Lolita Teen Pthc

Lolita Teen Pthc

Новосибирск красавицы Сибири
Novosibirsk’s Siberian Beauties

Маяк засекреченная ядерная катастрофа
Mayak: The Secret Nuclear Catastrophe

Таргиз поликлиника на рельсах
Targiz: A Hospital on Rails

Anna Yuzhakova takes her laptop computer with her to the restaurant car. She wants to show her international visitor the many charms of Siberian beauties. They are the result, she says, of years of mixed marriages by citizens from different republics of the former Soviet Union.
Anna is a scout. She discovers new talents for the Noah Models agency in St. Petersburg.
She is herself a former model. Four times a year she crosses her native region by train searching for the next top models, the ones who will one day strut the catwalks of Paris or New York.
Her travelling companion, Stephane Hababou, watches the photos of would-be models scroll across the screen. He’s also a scout. He represents the prestigious Marilyn agency in Paris.
It’s his first trip to Siberia. Hababou says it’s the best way for him to find new prospects ahead of his competition.
There’s not a moment to waste. Anna and Stephane stop in every large city of the region, holding a casting call that is open to all.
About 50 teen girls in black undergarments and stiletto heels greet Anna and Stephane at every stop. Some move nervously. Others proudly show off their curves.
The presence of this visitor from Paris ramps up the pressure. Everyone knows Hababou holds the key to a possible career abroad. It’s an opportunity to follow both an American and French dream, a chance to escape the daily drudgery of life in Siberia.
Anna invites Marina Korotkova to step forward. The 17-year-old barely has the time to take two steps before a cutting remark welcomes her into the world of modelling, even if pronounced under the guise of humour. “Marina is a little overweight.” At 93 centimetres, her hips are too wide. The visitors still take a few photos and recommend she go on a diet.
Russia’s largest modelling school is in Novosibirsk. It’s a unique breeding ground for girls who start training as early as age 10 or 12. They learn fashion photography techniques and how to sway their hips on a catwalk.
Fifteen-year-old Kristina Churina, a recent graduate, catches Stephane Hababou’s eye. If she loses a little weight, she could end up in Paris within the year, modeling the creations of top designers.
But few are chosen. Anna selects about 30 young women during each of her Siberian scouting trips. Only a fraction of them will ever end up with real modelling careers.
To be ready to seize the opportunity if presented with it, Kristina has been taking intensive English courses. She also has a plan B. She’s studying tourism and hopes to one day manage a large hotel.
Anna Yuzhakova takes her laptop computer with her to the restaurant car. She wants to show her international visitor the many charms of Siberian beauties. They are the result, she says, of years of mixed marriages by citizens from different republics of the former Soviet Union.
Anna is a scout. She discovers new talents for the Noah Models agency in St. Petersburg.
She is herself a former model. Four times a year she crosses her native region by train searching for the next top models, the ones who will one day strut the catwalks of Paris or New York.
Her travelling companion, Stephane Hababou, watches the photos of would-be models scroll across the screen. He’s also a scout. He represents the prestigious Marilyn agency in Paris.
It’s his first trip to Siberia. Hababou says it’s the best way for him to find new prospects ahead of his competition.
There’s not a moment to waste. Anna and Stephane stop in every large city of the region, holding a casting call that is open to all.
About 50 teen girls in black undergarments and stiletto heels greet Anna and Stephane at every stop. Some move nervously. Others proudly show off their curves.
The presence of this visitor from Paris ramps up the pressure. Everyone knows Hababou holds the key to a possible career abroad. It’s an opportunity to follow both an American and French dream, a chance to escape the daily drudgery of life in Siberia.
Anna invites Marina Korotkova to step forward. The 17-year-old barely has the time to take two steps before a cutting remark welcomes her into the world of modelling, even if pronounced under the guise of humour. “Marina is a little overweight.” At 93 centimetres, her hips are too wide. The visitors still take a few photos and recommend she go on a diet.
Russia’s largest modelling school is in Novosibirsk. It’s a unique breeding ground for girls who start training as early as age 10 or 12. They learn fashion photography techniques and how to sway their hips on a catwalk.
Fifteen-year-old Kristina Churina, a recent graduate, catches Stephane Hababou’s eye. If she loses a little weight, she could end up in Paris within the year, modeling the creations of top designers.
But few are chosen. Anna selects about 30 young women during each of her Siberian scouting trips. Only a fraction of them will ever end up with real modelling careers.
To be ready to seize the opportunity if presented with it, Kristina has been taking intensive English courses. She also has a plan B. She’s studying tourism and hopes to one day manage a large hotel.
Siberia is known around the world for its frigid temperatures. But in the world of fashion, the region is famous for being home to the most beautiful women in the world.
The measuring tape is king. Minimum height: 172 centimetres (5 feet, 6 inches). Maximum hips: 90 centimetres (35.4 inches).
Casting calls are open to all and attract about 60 hopeful young women every time they are held.
The measuring tape is unforgiving. With hips measuring 93 centimetres (36.6 inches), Marina Korotkova is considered “a little fat.”
Stephane Hababou, from the Marilyn agency in Paris, has come to Siberia to find the most promising beauties before his rivals do.
Anna Yuzhakova (centre), herself a former model, visits Siberia four times a year on behalf of the Noah modeling agency in St. Petersburg.
Anna discovers 30 to 40 fresh and interesting faces every month.
Anastasia Akhmameteva catches the eye of Stephane Hababou. Her ticket to Paris is within reach.
For the ones left behind, the rejection is often brutal.
15-year-old Kristina Churina just graduated from Novosibirsk’s modelling school and has caught the attention of the Paris agency.
But Stephane Hababou hesitates about Kristina: “If she loses weight, we’ll see see how she changes.”
Siberia is considered a modelling reservoir, thanks to ethnic mixing.
A little powder, and barely pubescent girls turn into femmes fatales.
A fashion show after the casting call allows scouts to observe the models in real conditions.
For many young women from small villages, modelling offers a chance to travel and earn a lot of money.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

^ " Pre-trial preparation in computer child pornography cases: combating the watering down of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in state prosecutions , Ian Friedman, The Vindicator, 12.09.2005

^ See, e.g., R. v. Sharpe

^ What's obscene in Canada?

^ US judge rules The Tin Drum is not child pornography , David Walsh, 23 October 1998, downloaded 22 April 2007

^ Jones, L., and Finkelhor, D. (2001). The Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases . Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

^ Dunne, Purdie, Cook, Boyle, & Najman (2003). "Is Child Sexual Abuse Declining? Evidence from a Population-Based Survey of Men and Women in Australia," Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal , 27(2):141-52

^ "Internet porn 'increasing child abuse' " . Guardian Unlimited (in English ). Guardian News and Media Limited. 2004-01-12 . Retrieved 2007-06-01 . Demand for child pornography on the internet has led to an increase in sex abuse cases, {{ cite news }} : CS1 maint: unrecognized language ( link )

^ DCSF: Referrals, Assessments and Children and Young People who are the subject of a Child Protection Plan or are on Child Protection Registers, England - Year ending 31 March 2007

Discussion of the ArbCom pedophile userbox case and its repercussions for pedophiles editing Wikipedia

PetraSchelm , not to digress, but I would like to inquire into your interesting observation - so, in your opinion, pedophiles should now, all of a sudden, have a say in pedophilia-related articles? How intriguing... Well, unfortunately, ArbCom disagrees with you, whether justly or not, because self-identifying as a pedophile has been established as a sure way for an editor to get premablocked. If that's not a way to "suppress the views of pedophiles here on Wikipedia," I don't know what is. Not to say that the ArbCom is fully justified in its conduct. Would you now like to contest the ArbCom's approach? ~ Homologeo ( talk ) 21:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
Pedophiles are not and have never been blocked from editing wikipedia. Nor are murderers or any kind of convicted criminals blocked from editing wikipedia, nor a re rascists or anybody of any class, colour or creed. That is stating the obvious and arbcom have never said differently21:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC). Thanks, SqueakBox
Well, I pretty sure ArbCom members and other admins that decided to block editors for self-identifying as pedophiles or for editing in a manner deemed sympathetic to pedophiles or PPAs would disagree with you. Besides, precedent has already brought this type of blocking almost to a level of uncontested procedure by admins. ~ Homologeo ( talk ) 21:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
No they would not disagree with me. Dcmdevit said the same thing the other day. We block editors for self-identifying as pedophiles and for POV pushing pedophile beliefs but we most certainly do not block anybody for "being" a pedophile. If someone knew that another editor, who edited only sports articles and had only self-identified as loving cricket , was in fact a convicted pedophile he could not use that knowledge to see the editor blocked. this is self-evident. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
If this is how you regard the situation, then there's probably little I can say to change your mind. However, there's been plenty of cases where editors were blocked for supposedly simply "being" pedophiles or PPAs, having been deemed to be such by others, or for having edited in a manner that was said to reflect sympathy for pedophiles or PPAs. Of course, you'll deny that anything of this nature has happened, but I really don't think this disagreement of ours will lead anywhere productive anyways. ~ Homologeo ( talk ) 21:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]
These editors were not editing on cricket or box jellyfish, though, they were editing the pedophile articles and appeared to have an agenda, its totally different. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

^ Cite error: The named reference Onlinepred was invoked but never defined (see the help page ).
^ Jump up to: a b Hobbs, Christopher James (1999). Child Abuse and Neglect: A Clinician's Handbook . Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 328. ISBN 0443058962 . Child pornography is part of the violent continuum of child sexual abuse {{ cite book }} : Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored ( |author= suggested) ( help )

^ Jump up to: a b c d e Cite error: The named reference doj1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page ).

This is an area of massive international importance, and yet this entire article is basically unreadable. I'd like to see some ways police around the world are combating this, some famous cases, and maybe some historical perspective.

Can someone please step up to the plate and clean up this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.173.234 ( talk ) 22:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Titsocus of the picture or video lewd. There was a US case where a man order a japan video of a 13ish girl, dress, but the camera zoomed in to her as she stoof there. it's a major reference case, any lawyer would know it.

a later line, "Operation Cathedral that resulted in multi-national arrests and 7 convictions as well as uncovering 750,000 images with 1,200 unique identifiable faces being distributed over the web" what is never address, is the lack, of "proof" they state how many identifiable faces there are, but they don't state how many unknowns there are. Newspapers never want to cover a store about a person being charged with images of child porn, let there is no child.

Collection by pedophiles, let's make "people who look at picture weird-o's" what lets look at the world, (if wiki is a even playing field) from http://www.coolnurse.com/teen_pregnancy_rates.htm ,

Fact: One million teens in the USA will become pregnant over the next twelve months. Ninety-five percent of those pregnancies are unintended. About one third will end in abortion; one third will end in spontaneous miscarriage; and one third will continue their pregnancy to term and keep their baby.

that's means while we go after a few 100 people for looking at images, we as america have 500,000 minors getting laid and knocked up. Why don't the police find out who the father is? there are child porn case of teenages, minors who get arrrested and changed with child porn.

MY PERSONAL NOTE: i think child porn(and for sure child having sex) should be illegal! but normally child porn is illegal because the "rights and protection" of the child, yet to me hollywood is no different in the breaking of a childs rights.

Cases: i can get frommy lawyer, many legal issues/cases. I've seen the tanner scale be used, and I know the standard process of how images on your computer are determed to be child porn, and that allow would scare anyone. I've also seen cases of being being changed with child porn, when they had main stream porn. I know a few porn stars who went to court for a person arrested on child porn to prove that they where 18 or older. Yet no one wants to "fix" the legal issues of something like this, because then they seem like pro-child porn.
FyiFoff —Preceding comment was added at 22:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Is computer generated/illustrated/animated work illegal, or is it not because it involves the exploitation of no minors? What about acts that say that an adult is a minor for the work's purpose?

Here are some bits that didn't fit anywhere: with a little more work, this could become another section in the main article.

I have added a relevant link to a relevant site, as well as expert opinion on the simulated porn aspect to the article. See diff . However an anonymous user 69.3.235.56 and user User:Doc Tropics removed these additions, describing them as "spam", "unsourced POV and linkspam". This is clearly and obviously untrue.

The following text was inserted in the "Simulated porn" section:

User:Doc Tropics says it's unsourced, but it is nonsense, because that text itself is a refernce to a source! He says it's POV, but it's a sourced expert statement and thus doesn't meet the Wikipedia definition of POV. He says it's link spam, but it's a nonsensical claim, because it's a reference to a sourced statement which is directly relevant to the subject under discussion!

I also added a link section "Legal support" and a link to:

The description was copied from the linked site. I simply don't see how a law firm working specifically with this type of cases can be irrelevant to the article, considering that they provide links to articles in law journals discussing this subject.

I would like to see the explanations for these deletions, because I simply don't understand the justification and how they may add to the quality of the article... Paranoid 17:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Paranoid's right about one thing - many items in the link section are non-encyclopedic. It could use a thorough culling. Dan B † Dan D 18:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I don't think that we will be able to find a reliable source for the claims of availability of child pornography involving amateurs or very young children, since any source that would typically be considered "reliable" would be unwilling to confirm this in the interest of legality. Would it not be better to simply use a phrase such as "It is said that" and remove the citation needed tags? 'Net 02:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The archive needs to be kept on top of here. As well as the sigs. A lot of posts here were unsigned and the unsigned ones were quite old. As well a lot of old talk was missed in the last archiving. I've archived up to all but the last couple discussions and some notes I couldn't easily date.-- Crossmr 03:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I believe this site was taken down as part of some latest operations in the US. I thought it used to have an article here, but I can't find it. The servers are no longer responding and I read a story about a "vague" network of sites that were taken down which contained young girls in sexually suggestive poses but not nude. It was based in Florida. Claim is being made that even without nudity it is child porn. Once more details come out it should be considered adding to the article.-- Crossmr 03:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Here is the story here [1] -- Crossmr 18:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Maybe that's about as good as you can make it, but what of the rather bizarre peculiarlities of western television advertising? One is tempted to amend the last sentence as follows:

Why do marketers get this seemingly outrageous exception, and should Wiki articles point it out? Just wondering. Parsiferon 22:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

What dispute? Hasn't it been resolved? (I thought?) Colonel Marksman 04:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

This article is one big POV. It describes in the main the societal opinion about this scourge. A supreme court justice of the United States admitted his inability to define pornography, but said he "knew it when he saw it." This article is a failure, because it fails to define its subject, and doesn't show it either. The visitor from another planet who would seem to be the target audience for this article would go away scratching his head (provided he had one).
69.140.95.53 ( talk ) 03:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

PLEASE NOTE : User Kirbytime who started this section was warned and blocked for repeatedly requesting inappropriate pictures. See: User_talk:Kirbytime#Blocked_for_48_hour
PLEASE NOTE : User Kirbytime who started this section is now banned indefinitly. See: User_talk:Kirbytime#Blocked_indefinitly

Of course, given the delicacy of the subject, proper care should be taken. But such a large article should have at least some pictures of examples of child pornography, at least partially obscured. -- Ķĩřβȳ ♥ Ťįɱé Ø 09:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Kirby, You are one sick fucker. May you rot in hell. <---- EPIC LOL

Look, I think that the pics on the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse article would be much worse than any sanitized kiddie porn in this article, so why not? Do you honestly think that a person who is looking for kiddie porn would search Wikipedia? ...err never mind about that. And actually you're wrong about the collection of fetish pornogra
Private Var Mobile Applications
Xxx Lolitas Porn Images
D Va Overwatch

Lolita Teen Pthc

Report Page