Latina Labia

Latina Labia

Address: 461 Park Ave S, #7L, New York, NY 10016
Phone: (212) 481-3555

Home
Dr. Hunter
Gallery
Labiaplasty
Vaginal Rejuvenation
Labia Majora Reduction
Clitoral Hood Reduction
Mons Pubis Lift
Media
Contact
Go to... Home Dr. Hunter Gallery Labiaplasty Vaginal Rejuvenation Labia Majora Reduction Clitoral Hood Reduction Mons Pubis Lift Media Contact

Labiaplasty Center NYC
461 Park Ave S, #7L
New York, NY 10016
(212) 481-3555
info@labiaplastycenternyc.com
WARNING: The following pages in the photo gallery contain adult oriented materials and pictures. You must be over 18 to view. Thank you.
FEMALE GENITAL ANATOMY
Our procedures are designed to address the cosmetic concerns involving the four major areas that comprise a woman’s external genitals:
1. Labia Minora : The inner lips can be made smaller, irregular shape or contour improved, and differences in size of the two lips corrected. Our techniques preserve natural pigmentation of the labia edges, with virtually no visible scarring.
View Labia Minora Reduction Photos
2. Clitoral Hood : Excess skin and extra folds can be removed to contour the Clitoral Hood achieving a more normal appearance, with virtually no visible scars.
View Labia Minora Reduction & Clitoral Hood Contouring Photos
3. Labia Majora : The outer lips can be made less puffy by liposuction or surgical excision. Drooping or sagging is corrected by skin removal, or plumped by fat injection.
View Labia Majora Reduction & Mons Pubis Contouring Photos
4. Mons Pubis : The Mons Pubis often sags with age or weight gain. It can be elevated and reduced in height and width. The resulting scars are usually hidden within the pubic hair. A bulging, prominent mons can be made flatter using liposuction.
View Mons Pubis Lift & Reduction Photos
If you have any questions in regards to labiaplasty (or other female genital surgeries we offer) and would like a complimentary consultation with the board certified NYC Plastic Surgeon, Dr. John Hunter, MD, FACS, please feel free to contact our NYC office for a complimentary consultation or request a consultation online using the eForm on the right. Cosmetic genital surgery is a private matter. All information is kept confidential.
Labiaplasty Center NYC
461 Park Ave S, #7L
New York, NY 10016
(212) 481-3555
Choose Contact Method (required) *Choose Contact Method Contact me by email Contact me by phone Contact me by Text
Consultation Type (required) *Consultation Type In Person Consultation Virtual Consultation
Copyright 2014: Labiaplasty Center NYC, 461 Park Ave S, #7L, New York, NY 10016
Site Map | Americans with Disabilities Act / Privacy Policy / Medical Disclaimer

Navbar Search Filter

Aesthetic Surgery Journal This issue Aesthetic Genital Plastic Surgery ASJ Journals

Cosmetic Medicine Books Journals Oxford Academic

Mobile Microsite Search Term

Search

Issues

Subject

Aesthetic Genital Plastic Surgery

Body Contouring

Breast Surgery

Cosmetic Medicine

Facial Surgery

Oculoplastic Surgery

Rhinoplasty

More Content

Advance articles

Editor's Choice

Thematic Issues

CME

Supplements

Monthly Editorial Announcement

Highly Cited Collection

Podcasts

Submit

Author Guidelines

Author Guidelines in Chinese

Submission Site

Permissions

Open Access

Purchase

Advertise

Advertising and Corporate Services

Journals Career Network

Advertising

Mediakit

Reprints and ePrints

Sponsored Supplements

Branded Books

About

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Awards and Achievements

The Aesthetic Society

Editorial Board

Alerts

Self-Archiving Policy

Disclaimer

Instructions for reviewers

Journals on Oxford Academic

Books on Oxford Academic

Navbar Search Filter

Aesthetic Surgery Journal This issue Aesthetic Genital Plastic Surgery ASJ Journals

Cosmetic Medicine Books Journals Oxford Academic

Microsite Search Term

Search

< Previous

Next >

Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations

Dr Hunter is an Attending Surgeon in the Division of Plastic Surgery
New York-Presbyterian Hospital (Weill Cornell Campus)
Vice Chairman in the Department of Surgery
Corresponding Author: Dr John G. Hunter, New York Methodist Hospital, Department of Surgery, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA. E-mail: jgh2001@nyp.org

Search for other works by this author on:

Aesthetic Surgery Journal , Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv092

Select Format

Select format
.ris (Mendeley, Papers, Zotero)
.enw (EndNote)
.bibtex (BibTex)
.txt (Medlars, RefWorks)

Download citation

Navbar Search Filter

Aesthetic Surgery Journal This issue Aesthetic Genital Plastic Surgery ASJ Journals

Cosmetic Medicine Books Journals Oxford Academic

Mobile Microsite Search Term

Search

Navbar Search Filter

Aesthetic Surgery Journal This issue Aesthetic Genital Plastic Surgery ASJ Journals

Cosmetic Medicine Books Journals Oxford Academic

Microsite Search Term

Search

Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics
The safety of aesthetic labiaplasty: a plastic surgery experience
Commentary on: labioplasty: anatomy, etiology, and a new surgical approach
Cosmetic surgery of the female external genitalia
Aesthetic surgery of female external genitalia
Labia minora reduction techniques: a comprehensive literature review
Refreshing labiaplasty techniques for plastic surgeons
Labioplasty: anatomy, etiology, and a new surgical approach
Commentary on: Postoperative clitoral hood deformity after labiaplasty
Postoperative clitoral hood deformity after labiaplasty
A large multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery
Functional and aesthetic labia minora reduction
A new technique for aesthetic labia minora reduction
Commentary on: Labia minora reduction techniques: a comprehensive literature review
Clinical characteristics of well women seeking labial reduction surgery: a prospective study
Psychological characteristics and motivation of women seeking labiaplasty
Aesthetic labia minora and clitoral hood reduction using extended central wedge resection
A new method for aesthetic reduction of labia minora (the deepithelialization reduction labiaplasty)
Considerations in female external genital aesthetic surgery techniques
Hypertrophy of the labia minora: experience with 163 reductions
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com

Web of Science

Google Scholar

CD30 Regulation of IL-13-STAT6 Pathway in Breast Implant Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Fat Juice: A Novel Approach on the Usage and Preparation of Adipose Tissue Byproducts

Microbes, Histology, Blood Analysis, Enterotoxins, and Cytokines: Findings From the ASERF Systemic Symptoms in Women—Biospecimen Analysis Study: Part 3

Restoration Liposuction of the Abdomen: High-definition Liposuction With Umbilicus and Lower Abdomen Improvement Using PDO Threads

Deep Subcutaneous Gluteal Fat Compartments: Anatomy and Clinical Implications

Online ISSN 1527-330X Print ISSN 1090-820X Copyright © 2022 The Aesthetic Society

Copyright © 2022 Oxford University Press
Cookie policy
Privacy policy
Legal notice

Presented at: The Cutting Edge 2014 Aesthetic Surgery Symposium in New York, NY, in December 2014.
John G. Hunter, MD, MMM, FACS, Labia Minora, Labia Majora, and Clitoral Hood Alteration: Experience-Based Recommendations, Aesthetic Surgery Journal , Volume 36, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages 71–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv092
Aesthetic alteration of the genitalia is increasingly sought by women unhappy with the size, shape, and appearance of their vulva. Although the labia minora are usually the focus of concern, the entire anatomic region—minora, labia majora, clitoral hood, perineum, and mons pubis—should be evaluated in a preoperative assessment of women seeking labiaplasty. Labiaplasty is associated with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates. The three basic labia minora reduction techniques—edge excision, wedge excision, and central deepithelialization—as well as their advantages and disadvantages are discussed to assist the surgeon in tailoring technique selection to individual genital anatomy and aesthetic desires. We present key points of the preoperative anatomic evaluation, technique selection, operative risks, perioperative care, and potential complications for labia minora, labia majora, and clitoral hood alterations, based on a large operative experience. Labiaplasty competency should be part of the skill set of all plastic surgeons.
Although ranked relatively low on volume lists of overall cosmetic surgery procedures in the United States, 1 aesthetic alteration of the genitalia is increasingly sought by women unhappy with the size, shape, and appearance of their vulva. There was a 44% increase in labiaplasty procedures performed in the US between 2012 and 2013. 2 Labia minora reduction is the most commonly requested and performed procedure on the female external genitalia. 2-4
It is estimated that greater than 90% of female genital procedures performed involve alteration of the labia minora. 4 Although the labia minora are usually the focus of patients’ concerns, achieving a desirable cosmetic outcome often requires additional external genital alterations. It is therefore essential that the entire anatomic region—labia minora, labia majora, clitoral hood, perineum, and mons pubis—be evaluated in the preoperative assessment of women seeking labiaplasties.
Descriptions, reviews, and illustrations of female external genital anatomy and labiaplasty procedures and techniques are abundant, and readily available in the recent literature. 4-8 Therefore, a discussion of vulvar anatomy or a detailed description of the various operative techniques available are not the focus of this paper. Rather, I offer what I have learned in performing over 600 labiaplasties. Key points of preoperative anatomic evaluation, technique selection, operative caveats, and perioperative care for labia minora, clitoral hood, and labia majora alterations are presented.
Female external genital cosmetic surgery procedures are viewed by many plastic surgeons and gynecologists as being technically simple operations. They often are. Many women, however, present with anatomic challenges that make achieving good aesthetic outcomes difficult. 9 Labia majora redundancy, deflation and ptosis, vertical and/or horizontal clitoral hood excess, and redundant labial tissue posterior to the introitus (in addition to unlimited labia minora size, shape, and pigmentation variations) may be present and require attention. 4 , 9 , 10 Such women need more nuanced procedures to achieve aesthetically acceptable, natural-appearing outcomes. Simply reducing the labia minora in women with complex anatomic issues may result in unnatural-appearing genitalia and the perception of genital deformity as unintended consequences. Prominent lateral clitoral hood folds or labial remnants between the introitus and anus (Figures 1 and 2 ), proportional to large labia minora before surgery, may appear more unnatural after a simple labia minora reduction, regardless of the labiaplasty technique employed. Patient dissatisfaction and an augmented sense of genital embarrassment may occur. 9 , 10
A 32-year-old woman with prominent bilateral lateral clitoral hood folds.
A 28-year-old woman with thick, hyperpigmented labia minora and redundant labia minora tissue extending between the introitus and anus.
Accurate evaluation of anatomic issues, surgical planning, and technical execution are essential in achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes. For labia minora reduction, reported patient satisfaction rates are remarkably high (greater than 90%) in published surveys involving various techniques. 6 , 11 It therefore appears that, when competently performed, most labiaplasty techniques result in high patient satisfaction rates and low complication rates. 2 , 7 , 12-14 Furthermore, to date no published operative technique has proven superior to the others described in the literature. 6 , 15
As previously stated, reduction of the labia minora is by far the most commonly requested female external genital cosmetic procedure (Figures 3 and 4 ). Those seeking surgery, in my experience, have labia minora that, albeit large, fall within the normal minora size range. Very few women have minora that can be considered abnormally large. Female genital cosmetic surgery is overwhelmingly sought for aesthetic reasons. Although minor functional complaints (ie, irritation) are common, significant issues are rare. This experience mirrors the published findings of Crouch et al. 16 They report that all women in their study had “normal-sized” labia, with the majority of complaints being related to genital appearance or minor discomfort issues. The main indication for labiaplasty, therefore, is overwhelmingly the same as for other aesthetic procedures: patient preference. 15 Although uncommon, one must be aware that underlying psychological issues may be present in those women presenting with major functional or sexual complaints (ie, disabling pain or severe irritation) out of proportion with observed genital anatomic findings. Veale et al 17 found that labiaplasty patients did not differ from controls on measures of depression or anxiety, but reported a significantly greater frequency of avoidance behaviors. Eighteen percent of women in their study met the diagnostic criteria for body dysmorphic disorder.
(A) Preoperative photograph of a 25-year-old woman with large labia minora. (B) Postoperative photograph obtained 3 months after bilateral labia minora reduction (edge excision).
(A) Preoperative photograph of a 29-year-old woman with large labia minora and right lateral clitoral hood fold. (B) Postoperative photograph obtained 3 months after bilateral labia minora reduction (wedge excision) and right clitoral hood fold excision.
Labia minora size and shape show almost unlimited variations
Japanese Hentai Sites
Kylie Jenner's Tits
Julia Ann Lesbian Pics

Latina Labia

Report Page