Issue appeal, continued

I understand why you think that, and on this particular page, I'd agree with you. However, this tag does not always contain an article "category" like here.

For example, at https://www.gelderlander.nl/rheden/uit-de-examenbanken-vrezen-voor-een-her~a700e8dd/ , it's "Examens 2017", which is more like a kicker (refer to the "uber sex claims" example from the checklist); it describes what the article is about.

At https://www.gelderlander.nl/show/maassilo-derde-nederlandse-stop-surfrockers-allah-las-in-een-week~a16fb97d/ , the tag content is "UPDATE"; an important piece of text indicating that the article is about a recent development on a case. This is also the case at https://www.gelderlander.nl/wijchen/bouw-omstreden-megasauna-in-wijchen-kan-beginnen~a4b410a8/ .

Furthermore, the 2.0 element <mark> clearly tells the user that the word isn't part of the article text itself. Having "photo series" here does not make the IV any less clear or less useful.

All of the above considered, I definitely think it's better to occasionally have something like "photo series" as the tag here than to omit all of these useful tags from all pages.

Thank you for reading and reconsidering.