Journal Of Home Sex

👉🏻👉🏻👉🏻 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Intended for healthcare professionals
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.

You can be signed in via any or all of the methods shown below at the same time.
Sign in here to access free tools such as favourites and alerts, or to access personal subscriptions
If you have access to journal content via a university, library or employer, sign in here
Loading institutional login options...
If you have access to journal content via a university, library or employer, sign in here
Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here
If you have access to journal via a society or associations, read the instructions below
Access to society journal content varies across our titles.
If you have access to a journal via a society or association membership, please browse to your society journal, select an article to view, and follow the instructions in this box.
Contact us if you experience any difficulty logging in.
Some society journals require you to create a personal profile, then activate your society account
Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out more and recommend Lean Library.
Search all journals
Search this journal
Consistently one of the world’s leading journals in the exploration of human sexualities within a truly interdisciplinary context, Sexualities publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles that exemplify the very best of current research. It is published six times a year and aims to present cutting-edge debate and review for an international readership of scholars, lecturers, postgraduate students and advanced undergraduates...
Articles most recently published online for this journal.
Alexandra Oliveira, Marie-Louise Janssen
Most read articles in this journal in the last 6 months.
Daniel Y Fiaveh, Michael PK Okyerefo
Kate Senior, Richard Chenhall, Janet Helmer
Ana Cristina Santos, Ana Lúcia Santos
Most cited articles published in this journal in the last 3 years. These statistics are updated weekly using data sourced exclusively from CrossRef.
Articles with the highest Altmetric score from the last 3 months, indicating influence and impact.
Alexandre Baril, Marjorie Silverman

Explore the NEW Sociology, Gender Studies & Cultural Studies Hub, featuring the complete portfolio of journals, new articles, special issues and key books titles.
Rigorous peer review of your research
High visibility for global exposure
When new articles are published online
You are adding the following journals to your email alerts
Sexualities
ISSN: 1363-4607
Online ISSN: 1461-7382

Copyright © 2021 by SAGE Publications
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.


    The academy is in a state of crisis. Too many of our most reputable institutions of higher learning now reject the idea that the university is a place where the free exchange of ideas is not only desirable but essential to the increase of knowledge. On campus after campus, a rigid orthodoxy has replaced a policy of free inquiry; and students are taught what to think rather than how to think. Needless to say, this sea change in the academic community has had a profound effect on the social sciences and humanities, particularly on the nature of the scholarship produced. More and more learned journals reflect the ideological bias that dominates our colleges and universities, and nowhere is that bias more apparent than in the study of homosexuality.
    In writing about such crucial issues as origins, normalcy, social behavior, treatment of children, and health, scholars must conform to a rigid party line or else be relegated to an underworld of outcasts whose works are rejected by editorial boards and their carefully chosen peer reviewers.
    The purpose of The Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior (EJSSB) is to provide a scholarly forum for a discussion of homosexuality that is free from the bias and intimidation found in most journals and their editorial boards. The only criterion for acceptance and publication of articles in EJSSB is sound scholarship, well organized and clearly articulated. If someone submits a sensible, well-crafted study that supports different conclusions from those expressed by our editors, it will be accepted for publication as readily as one that supports those same conclusions. Indeed, our editorial board members frequently disagree with each other about substantive matters.
    Members of EJSSB’s board and its peer reviewers are prepared for the attacks sure to be launched by those with a political agenda to be served. As individuals, many of us have already been maligned by scholars with opposing opinions, almost always with little or no concrete evidence to support their accusations, some of which are provably untrue. We expect attacks even more unprincipled as EJSSB begins to publish corrective studies of homosexuality.
    In addition to the publication of new empirical research, the editorial board is committed to the reexamination of studies that have either been misrepresented to the profession and to the general public (e.g., the oft-quoted Evelyn Hooker study), or else are so flawed that they do not deserve inclusion in the canon of respectable research (e.g., the equally well-cited Jenny study).
    The editorial board notes that empirical studies in the social sciences, no matter how well-designed or executed, inevitably fall short of the precision and finality of studies in the “hard sciences,” if only because social scientists often rely on the credibility of testimony by respondents rather than on objective data, such as one finds in, say, physics or microbiology. In addition, it is much harder to replicate human behavior than it is to replicate the activities of an atom. The size and integrity of samples can always be questioned. Thus those who disagree with the findings of studies on homosexuality can claim that the methodology of the researchers is flawed.
    To admit this truth is not to say that all studies are equally invalid or equally true. Some are demonstrably better than others: some rely on samples that are too small; some samples are clearly chosen to reflect a certain point of view while others strive to give alternative views a fair hearing; in many studies, researchers fail to report findings in their own data that tend to modify and even contradict their stated conclusions. Such studies deserve neither the serious attention of the scholarly community nor the acceptance of the federal judiciary in deciding such cases as Roemer v. Evans and Lawrence v Texas. EJSSB will try to act as an ombudsman for the substantial group of scholars who address the perplexing problems surrounding this highly controversial issue.
    Finally, EJSSB will publish responses and critiques of articles appearing in the journal provided these address the substance of the work in question and are not merely ad hominem attacks on the motives or character of the author.

Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior

The Habib Show Porn
Www Xxx Sex Tv
Twins Lesbi Porn
Porn Tickling Big Porn
Sex Scene 11
The Journal of Sex Research: Vol 58, No 5
Amazon.com: Love and Lust: A Sex Journal (9780811876292 ...
Sexualities: SAGE Journals
Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior - Home
The Journal of Sex Research Aims & Scope
Medical Xpress - Journal of Sex Research
Journal of Sex Research - SCImago Journal Rank
Sex Roles | Home
HOME | Journal of HS
Journal of Homes | djournal.com
Journal Of Home Sex