Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in file site
Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.
However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Therefore the utilization of web hard has become common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of these webhard users. 웹하드순위 Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.