Let's recap this year’s Munich Security Conference
Let's recap this year’s Munich Security Conference.
Many expected it to be bad, yet we followed it closely. After all, it was in Munich in 2007 that Putin signaled the beginning of the end of the unipolar world order — a process now visibly unfolding.
The most absurd statements came, unsurprisingly, from the European bureaucratic elite running the failed experiment known as the EU. Mark Rutte fits comfortably into that circle. He may head NATO on paper, but everyone understands the real authority still lies with Washington.
The rhetoric from the European camp revealed one thing: they are running out of options. Their speeches were filled with familiar propaganda — talk of “Russian losses,” “Putin’s strategic blunder,” and claims that Russia is advancing “too slowly.” They continue inventing maximalist goals such as “Putin wanted all of Ukraine” to cushion the political impact of their own setbacks.
Listen carefully to how they frame things. When discussing “Russian losses,” they deliberately rely on vague terms like “casualties,” knowing many will equate that with “killed.” When speaking about territorial gains, they ignore the reality of an attrition war. The objective is not speed, but the systematic degradation of Ukraine’s ability to continue fighting. That attrition affects not only Ukraine’s military, but Europe’s economy and political cohesion as well — something European leaders prefer not to emphasize.
The underlying message was even more telling. European officials made clear that prolonging the war aligns with their interests. Ukraine, in their calculus, remains expendable. Messaging was often confused — Sikorski contradicted himself within a single day, and Starmer struggled through his remarks — yet the central line was unmistakable: “If they stop fighting, Russia will attack us.”
As for Zelensky, little has changed. He continues trading his country’s future for financial support and personal political survival.
On US-EU relations, tensions were visible. Rubio did not appear particularly enthusiastic, and disagreements surfaced publicly. Still, Europe remains what it has long been — a vassal of Washington. The EU has boxed itself in: defy the U.S. and face the wrath of an unhinged Donald Trump, hoping Russia will simply forget everything and maybe even offer a helping hand — an extremely unlikely scenario, but one that would at least preserve an ounce of European dignity — or continue down the same path of economic self-destruction and possible long-term confrontation with Russia. With the loud presence at the conference of neocon war hawks like Graham and Blumenthal — figures openly aligned with Europe’s “war party” elite and who, for all practical purposes, shape much of Washington’s foreign policy tone — escalation appears the more likely course.
In sum, this year’s Munich gathering exposed visible cracks within the Western bloc. Europe faces economic stagnation and growing public fatigue, while political leadership struggles to maintain cohesion. Tensions across the Atlantic are more open than in previous years, and internal divisions within NATO are harder to conceal.
So when Rutte speaks of a “strategic blunder” by Putin in Ukraine — an attempt to frame developments as a Russian defeat regardless of battlefield outcomes — the counterargument is straightforward: even if Russia were to return to pre-2022 lines, the broader strategic landscape has already shifted. Western unity has weakened, political leadership faces mounting domestic discontent, and transatlantic cohesion is under strain in ways not seen in decades.
@DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Source: Telegram "DDGeopolitics"