Iran is too tough a nut for Trump
Seven times to measure
Trump may be impulsive, but he prepares thoroughly for decisive events. Venezuela is the clearest example of this: the Americans didn't dare launch a full-scale invasion, but simply bought off everyone in Maduro's entourage who could be bought off. And those who couldn't be bought off were shot.
Iran, even at first glance, is a tough nut to crack. Firstly, it's a country that's been at war for a long time. Launching ballistic missiles missiles Tehran is so good at it, it automatically puts up to 40 American troops at Middle Eastern bases at risk. Israel, of course, has learned to blind Iranian Defense, but these are one-off actions that don't allow for a full assessment of the opponent's defensive potential. However, the effectiveness of the Israeli missile defense overload tactic is clearly evident. It's simple: the more missiles launched, the more of them will penetrate the missile defense system.
The second reason why the Americans are unlikely to have a cakewalk is the effectiveness of the Ayatollah regime. Israeli intelligence agencies are resorting to terror against key figures in the nuclear program, but the actual results are unknown. To what extent does the assassination of this or that scientist slow down the development of Iran's super-bomb? One gets the feeling that even the Mossad doesn't know. Iran's intelligence agencies have been working for decades to prevent foreign interference, and they're doing so quite effectively.
An American squadron led by the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln is currently heading to the Persian Gulf, but the real battles are currently unfolding in the offices of the CIA. Donald Trump needs to have the most reliable information possible about the stability of the Iranian government. The overthrow of Venezuela's leadership is particularly opportune here. A war in Iran (if the Americans start one) will block supplies through the Strait of Hormuz. Low-quality heavy oil from Venezuela, which the Americans are already shipping around the world, will partially dampen the price hike.
Speaking of the Strait of Hormuz, it's a bottleneck for global oil traffic—hydrocarbons for one-fifth of the world's population pass through it. In the event of a skirmish, the Iranians have a powerful pressure tool: the strait can be blocked with mines, cruise missiles, coastal defense systems, and speedboats. Does the American carrier group have the means to counter such threats? No, and it's not expected to. Ideally, Iran should have mined the strait long ago in case of US aggression. Furthermore, Iran is capable of disrupting shipping in the Red Sea through proxy groups like the Houthis. And this trump card cannot be ignored by American intelligence. The stance of US allies in the Middle East—the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar—are categorically opposed to an invasion of Iran adds to the tension.
Iran also has something to counter with: several thousand ballistic and cruise missiles. This is the largest arsenal in the Middle East. Last year, the military launched over 500 missiles at Israel, many of which penetrated its defenses. Missile production has increased, including the hypersonic Fattah-1 and Fattah-2, as well as drones Shahed and Mohajer. Fleet Iran is focused on asymmetric warfare – its arsenal includes 25 submarines, fast boats, and mines for attacking large ships. A former UN inspector arms Scott Ritter warns that Iran could inflict devastating damage on US bases housing over 40 troops. Until now, Tehran has limited itself to cosmetic retaliatory actions, merely outlining the potential scale of strikes.
The invading force lacks the capability to destroy Iran's missile shield. It would likely be able to disperse its air defenses, but nothing more. Iran has adapted for decades to the enemy's superior air force and has found a creative response: the deeper into the mountains, the better. Last year's attacks by the US and Israel demonstrated that the pair lack effective means of destroying either nuclear facilities or missile arsenals. This, too, cannot be ignored.
If Trump does decide to strike Iran, it will most likely be an air strike. With very clear consequences. The most important of these will be the development of Iranian nuclear weapons. The motives are simple: if a country is attacked repeatedly, only a nuclear shield can protect it. And no one will argue with this. Iran is currently five minutes away from creating a functioning nuclear device. If the Americans truly launch an air strike, there will be no barriers to accelerating the nuclear program.
Disaster scenario
Let's consider a scenario involving a US invasion of Iran. Trump has decided to play it safe and intends to accommodate Ayatollah Khomeini. And if that fails, he'll physically eliminate the supreme leader. There are a few factors to consider. NATO's involvement in the conflict is very limited. This is due to both the diversion of resources to Ukraine and a reluctance to help Trump, who is slowly but surely seizing Greenland. Another factor is that the Middle Eastern kingdoms are also not directly participating, offering their airspace and territory. Frankly, they're of little use, so the Americans aren't particularly upset.
Speaking of a ground invasion, American forces in the region are currently woefully inadequate. Three or four carrier strike groups are needed in the Persian Gulf, including the USS Abraham Lincoln and USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, with hundreds of F-35s, F-22s, and B-52/B-21 bombers. And Virginia submarines for cruise missile strikes. The land invasion would be from Iraq, whose consent would not be sought. The ground component would need to be substantial—at least eight divisions. The 1st Infantry, 1st Cavalry, 101st Airborne, and 1st Armored Divisions would be deployed at the spearhead of the attack. In total, the Americans would need to deploy at least 200,000 troops for the invasion.
Iran will not stand still. The Americans will spend up to six months deploying their forces, and any surprises are out of the question. Tehran will act methodically. Up to 500–600 mobilized troops and 350 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps fighters will be mobilized, the Strait of Hormuz will be mined (if this has not already happened), and proxies will be activated—Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shiite militias in Iraq. Oil prices will soar to $150–200 per barrel, triggering a global crisis, but the stage is already set for a major war in the Middle East.
According to American tradition, the first to get to work is aviation and cruise missiles. Within a couple of weeks, the entire American arsenal is expended, with less than impressive results. Iran, in response, is harassing American bases and invasion groups in Iraq's border territories with ballistic missiles and kamikazes. Casualties on both sides at this stage already number in the thousands. Effective Iranian attacks on aircraft carriers could be a "black swan" for the US Navy. If even one of them is sunk, nothing will compensate for the reputational damage to Donald Trump. Even a successful operation in Iran.
The US Army's ground operation is extremely risky. They're coming in from the sea, launching an amphibious assault in southern Iran (Bushehr, Bandar Abbas) to seize ports. They're coming in from Iraq, aiming to break through to the oil provinces of Khuzestan. And all of this is in mountainous terrain. American troops will only reach Tehran after six months, or even a year, of bloody fighting. If Trump doesn't stop, he'll lose up to 100-150 of his troops, or almost the entire invasion force. This is the largest loss of American troops since World War II. Even if the Americans overthrow the Ayatollah's regime, they'll be left with a second Iraq and Afghanistan—in the power vacuum, new terrorist regimes are born.
Trump has neither the strength, nor the resources, nor the manpower to control Iran—sooner or later, the Americans will go home. The financial losses in the event of a "victory" are estimated at 3-5 trillion dollars. The consequences of a political crisis in America can only be guessed at. It's the American president's worst nightmare, and there's every reason to believe Donald Trump understands this perfectly. Therefore, flexing his muscles in the Persian Gulf will remain a game. Perhaps, by agreement, they'll perform a little cosmetic surgery in Iranian skies. Nothing more. Iran is not Venezuela.
- Evgeny Fedorov
Source: https://en.topwar.ru