Is Motherless Legal

🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Is Motherless Legal
Can I get arrested for just viewing some certain websites?
Bottom Writer who adds to Quora's ad views. ( 2016 – present ) · Author has 4K answers and 24.9M answer views · 5 y ·
I clicked a link on a website and was redirected to another website with illegal content. I do not want to go to prison. What do I do?
How long would it be before the police raided your home after you accidentally visited an illegal link on Tor?
I accidentally saw CP while I was checking out dark web. Am I in trouble? I closed it at that minute itself.
Will the police come to your house if you search for something illegal online but don't go to any website and exit the tabs quickly?
Will I get in trouble if I accidentally open an illegal (CP, drug dealing, etc.) site on the dark web?
Detention Deputy ( 2007 – present ) · 2 y ·
I clicked a link on a website and was redirected to another website with illegal content. I do not want to go to prison. What do I do?
How long would it be before the police raided your home after you accidentally visited an illegal link on Tor?
I accidentally saw CP while I was checking out dark web. Am I in trouble? I closed it at that minute itself.
Will the police come to your house if you search for something illegal online but don't go to any website and exit the tabs quickly?
Will I get in trouble if I accidentally open an illegal (CP, drug dealing, etc.) site on the dark web?
Could one get arrested for what they search for on Google?
Will the police come to my house for one illegal Google search? I did not go onto any websites. I’m 13.
In the U.S., are we allowed to look up anything on the Internet?
I may have accidentally visited an illegal website. What do I do?
What is the most seemingly illegal website that is actually legal?
Is viewing illegal content online the same as downloading thus against the law?
If a person searches something illegal on Google and went on to click on Google images, could they get arrested? If so, how long would it take the FBI/NSA or police to make an arrest (for example, CP)?
If you search up something illegal, but you don't visit any of the illegal websites, can you still get arrested?
I accidentally viewed something illegal online. I clicked on a link and it showed that it is illegal, but I did not view anything. Will I get in trouble?
I think I may have viewed an illegal image online. How long would it take for the police to come knocking if so? Are there certain internet cases that take priority?
I clicked a link on a website and was redirected to another website with illegal content. I do not want to go to prison. What do I do?
How long would it be before the police raided your home after you accidentally visited an illegal link on Tor?
I accidentally saw CP while I was checking out dark web. Am I in trouble? I closed it at that minute itself.
Will the police come to your house if you search for something illegal online but don't go to any website and exit the tabs quickly?
Will I get in trouble if I accidentally open an illegal (CP, drug dealing, etc.) site on the dark web?
Could one get arrested for what they search for on Google?
Will the police come to my house for one illegal Google search? I did not go onto any websites. I’m 13.
In the U.S., are we allowed to look up anything on the Internet?
I may have accidentally visited an illegal website. What do I do?
What is the most seemingly illegal website that is actually legal?
Something went wrong. Wait a moment and try again.
I suppose that depends on what country you live in.
To my knowledge, the only “topic” that simply viewing it on your computer (in the form of images being loaded by your web browser, which technically is downloading them to your browser cache) is child pornography.
Any other topic, simply browsed and read, that does not violate national security (OK, so that might be a second one…), you cannot be arrest for simply “viewing”.
Now, if you’re looking at web sites that cover how to kill somebody, and someone you know turns up dead in a manner suspiciously similar to what you were browsing… it ain’t g
I suppose that depends on what country you live in.
To my knowledge, the only “topic” that simply viewing it on your computer (in the form of images being loaded by your web browser, which technically is downloading them to your browser cache) is child pornography.
Any other topic, simply browsed and read, that does not violate national security (OK, so that might be a second one…), you cannot be arrest for simply “viewing”.
Now, if you’re looking at web sites that cover how to kill somebody, and someone you know turns up dead in a manner suspiciously similar to what you were browsing… it ain’t gonna help your defense case!
Now here are some things to remember. When you view anything online, a copy of the content is saved on your device for easier, faster retrieval at a later date. Yes, you can clear the content from your device but remember, the portal you used to connect to the website or content is also logging what you viewed, where you viewed it and so on. Here's some friendly advice regarding online activities: Don't visit, download, create or upload anything that you wouldn't want your boss, friends or children to see. Ask yourself if what you're doing would be something that anyone
Now here are some things to remember. When you view anything online, a copy of the content is saved on your device for easier, faster retrieval at a later date. Yes, you can clear the content from your device but remember, the portal you used to connect to the website or content is also logging what you viewed, where you viewed it and so on. Here's some friendly advice regarding online activities: Don't visit, download, create or upload anything that you wouldn't want your boss, friends or children to see. Ask yourself if what you're doing would be something that anyone important or dear to you might find objectionable or illegal.
If something you're looking at or doing feels wrong, it probably is. I'm not saying that you should surf the web and feel paranoid or concerned that someone is watching you, but in reality, this is exactly what's happening. Privacy in the online world as a concept died a long time ago. The only privacy we have is the space between our ears and that's on the way to extinction as well. Conduct yourself online with the same care and attention to detail that you would if you were doing it with the world watching you. Remember, once something is published on the web, it is immortal, it will never truly go away. That's nothing to live in fear of, it simply means that we have to be responsible and accountable for our actions. Real life is no different. I hope I've given you some clarity on this topic, be well.

We'll notify you here with news about
Turn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest?
Victim in 1989 Central Park jogger rape case believes more than 1 person responsible
28-year-old officer shot 3 times including in face
Arizona Republicans weigh in on governor's primary
Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a low-security prison in Florida for 20-year sentence
Ex-husband allegedly kills woman after she opens up about her divorce on TikTok
Why did one teenager face 90 years in jail for viewing porn?
Jan. 12, 2007— -- Sixteen-year-old Matthew Bandy was about as normal a teenager as you could find. He actually liked hanging out with his family.
"He was a happy-go-lucky kid," said his mother, Jeannie Bandy. "Very personable, and big-hearted. I sound like a boastful mom, but I guess the biggest thing is that he could always make me laugh."
"We went on vacations and had a lot of fun together," Matthew said. "I just enjoyed the life I was living. But after I was accused, everything changed."
What was Matthew Bandy accused of? Jeannie and Greg Bandy were shocked to discover that their son was charged with possession of child pornography.
One December morning two years ago, Matthew's life took a dramatic turn. In an exclusive interview with "20/20," the Bandy family reveals how the world as they knew it came crumbling down, and how Matthew's life has since changed.
It has been two years since police officers stood at the doorstep of the Bandy home with a search warrant bearing a devastating charge -- possession of child pornography.
"It was 6 a.m. It was still dark…there was this pounding at the door," Jeannie Bandy said. "I was petrified."
Police officers stormed into the house with guns pointed. "The first thing I thought was, someone's trying to break in our house," Matthew said. "And then there [were] police officers with guns pointed at me, telling me to get downstairs."
Greg Bandy was handed the search warrant and informed that the central suspect was Matthew. According to the warrant, nine images of young girls in suggestive poses were found on the Bandy family computer. Yahoo monitors chat rooms for suspicious content and reported that child porn was uploaded from the computer at the Bandys' home address.
"When they asked me have you ever looked up or uploaded or downloaded erotic images of minors, I was just taken aback and…I said, 'No,'" says Matthew.
Nevertheless, Matthew did have an embarrassing confession. He had been sneaking peaks at adult erotic photos on the family computer. "I got the Web site from a bunch of friends at school. [It was] just adult pornography…Playboy-like images."
Difficult to admit, but not illegal -- or so it seemed. Still, it didn't look good for Matt, as police confiscated the computer and left the house that December day. A family was shattered.
"I still remember when they were cleaning up and leaving and of course I was still in my pajamas and my bathrobe and my fuzzy slippers," Jeannie Bandy said. "I said, 'What do we do now? Should I contact a lawyer?' [The police officer] said, 'Well, they are felonies that the state takes very serious.'"
The Bandys would soon find out just how serious the charges against Matthew were. The family hired Ed Novak, a well-respected attorney from a large law firm in downtown Phoenix.
"20/20" correspondent Jim Avila asked Novak what the family was up against.
"We faced 10 years per count, there were nine counts," said Novak. "If Matt was convicted, those sentences would have to be served consecutively. In other words, he would have been sentenced to 90 years in prison. He would have served time until he died."
Greg and Jeannie Bandy knew their son well. They were shocked at the serious charges against him and frightened by the prospect of such a serious sentence.
"He's never done any drugs," Greg said. "He never drank a drop of alcohol. He's never been a problem, never stayed out late and gotten into trouble or anything like that."
Arizona child pornography laws are among the harshest in the country. As soon as Matthew was charged, he was put on virtual house arrest, and an electronic bracelet was attached to his ankle to monitor his movements 24 hours a day.
"It was just terrifying. I didn't know what was going on. I didn't know why it was happening," Matthew recalled.
Matthew was in an awful predicament, and he tried to keep his house arrest a secret. He wore longer pants to hide the ankle bracelet, but he was scared he would be discovered.
"Yes, I was very scared," he said. "If they found out that I was wearing an ankle bracelet all of a sudden they would be wondering, why are you wearing that? And I had no good answer for them."
The shy young boy could not explain how such pictures appeared on his computer hard drive. The stress of the situation got so bad for Matthew that he told his parents the charges hanging over his head made high school impossible.
"He said 'Mom, I'm hurting,'" said Jeannie. "'I can't sleep. I don't want to disappoint anybody, but I just can't go on anymore.'"
Matt's dreams had been destroyed and his mother was crushed. And even though there was no proof that Matthew personally downloaded those nine pictures, it would be difficult to prove his innocence. Novak said that the pictures alone were practically all the evidence the police needed.
"I thought his chances of winning were probably 20 percent," said Novak.
"They didn't care that I denied it," Matthew said. "They just kept on asking me and kept on thinking that I did it. They just had it built into their mind that this kid is guilty."
What is so frightening about Matt's case? It could happen to anyone.
"The computer had accessed a 'Yahoo' account where there was child pornography," Andrew Thomas, Maricopa County district attorney said. "That was the basis for the search warrants issued by a court."
Yet, the evidence submitted by the Phoenix police department did not identify a specific user. Matt's clean reputation, his good grades and protective family could not stand up to the cold fact that child porn was on that computer. The police and the district attorney had the incriminating photos from the Bandys' computer and the prosecutors were determined to send Matt away.
Matthew Bandy found himself outmatched in the national campaign against child pornography -- harsh laws designed to keep track of pedophiles and punish them severely.
"They didn't care that I denied it, they just kept on asking me and kept on thinking that I did it," he said. "They just had it built in their mind that this kid is guilty, and we're going to make sure that he's convicted. No matter what the means are."
The Bandy family contends that Thomas was on a mission and that his desire to convict was so strong that he ignored important evidence -- like the fact that Matthew passed a lie detector test. The fact that the test indicated that Matt was telling the truth wasn't taken into account.
And that's when the Bandy family really began to fight back. They hired two polygraph examiners who confirmed Matthew was telling the truth. Then they ordered two psychiatric evaluations which concluded that Matthew had no perverted tendencies.
ABC's Jim Avila asked Thomas about the results of the lie detectors tests and Matt's psychiatric evaluations.
"Quite frankly, criminal defendants are not famous for being forthcoming with the facts," Thomas explained. "I'm not a big believer in polygraph tests. And certainly, they're not admissible in court. At the end of the day, we certainly felt there was a good faith reason to go forward with the prosecution." (Click here to read excerpts of Jim Avila's interview with Thomas.)
Despite the positive polygraphs and psychiatric exams, the district attorney pressed on. So the Bandys and their attorney tackled the most difficult question on the table. If Matthew didn't put the pictures on the computer, how did they get there?
For that answer, they turned to computer forensic expert Tammi Loehrs.
"If you have an Internet connection, high speed, through, let's say, your cable company, or through the phone company, that computer is always on, and basically you have an open doorway to the outside," Loehrs said. "So the home user has no idea who's coming into their computer."
Loehrs went into the Bandys' computer and what she found could frighten any parent -- more than 200 infected files, so-called backdoors that allowed hackers to access the family computer from remote locations, no where near Matthew's house.
"They could be on your computer and you'd never know it," she said.
Loehrs says she does not believe that Matthew uploaded those images onto his computer "based on everything I know and everything I've seen on that hard drive."
But police still had those pictures, and the harsh child porn laws made going to court risky for Matthew.
"All the jury would know is that there were these images on the computer," Matthew said. "And here's me sitting in the courtroom … let's blame him because he was on the computer, obviously he did it."
Even if he was only convicted on one count, Matthew would have faced 10 years in jail, and have his "life ruined," said Novak.
"We had no faith," said Jeannie Bandy. "Our lawyers had no faith. We were told he more than likely would end up in jail."
So the Bandys took a deal from the prosecution. In exchange for dropping all counts of child pornography, Matthew pleaded guilty to the strange charge of distributing obscene materials to minors -- a "Playboy" magazine to his classmates.
"To be precise, he was charged with showing [a Playboy magazine to other 16-year-olds] before school, at lunch and after school," Greg Bandy said.
But the Bandy family nightmare was not over. While the prosecution deal offered no jail time for Matthew, he would still be labeled a sex offender. Under Arizona law and in most states around the country, sex crimes carry with them a life of branding. Matthew would be forced to register as a sex offender everywhere he lived, for the rest of his life.
"I have to stay away from children," said Matthew. "I cannot be around any area where there might be minors, including the mall, or the movies, or restaurants or even church. To go to church I have to have written consent from our priest, I have to sit in a different pew, one that doesn't have a child sitting in it."
The judge couldn't believe the prosecution was insisting on sex offender status and invited Matthew to appeal. "20/20" was there when two years of fear and misery finally ended. A message arrived from the judge, ironically on the computer, informing them that Matthew would not be labeled a sex offender. Matt and his parents had won his life back.
In the den of the Bandy home sits the family computer, now unplugged from the Internet. The Bandys learned that, for them, the Web is simply too dangerous.
"It means that computers are not safe," said Jeannie. "I don't want to have one in my house. Under even under the strictest rules and the strictest security, your computer is vulnerable."
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events

We'll notify you here with news about
Turn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest?
By Column by ADAM LEVIN, Credit.com
Here are some links to be wary of when surfing the internet.
Victim in 1989 Central Park jogger rape case believes more than 1 person responsible
Active shooter reported at Dallas airport
28-year-old officer shot 3 times including in face
Arizona Republicans weigh in on governor's primary
Ghislaine Maxwell moved to a low-security prison in Florida for 20-year sentence
Here are links that you should never click for your own sake.
Oct. 6, 2013— -- intro: Here's a scary scenario. You're innocently surfing the Web, maybe on an unfamiliar site, not paying close attention. Suddenly your computer screen fills with illegal pornographic images of minors. You try to navigate away, but a warning screen branded by the National Security Administration's Internet Surveillance Program pops up with the message: "Your computer has been locked due to suspicion of illegal content downloading and distribution."
You are then offered a sort of Hobson's choice: Pay a fine immediately, or face prosecution for downloading child pornography.
The folks behind that scam were actually based in Russia, SC Magazine reported , not NSA headquarters. The number of people entrapped by this type of scam has been increasing exponentially. In a recent report from McAfee, an Internet security company, there were fewer than 25,000 samples of ransomware catalogued per quarter in the first half of 2011. In the second quarter of 2013 alone, the number of new samples multiplied to more than 320,000, (which was double the number in the first quarter of this year).
"During the past two quarters we have catalogued more ransomware than in all previous periods combined," MacAfee found. "This trend is also reflected by warnings from law enforcement and federal agencies around the globe."
If you think the most common cyber scam still involves deposed N
Best Fap Sites
Sexy Treesome
Harcore Creampie