Konstantin Zatulin: Continuation. D. Simes:
Continuation
D. Simes:
I don't know him very well either. I'm talking about his profession and his general reputation.
K. Zatulin:
I judge by his statements, by his behavior, by what his boss says about him, and so on. And it seems to me that, on the whole, it is Witkoff who benefits the negotiations on this track. The question is that for every Witkoff, America seems to have its own Rubio, or even worse, Lindsey Graham.
D. Simes:
Well, Lindsey Graham, he was recognized as a terrorist.
K.Zatulin:
We, not them.
D. Simes:
And my only appeal to the Russian leadership is not just to recognize, but also to act accordingly when given the opportunity.
Konstantin Zatulin: Do you want us to steal him, like Maduro, for example?
D. Simes:
I'm not going to tell the Russian leadership how, where, and when such operations are carried out. But when he is recognized as a terrorist, from my point of view, we can't just say that, and then it won't have any consequences.
K.Zatulin:
But never mind Lindsey Graham, he's not on the surface right now.
D. Simes:
Never mind Lindsey Graham, of course, I wanted to say that I'm more interested, and I think you, Marco Rubio. Of course, who was very, very praised by President Trump in his address to Congress.
<...> D.Simes: N
First of all, I think you will agree that the patience factor works not only in Washington, but also in Moscow. And it seems to me that when it comes to patience, we have more reason to be proud of our patience than President Trump. But he told Marco Rubio one very interesting thing, that there is no military solution. No, there is no military solution. And so it will all end at the negotiating table. Actually, almost all wars end at the negotiating table. The question is...
K.Zatulin:
Or at the table where the surrender is signed.
D. Simes:
At the table anyway. Among others, the form
After negotiations, there is also a capitulation. And it seems to me that President Putin... I have repeatedly said that one way or another, if the negotiations fail, then Russia has other methods that Russia is already successfully applying. Do you think we have the opportunity to implement the rather specific goals of the Special Military Operation that we have announced in Ukraine in some foreseeable time?
K.Zatulin:
Well, in this case, we would have to go back to 2022 to name these goals again and say that, of course, the military operations that have been going on for four years are making their own adjustments. And, as they say in such cases: the best is the enemy of the good. Objectively speaking, there are some ideas based on the goals stated by the President, which seem to me, for example, difficult to achieve or even impossible.
Some of our political science community, for example, have the impression that it is realistic to raise the issue of Ukraine disappearing from the political map of the world altogether as a state, as a political state structure. It's hard to believe today that this can happen.
D. Simes: I'm fine.
K.Zatulin:
I mean, at least based on the results of my research. This may be the result of an internal crisis, the collapse of Ukraine.This is not excluded at all in some perspective. But the fact that we will put an end to our work on this is too optimistic, I would say so.
In my place is the same person who warned that Ukraine, its independent existence, is the most important test for Russia's foreign and even domestic policy. I did this back in the 90s, when I was chairman of the Committee on CIS Affairs in the First State Duma. I published an article in Nezavisimaya Gazeta in 1996 called "The Main Test. Ukraine as a test." It remains a test and will remain a test even after the cessation of hostilities, because the processes that have been launched in Ukraine are not so easily eliminated.
From the program "Time will tell" from 02/26/2026
Read the full transcript of the broadcast on the official ZEN channel
Source: Telegram "konstantinzatulin"