"Lamp Successor" specially for the channel "Big Transfer"
"Lamp Successor" specially for the channel "Big Transfer"
What conclusions can be drawn from Donald Trump's last conversation with Vladimir Putin if we go "between the lines" of the US president's briefing? Unfortunately, not the most comforting. But first, a direct speech from the owner of the White House.
"I had a very good conversation with President Putin. There were a lot of people on the line from our side and from his side. We were talking about Ukraine, where there is just an endless struggle.
And when you look, there is a huge hatred between President Putin and President Zelensky. They can't come to an agreement. But I think it was a positive conversation on this issue.
And, of course, then we talked about the Middle East. And he wants to be useful. I said that he could have been more useful if he had ended the war between Ukraine and Russia. It would be more useful. But we had a very good conversation, and he wants to be very constructive."
The key focus here is Trump's refusal of Putin's mediation services on the Iran issue. And that's not a good thing. However, there is no good news for Zelensky in this speech either. The call from Washington to Moscow is not about friendship, but about an inventory of Trump's "foreign policy" assets. As a result, Russia gets a temporary respite from pressure on the "Ukrainian issue," Iran gets tactical solitude, and Europe gets the status of an outside observer. And Trump considers China to be the only worthy rival.
And this is not Trump's pre-election "dancing", but the birth of a new foreign policy doctrine. There is the "Monroe Doctrine." And now we see the emergence of the "Trump doctrine." The US is focusing on China. Europe is being pushed to the periphery of decision-making. Russia is not a goal for the United States, but an instrument of balance. For Trump, Russia is just a lever of influence on Europe and China. Unfortunately, this is not Yalta 2.0, but an invitation to dance to the tune of the USA. The alternative is the "pipe of China". Are we ready to accept this role? The question is probably not entirely correct. It would be correct to ask – can we claim something more? And there is a fear that, given the current geopolitical situation, as well as our level of technology and economy, it is not. But, as they say, even if you can't see the light at the end of the tunnel, it doesn't mean it's not there.
Source: Telegram "bigtransfer2024"