MARATHON OF WORLD LIES 🤴19
There is one just question we should all ask governments around the world: If you shut down the economy, deprive people of a source of income, erase concepts such as rights and freedoms, violate the constitution (which protects these rights and freedoms), and prohibit people from having even the most basic human needs, such as breathing fresh air and socializing, then behind all these so-called measures, shouldn't there be some incredibly clear science? Shouldn't you have a wealth of scientific evidence that supports the need for all of these measures? After all, you can't do things of this magnitude if you don't have absolutely anything you can justify all of these actions? I suggest that you and I take matters into our own hands and see what they really have? What do they have so that, scientifically speaking, they can justify their actions towards us? After all, it is known that those of us who disagree with what is happening are called anti-scientific egoists. And if we check, is that really the case? And whether all these actions of the government that infringe on us can really be justified by science and common sense. The government and the media tell us the following story: suddenly, suddenly, a deadly virus appeared, and caused an epidemic of respiratory diseases in Wuhan, and then around the world. Brave and intelligent scientists immediately got down to business. They identified the virus, and PCR tests were created based on its RNA, which they found. And we all now have to hand them over to prove our non-infectiousness. Here's what their story sounds like. Let's see if this is true. There are clearly formulated, logical and sound rules that you must follow if you want to prove that a certain pathogen exists and causes the disease. They were formed in the late 1800s by the German professor Jacob Henle and his student Robert Koch. These rules are called "Henle Koch postulates" or simply "Koch postulates". These postulates are the gold standard in microbiology, and sound like this:
1. The microorganism should be found in abundance, in all organisms suffering from the disease, and should not be found in healthy organisms.
2. The microorganism must be isolated from the diseased organism and cultured in pure culture. (for viruses, this has been changed, since by definition, viruses cannot reproduce on their own, and their cultivation requires cells of a host-sick person. that is, this is not a culture in pure culture, but in cell culture)
3. A cultured microorganism must cause disease upon contact with a healthy organism. That is, when you isolated it from the patient's body and purified it, then cultured it in pure culture or if it is a virus, then in the cells of the host (the person from whom the sample was taken), and then, cleansed of the host cells, then you can put it in a healthy body and cause the same disease.
4. You should again isolate this microorganism from the body of the person you made sick to make sure that it was he who caused the disease. And only if you can follow all these steps, then you can prove and conclude that this microorganism or microbe is causing the disease. Simply put, you have to find the virus in the body of sick but not healthy people, isolate and purify it, then grow it using host cells, clear the virus of host cells, introduce the grown virus into the body of a healthy person, cause illness, and then re-isolate this virus from the body of someone you made sick. Only under such conditions can you prove your theory that this virus exists and causes disease. It's also important to say that it's only after you've done all of these steps that you can start talking about tests and a vaccine, because if you don't have a virus particle isolated, then how can you then create a test and a vaccine? It's impossible. So, let's see what kind of scientific data they have, and what exactly those brave scientists whose works are now referred to by the WHO and governments around the world have done to force us to agree to the introduction of measures that infringe on us, designed to change our lives beyond recognition. There are 4 scientific publications in which scientists claim that they have isolated the Covid-19 virus (sars-cov-2, the so-called virus, and Covid-19 is the condition that it causes) These publications are what the entire world policy of "health" is based on now.Before we go through all these 4 documents, let's look at the definition of the words "isolation" and "purification", in English and Russian. Virologists should be aware that the general definitions of "excretion" and "purification" are almost identical.For example, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, isolation • "a state of isolation or loneliness; separation from other things or people; privacy."To single out - To separate, to separate from the general, the whole. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, Purification • "Pollution Relief"; separation of slag, debris, or other contaminants in order to obtain the substance in its pure form."
Clean- Remove dirt, impurities; peel. To free from unnecessary, superfluous.Finish, freeing from all excess.Make clean in composition, freeing from foreign impurities, from something. Foreign.What does the real method of cleaning the virus look like? This method is well documented. It is described in standard microbiology textbooks and has been widely used to isolate viruses from lower organisms such as bacteria, amoebas, and algae.
1. To do this, you need to take physiological fluid. In the case of Covid-19, pulmonary fluid is the most common thing used for this purpose.
2. Due to the fact that viral particles are much smaller in size than bacteria, this liquid must be passed through very, very small filters. So you filter out the bacteria, and only tiny virus particles will remain in this filtrate. After that, you take this filtrate and subject it to gradient centrifugation. You put a gradient gel in a test tube, then add filtrate there and start rotating it.
What will it do? This will bind the particles because they all have the same density and you can easily pick them up with a pipette and look at them under an electron microscope. You will be able to chemically characterize them and you will be able to extract genetic material from them if you want to study it. But the key point is that by going through these steps, you have completely cleared the particles DIRECTly from the sample taken from the sick person. And you didn't mix any other substances in there and that's the key point in these isolation steps.And here's what those scientists who publish their scientific articles and say they have isolated the virus are actually doing:
And here's what those scientists who publish their scientific articles and say they have isolated the virus are actually doing:
1. They start with the same sample of lung fluid.
2. But what they do next is not filter or clean it in any way. They do one of 2 things: they add certain enzymes that dissolve the membranes, and this releases all the genetic material that may be inside the cells or particles into a free solution. And then they put PCR probes in there that magnify different parts of that genetic material, and then they study and characterize that genetic material. But there is not a single word about excretion and purification. They don't even know what kind of genetic material they're studying because they haven't cleaned anything beforehand. It can be human genetic material, bacterial, fungal and so on. So this method of action is far from "highlighting" and "cleansing".
3. Another way they go is to take the same lung fluid that they may or may not filter out. Some of their methods are not even described in detail, so it is difficult to say whether they missed this step or not. Then, they mix this physiological fluid with non-host, non-human cells. They often buy commercially prepared mammalian cells and their most commonly used cells are "Vero" cells – monkey kidney cells. That is, they mix physiological fluid with a cell culture consisting of monkey kidney cells, and necessarily add antibiotics there, and often liquid embryonic veal serum. Since antibiotics and foreign blood products are toxic to these cells, they die, and cell death (cytopathic effect) in this case is called isolation (isolation) of the virus. Is it like isolating (isolating) something? No, it doesn't look like it. Cell death does not prove the presence of the virus, nor that it was he who caused the death of cells, since in this "mix", in addition to the fluid from the lungs with the alleged virus, there were other substances toxic to the cells. And as practice shows, cells die, even if you add an absolutely sterile solution there. They die simply because something has been added to them.It is also very important to note that antibiotics contribute to the production of exosomes. Exosomes are particles that secrete all mammalian cells in response to stress, damage, or poisoning. They help the various cells inside the body communicate with each other, and help us heal. The function of exosomes has long been well known and documented. Different things cause cells to produce more exosomes. And antibiotics are one of those things because they're pretty toxic to cells. This fact is well known, there are several scientific documents that describe it in detail. Therefore, when they mix this physiological fluid with cells and antibiotics, it causes the cells to produce exosomes. Under an electron microscope, exosomes look almost identical to what virus particles should look like by definition. They have the same size and shape. When scientists look at this mixture through a microscope, they observe these particles there. This is what we can often see in photographs. And in the descriptions to the photos, statements are often made that these are viral particles, although there is no evidence of this. Then, they may or may not purify particles from this mixture. Almost always, they leave them mixed with cells by looking at them with a microscope. But it is not possible to know for sure whether these particles, which they have identified, after these procedures, come from cell culture with antibiotics, or from pulmonary fluid. And since the procedure itself that they produce, always provokes the production of exosomes, then absolutely, there will be exosomes that look like viral particles.
Now let's move on to 4 documents:
1. Peng Zhou et al. Discovery of a novel coronavirus associated with
the recent pneumonia outbreak in 2 humans and its potential bat
origin. (Peng Zhou et al. Discovery of a novel coronavirus related to
a recent outbreak of pneumonia in 2 people and its potential origin from bats)
origin)
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.914952
2. Na Zhu et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. (Na Zhu et al. Novel coronavirus from pneumonia patients in China, 2019.) N Engl J Med 382;8
3. Jeong-Min Kim et al. Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a patient in Korea with COVID-19. (Jeong-Min Kim et al. Identification of coronavirus isolated from a patient in Korea with COVID-19.) Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2020;11(1):3-7
4. McMaster University, Canada:
https://brighterworld.mcmaster.ca/articles/i-study-viruses-
(a team of scientists from Canada who claim to have isolated sars-cov-2. they did not publish their study, but only an article on their website)
What conclusions can be drawn by carefully reading all these documents? None of them satisfied the first 2 postulates (that is, the isolation of the virus and its cultivation in the host cells) and none of them even tried to satisfy the postulates 3 and 4 - and this is the inoculation of an isolated particle into a healthy host, in order to cause disease, as well as the re-isolation of the particle from the body of this host. They didn't even try to do any of that. But let's take a closer look.
Zhou's 1st publication:
1. They did not isolate any virus. They obtained genetic material, without prior isolation and purification, by the method I described earlier, and which has nothing to do with isolation and purification.
2. They did not culture it in host cells, they used "Vero" (monkey kidney cells) and another "Huh7". Of course they used antibiotics. And they did it with only 1 in 7 patients.
3. And they also didn't filter out these cells to isolate any particles. (continued in the next post)
And here's what they wrote in the conclusion: "This study ... provides evidence of association between the disease and the presence of this virus. However, we still have a lot of urgent questions that we don't have an answer to, we need more clinical data and samples to confirm that this virus is indeed the etiological agent of this epidemic. Etiology means cause. In general, they said that they need more research to confirm causation, and this so far only provides evidence of association, and we still need to answer many questions. The authors of this article were honest and understood the limitations of their research methods, and placed an appropriate conclusion.
They did something else very interesting, and I don't want to talk much about the genetic material, because that was the basis for the development of this diagnostic test, the RT-PCR test. This is a test that tests for the presence of a genetic sequence. The fact that they decided to declare it a coronavirus was because they tested the RNA found in their experiments, the source of which they cannot determine because they did not purify anything, and said that its sequence has almost 80% similarity with Sars-cov-1, that is, with the SARS coronavirus of 2003. 80% may sound like a lot, but that's not the case at all. Humans share a 96% similarity in genetic sequence to chimpanzees. And so if you want to say that 80% consistency means it's also a coronavirus, if you took a sample of your DNA and compared it to a chimpanzee DNA sequence, you would say chimpanzees. But you clearly aren't. Humans and chimpanzees are quite different creatures, with such seemingly large similarities in genetic sequence. So, the claim that the sequence they found, which has an 80% similarity to the alleged sequence sars-cov-1, is also a coronavirus, has no basis. Let's move on to the next paper. To the publication Zhu.
2nd publication of Zhu.
1. Again, no virus was isolated, they only received genetic material.
2. They didn't culture it in the host cells, and this time they used lung cancer cells altogether. And one thing we know about cancer cells is that they produce a lot of exosomes. And it will provide particles that can be seen under a microscope and confused with other particles, such as viral ones.
3. And they also didn't isolate these particles from these cancer cells. And here's what they said in their conclusion: "Although, our study did not fulfill Koch's postulates, (they admit it immediately) our analysis provides evidence of 2019-nCov's involvement in the Wuhan outbreak."
So far, based on the documents, we have an association and involvement that is not even close to the cause. These are just preliminary findings that suggest that you should do further research and apply postulates if you want to prove a causal relationship.
Now, 3rd Korean post by Kim
The 3rd post is much more problematic and now you will understand why. They did not isolate any virus or culture it in host cells, they used "Vero" cells and antibiotics, and they did not isolate any particles from these cells. And in their introductory piece, they say, "The new caronavirus was identified as the causative agent of this unexplained pneumonia in January 2020." As you can see, in the final part of the other two documents, they did not make any such statements. In this Korean study, they linked to another study supporting their bold claim. Let's take a look at this study that they cite, and which they believe proves that this is the causative agent.
But this is not a study that tries to isolate and identify a virus, it is a study that looks at the full sequence of genetic material, this so-called virus (although the origin of this material is unknown to anyone) and compares it with evolutionary analysis. That is, it compares it with other "viral" genetic sequences found in the organisms of creatures of different species. In other words, the scientific evidence of this publication is not able to prove anything regarding causation. In the document to which they refer, nothing is written anywhere about causation. In the introductory part, they write: "The novel coronavirus is associated with human-to-human transmission and acute human infections."
Again, association is not the reason. And in their final part, they talk about the genetic features of the virus and their potential association with viral characteristics, and say that its virulence in humans has not been elucidated, and it has yet to be clarified. In other words, there's an association, but we need more research, we haven't proven anything.But how, then, in the third Korean publication, can they say such a thing? It turns out they're just blatantly lying. They made it up, they said it was the causative agent, they provided a link, and this data is not in this source. It is a serious crime to make such an important statement without any evidence. After all, all world politics is now based on this statement that this agent is a pathogen. And they can't provide any scientific data at all to confirm that. We're going to go ahead and look at the 4th, most recent publication, more specifically the mcMaster University article, we're going to see that they didn't isolate the virus either, and they didn't culture it in host cells, they used some other kind of mammalian cell along with antibiotics, thereby achieving cell death, and that's the same thing that all the other authors of the publications did. They, too, are making a bold statement, perhaps following a previous publication. They said sars-cov-2 is what "set the pandemic in motion." Despite the fact that neither they nor anyone else even isolated and purified this virus, did not fulfill the very first postulate, and also no one even tried to check whether it can cause the disease. Which means we don't even have evidence of the sars-cov-2 virus. The authors of the last 2 studies simply launched a rumor, the veracity of which they were not going to prove.
And now, to summarize:
We have 2 studies whose authors have stated that there is an association or
the involvement of this virus in the disease. And that's a far cry from any final statement of causation. Then, in the 3rd document, it was changed to "causative agent" and then in the 4th to "set the pandemic in motion". And no evidence has been provided to back up these claims. It's just an outright lie. I would like to draw conclusions from all that we have just discussed:
1. None of Koch's tenets have been fulfilled for the Covid-19 virus (sars-cov-2). This means that there is no evidence of its existence. No one has ever isolated or purified this virus and no one has even tried to prove that it can cause disease.
2. And also, only lies have made the Covid-19 virus the cause of the pandemic without any evidence. Here's what scientific evidence who and governments around the world rely on. And who really is now an anti-science egoist or worse a state biological terrorist?
And another crucial important question: if a viral particle has never been isolated and purified, the existence, let alone the ability to cause disease, of this virus has not been proven, then how can you create a test and a vaccine? It's not possible. And an even more important question: what is this vaccine for then and what will actually be in it? And what are the goals pursued with the compulsory vaccination of the population, which has long been discussed? Of course, all these questions are rhetorical and most likely they are best addressed to children for the study of the psychology of lying. We are well aware that this is all NWO. Can anyone explain the new fashion of wearing rags on the respiratory organs? Why or who are people and children suffocating in rags, sitting at home in quarantine? All plans are extremely clear and all the won are also calculated and planned, distances in Germany are already measured by the police with long sticks with rulers. Allowing them to control movement and inject vaccines against a non-existent virus and fulfill all their other ridiculous whims is disrespect for themselves personally. For us, this is simply not possible and will not be. There is no need to approach us with these questions of dope degenerates. The genetic sequence that Ethiopians use in their protocols for PCR tests for sars-cov-2, and which they say is "viral," is actually found in human DNA. That is, in fact, the origin of this sequence is not viral, but human, and comes from our own cells. This means that everyone can and does get someone who allows themselves to be bullied by taking this nonsense – a PCR test. PCR technology increases the tested material, making it larger. The only question is how many cycles of increasing the material will be set. The greater the increase, the greater the likelihood of getting a positive result. That is, if in some country or region they decide to conduct more cycles of increase, then there will be more positive results. What does all this mean for the population? The sars-cov-2 virus does not exist. Tests test you for human, that is, your own genetic material, so everyone can get a positive result. This virus was not created in the laboratory, firstly because it is simply impossible, because if no one has ever been able to prove the existence of any of the viruses that are considered pathogens (yes, with all the so-called "pathogen viruses", the same picture happens as with sars-cov-2, there is no evidence of their existence, but there are empty publications claiming the opposite and tests, which use their own human genetic material. They simply cannot create a virus in the laboratory, since their very existence is fiction. This is a scam that has been going on since the middle of the 19th century, which has no evidence. No one has ever been able to isolate any virus from a person and cause illness with it. The only thing they were able to do was isolate viruses from the simplest organisms, such as bacteria, algae and amoebas, but these viruses never harmed the host's body, but on the contrary, helped its survival, and this is well documented. But in more complex organisms, such as animals and humans, no viruses exist, as such organisms do not need them. That's why no one has ever been able to find them in humans. Also, unlike viruses, exosomes have been successfully isolated, characterized and photographed, which are very similar to viral particles, in size and shape, and they also help the body heal and survive without harming it in any way. There are methods of isolation, and they are actively used, so if human viruses existed, they would be isolated in the same way using these methods. And we would have real photos of isolated viruses (like, for example, we have photos of isolated bacteriophages—viruses of protozoa, such as bacteria—or photos of exosomes) rather than pictures taken with computer graphics or photographs of cell cultures or other unpurified samples. The idea of the virus is just intimidation, imposing faith in the invisible Baba Yaga, which no one has ever seen, but still everyone is very afraid of her. This is the plan of the special operation corona 🤴 19 and this is how they manage to patent viruses. This is a well-known fact, nature (bacteria, viruses) cannot be patented. But if you know that viruses don't exist, then you can patent sars-cov-2, just like J.K. Rowling patented Harry Potter. That is, an idea, a story, a fantasy. And even if you imagine that they could create a virus in a lab that they can't actually do, they still wouldn't do it, they'd just invent it. The laboratory "virus" would be impossible to control. And it is far from a fact that he would behave exactly as they need. His behavior outside the lab would be unpredictable. But a fictional virus is easy to control. A made-up virus will behave exactly as they want. Because they have complete control over it. Biological weapons are not viruses. These are vaccines, toxic medicines, pesticides, chemtrails, fluorine, bromide, heavy metals, gmos, radiation, dangerous electromagnetic radiation, and many other poisons. They already have enough biological weapons. And patients with various diseases, the population is not made by viruses, but by a toxic lifestyle and nutrition, the above biological weapons, which have long poisoned people and the unrealistic level of stress in which everyone lives. Diseases that people suffer from exist, but they are not caused by viruses. And all this has long been proven. Inventing about viruses is certainly brilliant, you can safely continue to poison the population in this paradigm, inject poisonous mixtures into them, put dangerous chemicals in their food, push toxic allopathic drugs, introduce GMOs, pesticides, subsidize McDonald's with taxpayer money, white sugar, sell cigarettes, alcohol, promote air pollution, quietly, while everyone is in quarantine, install health-destroying 5G technology, and expose the population to dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation, which independent studies have shown to be extremely dangerous to all life on earth. As well as constantly misinforming people and putting false information about maintaining health in their heads, which only cripples. And then, when people get sick and die, come up with a new virus that's to blame for it all. No wonder, the word "virus" in Latin means "poison". Because that's what we're constantly dealing with. And why don't people know about it? Back in 2001, it was proved in court in Germany that the HIV virus had never been isolated, and there was no evidence of its existence, and even the Robert Koch institute itself had to admit this in this trial. And similarly, in 2017, Germany's supreme court found that the existence of the measles virus had not been proven. (not to be confused: the existence of the virus that is thought to be responsible for this disease, not measles itself as a phenomenon). And why was this sensational news not on the agenda of all the world's media, such as the current "pandemic caused by a deadly virus"? And because there are people interested in it, a small bunch of psychos of perverts. It is their desires, in fact, that guide governments around the world, implementing a "new normal" that does not promise the world anything normal. They control what information people have in their heads. They want to keep people in constant fear, because only in this way can the population be easily manipulated to achieve its goal. They control access to information. To such an extent that even the virologists and doctors themselves don't understand what they're doing because they don't verify any facts. They just follow the protocol clearly, that's something they're well trained to do. Those of the not many virologists who decided to delve into the essence of the matter, and study this issue thoroughly, stopped calling themselves virologists, because they understood what was really happening. They weren't afraid of losing their careers and money, and they started sharing information with people, educating people about what was really going on. But thanks to the efforts of this small handful, this information has not yet spread widely. But it's starting to go beyond the boundaries they've set, and there's nothing they can do. They are completely powerless. After all, they do not understand one very important thing: if you hide the truth, and bury it in the ground, then it will certainly grow, and acquire such power that one day, it will break out, sweep away, roll into the asphalt a lot of people on its way. We say loudly quite clearly and unequivocally: this gang will no longer be able to use deception under the eternal motto: "this is for your own benefit", to impose its rules on nation-states and the world and take away the law and freedom of people. We just stop giving it away. Truth and information is what will set everyone free. They know this very well and therefore they are in a hurry. They know what will happen to them when the truth makes the population ungovernable. The material is based on a lecture and interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, David Crowe and other wonderful people who make a huge contribution to all of humanity. We are no longer interested in the empty statements of politicians and journalists who do not have medical education and medical licenses to practice. All statements without providing evidence are state biological terrorism and blackmail of the population of nation-states and the world as a whole. Without documents describing any actions, we have nothing to talk about and no one to talk to. What is the problem in providing documentation on the isolation of the virus? Everyone uses the same fraudulent method of selection and does not even try to fulfill the postulates. That is, to prove that what they have is pathogenic. And all of this needs to be exposed. This is a Mega Crime. Exposure is very important. That's the only thing we need to focus on right now. When we had only the 4 studies that are discussed in this analysis, the lockdown was already going on around the world. They served as the ground and justification for causing a lockdown all over the world, tests were developed to diagnose the "virus", which is simply impossible without isolating a viral particle. It was these studies that the WHO and governments around the world relied on when they announced that a new normal was now waiting. The only argument is to provide scientific research on the isolation of sars-cov-2, and this study should use the correct method of isolating particles such as viral particles (and not fraudulent), and all postulates, that is, proof of the pathogenicity of the agent, should be fulfilled. This is the only way to prove that a pathogen exists and causes disease. Any arguments other than the provision of such documents are not arguments. It's just blind denial and lies.
We have heard about the version that viruses do not need to fulfill koch's postulates. And even Koch himself could not fulfill these postulates for some bacterial infections. Let's find out. And let's remember what Koch's postulates are.
Koch's postulates are the only possible sound rules that have been formulated in order to prove that a certain microbial agent causes disease. No other rules can be created, since these are the only logical rules that are only possible. Anything else just won't make any sense. Therefore, Koch's postulates are the gold standard in microbiology. For both viruses and bacteria. These rules cannot be circumvented. Initially, these postulates were formulated by the German professor Henle. Koch changed these rules in an attempt to simplify them, as he simply could not prove that certain bacteria cause certain diseases. He was never able to prove it, precisely because these bacteria simply do not cause these diseases. The causes of these diseases are completely different. Just those in whose interests he acted. Koch, they really wanted us not to know about the true reasons. The postulates of Henle Koch are also slightly altered for viruses, these changes were made by the American professor Rivers. As it stands, they are called rivers criteria. They are almost identical to Koch's postulates, except for some points that are characteristic of viruses. For example, you can't culture a virus in a pure culture like bacteria. Therefore, cell culture is used for viruses, namely the cells of the host-sick person. In order not to create confusion and for simplicity, they usually talk only about Koch's postulates. Therefore, whoever tells you that viruses do not need the postulates to be fulfilled, tells you that viruses do not need their existence and pathogenicity to be proven. Koch's postulates include isolating the virus as the first step, and then it all comes down to the fact that you have to prove the pathogenicity of this agent. No one even tried to prove the pathogenicity of this agent. Because no one singled him out. Without a separate particle, you can't prove anything because the existence of anything is only confirmed after isolation. And they didn't isolate anything, for the simple reason that sars-cov-2 doesn't exist at all. Some opponents may also say that during this time they could already come up with other, new progressive methods of isolating the virus, which are used successfully isolating the virus. Yes, they came up with other methods of selection. It's just that all those methods other than the correct method are fraudulent. With the correct method, many different particles have already been isolated, and viruses are considered particles. Just like exosomes. They are considered absolutely identical to exosomes. It is believed that they have the same weight, size and shape. Exosomes have been isolated many times and over the past 50 years, many scientific studies have come out. If exosomes have been successfully isolated using this method, and other exosome-like particles, why should there be an exception for viruses? There is no exception for viruses. But since viral particles do not exist, and there are only those particles that produce our own cells (exosomes, apoptotic bodies, and others), they certainly cannot follow the correct method. Otherwise, they will not be able to confuse anyone and it will immediately turn out that these particles are absolutely harmless. That's why the opponent is a liar and says they came up with other methods of "highlighting."
This method is called the "cytopathic effect".
They simply take the lung fluid of a sick person, put it in monkey kidney cells, add antibiotics, bovine blood serum, and preservatives. Cells die, and this is called "excretion." There's not a word here about the real highlighting. It is a known fact that antibiotics and foreign blood products are toxic to monkey kidney cells (Vero cells). So they die. This does not prove the presence of the virus or its isolation. Therefore, any methods other than the only correct method are fraudulent. The only possible correct method is the one I described. It is recognized as correct, and this is the gold standard. It's just that the "system" that the plandemies need is the fraudulent methods that are used. Many scientists are not interested in the truth, they are only interested in grants. They're told, single out the virus, get a grant. They do it and take advantage of what is available to them. Available fraud means they will use it. And the fact that their relatives, friends or they themselves suffered a severe flu this year is also not an argument. You're not denying that these people got sick. And only provide data saying that this is not caused by the sars-cov-2 virus. From which they are going to vaccinate the population, for which PCR tests and antibody tests were created back in 2015-16, despite the fact that no one even isolated this virus and did not prove its pathogenicity. "If all this were true, it would be talked about at every corner, and quarantine and all these measures would not be imposed'' - an argument so-so, for suckers. If the government does not act on the basis of real facts, and this is not said in the media, this does not mean that these data are incorrect. Governments run by a gang of manipulators have their own reasons for doing so. If new arguments appear, what will we add to this list. And it is very important to understand that if a person is not ready to perceive this information, then we will not be able to influence his readiness. But by confronting people with the truth, even if they push it away, you irreversibly leave a seed in their minds that will germinate sooner or later. It's only a matter of time. Therefore, the fact that this information gets into people's field of vision, regardless of how they react to it, is very, very powerful. Because the only information that has so far fallen into their field is information from the false media. And when they come across this new information, they will irreversibly begin to concentrate on it, even if, as is usually the case, they will only read the headline. And this concentration, gradually, will become more and more, they will begin to see more and more such information, and believe me, someday there will come such a moment, these people simply will not be able to continue to ignore it. The only thing that is needed to change this world is an iron confidence in our rightness. Therefore, do not fall into despondency from the fact that not all people are ready to see reality. After all, to change this world, we do not need everything. "Make no mistake that a small group of thoughtful and selfless people can change the world. In fact, they were the only ones changing it.' And it's always a small group of people -0.1%.
Once again, Covid-19 (sars-cov-2) does not exist. Covid-19 (sars-cov-2) has never been isolated by anyone, and none of Koch's tenets have been fulfilled for this virus, nor in any of the existing scientific studies. Which means that there is no evidence of its existence. The authors of the studies themselves, which claim that the viral particle was isolated, and they have electronic micrographs of this particle, in response to the question of German journalist Thorsten Engelbrecht, whether their photos really show a purified viral particle sars-cov-2, could not give a positive answer to this. All of them admitted that they did not have an electron micrograph showing a purified virus particle.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are- scientifically-meaningless/)
Here are their answers in more detail:
Study 1: Leo L.M. Poon; Malik Peiris. "The emergence of a new coronavirus that threatens human health" Nature Medicine, March 2020
Author of the answer: Malik Peiris
Date: May 12, 2020
Answer: "The photo shows a virus emerging from an infected cell. But it's not purified virus."
Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. "Identifying Coronavirus Isolated from a Covid-19 Patient in Korea," Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020. Author of the answer: Myung-Guk Han
Date: May 6, 2020
A: "We were unable to assess the degree of purification because we did not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in the cells."
Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al.
"Isolation of the virus from the first patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea", Korean Journal
Medical Science, February 24, 2020
Author of the answer: Wan Beom Park et al.
Date: March 19, 2020
Answer: "We did not receive an electronic microphotography showing the degree
cleanup."
Study 4: Na Zhu et al.
"Novel Coronavirus in Patients with Pneumonia in China", 2019, Medical
New England Magazine, February 20, 2020
Author of the answer: Wenjie Tang
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: "We show an image of settled virus particles, not purified"
That is, if the authors of these studies admit that their published electron micrographs do not show purified viral particles, then this means that they have not been able to isolate and purify these particles. Otherwise, what would prevent them from taking real pictures of the purified virus particles? What exactly they mean when they use the words "cleanup" and "highlighting" is understandable. The methods they use have nothing to do with isolating and purifying a viral particle.
And without isolating and cleaning the viral particle, as well as fulfilling all the other postulates ( such as the introduction of this particle into a healthy body, in order to cause disease, etc.), all statements that the photo is a viral particle, but simply uncleaned - are absurd. These statements have no basis in fact. It's just an assumption, nothing more. It could be anything. These can be exosomes, apoptotic bodies (particles formed in the process of natural cell death) and many other particles that our own cells produce. Some of these particles are produced in response to stress, damage, trauma, poisoning, and other stressors, while other particles are always produced. It can also be particles that produce microorganisms that are part of our microbiome. And you can list for a long time what it can be. But to say that these are viral particles without having absolutely no scientific evidence for this is the same as just voicing what they want to come up with, so that it was, and nothing more. And of course, after all this information, the question arises: If a viral particle has never been isolated, never detected by anyone, then what does the PCR test, as well as the antibody test, which we now almost "must" take, react to? And in China, Xi and Australia, David can even break into your home and force you to take these tests in a compulsory manner. First, the PCR test. Antibody test later. We are told that PCR testing is the "gold standard" in detecting a novel coronavirus infection. And this despite the fact that Carey Mullis himself, the American scientist who invented this technology in 1983, and subsequently received the Nobel Prize for this, said many times that PCR technology could not be a tool for diagnosing infectious diseases, and there was no limit to its perturbation when it began to be used for This. In addition to the fact that PCR tests should not be used as a tool for diagnosing infectious diseases, they also cannot be based on the "gold standard", because the "gold standard" is the isolation and purification of the virus, and its subsequent biochemical characteristic as a single, unique structure. Which in the history of the "Covid-19 pandemic" has not been done. Therefore, the claim that these tests are the "gold standard" is patently false. Contrary to the words of its creator, PCR technology turned into a tool for diagnosing infectious diseases, when suddenly, in 1987, it began to be used as a tool for HIV diagnosis. A virus with which Tony Menge Faust also attached his hands and exactly the same story as with sars-cov-2. After all, the HIV virus has never been isolated and purified. "I repeat, we never purified it" - this phrase belongs to the "discoverer" of HIV and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier (from an interview with journalist Jamel Tahi). And in 1997, in an interview with Continuum magazine, he stated:
"Even after the Roman efforts with electronic micro images of cell cultures(in which HIV was claimed to have first been found), we were unable to detect any viral particles." About HIV, I will write in detail later. Let's get back to our topic.
What is PCR ? Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an experimental method of molecular biology, a method of significantly increasing small concentrations of certain nucleic acid (DNA) fragments in a biological material (sample). That is, first your sample is given for analysis, (in the case of Covid-19 - sputum from the lungs), then, in the laboratory, with the help of enzymes, in artificial conditions (in vitro), there is a multiple doubling of certain sections of DNA. The PCR method simply increases the number of copies of certain sections of DNA (this process is called amplification), so that there are a lot of them, and they can be visually determined. That is, PCR is just a tool to help us "multiply" certain tiny and small fragments of DNA, multiply their number many times, and thereby allow us to study them. In an interview with Swedish journalist Celia Farber, David Crow, a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics, host of the Infectious Myth podcast, and president of the Rethinking AIDS think tank, takes a closer look at the challenges associated with PCR-based tests:
"They use PCR for diagnosis. But really, PCR is a manufacturing technology," Crowe explained. "You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA, and in each cycle that amount doubles, which doesn't sound like much, but if you double 30 times, you'll get about a billion times more material than what you started with. So as a manufacturing technology, that's great.
What they do is attach a fluorescent molecule to RNA as it is produced. You emit light at one wavelength, and you get a response in the form of light sent back at another wavelength. So, they measure the amount of returning light, and this is their surrogate in order to determine the amount of RNA available. "Regarding Carey Mullis (the creator of PCR), Crowe had this to say:
"I'm sad that he's not here so he can protect his production.
Technology. Carey did not invent a medical test. He invented a very powerful production technique, which is abused. What is the true application for PCR? Non-medical diagnostics. That's what Carey always said." We are told that when we take a PCR test, it will, thanks to its ability to multiply and build up genetic material, help us determine whether there are viral DNA in the sample we have donated. And if they are available, then our test will give a positive result. But in order to find viral DNA in this sample, it is necessary to already have a separated and purified viral particle, the genetic material of which (DNA) has been identified and characterized. After all, we need to know what exactly we're looking for, right?PCR technology only works with DNA. But if it is necessary to use RNA, as in the case of sars-cov-2, then it will be converted into DNA using special enzymes. In this case, such a PCR test is called reverse transcription PCR or RT-PCR. That is, the RNA will be converted into DNA, and the test will be able to determine the DNA related to the virus. All this means that those who test us must have already found a viral sequence of RNA, and without the preliminary isolation and purification of the virus itself, they simply cannot have it. We already know that no one has ever isolated or purified the sars-cov-2 virus, and that none of Koch's tenets have been fulfilled. We also know that there simply is no control, viral genetic sequence (RNA) with which to compare the test. And the question arises: what are we being tested for then? What are they trying to find if they don't even know what to look for? And what does a positive PCR test result mean? With such tricky, almost intimate questions, it is worth reading the article, wrote its creator of the sit www.pieceofmindful.com
During his research into the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database for nucleotide (DNA) sequences, he came to a stunning discovery. One of the SEQUENCES of WHO primers in the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 is found in human DNA. The primer is the genetic sequence specified in the test, if detected in your sample, the test will give a positive result. This primer, which the WHO uses, completely coincides with the 8th chromosome of a person. The sequence consisting of 18 symbols "CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTGT" that WHO uses in its PCR testing protocol for sars-cov-2 is identical to the 18-character sequence, the 8th chromosome of a person! Let's take a closer look at this Ethiopian creation on the WHO website and look at their protocol. Oh my god, WHO Ethiopians use a protocol from the Pasteur Institute in Paris:
And now Gen Bank is located on the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) website. It is the storage site for all human genetic sequences found in the Human Genome Project. There is one beautiful page and it describes the 8th human chromosome ( Homo sapiens chromosome 8) and see what we see:
What's the takeaway from this? We can clearly see that they are exactly the same. WHO tests human DNA. And at the same time, they claim that this is the isolated viral DNA. With the help of a PCR test, which the world population is obliged to pass, it is not the sars-cov-2 virus that is looking for it, but for the test subject's own DNA. That's the Ethiopian doctors 🥼 Bill moron. Here's the twist! That is, they lock the population of nation-states and the world for quarantine, take away children, stop the economy, destroy small and medium-sized businesses, plan to introduce mandatory vaccination and "immune passports", make everyone suffocate in masks, spray everything around, including the skin with poisonous antiseptics with a carcinogenic composition, continue to impose curfews, fine people for moving more than 1 km from home or leaving the house without evidence of "vital" (as is happening now in Australia), close the borders, monitor movement and contacts using phones and CCTV cameras, plan to leave all these measures forever and call it the "New Normal", for the simple reason that people are carriers of their own DNA, which they are looking for using a PCR test, in the absence of a virus invented by them. How beautiful and cleverly invented it is! Bravo 🙌 So, the primer sequence that the WHO and the Pasteur Institute use in their protocols completely coincides with the 8th chromosome of a person. And this means that every person passing such a test can get a positive result. It all depends on how much of this genetic material circulates in your sample, and how many cycles of amplification (increase) of the material are set. The more there are, the more likely it is that PCR will create enough copies of this genetic sequence in your sample, to the point where the test can respond to it.
"The first thing that is very important to know about PCR," says David Crowe, "is that the test is not binary (giving a positive or negative result). What they're really doing is that they say that this chosen point is the difference between a positive and a negative outcome." In other words, when you and I get tested, we think that a PCR test, with a positive or negative result, is the same as a pregnancy test. You're pregnant, or you're not pregnant. You have a virus, or you don't have a virus. But that's just the PCR test doesn't work that way. "For example, in one paper," says Crowe, "they use 37 amplification cycles. If you don't get enough fluorescence in 37 cycles, you're considered negative. And in another article, that threshold was 36 cycles. In another article, they couldn't choose between 37 and 40 cycles. I've only seen 2 articles that describe a specific limit of cycles. In the list of test kits approved by the US FDA, one manufacturer recommended the use of 30 cycles, as well as 31, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 39. That's such a huge spread. 40 cycles were the most popular, they were chosen by 12 manufacturers. Another manufacturer has already recommended 43 and 45 cycles. Thus, it is only natural that different hospitals, different regions, countries, Canada and the United States, Italy and France may use different standards of threshold sensitivity of the Covid test. So, if you reduce the number of amplification cycles to 20, all the results will be negative. If you increase their number to 50, all the results will be positive. Therefore, if the government of some country says: "You know, we need to put an end to this epidemic," then they can safely send out an aide-memoire that would say: "We should not have a limit on the 37th cycle. If we put 32, the number of positive test results will drop dramatically. If that's still not enough, well, then 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity of this test." Yes, you read that right. Laboratories can and certainly manipulate the number of "cases" of Covid-19 in their country. Isn't that how the Chinese suddenly got rid of a huge number of "infected"? Not all countries use the WHO testing protocol. Different primers are used in different countries. Some countries use the WHO protocol, some use the protocols of other institutions. But that doesn't change the situation. After all, we don't know where all these other genetic sequences that these institutions use come from. Because, no one isolated and purified the viral particle and no one was able to get RNA out of it. No one ever did. They only looked at a "dirty," unpurified sample, which is a mix of a wide variety of microorganisms and human cells. And for this reason, the genetic sequences that they got out of there can be of human, bacterial or fungal origin. And the fact that without any scientific basis, they call these sequences "viral" is simply criminal. And it becomes obvious that these people pursue their interests under the NWO program. And these interests are clearly not aimed at protecting the health of nations and peoples. Dr. Andrew Kaufman, conducted an analysis of various German PCR testing protocols, and many of the primers in these protocols had 80 to 85% similarity in genetic sequence to specific regions of the human genome. He did not find a complete match, as in the case of the Institut Pasteur and the WHO. "But those enzymes that are used in the PCR test to copy DNA make mistakes," says Andrew Kaufman. - "And the more amplification cycles you run, the more fake signals you get. Because you also increase the "noise", which can be other sequences that partially coincide with the primer (that is, with the genetic sequence specified in the test) and which cannot be determined until you amplify them so many times that the test will respond to them. And it will give you a fake-positive result. "That since we already know for sure that one of the genetic sequences for which we are being tested is an exact copy of the 8th chromosome of a person, and the origin of all the other sequences is not known to us, since the viral particle itself has never been isolated, then we can say with confidence that this test is 100% fake."
There's another important and logical question: They say that when a virus enters the human body it immediately starts making billions and billions of copies of itself in our cells. As a result of this, there can be a hundred thousand virus particles in just one cell. Based on common sense, in a sick person their number should be measured in billions.
In this case, when patients are tested, presumably because of this virus, people, then why use PCR and amplify this sample? These particles would be everywhere, and they would be concentrated in the lungs. Why should we do a PCR test to multiply this material, if a sick person must have so many viral particles that we can determine their DNA, without amplification? Therefore, based on their own false viral theory, all this increase, the multiplication of material, does not make any sense. Or does it still make sense? And this is an artificial creation of "cases of infection" with a non-existent virus. David Crowe described in the literature the case of a woman who was in contact with a sars-cov-2 positive person (in Wuhan), which they believed was an index case. "Because of this, it was important to the alleged chain of infection. They tested it 18 times with a PCR test. 18 different tests. And each time she got a negative result. And then . Because of her epidemiological link to other cases, they said, "We think she's infected." So they had 18 negative tests and they still said she was infected. Why was it so important to them? Well, she was the only person who could theoretically pass on the "virus" to her family. So, four people in her family (including this woman) got sick, with fever, cough, headaches, and fatigue. So, if she can have these symptoms without the virus, then you can say, well, why don't we then explain other people's symptoms with what she had? Could it be caused by increased air pollution, poor nutrition, change of seasons, hypothermia, and other factors, and so they all got sick and it had nothing to do with the coronavirus? But because three out of four had a "positive" test result, all were found to be infected. It's important to understand that they've done a lot of tests. The first person in this family, on the list of people tested, tested positive in 3 of the 11 tests. That is, only 3 tests out of 11 were positive. And of course, all you need to be considered infected is one positive test. They can test you 20 times, and if you only get 1 positive result, then you are infected and go to concentration camps. So, a positive test matters. A negative test - well, let's say not so much."
So, friends, what is the takeaway from all this? We have become not only witnesses, but also unwitting participants in the most massive scam in the entire history of mankind. The purpose of PCR testing is to create fake "cases of infection" with a non-existent virus. As well as a large-scale collection of DNA samples of the population. Knowing all this, would people continue to submit to all this new normality? Of course not. This bunch of mentally deranged people had planned all this for a very long time, but they wouldn't have been able to get such powerful support from people. And they support the people themselves, only because they are deceived. People are deceived from the heels to the head. So many lies... As soon as the truth penetrates into the minds of people, all their plans will be shattered. This plan is only needed to create an NWO in which people will have no place. There will be no room for free people. In their minds, the population is too free, too thinking, asking too many questions and making too many plans. They give birth to too many children. And that scares them all. For them, this is a real threat. Because, those people who "built themselves" only on lies, on fear and on intimidation and suppression of people, are very afraid that they will be thrown off the pyramid on which they climbed. Because to throw them out of there, all you need is the truth. And understanding that in this world, you and I have nothing to fear. And the truth will say just that. That's what they fear more than anything. They understand perfectly well that they disappear, there is no need for any wars, conflicts, no messes and complex scenarios. We just need people to know the truth. That's the only thing you need.
When the truth spreads enough, people will simply stop cooperating with this gang. And without our cooperation, they are nothing. They will disappear instantly. Just dissolve in the air like steam 💨
Okay, it seems that this is not enough, well, let's continue to escalate tensions in the camp of international state biological terrorists. PCR is not looking for a virus because the Covid-19 virus particle (sars-cov-2) has never been isolated and its RNA has not been identified. They just don't have that viral RNA that they claim they're looking for in us with PCR. There is no evidence that at least one of the genetic sequences used in the PCR test is of viral origin. They may be of human origin, as well as one of the billions of microorganisms that are part of the human microbiome. Therefore, absolutely any result of the PCR test for sars-cov-2 is false. We also know for sure: one of the primers in the testing protocols of the WHO and the Pasteur Institute is an exact copy of the 8th chromosome of a person. The NCBI (National Institute of Biotechnology Information) database on which the Human Genome Project is located, where we compared the WHO primer and the 8th chromosome of a person was not randomly deleted.
However, we managed to fix this fact.
The Final Part of Neutralizing Mega Lies
https://telegra.ph/MARATHON-OF-WORLD-LIES-19-part-2-12-13
A photograph taken during a famine in British Bengal that occurred in 1943.
According to various sources, between 1.5 and 4.3 million people died in Bengal during this period.