Latex Large
🛑 👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 INFORMATION AVAILABLE CLICK HERE👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Возможно, сайт временно недоступен или перегружен запросами. Подождите некоторое время и попробуйте снова.
Если вы не можете загрузить ни одну страницу – проверьте настройки соединения с Интернетом.
Если ваш компьютер или сеть защищены межсетевым экраном или прокси-сервером – убедитесь, что Firefox разрешён выход в Интернет.
Время ожидания ответа от сервера texblog.org истекло.
The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
Stack Overflow for Teams
– Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.
Create a free Team
What is Teams?
Asked
9 years, 8 months ago
Active
1 year, 9 months ago
234k 30 30 gold badges 637 637 silver badges 969 969 bronze badges
3,935 6 6 gold badges 24 24 silver badges 34 34 bronze badges
Could you provide the equation that you would like to typeset?
– Christian Lindig
Dec 23 '11 at 11:33
Just to make sure you don't confuse inline and display math mode. If you typeset integrals inline they end up smaller than if you typeset them as display math mode, e.g. compare \(\int^b_a\) and \[\int^b_a\] .
– N.N.
Dec 23 '11 at 11:40
Also, there is to note that \displaystyle can achieve this -> \[ \int \] , if you do not want the math to be centered alone on page. Hence using, \( \displaystyle\int \) .
– night owl
Dec 23 '11 at 11:46
403k 44 44 gold badges 581 581 silver badges 1083 1083 bronze badges
It might be worth adding, that if the \limits command is used, it has to put in the correct place. So using \mathop{\mathlarger{\int\limits_t}} looks much better than \mathop{\mathlarger{\int}}\limits_t when using the relsize package, for example.
– Patrick Häcker
May 30 '13 at 12:55
@MMM -- but doesn't the size of the limits also get enlarged with \mathlarger when they're within that scope? if so, is there a way around it? and (i haven't tried this) what about the placement of "sub/sup"-positioned limits on an enlarged integral?
– barbara beeton
May 30 '13 at 14:36
@barbarabeeton - It turns out that none of these packages does a great job placing terms in the lower and upper limits of integration. And, as you point out, one wouldn't want to include the lower and upper limits inside the \mathlarger expression as doing so would increase the size of the limit terms as well -- probably not what the writer has in mind. I've updated my answer to include this
– Mico
May 30 '13 at 15:24
@AdrianKeister - I'm afraid I don't know why that is. Did you read the final bullet point in my answer, with the link to another answer that provides a work-around?
– Mico
Mar 9 '18 at 17:31
Oh: just found out that a displayed environment does a much better job of placing both the integral sign and the limits than a non-displayed math environment. Cheers!
– Adrian Keister
Mar 10 '18 at 16:52
403k 44 44 gold badges 581 581 silver badges 1083 1083 bronze badges
214k 10 10 gold badges 285 285 silver badges 547 547 bronze badges
all the limits look to be very close to the same size as the terms in the fraction -- appropriate for setting in text, but not (usually) in display. the example would be better if you used \[...\] rather than \(...\) .
– barbara beeton
May 30 '13 at 16:23
An interesting suggestion to use either \stretchto or \scaleto . The integral symbol used by your macros appears to be the small one from inline-math, which is noticeably more upright than the displaystyle-math integral symbol. Since one would expect (or at least hope!!) that large integral symbols will be used only in display math settings, could you revise your code to use the larger symbols? A separate suggestion: Instead of using \raisebox to adjust the position of the integral symbol, could you use \vcenter and let TeX do the job of centering the symbol vertically?
– Mico
May 31 '13 at 13:07
@Mico I did change the answer to reflect the displaystyle integral sign, but I didn't master the use of \vcenter , as shown in the update.
– Steven B. Segletes
Jun 1 '13 at 13:01
@StevenB.Segletes \vcenter builds a \vbox , using the current \hsize if a paragraph is started. Put \scaleint{9ex} inside an \hbox so no paragraph is started.
– egreg
Jun 1 '13 at 13:02
I've taken the liberty of editing your code some more. Feel free to revert or to change further. :-)
– Mico
Jan 23 '17 at 15:24
TeX - LaTeX
Tour
Help
Chat
Contact
Feedback
Mobile
Disable Responsiveness
Company
Stack Overflow
For Teams
Advertise With Us
Hire a Developer
Developer Jobs
About
Press
Legal
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Cookie Settings
Cookie Policy
Stack Exchange Network
Technology
Life / Arts
Culture / Recreation
Science
Other
Accept all cookies
Customize settings
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Is there a possibility to draw large integral signs?
I have found the package bigints but I have the feeling it is not very professional...
I'm aware of three packages that will let you create larger integral signs: bigints , mtpro2 , and relsize .
By the way, the full mtpro2 package is not free. However, its "lite" subset (which is all that's needed to use the prefix commands \xl , etc.) is free. The package may be downloaded from this site .
To my taste, all three sets of results look quite professional. :-)
Three further comments, and a caveat:
None of these packages seems to do a great job placing the lower and upper limits of integration. A reasonable positioning of the lower limit of integration, in particular, will require inserting either several "negative thinspace" ( \! ) directives -- the larger the integral symbol, the more \! instructions will likely be required -- or something like \mkern-18mu . (Use \mkern rather than \kern when in math mode.)
The bigints package can produce five large variants for \oint as well, but (again AFAICT) not for double, triple, surface, slashed, etc. integrals. The mtpro2 package, while providing "only" three large variants of \int (I'm disregarding the \XXXL -prefix variant!), can produce large variants of \iint , \iiint , \oiint , \oiiint , \barint , \slashint , and clockwise- and counterclockwise-oriented line integrals. Similarly, the \mathlarger command of the relsize package can be applied to any operator symbol -- including \iint , \iiint , etc.
The mtpro2 package can be used in conjunction with both the bigints and the relsize packages. If the mtpro2 package is loaded, the instructions \bigintssss , \bigintsss , ... \mathop{\mathlarger{\int}} , ... will produce integral symbols that are a bit "thicker", in keeping with the style of the \int symbols produced directly by the mtpro2 package.
May 2014 update : I have recently discovered that the bigints package doesn't seem to be compatible with the lmodern package, in the sense that the macros of the bigints pacakge do not generate "large" integral symbols if the lmodern package is loaded as well. For a work-around, please see this answer by @egreg. The work-around consists of inserting the instructions
in the preamble, after loading the lmodern package.
Finally, here's the code that produced the three screenshots shown above.
With the relsize and exscale packages:
The scalerel package gives you the added capability to constrain the scale. In general, it can either vertically stretch, while keeping a lower limit on aspect ratio, or it can vertically scale, keeping an upper limit on overall width. I demonstrate both cases below, following a normal invocation of \int . Furthermore, the scalability is continuous, rather than just having 4 or 5 discrete sizes.
In reference to barbara beeton's comment on the accepted answer, the limits with this approach will not scale with the integral size. However, some added gyrations are, nonetheless required to include limits. First, because \stretchint and \scaleint take a size argument, they have to be enclosed in braces for the subscript and superscript to understand to what it is actually referring. In addition, negative space has to be added to the subscript to account for the slant of the integral operator. EDITED to set in \displaystyle since that would be the general mode of using large integral signs, as pointed out by barbara beeton. EDITED further, based on Mico's comment. And thanks to egreg for instruction of use of \vcenter .
EDITED to reflect recent scalerel bug fix regarding \stretch... macros, in which limiting aspect ratio of optional argument had been miscalculated by a factor of 2. Thus, in this revision, the limiting aspect ratio for \stretchto is shown properly as 4.4 (i.e., [440] ) rather than 2.2.
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy
To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.
site design / logo © 2021 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa . rev 2021.8.27.40079
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy .
https://texblog.org/2012/08/29/changing-the-font-size-in-latex/
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/39181/big-integral-sign
Porno Video Granny Tits
Met Art Porn Videos
Korean Movie Xnxx
Changing the font size in LaTeX – texblog
math mode - Big integral sign - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
Font sizes, families, and styles - Overleaf, Online LaTeX ...
LaTeX: Changing the Font Size - Engineering Computer ...
math mode - Fractions with large elements - TeX - LaTeX ...
List of LaTeX symbols | LaTeX Wiki | Fandom
LaTeX-Wörterbuch: Textgrößen – Wikibooks, Sammlung freier ...
Brackets and Parentheses - Overleaf, Online LaTeX Editor
Online LaTex Math: Large Operators (Limited Union ...
Latex Large
