double standards of the media.

comment:

Yes, these exhibitions are in public space and for many they are disgusting, but such manifestations warn from the beginning about this fact and do not want to seem anything other than they are, unlike the debauchery of MISA, which is presented as divine, but those who attend find something else, because they were presented as classes in the gym like all the others, after which they realize that they have entered a "spiritual school", or rather a sect. The way in which LGBT+ manifestations take place does not justify the fact that MISA manifestations should be of the same kind, especially when they are presented as "divine manifestations"!

MisaTV broadcast:

Also regarding the false victim Miranda's statements, it is important to specify that, paradoxically, she nevertheless participated in that Miss Shakti contest. Now she criticizes it, precisely because she did not win, being eliminated along the way and then showing furious resentment that led her to take revenge, even if she will never admit it. If paradoxically she considered that contest to be something good then, now she considers that contest to be something bad. This obvious change in her point of view fully proves that she is, unfortunately, a changeable, fluctuating woman, who is subsequently capable of distorting something eminently beneficial in every way. She twists internally the good that she once really experienced, changing it into something bad, which is imagined due to the perversity that exists in her inner universe. In conclusion, this shows that she is a changeable and superficial woman, from whom we can expect a lot of bad. This is the gratitude of this person, who was once offered free food at that camp.

comment:

To attribute Miranda's complaints to her frustration at not having won the Miss Shakti contest is a ridiculous maneuver. Obviously, MISA would have no way of knowing whether this is so or not, because they cannot read people's minds. Furthermore, Miranda could not have started from the idea that she was the favorite to win the contest. 

The idea is so stupid that MISA immediately launches, without evidence, another explanation for the "resentments", namely the superficial, fluctuating and changeable character of some women. It is clear, once again, what Bivolaru's intention was when he published the book about changeable women 🔗: in order to serve his followers with an "explanation" for the complaints of female students who were increasingly accusing him of sexual abuse. Of course, this is an invention of Bivolaru, since many of the facts complained about by these female students could be observed "live" by the French police who monitored the locations where the abuses were taking place, the complaints therefore not being the result of the "frustrations or hormonal fluctuations" of the women.

MisaTV broadcast:

Miranda claims to have participated in a group sex session for women, which culminated in the consumption of urine, described as a technique. The question was asked by the producer of this podcast to the MISA Press Office. We quote here the answer received by this pseudo-journalist, an answer which she then distorted in every way:

MISA's response to the BBC (which no one saw):

A first blatant lie in this dubious, manipulative conclusion of yours is the one regarding some so-called "sexual limits", when, in reality, within this esoteric spiritual school, which promotes integral yoga, ordinary sexuality is permanently rejected, it is always replaced with pure, elevated, euphoric eros, which is permanently based on erotic continence, on mutual love and especially on the prior mystical consecration of the fruits of such an intimate, erotic experience to God. This eliminates from the start, every time, any possible abuse, any attempt at manipulation that could occur between two human beings of the opposite sex, who each aspire in advance to have an intimate loving relationship with someone. Therefore, this statement regarding some so-called "sexual limits" does not correspond at all to the real truth.

comment:

Notice how, instead of answering the question with the "urinary technique", those from MISA issue an "answer" to a question that was not asked to them, but which they invented to divert attention from the original question, which they could not combat in any other way. By the end of this episode, those from MISA will not answer this question.

Regarding "sexual boundaries", here are excerpts from the second episode of the BBC podcast:

The camp is an extension of the sexual boundary-pushing that women had been exposed to back in the UK, or whichever country they'd been attending a yoga center inspired by guru Gregorian Bivolaru. This isn't what you'd expect at a normal yoga festival, and I think if most of us encountered this, we'd get straight on the next plane home. According to Miranda, in the preceding months at the Tara Yoga Centre in London, she's been told she has to push her boundaries if she wants spiritual awakening. 

...and other excerpts, from the very first episode of the BBC podcast:

I remember that there was one woman who didn't feel comfortable, didn't want to participate and she was made to feel pretty bad.

That this was her limitation she needed to overcome and this was her ego. [...] And she was really, really distressed and she cried for a whole evening and the night and she could not sleep. She was not upset with me because she realised that she actually ran into the room and made her choice of a man. But she felt very coerced into doing so. The way the preliminary workshops in the women's quarters took place caused some sort of psychological pressure for her, at least, that if she wouldn't proceed with the ritual, then she would not be accepted. So she really pushed herself way beyond her boundaries. This is the nub of it. The women appear to be consenting, but some feel they've been coerced into consenting.

Indeed, this is the core of the problem: women are "convinced" to give in! That is why Bivolaru ended up in this situation. Much can be imputed to Bivolaru and MISA, including violations of the moral code of spiritual paths, but while this concerns them first and foremost and is their problem, convincing women to give in to sexual abuse against their deepest desires also concerns the victims! “Give yourself up, even if you don’t want to, and you will overcome the limitations of your ego!”

How many times have I heard this at MISA, which is very real, it is not a lie at all:

Conscious abandonment in the erotic, loving experience leads to the stopping of discursive thinking and thus allows [...] implicitly the plenary experience of the yoga state. 🔗 

But abandonment must be conscious, that's why discursive thinking exists!

So that there is no "room for interpretation", Bivolaru came up with the "answer to consecration", an argument that he served to the women invited to the "initiation", as well as to the French court (who does not participate in the yoga class), and now the followers serve it to the producer of the BBC Radio podcast! If anyone thinks that the troubles at MISA will end with Bivolaru, they will have to resume the discursive thinking that they abandoned!

Let's not forget about Bivolaru's other disciples: Vivekananda Saraswati 🔗, Stoian Advaitananda 🔗 and other ”anandas” will appear!

Through the "response to consecration", which is a "subtle" sensation that leaves room for interpretations, consent is taken from the student who is to be "initiated" and is given to "god", who responds as Bivolaru ("god") wants, whom "he himself sent" to reveal the consecration...

Furthermore, those at MISA are trying to convert those at the BBC, just as Bivolaru tried to bewitch the French court. 🔗, probably with the same "chance" of success:

According to the teachings of the esoteric yoga school MISA, beings who love each other and who wish to engage in an intimate-loving experience are always recommended to practice beforehand, in unison, the mystical consecration of the fruits to God and then, only if each of them ultimately experiences a positive affirmative response, only then are they advised to accept engaging in such an intimate experience. This thus eliminates from the start any alternative of a possible abuse or an insidious manipulation because, in the end, each of the two is, so to speak, guided, enlightened, internally and directly advised only by God, because then no one else but God intervenes in the inner being of those people. In the situation where one of the two beings does not receive a positive affirmative response to the respective mystical consecration of the fruits, he immediately chooses to refuse to advance in that intimate loving experience, because he has certain, incontestable proof, coming from God himself, that the respective intimate loving fusion does not imply, obviously, a full divine mystical integration.

comment: But what if the “female aspirant to initiation” is afraid to admit or express the fact that she does not want the sexual initiation to be “consummated”?

In this case, God would know this and would not manifest the affirmative answer, and this fact should also be clearly felt by the “Great Macrocosmic Lover” because God, if he does not agree for the love act to occur, will not transmit “NO” to her and “YES” to him! If she is “stupid and superficial”, at least he - the “Clairvoyant” - should be aware and responsible. Therefore, the responsibility also falls on him, not only on her, as suggested by the Mystical Jerk in a statement to the press:

"I have a paranormal gift, a fluid that is amplified by the practice of yoga and that allows me to act like a magnet. The female students came to talk about yoga, and for some the desire to make love arose and so we made love. Obviously, when the love was mutual," he assures.”  🔗

continuation and end of MISA's Response to the BBC:

Therefore, this statement regarding some so-called “sexual limits” does not correspond at all to the real truth and it can be easily refuted by many thousands of students of this spiritual school, if and only if honest interviews are conducted beforehand with such students. In this simple way, this miserable lie, which is shamelessly circulated by certain human beings who are intent on defaming and denigrating Gregorian Bivolaru at all costs, will be shattered forever. However, we doubt in advance that you will ever allow such honest, sincere interviews to be conducted, which would be likely to show with great ease what the truth is regarding this false statement that you have made here.

However, we do not exclude the possibility, fundamentally cunning, miserable, onerous, that some perverse people invent something that never existed in reality and then lie with insolence, posing with immense audacity as false victims, precisely in order to skillfully profit in this way from the subsequent request, sometimes after years, of immense so-called dubious material damages. Just as there is in fact no forest without dry branches, it is sometimes possible for such perverse, cunning human beings to appear, who especially have obvious financial interests and who brazenly assert, even in the absence of any edifying evidence, that they are vulnerable victims. All these pertinent arguments will, of course, be a bit confusing for you, because they promptly demolish your vile, Machiavellian attempts to denigrate this man at all costs, who is not at all as you imagine him with immense pride, those of you who are animated by the malicious intention of exposing him to the pillar of infamy so that he will be despised and unjustly hated by all those who will listen to your broadcasts.

comment:

Of course, the BBC will be baffled, but not by the "arguments", but by the way they clash, proof of a psychic lability you rarely see:

the MISA people start by proposing a solution for finding out the truth - honest interviews with students - and then argue the opposite, stating that the solution is not infallible, because some people might still lie, obviously because they are paid for it.

Since we're talking about money, MISA launches a "logical argument" in an attempt to clear Bivolaru of the accusation of exploitation:

MisaTV broadcast:

In reality, Gregorian Bivolaru has never exploited anyone, in any way. Why would this man ever choose to exploit someone, even though he could have legally collected a total of 639,000 euros for all 71 of his books? But despite this, it is well known that he chose to give away his 71 books for free, without requesting any legal copyrights.

Any intelligent person, endowed with common sense, will ask himself this natural and elementary question. Any intelligent person who would listen carefully to such abject slander would come to the conclusion that such a thing is an aberration and would consider it impossible.

comment:

It is noticeable that those at MISA kept an exact account of the money that Bivolaru should have collected: 639,000 euros! Not 600,000, not 650,000, but exactly 639,000 euros! Dividing this amount by 71 books, the result is exactly 9,000 euros per book!

Considering that these books are very different in terms of time of publication, number of pages and circulation, why are all the books considered at the same price? Where does this amount come from? Why doesn't he ask for 10,000 euros per book?

If Bivolaru offered his copyrights to MISA publishing houses for free, what is the point of maintaining such accurate records? There is only one logical explanation: Bivolaru did not give up this money! At the time of the raid, the French police found over 200,000 euros in his apartment in Paris. Where did this money come from? Are the “copyrights” collected in cash, without documents?

There are testimonies that Bivolaru has been inviting women to Paris since 2006, almost 20 years ago. I quote excerpts from the 5th episode of the German podcast “Toxic Tantra”, episode entitled “Trapped” (link). Right at the beginning, it says:

Costinești, Romania in September 2021. A month later, Natalie left the Viluța (Little Villa). She goes up with several other young women in a silver van. Nathalie and the other women know just so much: they will go to Paris or somewhere nearby.

Then at the moment min2:sec43, it says, I quote:

About 15 years ago, another woman experienced almost exactly the same. By car, by parking somewhere near Paris. We call her Eva. 

Considering the costs of an apartment near Paris, including receiving several girls each week and the "gifts" for them, no one is naive enough to believe that the amount found in Paris was what Bivolaru had left of the 639,000 euros, received all in one installment, after which "goodbye, you took your money!" And not just the 639,000 euros, but much more, in many installments over time. These shatter the ridiculous attempt to exonerate the Great Humble. MISA has once again let the pigeon out of its mouth and once again exposed the Holy of Holies, the one without sin and disinterested in worldly pleasures and goods!

At the end of the analysis of this new episode of villainy combined with gross stupidity, if we compare the "plea" contained in MISA's "response" with the original podcast, we find that those at MISA are hiding the facts exposed and avoiding the important questions raised by the BBC producer, seeking to divert attention to non-essential and less disturbing aspects for the "esoteric school".

For those from MISA, the problem is not the indoctrination, exploitation and sexual abuse accused in the report, aspects that they deny from the start as "hallucinating inventions", instead they are outraged that the podcast does not promote MISA's ideas, such as "pure eros, sexual continence, consecration" and reproach the producer and the media, and even the entire society, for not singing in the MISA choir and not understanding the "formidable esoteric revelations of the formidable Spiritual Guide" and that the deeds of him and his acolytes are not abuses, but "wonderful manifestations of pure eros and divine love". In the great esoteric school, everything is divinely integrated and irreproachable, but the media paid by the Illuminati maliciously denigrates it, spreading false inventions of "superficial, frustrated and fickle stupid" women. The women complainants are false victims, who are "superficial" because they do not understand the significance of the actions they incriminate, and they are fickle, because they now denigrate what they once considered to be something wonderful and uplifting.

In reality, MISA's maneuver of remaining silent about the alleged facts, of avoiding answering important questions (and even hiding these questions), and of diverting attention to false or unessential issues, combined with the deliberate distortion of what was stated in the podcast, shows that the BBC Radio journalist's approach actually reached the core of the problem.

It is also worth noting the "esoteric lesson" given in this episode by those from MISA, speaking to "uninitiated" people about pure eros and consecration. Usually MISA "uses" any opportunity, including the right of reply, to promote its fixed ideas, but this time the maneuver is clearly part of an attempt to publicly justify Bivolaru's actions.

Since he declared before the court and the French press that it was not sexual abuse by violating the victim's consent, but about "an amorous fusion based on the affirmative response to consecration from God and on pure eros", MISA has oriented its positions in this direction.

(to be continued)