Marijuana Pathos

🔥Мы профессиональная команда, которая на рынке работает уже более 5 лет.

У нас лучший товар, который вы когда-либо пробовали!

Marijuana Pathos

______________

✅ ️Наши контакты (Telegram):✅ ️

>>>НАПИСАТЬ ОПЕРАТОРУ В ТЕЛЕГРАМ (ЖМИ СЮДА)<<<

✅ ️ ▲ ✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ️✅ ▲ ✅ ️

_______________

ВНИМАНИЕ! ВАЖНО!🔥🔥🔥

В Телеграм переходить только по ССЫЛКЕ что ВЫШЕ, в поиске НАС НЕТ там только фейки !!!

_______________

Marijuana Pathos

potency test

Marijuana Pathos

Закладки кокса Кутаиси

Buy drugs Denis

Marijuana Pathos

Купить марихуану Кутаиси

Cornelius Griffith Kiaya Marshall Alexis White David Brookshire English 14 October Legalizing Marijuana There will always be a debate about the legalization of marijuana because on one side of the argument it is a drug, just like any other addictive drugs such as crack, or crystal meth. But on the other hand of the argument, it is debated that, yes, it is a drug, but it is also medication that benefits illnesses and is a relief for pain. Some states, such as California, have long come to a mutual ground regarding the issue and believe that it should not be a crime worth prosecuting. So why is it that all states cannot come to a mutual ground regarding the subject? We will analyze and break down the rhetorical structure of an article that is in support of the legalization of marijuana. The article we have chosen is Why Legalizing Marijuana Makes Sense written by Alex Newhouse, an attorney who works on reforming marijuana laws. In his argument, he does not set out to persuade users to use marijuana, but instead to say that adults who are responsible or ill should be able to legally consume it without penalty Newhouse. Rhetoric is the ability of finding the best available means of persuasion for a given audience. An argument is an attempt to solve a problem where there are two or more conflicting positions. An effective way to develop or analyze an argument is to follow the Toulmin System of Logic, which mainly includes claims, reasons, grounds, and a warrant. Claims are the points that are being argued, reasons explain why the points being argued are true, grounds are concrete Griffith, Marshall, White 2 evidence to validate the reason, and a warrant is an unspoken assumption that is already recognized by the audience Toulmin System of Logic. Newhouse has followed each step of the Toulmin System of Logic. His claim for this article is that marijuana should be legalized. The reasons for his claim are that marijuana is already commonly used and the legalization would benefit the government. The grounds that he uses are that many people use marijuana illegally, and that if marijuana was taxed and regulated, the crime rates would go down, thereby creating a safer environment. In addition, the government would make a profit that would ultimately benefit the country because the taxes and profit made from the product would generate new revenue. The warrant is that higher crime rates are detrimental and that profit for agricultural communities and alternative sources of government income are beneficial. The first part of rhetoric I will analyze in his argument is his use of logos. Logos is defined as an appeal to reason or logic Purdue Owl. In the article, Newhouse provides numerous examples of logos. For example, he quotes the Shafer Commission in saying, 'Neither the marijuana user nor the drug itself can be said to constitute a danger to public safety' Newhouse. The specific finding of the Shafer Commission helps because it follows a logical train of thought. The Shafer Commission concludes that marijuana usage and users are not a threat to public safety. Donald Tashkin, have clearly demonstrated this Newhouse. We also know that marijuana is legitimate medicine. The second part of the rhetoric appeal is ethos. Ethos is the credibility of the author and it Griffith, Marshall, White 3 quiets the skepticism of the audience. It refers to the ethical appeal or from the credibility of the writer. Arguments without ethos can be completely valid and correct, but no one will believe the person making the claims because they have no reason to. In the article, Newhouse failed to establish his credibility. He did not bring up a reason for why he has to right to argue about the legalization of marijuana. To find out more about him, we had to conduct outside research, and we found that he is a lawyer who works with reforming marijuana laws. The fact that he failed to mention that in his article made it difficult to believe he is credible. If he would have explained further on his career, it would have made his argument a lot stronger. The last rhetorical appeal he incorporates into his argument is pathos. Pathos is a component of an argument that appeals to emotion Ethos, Logos, Pathos. For example, 'Regulating marijuana would also protect our children. It is easier for kids today to get marijuana than it is for them to get alcohol or tobacco' Newhouse. This excerpt appeals to the emotions of the reader because people in general have a instinctual responsibility towards taking care of children. People already believe that kids should not be able to access and use marijuana. So the possibility that it can be prevented is a positive thing. This argument hinges on the assumption that kids should not use marijuana. This assumption is called the warrant of an argument. Every argument includes a warrant or some Griffith, Marshall, White 4 commonly accepted assumption that must be true for the argument to work. The argument to the complete legalization of marijuana is not over and may not be over for a while, but Newhouse makes a very persuasive argument about the pro-legalization of marijuana. He chose the right evidence to support his claims and that would bring about a response from his reader. He incorporates logos and pathos very well throughout his argument, but he did not incorporate ethos well. The incorporation of ethos could have made his argument stronger. The evidence Newhouse chose to use was pertinent to his argument, although he could have provided more evidence that took a stronger stance against marijuana because by refuting stronger claims it makes an argument better. Even though the way he formed his argument may have not been the best strategy, it was a step in the right direction and it will just be the one of many discussions for the legalization of marijuana. Открыть меню навигации. Закрыть список предложений Поиск Поиск. Пользовательские настройки. Пропустить карусель. Карусель назад. Следующее в карусели. Что такое Scribd? Rhetorical Analysis. Загружено: api Сведения о документе нажмите, чтобы развернуть сведения о документе Оригинальное название rhetorical analysis. Поделиться этим документом Поделиться или встроить документ Параметры публикации Опубликовать в Facebook, откроется новое окно Facebook. Этот документ был вам полезен? Это неприемлемый материал? Пожаловаться на этот документ. Отметить как неприемлемый контент. Скачать сейчас. Сохранить Сохранить «rhetorical analysis» для последующего чтения. Оригинальное название: rhetorical analysis. Похожие издания. Карусель назад Следующее в карусели. Osama Almahdi. Перейти к странице. Поиск в документе. Griffith, Marshall, White 1 Cornelius Griffith Kiaya Marshall Alexis White David Brookshire English 14 October Legalizing Marijuana There will always be a debate about the legalization of marijuana because on one side of the argument it is a drug, just like any other addictive drugs such as crack, or crystal meth. Похожие интересы аргументация Каннабис наркотик Логотипы риторический убедительность. Документы, похожие на «rhetorical analysis». John Paolo Bello. Lehel Dorian Kovach. Alex Brotman. Michelle Quiquino Foliente. Israel Defense Forces. Nhuan Tu - Tuan. Antonio Lupetti. David Kabwama. Ngaira Mandela. Blane McElreath. Arif Ruzlan. Hareesha N G. Purushothama Reddy. Популярные на тему «Pathos». Ali ejaz khan. Tim Coen. John Lukezic. Isabelle Lock. Ana Dorica. Sveto Cvetkovski. Teresa Hernandez. Быстрая навигация Главная.

Buy cones, bosko, hashish Corfu

Marijuana Pathos

Кокаин (VHQ, HQ, MQ, первый, орех) Созополь