Lesbians Doggy Style

Lesbians Doggy Style

Illustrations

Templates

Audio

Premium

Illustrations

Templates

Audio

Premium

support

Sales:
+44 203 0277 764

Get Help

A link to set your password has been sent to:

To access your purchases in the future you will need a password.

We found a license history, credits, or subscription plan in your personal profile. Would you like to transfer them to your business profile?

We found a license history, credits, or subscription plan in your personal profile. Would you like to transfer them to your business profile?

All

Images

Videos

Audio

Templates

3D

Free

Premium

Unlock 200M+ assets in our full collection

Hide panel
View panel

New filters added

Change region

License terms

Learn & Support

Company

Sell Images

Enterprise

Careers

© 2022 Adobe. All rights reserved.

Privacy

Terms of Use

Cookie preferences

AdChoices

North America

Canada - English
Canada - Français
El Salvador
México
República Dominicana
United States

South America

Argentina
Bolivia
Brasil
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Guatemala
Panamá
Paraguay
Perú
Venezuela

Europe, Middle East, and Africa

Algeria - English
Belgium - English
Belgique - Français
België - Nederlands
Česká republika
Croatia - English
Cyprus - English
Danmark
Deutschland
Eesti
Egypt - English
España
France
Greece - English
Ireland
Israel - English
Italia
Jordan - English

Казахстан
Kenya - English
Latvija
Lietuva
Luxembourg - Deutsch
Luxembourg - English
Luxembourg - Français
Hungary - English
Malta - English
Morocco - English
Nederland
Nigeria
Norge
Österreich
Polska
Portugal
România

Россия
Saudi Arabia - English
Schweiz
Slovenija
Slovensko
Suisse
Suomi
Sverige
Svizzera
Turkey - English
UAE - English
Ukraine - English
United Kingdom
Узбекистан
България

Asia Pacific

Australia
Indonesia - English
中國香港特別行政區
India
日本
한국
Malaysia - English
New Zealand
Thailand - English
Philippines
Singapore
Sri Lanka - English
台灣地區
Vietnam - English

Selecting a region may change the language and promotional content you see on the Adobe Stock web site.

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of rugosity (smooth, moderate, marked) to do so. To prevent vaginal bias, the same person also conducted all of these measurements. The scientists later used this research to classify the contest’s entries into six different categories of “vulval morphology.”
A chart detailing the six classes is included below:
As far as methodology is concerned, a random assortment of entries was sent to each voter, who was then asked to rate the vulva pictured on a scale from 1 to 10. These voters were only able to rank one photo at a time, but could also vote on an unlimited number of entries. The scientists compiled 2,766,671 ratings from 134,707 contest voters.
“To reduce individual biases, we centered each voter’s ratings using their mean and standard deviation. This allowed us to reflect the preferences of voters on the same scale,” read the study .
According to the paper , each voter rated 21 photos, on average. Each vulva also received 15,285 votes, on average.
The study also found that “roughly 51% of voters preferred the first two classes of non-protruding, simple labia. The other 49% favored the four more complex vulva classes.”
“As expected from the rankings that we saw at the country and local levels, Class 1 vulvas are preferred over the others more often. But the combined percentages of voters who preferred more complex classes of vulvas far outweighed those who preferred the simplest style.”
The winners’ photos, however, were not included in the study—having been among the participants whose photos were not able to be considered. Moreover, the “doggy style” posture featured in these entries made it difficult for the scientists to complete the necessary measurements.
“Indeed, pictures depicting contest entrants in a doggy style position obtained ratings 2 points higher on average (p <0.001) than others. Other features, like piercings in the clitoral hood, didn’t affect the ratings,” read the study .
So basically, the “doggy style” photos generated “influential excitement” among the contest’s voters—an important competitive advantage for all future entrants to consider.
Photo via mislav-marohnic /Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
‘Who would pay this much?’: ‘Top Secret’ notebook from Depp-Heard trial sells on eBay for $15K, sparking debate
TikToker says he’s being threatened with legal action for ‘exposing’ Starbucks. Is it for clout?
‘As we sit through zoom calls in our office alone’: Employers making people return to the office sparks debate on TikTok
TikToker says she ‘pretends to work’ at her internship, sparking debate

*First Published: Jul 24, 2015, 10:05 pm CDT
More stories to check out before you go

Posted on Jul 24, 2015 Updated on May 28, 2021, 7:13 am CDT
Following rigorous competition and more than 130,000 voters, the World’s Most Beautiful Vagina Contest anointed a champion this week. It was a strange, difficult-to-gauge event—but that’s why organizers turned to scientists to tell us what it all means.
U.K. resident Nell, 27, won first place and $5,000 in the pageant with a vulva beauty ranking of 7.7 out of 10. Jenny, 23, of Bavaria, Germany, took second place with a 7.3; and Anita, 20, from Hungary, came in third. They each earned $2,500 and $1,250, respectively.
The contest was sponsored by Brian Sloan, who is also the manufacturer of the Autoblow 2 . It’s known as “the first truly realistic alternative to traditional pleasure products for men,” according to the its website .
These winners will also be flown out to Los Angeles, where their vulvas will be 3D-scanned to later be reproduced for the Autoblow device.
Sloan contracted a group of data scientists to analyze the contest’s findings for their scientific implications. The data was then compiled in “ The Vulva Paper .”
If you’re a visual learner, you can view photo examples of each class here .
The Vulva Paper’s website says scientists “used the contest data to assess the diversity in vulval morphology and voters’ preference for different morphologies.” A total of 182 women participated in the contest; 110 entries were examined for the study (if measurements could not be taken from the photo, the entry was not considered).
The scientists viewed each entry on a 15-inch computer screen, zooming in “until the genitalia were easily measured using a screen ruler,” read the paper .
They measured labia majora length, labia minora length, and clitoral hood length.
Finally, the scientists rated the complexity of the labia minora; they used the three categories of
Asian Boys Jerk Off
Seda Anal
Big Black Shecock

Lesbians Doggy Style

Report Page