Lust Influx
![](/file/0aa04defda813d1ef0ac0.gif)
🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Lust Influx
If you haven't already, join our mailing list to receive quarterly articles in your inbox.
In this article, I study one of the methods for countering the influxes in relation to mindful eating. Instructions on proper partaking of food lead me to argue that the employment of mindfulness in contemporary healthcare settings to improve physical and mental health has an antecedent in early Buddhism.
In previous articles in this journal, I studied the three types of feeling ( vedanā ) and their relation to the underlying tendencies ( anusaya ). In what follows, I take up the influxes ( āsava ), another early Buddhist teaching concerned with describing unwholesome influences in the mind. Exploring methods to counter the influxes leads me to a categorization of two types of feeling, which are related to eating.
In early Buddhist thought the influxes, just as the underlying tendencies, carry invariably negative connotations. The destruction of the influxes, āsavakkhaya , is a recurrent epithet for the final goal, and one who has reached that goal is designated as khīṇāsava , one who has destroyed the influxes. Both usages reflect the importance accorded to the removal of the influxes in the early Buddhist soteriological scheme. The discourses regularly mention three type of influxes:
These influxes and the underlying tendencies overlap to some degree in content, since the three influxes listed above are similar to the following three underlying tendencies (out of the standard set of seven):
A difference is that the standard listing of the three influxes speaks just of “sensuality” and “becoming”, whereas the corresponding underlying tendencies concern “lust” or “passion”, rāga , in relation to sensuality and becoming.
In later times a fourth influx was added to the standard set of three, found regularly in the early discourses: the influx of views ( diṭṭhāsava ). This influx also has a counterpart in the standard list of underlying tendencies, the underlying tendency to views ( diṭṭhānusaya ).
Given that the list of influxes does not explicitly reference aversion or anger, it is perhaps unsurprising that the early discourse do not directly relate the influxes to the three types of feeling (which they do with the underlying tendencies).
Nevertheless, a relationship between the influxes and feeling can be seen in the “Discourse on All the Influxes”, the Sabbāsava-sutta (MN 2). This relationship distinguishes feelings into two types. The resultant twofold distinction differs from the usual analysis of feelings into three types, as found, for example, in the instructions on contemplating feelings in the Satipaṭṭhāna-sutta . The distinction in the Sabbāsava-sutta is between “old” and “new” types of feeling.
By way of providing a background to the instructions concerning these two types of feeling, I first survey the main teachings of the discourse on how to counter the influxes.
The Discourse on All the Influxes presents seven methods that, in complementary ways, contribute to progress toward the final goal of eradicating the influxes. The main implications of these seven methods appear to be:
The first of these methods concerns in particular the need to avoid speculations related to self-notions. Instead, one should rather give attention to the four noble truths. This method and its relation to speculative views makes it quite understandable that the influx of views was eventually added to the standard list of three influxes.
The second method, guarding the sense-doors, is of further interest for appreciating the notion of an “influx”. According to the standard instructions for guarding the sense-doors, the task is to avoid the “flowing in”, anvāssavati , of what is detrimental. The verb used here stands in a close etymological relationship to the term āsava , influx.
The description of guarding the sense-doors thus documents that the range of meaning of the term āsava is not confined to the nuance of an “outflow”. Instead, sense-restraint appears to be concerned with avoiding the influence of external factors that adversely affect the mind. Hence the rendering of the term as “influx” seems appropriate for conveying the general sense of influence, whether through external factors or through what originates in the mind.
The third method turns to the requisites of a monastic, which are robes, alms-food, resting place, and medicine, offering advice in relation to each of them. In regard to the requisite of alms-food the two types of feeling are mentioned, which I explore in more detail after having completed my survey of the seven methods.
The fourth method requires that one patiently endures the vicissitudes of climate and various kinds of discomfort; the fifth is about avoiding what is dangerous, such as wild animals and perilous places.
The sixth and seventh methods are concerned with meditative cultivation of the mind, requiring that one overcomes what is unwholesome (sixth) and cultivates the factors of awakening (seventh).
Returning to the third of these seven methods, the Discourse on All the Influxes (MN 2) offers the following reflection for countering the influxes when partaking of food:
Wisely reflecting one partakes of alms-food: not for entertainment, not for intoxication, not for the sake of beautification, and not for becoming attractive, but just for the support and sustenance of this body, for keeping it free of harm and for supporting the celibate life: ‘Thus I terminate old feelings without arousing new feelings, and I will be healthy, blameless, and live at ease.
In this way, even an ordinary activity like eating can be turned into a practice that leads onward to the final goal of full liberation by eradicating the influxes. The task here is mainly to partake of food with the motivation of providing sustenance to the body rather than for the sake of entertaining the taste buds.
The distinction drawn between old and new feelings can be fleshed out with the help of the commentarial exegesis given in the Path to Purification, the Visuddhimagga . According to its explanation, the expression “old feelings” refers to hunger and the reference to “new feelings” concerns discomfort resulting from overeating.
Keeping in mind the situation of a Buddhist monastic in the ancient Indian setting helps appreciate this indication. As wandering mendicants, Buddhist monastics lived in a situation of constant uncertainty of their next meal. One day an abundance of food might be offered, but the next day they might receive very little.
Being prohibited from storing any food overnight, there could naturally be a temptation to stuff oneself and overeat, when occasion allows, in order to suffer less if food on the next day’s begging round should be scarce. Hence the need to beware of creating the new type of feeling that would result if one were to yield to this temptation.
The overall concern of the Discourse on All the Influxes is the monastic path to awakening. This is evident in the reference to “alms-food” in the passage quoted above, and in its mention of living the “celibate life” ( brahmacariya ). This does not mean, however, that the need to know proper measure when eating was not also thematized in instructions given to lay disciples.
An illustrative case can be found in a discourse in the Saṃyutta-nikāya that reports a visit paid by King Pasenadi to the Buddha (SN 3.13; a translation of the discourse can be found below in an appendix). The king had greatly overeaten and was panting. Seeing him in this condition, the Buddha is on record for pronouncing the following verse:
People who are constantly mindful
Know their measure with the food they have gotten.
Their feelings become attenuated;
They age slowly and guard their longevity.
Similar to the food reflection for monastics, the verse refers to feelings. The idea of attenuating feelings can be understood in light of the notion of overcoming old feelings without giving rise to new ones. Taken together, the point appears to be that the reasonable concern to quell feelings of hunger should not get out of hand to the extent that it triggers feelings resulting from overeating.
A significant contribution made by the above verse is the clarification that mindfulness is required. The same would be implicit in the standard food reflection, since the presence of mindfulness could indeed ensure that the body is appropriately sustained, without this becoming an occasion for intoxication.
This requires, as the verse explicitly states, “constant” mindfulness. If mindfulness is continuously present during the meal, we will indeed notice clearly when our measure has been reached, when we had enough and it is time to stop eating further. Moreover, a fairly constant presence of mindfulness will also help ensure that we chew properly, instead of gulping down the food and reaching out for the next spoonful before the present one has been properly assimilated.
Noteworthy is the overarching concern in the verse with this-worldly benefits. Even though King Pasenadi was a disciple of the Buddha, the verse does not refer to the central doctrinal teachings of early Buddhism, nor does it evince a clear-cut and explicit relationship to progress to awakening (unlike the food reflection in the Discourse on All the Influxes). Instead, here the central purpose of mindfulness practice is quite clearly an improvement of health.
The Saṃyutta-nikāya discourse continues after the above verse by reporting that Pasenadi offered a regular payment to a young man, present on this occasion, asking him to memorize this verse and recite it every time the king took his meal. As a result of being regularly reminded of the advantages of mindful eating, the king gradually lost weight and expressed his indebtedness to the Buddha for benefitting him in the present as well as in the future.
In this way, the Buddha’s verse on establishing mindfulness to counter overeating successfully brought about a weight-reduction in King Pasenadi.
This Pāli discourse has two Chinese Āgama parallels that proceed similarly. A minor difference concerning the verse spoken by the Buddha is that, instead of a reference to aging slowly, the two Chinese parallels mention good digestion as an outcome to be expected from mindful eating. In fact the term jīrati in the verse can mean either “to age” or “to digest”, so that this difference is probably merely one of interpretation.
The discourse to King Pasenadi shows that already in the ancient Indian setting instructions on mindfulness were delivered with a clear aim at mundane health benefits. Not only is the Buddha on record for devising a Mindfulness-Based Intervention to reduce overeating that successfully achieves weight-reduction, the narrative even involves a mindfulness-trainer who receives regular payment for delivering instructions in this Mindfulness-Based Intervention. This episode, in the way it has been documented in the early discourses, provides a precedent for contemporary Mindfulness-Based Interventions that are similarly concerned with health-benefits.
Needless to say, weight-reduction is only a marginal aspect of mindfulness in early Buddhist thought. The overarching concern of mindfulness practices is indeed for the sake of progress to liberation. As the presentation in the Discourse on All the Influxes shows, the whole topic of eating (in this discourse not even related to weight reduction) is only a single aspect of one of the seven methods to counter the influxes.
The marginality of the role of mindfulness in this respect may well be why, to the best of my knowledge, the implications of the instructions to King Pasenadi have so far not received the attention they deserve.
The discovery of this antecedent to current mindfulness-based interventions puts into perspective a fairly common impression that the contemporary employment of mindfulness for health care involves a radical departure from Buddhist thought, perhaps even a misappropriation of religious thought for secular purposes.
For example, in his ground-breaking monograph on different aspects of the contemporary spread of mindfulness in secular settings, Mindful America , Jeff Wilson argues that:
The teachings set forth in the new Western literature on mindful eating represent a radically new application of Buddhism (though it is usually presented as if it were traditional).
Such impression and similar criticisms are quite understandable, particularly in view of some of the undesirable developments that have resulted from the current mindfulness-hype. However, as far as authentic interventions in a clinical setting, in education, etc., are concerned, the instruction to King Pasenadi should help to allay such suspicions. The verse on mindful eating and its effect would make it clear that it is in line with what the texts convey to have been the Buddha’s own attitude if mindfulness is employed in such a manner.
Know their measure with the food they have gotten.
They age slowly and guard their longevity.”
Now at that time the brahmin youth Sudassana was standing behind King Pasenadi of Kosala. Then King Pasenadi of Kosala said to the brahmin youth Sudassana: “Come, my dear Sudassana, memorize this verse in the presence of the Blessed One and recite it to me when my meal is served. I will arrange for a hundred coins as a perpetual daily grant to be given to you.”
The brahmin youth Sudassana said “Yes, your majesty” in assent to King Pasenadi Kosala, memorized this verse in the presence of the Blessed One, and recited it when a meal was served to King Pasenadi of Kosala:
Know their measure with the food they have gotten.
They age slowly and guard their longevity.”
Then King Pasenadi of Kosala gradually established himself in taking no more than a normal measure of rice. Then, at another time when his body had become slim, King Pasenadi of Kosala stroked his limbs with his hands and on that occasion uttered this inspired utterance: “For both purposes the Blessed One has had compassion for me: for the purpose of the present and the future.
A pdf version of this article with diacritics and annotation can be downloaded here .
If you found this article helpful, please consider supporting the work of BCBS .
Science in the News
Opening the lines of communication between research scientists and the wider community
SITN Facebook Page
SITN Twitter Feed
SITN Instagram Page
SITN Lectures on YouTube
SITN Podcast on SoundCloud
Subscribe to the SITN Mailing List
SITN Website RSS Feed
by Katherine Wu
figures by Tito Adhikary
In 1993, Haddaway asked the world, “ What is Love? ” I’m not sure if he ever got his answer – but today, you can have yours.
Scientists in fields ranging from anthropology to neuroscience have been asking this same question (albeit less eloquently) for decades. It turns out the science behind love is both simpler and more complex than we might think.
Google the phrase “biology of love” and you’ll get answers that run the gamut of accuracy. Needless to say, the scientific basis of love is often sensationalized, and as with most science, we don’t know enough to draw firm conclusions about every piece of the puzzle. What we do know, however, is that much of love can be explained by chemistry. So, if there’s really a “formula” for love, what is it, and what does it mean?
Think of the last time you ran into someone you find attractive. You may have stammered, your palms may have sweated; you may have said something incredibly asinine and tripped spectacularly while trying to saunter away (or is that just me?). And chances are, your heart was thudding in your chest. It’s no surprise that, for centuries, people thought love (and most other emotions, for that matter) arose from the heart. As it turns out, love is all about the brain – which, in turn, makes the rest of your body go haywire.
According to a team of scientists led by Dr. Helen Fisher at Rutgers, romantic love can be broken down into three categories : lust, attraction, and attachment. Each category is characterized by its own set of hormones stemming from the brain (Table 1).
Lust is driven by the desire for sexual gratification. The evolutionary basis for this stems from our need to reproduce, a need shared among all living things. Through reproduction, organisms pass on their genes, and thus contribute to the perpetuation of their species.
The hypothalamus of the brain plays a big role in this, stimulating the production of the sex hormones testosterone and estrogen from the testes and ovaries (Figure 1). While these chemicals are often stereotyped as being “male” and “female,” respectively, both play a role in men and women. As it turns out, testosterone increases libido in just about everyone. The effects are less pronounced with estrogen, but some women report being more sexually motivated around the time they ovulate, when estrogen levels are highest.
Meanwhile, attraction seems to be a distinct, though closely related, phenomenon. While we can certainly lust for someone we are attracted to, and vice versa, one can happen without the other. Attraction involves the brain pathways that control “reward” behavior (Figure 1), which partly explains why the first few weeks or months of a relationship can be so exhilarating and even all-consuming.
Dopamine , produced by the hypothalamus, is a particularly well-publicized player in the brain’s reward pathway – it’s released when we do things that feel good to us. In this case, these things include spending time with loved ones and having sex. High levels of dopamine and a related hormone, norepinephrine , are released during attraction. These chemicals make us giddy, energetic, and euphoric, even leading to decreased appetite and insomnia – which means you actually can be so “in love” that you can’t eat and can’t sleep. In fact, norepinephrine, also known as noradrenalin, may sound familiar because it plays a large role in the fight or flight response, which kicks into high gear when we’re stressed and keeps us alert. Brain scans of people in love have actually shown that the primary “reward” centers of the brain, including the ventral tegmental area and the caudate nucleus, fire like crazy when people are shown a photo of someone they are intensely attracted to, compared to when they are shown someone they feel neutral towards (like an old high school acquaintance).
Finally, attraction seems to lead to a reduction in serotonin , a hormone that’s known to be involved in appetite and mood. Interestingly, people who suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder also have low levels of serotonin, leading scientists to speculate that this is what underlies the overpowering infatuation that characterizes the beginning stages of love.
Last but not least, attachment is the predominant factor in long-term relationships. While lust and attraction are pretty much exclusive to romantic entanglements, attachment mediates friendships, parent-infant bonding, social cordiality, and many other intimacies as well. The two primary hormones here appear to be oxytocin and vasopressin (Figure 1).
Oxytocin is often nicknamed “cuddle hormone” for this reason. Like dopamine, oxytocin is produced by the hypothalamus and released in large quantities during sex, breastfeeding, and childbirth. This may seem like a very strange assortment of activities – not all of which are necessarily enjoyable – but the common factor here is that all of these events are precursors to bonding. It also makes it pretty clear why having separate areas for attachment, lust, and attraction is important: we are attached to o
Hentai Scoobydoo
Homemadevideos Com
Xtapes.Tv