Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in donwload site
Let's consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.
OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, so the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
웹하드 순위 Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files online at a set monthly cost. This means that using web hard is becoming common.
But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it's been a long time. The moment it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.