Kill Muslim

👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

By Rod Nordland On 11/7/93 at 7:00 PM EST
THE VILLAGERS OF STUPNI DO knew something was wrong when Anna Likic, the only Croatian resident and the wife of a Muslim, suddenly disappeared with all her children. Word travels fast in this tiny mountain hamlet in central Bosnia, a farming and sheep-grazing community of 250 people, most of whom are related and share a common surname. When the first mortar shell hit, 36 men of military age grabbed their hunting rifles and their few AK-47s and manned the bunkers they had dug along the edges of the village. But no one expected the ferocious artillery pounding that followed. Quickly overwhelmed, Stupni Do's defenders retreated to a couple of houses. There they spent the day trying to hold off 600 Croatian nationalists--and protecting the 100 women and children who huddled together in the basements of the two homes.
The "death platoon"--a group of 30 or 40 Croatian paramilitaries--entered the village and marched down its only main street. Dressed all in black, they hid their faces under camouflage grease or covered them with ski masks to conceal their identities. But many of the villagers recognized them--a policeman and former colleagues from the nearby town of Vares. "We used to work together," says Fatima Likic. "We were friends a year ago, and then six months ago they started to hate us." The platoon sang martial songs and began shouting "Let's kill the Muslims!" and "Where are all the pretty girls for us to rape? Bring them out!"
Then the killing started. "I could hear Ibrahim Likic and his wife, Jeva, screaming while they were burning alive in their house," recalls Zinata Likic, who hid in the basement of her house with her two infants and eventually escaped through the woods to the nearby village of Dabravine. During the night she heard two Croatian soldiers raping the woman next door. Another neighbor, she says, was raped by soldiers who forced her to comply by threatening to kill her family--and then did so anyway. "People were begging, pleading, 'Please don't kill us, we're innocent'," says Alija Likic, who hid in a clump of trees just outside town, close enough to hear much of the butchery. "But they were saying, 'We're going to do to you what you've been doing to us'"--an apparent reference to a recent expulsion of Croats by Muslims in the village of Kopjari. With avenging fury, the Croatian death squad crushed the skulls of Muslim children, slit the throats of women and machine-gunned whole families at close range. The next morning Croatian reinforcements finished up the job, torching all 52 houses and dynamiting the community's one small mosque. in less than 48 hours Stupni Do simply ceased to exist.
Kadira Dobinovic, a 27-year-old Muslim mother of two, was somewhat luckier than most villagers in Stupni Do. A resident of nearby Vares, she had just finished her morning coffee when she heard the artillery pounding a couple of miles away. Fearing for her safety, "I told MY husband, 'Let's run away'," she says. But at a Croatian checkpoint, her husband, Zehrid, was arrested. Kadira, her mother and her children fled to the home of a Croatian friend and waited for word of Zehrid. She would have no protection. That night a young Croatian Soldier, dressed like a member of the death platoon, burst into the house, yelling, "Give me your money, give me your gold!" says Kadira. "I had nothing. So he said, 'You will give me something else'."
The soldier ordered everyone to sit on the floor and told Kadira to follow him into another room, slamming the door behind them. "My babies started crying, and he said, 'Why are you screaming? Stop it or I'll kill your mother'," she recalls. "They were old enough to obey." Her elderly mother begged the soldier through the closed door not to harm Kadira. "Be quiet or I'll put this knife in you, old lady," he screamed. Then he ordered Kadira to remove her clothes. "I wasn't fast enough, so he said to take them off more quickly ... And then he raped me." After he finished, the soldier threatened her: "if you tell anyone what happened here, I'll kill you."
Stupni Do wasn't just another massacre in Bosnia. At least 25 people died in the small village, a fraction of the casualties Croatian forces inflicted on the Muslim civilians of Ahmici in April. But Stupni Do stands out because the world discovered its horrors just after they unfolded--and because U.N. investigators jumped to the scene to document what appears to be a clear-cut crime against humanity. Bosnian army scouts, who saw what was happening through their binoculars, radioed for help. Scandinavian U.N. troops answered the call and found the roads swarming with drunken Croatian soldiers who threatened them with rocket-propelled grenades and automatic weapons, preventing them from reaching the village for three days. Meanwhile, the Croats tried to cover up the evidence of their dirty work by burning everything in sight victims included. "This is not war. This is a disgusting war crime," Brig. Angus Ramsay, the British chief of staff of the U.N. Protection Force (UNPROFOR) in Bosnia, told reporters who visited Stupni Do. "Those who have done this thing will one day answer for it." Tracking down the killers shouldn't be that hard. Not long after the attack, UNPROFOR Commander in Chief Gen. Jean Cot pointed the finger at two leaders of the Croatian Defense Council (HVO): Ivica Rajic, special-forces commander from Kiseljak, and Kresimir Bozic, head of the Bobovac Brigade in Vares (box).
But will they end up paying for their actions? That's the idea, at least, behind the international war-crimes tribunal. Created by the U.N. Security Council in May, the panel has the power to issue indictments against individuals it deems responsible for the long catalog of offenses--among them: rape, torture, murder--that fall under the hideous euphemism of "ethnic cleansing." But nabbing and punishing the perpetrators--primarily the Serbs, but Croats and Muslims as well--won't be easy. It would be nearly impossible, say, to obtain custody of Ratko Mladic, the Bosnian Serb commander who has led the 18-month siege of Sarajevo and is often mentioned as a possible defendant. "This is my country and I will defend my own people," he told NEWSWEEK. "Whatever happens, I don't feel like a war criminal."
Making Mladic and others feel more culpable is the job of the recently appointed prosecutor, who will turn his indictments over to the tribunal's 11 judges. That's not likely to happen any time soon. While a U.N. commission of experts has been compiling evidence of war crimes for a year, no one can be sure what will stand up in court. Forensic investigation--like the current excavation of an alleged mass grave of some 200 hospital patients in Vukovar, Croatia--is the stuff of criminal proceedings. But Vukovar is only one of some 100 sites of reported massacres in the former Yugoslavia, most of them in areas held by forces that have no interest in seeing crimes brought to light. The lack of adequate funds has also hampered investigative work. "It appears incongruous that the Security Council established such a commission and then didn't provide it with the resources," complains a U.N. human-rights official. "Is this an act of superb diplomatic hypocrisy--or inattention?"
The question cuts to the heart of the matter. Is the international community serious about pressing war-crimes trials? More than a year in the making, the tribunal has been hailed by the Security Council as a way to exorcise awful truths and "cleanse" ethnic hatred. But it has also been criticized as the West's way of washing its hands of the mess in the Balkans--"a substitute for real action to control the crimes," says Muhamed Sacirbey, Bosnia's ambassador to the United Nations. "In practical terms, as long as the war lasts, the tribunal's role is very limited," says Tadeusz Mazowiecki, special rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights in the former Yugoslavia. A major limitation, he says, is that "the list of war criminals includes people with whom the West is negotiating now."
Another Nuremberg isn't likely. In that case, the victors of World War II separated individual and collective responsibility, and meted out justice accordingly. At best, concede supporters of a Yugoslav tribunal, the prosecution may be able to hand down detailed indictments that turn the worst offenders into prisoners in their own countries, subject to arrest if they ever travel abroad. Serbia, claims Peter Galbraith, the U.S. ambassador to Croatia, will be turned into an international pariah, "the new Albania of Europe." But there's also a chance the tribunal will go the way of high-minded principles like the territorial integrity of Bosnia. Weary negotiators may find it hard to resist the temptation to swap justice for peace.
By Paul Bambrick-Santoyo and Stephen Chiger
By Dr. Tara Sander Lee, Dr. David Prentice and Lila Rose
You have 4 free articles remaining this month
Sign-up to our daily newsletter for more articles like this + access to 5 extra articles
Newsweek magazine delivered to your door
Unlimited access to Newsweek.com
Ad free Newsweek.com experience
iOS and Android app access
Personalized daily newsletter
Unlimited access to Newsweek.com
Ad free Newsweek.com experience
iOS and Android app access
Personalized daily newsletter
Daily news headlines & detailed briefings enjoyed by half a million readers.
Subscribe for unlimited access Subscribe now! Already have an account? Login here

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts
Apr 4, 2018 5:34 pm By Robert Spencer
Recently at a meeting I was given a copy of a pamphlet from the Islamic apologist group Sound Vision; you can find the pamphlet online here. And here is why the pamphlet is false and misleading:
Abdul Malik Mujahid’s Sound Vision pamphlet, “Does God Really Command Muslims to Kill Non-Muslims?,” is full of inaccuracies, distortions, and outright falsehoods, to the extent that it appears designed to mislead non-Muslims about the root causes of Islamic jihad violence within Islamic texts and teachings.
Terrorists abroad and Islamophobes at home are busy abusing Islam while building on each other’s hate. Both groups claim that God commands Muslims to kill non-Muslims wherever they find them.
The fact, however, is that a Muslim will be punished in this world under the law for killing someone. S/he will also be banished to Hellfire by God in the afterlife unless s/he repents, reinstates his or her faith, and lives a life of good deeds (Quran 25:68-70).
In reality, Qur’an 25:68-70 warns Muslims not to kill the soul which Allah has forbidden to be killed”; it does not contain any blanket prohibition on killing someone. The Qur’an also tells Muslims to “kill them wherever you find them” (2:191); again, “kill them wherever you find them” (4:89); and “kill the polytheists wherever you find them” (9:5). So clearly killing is permitted, and indeed, commanded, under certain circumstances.
Many of our neighbors are confused by the persistent propaganda by Islamophobes that it is not terrorists but “Islam itself” that is the problem.
They quote the Quran out of context to achieve this goal. In reality, Islamophobes represent a $200 million dollar-plus hate industry, which promotes such bigoted misrepresentations and smears against Islam and Muslims. Islamophobes are also given multiple platforms and mediums to state this nonsense, as well as countless online venues.
This is sheer fantasy and propaganda. There is no “hate industry” of “Islamophobes.” Those who call attention to the jihad threat have far less money and resources than those who oppose them, and far less media access as well.
The result is that hate, anger, and fear are rising in our nation. Gun purchases, hate groups, and the number of armed militias are at an all-time high. President Barack Obama received 400% more death threats than former President George W. Bush did, according to the Secret Service. This is partially because he is assumed to be a secret Muslim born in Kenya.
What connection does this claim have to whether or not the Qur’an teaches violence? None.
The Missing context of the accusations
Prophet Muhammad was a very peaceful man. He never hurt anyone, much less killed anyone. He lived simply, consuming less and sharing more, despite being married to one of the richest person in Mecca. God’s Peace & Blessings be upon him.
In reality, according to early Islamic records, Muhammad several times ordered the murders of people who have insulted him. According to his first biographer, the eighth century Muslim Ibn Ishaq, these included Abu Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess Asma bint Marwan. Abu Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad’s question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, Umayr ibn Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)
Muhammad also ordered the murder of the poet Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf. Muhammad asked: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the Muslims, Muhammad bin Maslama answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Sahih Bukhari, volume 5, book 59, number 369)
Muhammad also personally beheaded the men of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe. “Then they [the Jewish Qurayzah tribe] surrendered, and the apostle [Muhammad] confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. Al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka’b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900.” (Ibn Ishaq 690)
When the Muslims attacked the Jews at the Arabian oasis of Khaybar, a Jewish leader of Khaybar, Kinana bin al-Rabi, was brought before Muhammad; Kinana was supposed to have been entrusted with the treasure of one of the Jewish tribes of Arabia, the Banu Nadir. Kinana denied knowing where this treasure was, but Muhammad pressed him: “Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?” Kinana said yes, that he did know that. Some of the treasure was found. To find the rest, Muhammad gave orders concerning Kinana: “Torture him until you extract what he has.” One of the Muslims built a fire on Kinana’s chest, but Kinana would not give up his secret. When he was at the point of death, one of the Muslims beheaded him. (Ibn Ishaq 511-515)
Pre-Islamic Arabia was caught up in a vicious cycle of war and revenge. Prophet Muhammad launched a non-violent peace movement in the early 7th century A.D., to end precisely the cycle of war, revenge, and terrorism we see today.
In reality, Muhammad’s movement was hardly non-violent, as shown above. He told the Quraysh, the pagan Arabs of Mecca who rejected his claim to be a prophet, “I bring you slaughter.” (Ibn Ishaq 131)
His vision was to bring humanity together with belief in One God and one humanity. He required a belief in all of the Prophets of God and revealed Scriptures. He wanted people to be forgiving and merciful to each other and all creatures on earth.
Contrast that claim with these statements of Muhammad, as reported in hadith (reports of Muhammad’s words and deeds) collections that Muslims consider authentic:
“I have been made victorious through terror.” (Sahih Bukhari 4:52.220)
“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them…. If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.” (Sahih Muslim 4294)
“I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except for the right affairs rest with Allah.” (Sahih Muslim 30)
“May Allah curse the Jews and Christians for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets.” (Sahih Bukhari 1.8.427)
Through a peaceful coalition of tribes he achieved victory by an ingenious campaign of non-violence. When he died in 632, he had brought peace to war-torn Arabia.
In reality, Muhammad subdued Arabia by force. Ibn Ishaq notes that “the apostle took part personally in twenty-seven…raids” (Ibn Ishaq 659-660).
He wanted to achieve all of that just by preaching, which he did for 13 years in Mecca. However, he and his followers were abused and tortured. He himself survived several assassination attempts. His surviving followers narrowly escaped extermination at the hands of the powerful tribal lords of Mecca.
In reality, a Muslim killed one of the Quraysh, beginning the hostilities between the two (Ibn Ishaq 118).
The Prophet’s response to this oppression was to find peace elsewhere. Upon his encouragement, a majority of Muslims migrated to a Christian land where a just king ruled across the Red Sea in Africa.
He himself found refuge and protection in a town almost 300 miles away. He declared that town a peace sanctuary where no one, not even a bird, can be hunted and no tree can be cut. It was a multi-tribal and multi-religious society.
For his peace sanctuary in the city of Madinah, the Prophet developed constitutional treaties with Muslims, Jews and other tribes of the town, declaring them together as “one people” with full freedom of religion, justice, and equality.
In reality, the Constitution of Medina is of doubtful authenticity: it is first mentioned only in Ibn Ishaq’s biography of Muhammad, which was written over 125 years after the accepted date for Muhammad’s death.
And unfortunately for Sound Vision, Ibn Ishaq also details what happened to three Jewish tribes of Arabia, the Banu Qurayzah, Banu Qaynuqa and Banu Nadir, after the Constitution of
Mom's Explorer
Watch Massage
Porno Mother America
Latex Bondage Dolls
Mom Pov Fuck
Muslim Massacre (video game) - Wikipedia
'Kill Muslims, Kill Them All!' Trump Supporter Shouts At ...
'Let's Kill The Muslims!' - Newsweek
Does Allah really command Muslims to kill non-Muslims?
Islam Has Massacred Over 669+ Million Non-Muslims Since 622AD
Destroy Islam, SAVE HUMANITY | Join the peaceful movement ...
While Muslims are being murdered in India, the rest of the ...
‘Law against Islam’: French vote in favour of hijab ban ...
Murder of Lee Rigby - Wikipedia
Kill Muslim