Little Teen Porn 14.15

Little Teen Porn 14.15

Dashboard
Publications
Account settings
Log out

Journal List

PLoS One

PMC4558040

Published online 2015 Sep 2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133079
Nicole Prause , #
1
, * Jaymie Park ,
1
,
‡
Shannon Leung ,
1
,
‡
and Geoffrey Miller #
2

1
Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

2
Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico; Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.
Received 2015 Feb 11; Accepted 2015 Jun 22.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Preference for larger penis in one-time relative to long-term relationships.
1.
Tiggemann M, Martins Y, Churchett L. Beyond muscles: Unexplored parts of men's body image . Journal of Health Psychology . 2008; 13 ( 8 ):1163–72. 10.1177/1359105308095971
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
2.
Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the Definition of Micropenis Vary According to Ethnicity?
Hormone Research in Paediatrics . 2001; 55 ( 6 ):278–81. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
3.
Choi IH, Kim KH, Jung H, Yoon SJ, Kim SW, Kim TB. Second to fourth digit ratio: a predictor of adult penile length . Asian Journal of Andrology . 2011; 13 :710–4. 10.1038/aja.2011.75
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
4.
Shalaby ME, Almohsen AERM, El Shahid AR, Abd Al-Sameaa MT, Mostafa T. Penile length—somatometric parameters relationship in healthy Egyptian men . Andrologia . 2014:n/a–n/a. 10.1111/and.12275
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
5.
Siminoski K, Bain J. The relationships among height, penile length, and foot size . Annals of Sex Research . 1993; 6 ( 3 ):231–5. 10.1007/bf00849563
[ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
6.
Ponchietti R, Mondaini N, Bonafe M, Di Loro F, Biscioni S, Masieri L. Penile length and circumference: a study on 3,300 young Italian males . European urology . 2001; 39 ( 2 ):183–6. Epub 2001/02/27. 52434. . [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
7.
Soylemez H, Atar M, Sancaktutar AA, Penbegul N, Bozkurt Y, Onem K. Relationship between penile size and somatometric parameters in 2276 healthy young men . Int J Impot Res . 2012; 24 ( 3 ):126–9. 10.1038/ijir.2011.53
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
8.
Shah J, Christopher N. Can shoe size predict penile length?
BJU International . 2002; 90 ( 6 ):586–7. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02974.x
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
9.
Schneider T, Sperling H, Lümmen G, Syllwasschy J, Rübben H. Does penile size in younger men cause problems in condom use? a prospective measurement of penile dimensions in 111 young and 32 older men . Urology . 2001; 57 ( 2 ):314–8. 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00925-0.
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
10.
Johnston L, McLellan T, McKinlay A. (Perceived) Size really does matter: Male dissatisfaction with penis size . Psychology of Men and Masculinity . 2014; 15 ( 2 ):225–8. [ Google Scholar ]
11.
Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Does exposure to sexually explicit Internet material increase body dissatisfaction? A longitudinal study . Computers in Human Behavior . 2014; 36 ( 0 ):297–307. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.071. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
12.
Kvalem IL, Træen B, Lewin B, Štulhofer A. Self-perceived effects of Internet pornography use, genital appearance satisfaction, and sexual self-esteem among young Scandinavian adults . Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace . 2014; 8 ( 4 ). 10.5817/CP2014-4-4
[ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
13.
Veale D, Eshkevari E, Read J, Miles S, Troglia A, Phillips R, et al.
Beliefs about Penis Size: Validation of a Scale for Men Ashamed about Their Penis Size . The Journal Of Sexual Medicine . 2014; 11 ( 1 ):84–92. 10.1111/jsm.12294
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
14.
Nabil N, Hosny H, Kadah A, Shamloul R. Evaluation of Surgical Outcome of Penile Augmentation and Lengthening Procedures . Urologia internationalis . 2013; 90 ( 4 ):465–9. 10.1159/000347044
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
15.
Kang D, Chung J, Kim Y, Lee H, Cho S, Chang T, et al.
Efficacy and Safety of Penile Girth Enhancement by Autologous Fat Injection for Patients with Thin Penises . Aesth Plast Surg . 2012; 36 ( 4 ):813–8. 10.1007/s00266-012-9891-4
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
16.
Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, Muir GH, Natali A, Di Loro F, et al.
Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures . International Journal of Impotence Research . 2002; 14 ( 4 ):283. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
17.
Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. The Development and Validation of the Male Genital Self-Image Scale: Results from a Nationally Representative Probability Sample of Men in the United States . The Journal Of Sexual Medicine . 2013; 10 ( 6 ):1516–25. 10.1111/jsm.12124
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
18.
Althof SE, Cappelleri JC, Shpilsky A, Stecher V, Diuguid C, Sweeney M, et al.
Treatment responsiveness of the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in erectile dysfunction . Urology . 2003; 61 ( 5 ):888–92. Epub 2003/05/09. . [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
19.
Lawrance K-A, Byers ES. Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction . Personal Relationships . 1995; 2 ( 4 ):267–85. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
[ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
20.
Li NP, Kenrick DT. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . 2006; 90 ( 5 ):468–89. Epub 3. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
21.
Royer HR, Falk EC, Heidrich SM. Genital Herpes Beliefs: Implications for Sexual Health . Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology . 2013; 26 ( 2 ):109–16. 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.11.007. 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.11.007
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
22.
Jonason PK, Li NP, Richardson J. Positioning the Booty-Call Relationship on the Spectrum of Relationships: Sexual but More Emotional Than One-Night Stands . The journal of sex research . 2010; 48 ( 5 ):486–95. 10.1080/00224499.2010.497984
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
23.
Kissinger P, White S, Schmidt N, Taylor SN, Mena L, Lillis R, et al.
O07.1 Sexual Relationship Importance and Condom Use Among Men Attending STD Clinics in Two Southern Cities in the United States . Sexually transmitted infections . 2013; 89 ( Suppl 1 ):A38
10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.0119
[ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
24.
Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings . Psychological Bulletin . 2001; 127 ( 2 ):267–86.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
25.
Zink T, Fargo JD, Baker RB, Buschur C, Fisher BS, Sommers MS. Comparison of Methods for Identifying Ano-Genital Injury After Consensual Intercourse . The Journal of Emergency Medicine . 2010; 39 ( 1 ):113–8. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.08.024. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.08.024
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
26.
Anderson SL, Parker BJ, Bourguignon CM. Changes in genital injury patterns over time in women after consensual intercourse . Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine . 2008; 15 ( 5 ):306–11. 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.12.007. 10.1016/j.jflm.2007.12.007
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
27.
Johnston L, McLellan T, McKinlay A. (Perceived) Size Really Does Matter: Male Dissatisfaction With Penis Size . Psychology of Men & Masculinity . 2014:No Pagination Specified. [ Google Scholar ]
28.
Fisher WA, Branscombe NR, Lemery CR. The bigger the better? Arousal and attributional responses to erotic stimuli that depict different size penises . The journal of sex research . 1983; 19 ( 4 ):377–96. 10.1080/00224498309551199
[ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
29.
Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion . Nature . 2002; 415 ( 6870 ):429–33.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
30.
Dixson BJ, Dixson AF, Li B, Anderson MJ. Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China . American Journal of Human Biology . 2007; 19 ( 1 ):88–95. 10.1002/ajhb.20584
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
31.
Mautz BS, Wong BBM, Peters RA, Jennions MD. Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2013.
10.1073/pnas.1219361110
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
32.
Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile Length in the Flaccid and Erect States: Guidelines for Penile Augmentation . The Journal Of Urology . 1996; 156 ( 3 ):995–7. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65682-9.
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
33.
Sengezer M, Öztürk S, DevecI M. Accurate Method for Determining Functional Penile Length in Turkish Young Men . Annals of Plastic Surgery . 2002; 48 ( 4 ):381–5.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
34.
Awwad Z, Abu-Hijleh M, Basri S, Shegam N, Murshidi M, Ajlouni K. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction . Int J Impot Res . 2004; 17 ( 2 ):191–5. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
35.
Furr KD. Penis size and magnitude of erectile change as spurious factors in estimating sexual arousal . Annals of Sex Research . 1991; 4 ( 3–4 ):265–79. 1992-43496-001 0843–4611,4,3–4,265–279,1991. [ Google Scholar ]
36.
Udelson D, Park K, Sadeghi-Najed H, Salimpour P, Krane RJ, Goldstein I. Axial penile buckling forces vs Rigiscan radial rigidity as a function of intracavernosal pressure: Why Rigiscan does not predict functional erections in individual patients . International Journal of Impotence Research . 2000; 11 :327–39. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
37.
Gaißert N, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH. Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans . Journal of Vision . 2010; 10 ( 11 ). 10.1167/10.11.2
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
38.
Wallraven C, Bülthoff H, Waterkamp S, van Dam L, Gaißert N. The eyes grasp, the hands see: Metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review . 2014; 21 ( 4 ):976–85. 10.3758/s13423-013-0563-4
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
39.
Yildirim I, Jacobs RA. Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: Experimental and computational studies . Cognition . 2013; 126 ( 2 ):135–48. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.005. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.005
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
40.
Lawson R. Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts . Atten Percept Psychophys . 2014; 76 ( 2 ):541–58. 10.3758/s13414-013-0559-1
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
41.
Wallraven C. Touching on face space: Comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review . 2014; 21 ( 4 ):995–1002. 10.3758/s13423-013-0577-y
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
42.
Gaißert N, Waterkamp S, Fleming RW, Bülthoff I. Haptic Categorical Perception of Shape . PLoS One . 2012; 7 ( 8 ):e43062
10.1371/journal.pone.0043062
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
43.
Norman JF, Kappers AL, Beers A, Scott AK, Norman H, Koenderink J. Aging and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape . Atten Percept Psychophys . 2011; 73 ( 3 ):908–18. 10.3758/s13414-010-0053-y
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
44.
Khan S, Somani B, Lam W, Donat R. Establishing a reference range for penile length in Caucasian British men: a prospective study of 609 men . BJU International . 2012; 109 ( 5 ):740–4. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10338.x
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
45.
Gebhard P, Johnson AB. The Kinsey data: marginal tabulations of the 1938–1963 interviews . Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1979. [ Google Scholar ]
46.
Brody S, Weiss P. Vaginal Orgasm Is Associated with Vaginal (Not Clitoral) Sex Education, Focusing Mental Attention on Vaginal Sensations, Intercourse Duration, and a Preference for a Longer Penis . The Journal Of Sexual Medicine . 2010; 7 ( 8 ):2774–81. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01469.x
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
47.
Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis . Venerology . 1995; 8 ( 2 ):77–81. [ Google Scholar ]
48.
Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA. Erect Penile Length and Circumference Dimensions of 1,661 Sexually Active Men in the United States . The Journal Of Sexual Medicine . 2014; 11 ( 1 ):93–101. 10.1111/jsm.12244
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
49.
Lee AJ, Dubbs SL, Von Hippel W, Brooks RC, Zietsch BP. A multivariate approach to human mate preferences . Evolution and Human Behavior . 2014; 35 ( 3 ):193–203. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.01.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
50.
Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D, Hamilton C. The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males . Physiology & Behavior . 2008; 93 ( 4–5 ):783–8. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.033. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
51.
Baskin LS, Sutherland RS, DiSandro MJ, Hayward SW, Lipschutz J, Cunha GR. The Effect of Testosterone on Androgen Receptors and Human Penile Growth . The Journal Of Urology . 1997; 158 ( 3 ):1113–8. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64400-8.
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
52.
Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, Schmidt IM, et al.
Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys . European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies . 2006; 154 ( 1 ):125–9. Epub 2005/12/31. 10.1530/eje.1.02066
. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
53.
Eisenman R. Penis size: Survey of female perceptions of sexual satisfaction . BMC women's health . 2001; 1 ( 1 ):1 Epub 2001/06/21. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
54.
Francken AB, van de Wiel HBM, van Driel MF, Weijmar Schultz WCM. What Importance Do Women Attribute to the Size of the Penis?
European urology . 2002; 42 ( 5 ):426–31. 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00396-2.
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
55.
Lykins AD, Meana M, Strauss GP. Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli . Archives of Sexual Behavior . 2008; 37 ( 2 ):219–28.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
56.
Nummenmaa L, Hietanen J, Santtila P, Hyönä J. Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies . Archives of Sexual Behavior . 2012; 41 ( 6 ):1439–51. 10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
57.
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual
Technical Report A-8 . Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
58. Backman K, Mononen M. Tinkercad. Available: https://tinkercad.com/about/2011 .
59. Hoeken Z, Kintel M, Mayer A, Mets M. ReplicatorG. 2012.
60.
Locke SD, Gilbert BO. Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats . Journal of Social Behavior & Personality . 1995; 10 ( 1 ):255–63. [ Google Scholar ]
61.
Spector I, Carey M, Steinberg L. The Sexual Desire Inventory: Development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability . Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy . 1996; 22 ( 3 ):175–90. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
62.
Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology . 1991; 60 ( 6 ):870–83. 1991-26250-001 0022–3514,60,6,870–883,1991. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
63.
Francken AB, van de Wiel HB, van Driel MF, Weijmar Schultz WC. What importance do women attribute to the size of the penis?
European urology . 2002; 42 ( 5 ):426–31. Epub 2002/11/14. . [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
64.
Francken AB, van de Wiel HBM, Van Driel MF, & Weijmar Schultz WCMW. What importance do women attribute to size of the penis?
European urology . 2002; 42 :426–31.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
65.
Štulhofer A. How (Un)Important Is Penis Size for Women with Heterosexual Experience?
Archives of Sexual Behavior . 2006; 35 ( 1 ):5–6. 10.1007/s10508-006-8989-7
[ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
66.
Bunzeck N, Doeller CF, Dolan RJ, Duzel E. Contextual interaction between novelty and reward processing within the mesolimbic system . Human Brain Mapping . 2012; 33 ( 6 ):1309–24. 10.1002/hbm.21288
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
67.
Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences . 2002; 269 ( 1496 ):1095–100. 10.1098/rspb.2002.1984
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
68.
Wallen K, Lloyd EA. Female sexual arousal: Genital anatomy and orgasm in intercourse . Hormones and Behavior . 2011; 59 ( 5 ):780–92. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
69.
Berman JR, Adhikari SP, Goldstein I. Anatomy and physiology of female sexual function and dysfunction: classification, evaluation and treatment options . European urology . 2000; 38 ( 1 ):20–9. . [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
70.
Vardi Y, Gruenwald I, Sprecher E, Gertman I, Yartnitsky D. Normative values for female genital sensation . Urology . 2000; 56 ( 6 ):1035–40.
[ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
71.
Armstrong EA, England P, Fogarty ACK. Accounting for Women’s Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships . American Sociological Review . 2012; 77 ( 3 ):435–62. [ Google Scholar ]
72.
Dixson BJ, Grimshaw GM, Ormsby DK, Dixson AF. Eye-tracking women’s preferences for men’s somatotypes . Evolution and Human Behavior . 2014; 35 ( 2 ):73–9. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
73.
Grov C, Parsons J, Bimbi D. The Association Between Penis Size and Sexual Health Among Men Who Have Sex with Men . Archives of Sexual Behavior . 2010; 39 ( 3 ):788–97. 10.1007/s10508-008-9439-5
[ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
74.
Eschenbach DA, Patton DL, Hooton TM, Meier AS, Stapleton A, Aura J, et al.
Hard Porn Online
Anus Hole
The Ultimate Yuri Lesbian Futanari Hentai

Little Teen Porn 14.15

Report Page