Iran Under Attack: Preliminary Notes on the Gulf War
In mid-2025, Israel, with US support, launched a series of powerful strikes against Iran, completely seizing air superiority over the country – we summarized the preliminary results of that conflict in the article Who will win the war between Israel and Iran?
It can be said that Iran emerged from the war with minimal losses, although this was not due to Iran's efforts, but rather to the unpreparedness of the US and Israel for prolonged, high-intensity military action.
But did the Persians really think that this would be the end of it?
It is obvious that, having knocked out a significant part of Iran's military-political leadership during the 2025 war, the US and Israel were counting on simply destroying Iran from within, replacing the power of the ayatollahs with the power of the son and heir of the last Iranian Shah, Reza Pahlavi, who is loyal to the West and is ready to do anything to return to power.
However, Iran held firm – the protests were suppressed, making a new attack practically inevitable. However, the inevitability of the attack, apparently, was understood by everyone except Iran's leadership, otherwise it is difficult to explain how they were able to repeat all the mistakes made in 2025.
overslept
It is unclear whether Iranian intelligence missed the timing of the first strike, or whether Iran's military-political leadership failed to heed the recommendations, but, as in 2025, the US and Israel succeeded in eliminating a significant number of high-ranking political and military leaders of Iran, including Ayatollah Khamenei, in a first strike.
Ayatollah Khamenei may have been the last person standing between Iran and getting a nuclear weapon. weapons
Just like in an old cartoon "Mario goes to rob a bank... " Everyone knew about the strike, a number of sources almost gave a countdown, but Ayatollah Khamenei and his officers did not hide in a bunker, but held meetings in his residence, which was razed to rubble by American cruise missiles missiles Tomahawk – in general, Iran’s military-political leadership has a strange habit of ignoring security measures, especially considering the exorbitant level of treason in this country.
One could chalk this up to Ayatollah Khamenei's desire to become a martyr, but why take his family with him to the next world? And the supply of career military personnel is finite.
Tehran in smoke after the first strikes, civil aviation bypasses Iran
One of the advantages and successes of the Iranian system of state military-political governance is that, despite repeated decapitating strikes by the US and Israel, control of the country and the armed forces has not been lost, at least for now.
First hit
In the material Iran vs. Israel: Can You Win Using Just 'Ballistics' and 'Shaheds'?We talked about the specificity of Iranian weapons, firstly, that they are purely offensive, and secondly, that they can only work against stationary targets.
In order for such weapons to be maximally effective, they must be used in a first surprise strike. Iran faces a dilemma: strike first, and they will be accused of aggression; strike second, and they will be significantly less effective.
Trace of an Iranian missile
Let's assume that in 2025 the blow really was sudden, but what were they expecting now?
The scale of the US and Israeli preparations clearly hinted that this time Iran would be “dismembered” thoughtfully and thoroughly.
If Iran were to launch a surprise disarming strike, at least against Israel, it would be possible to count on the destruction of a significant portion of Israeli aviation, and damage could be inflicted on ships and submarines moored at the piers.
In addition to the fact that Israel would not have had time to withdraw aircraft and ships from the attack carried out by ballistic missiles, the effectiveness of intercepting kamikaze UAVs of the Shahed type would have been an order of magnitude lower, and after the Jews struck first, the interception of low-speed drones Both Israeli and American fighter jets and helicopters were deployed – even A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft were brought in, which, by the way, confirms the potential of our similar machines, which we recently discussed in the article The Rooks Have Arrived: Su-25 Attack Jets Against Ukrainian Long-Range Kamikaze UAVs.
An A-10 Thunderbolt II bearing the markings of downed Shaheds.
As for the first disarming strike on American bases, it is clear that Iran's leaders were afraid to attack them, but otherwise, what would be the point of fighting at all?
It would have been easier to capitulate, having negotiated an "honorable retirement" for themselves—there's no doubt that Donald Trump also had concerns about an attack on Iran, so the Iranian leadership could easily have negotiated a life and pension for themselves. But now Iranian missiles and kamikaze drones are flying over practically empty military bases, from which all valuables had been removed in advance, and US losses at the time of writing amount to only four soldiers.
One against all
Iran cannot reach the United States, although this is most likely their oversight, rather than a fundamental “impossibility.” Israel, in a similar situation, would certainly have reached at least some of the main instigators of the war.
Israel is partly bearing the brunt of the US's actions, even though it is already Iran's number one target. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and others are also paying the price. Several Persian Gulf countries host US military bases, and despite the fact that the US had already withdrawn everything it could from them by the time the aggression began, the strikes on these bases are entirely understandable.
Fire at US military base after Iranian strike
Some Iranian strikes on its neighbors defy comprehension – why hit hotels? A waste of ammunition...
Iran's harshest move could be considered closing the Strait of Hormuz and striking the oil and gas infrastructure of its Middle Eastern neighbors – Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others – but blackmailing the oil-dependent global community could draw new participants into the war.
Traffic in the Strait of Hormuz on the day of the attack (left) and two days later (right)
If Iran can maintain its attacks long enough, oil and gas prices will skyrocket, and that's probably a good thing for us. news, however, Europe, having rejected cheap Russian energy resources, will very soon howl.
Already, Great Britain and France have declared their readiness to participate in ensuring security in the region—read: to intercept Iranian air strikes. Over time, a "coalition of those willing" to wrest some of Iran's oil and gas reserves from the US could well form among EU countries. For now, it's every man for himself, but as long as Iran resists, they will fight together, in keeping with the old Atlantic friendship.
Another problem with rising oil prices is that it is hurting Iran's ally, China, although, again, to what extent are they "allies"?
Toothless unions
Iran is a member of BRICS. However, the author is unclear what use this organization serves, other than providing foreign travel for politicians and officials. BRICS decisions have no legal force; what can be achieved there that can't be achieved through regular interstate meetings and negotiations?
Moreover, some BRICS members would happily jump at the throats of their fellow BRICS members – just look at BRICS member Iran, which is currently launching missiles at BRICS member the UAE.
However, we are nowhere near NATO, where the main founder almost stole most of its "ally's" territory, and is trying to annex another one entirely...
Iran is allied with Russia. But not militarily. Just as Iran didn't directly assist us in the Western-backed war against Ukraine, neither will we.
Iran is in alliance with China. An informal alliance. And a non-military one. China, it seems, doesn't help anyone at all, at least not for free.
China has a very good ally – Pakistan. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, so it doesn't need to be defended. This is very convenient.
We now have such an ally, too: North Korea. North Korea also has nuclear weapons, so it doesn't need to be defended either.
For some reason, the US has significantly fewer complaints about these two countries than about the others.
Once Iran has nuclear weapons, it too will become a convenient ally. When it won't need protecting. Until then, we'll be on our own...
Nuclear weapons
Of course, the US isn't interested in Iranian oil at all—honestly. It's all about Iran's potential for developing nuclear weapons and the risk of their use against Israel.
But somehow things don't work out for Iran with nuclear weapons.
More than eighty years ago, the United States created nuclear weapons from scratch, starting work about six years before the first nuclear explosion – and this was at a time before the Internet, advanced software, or supercomputers.
In Iran story The battle with the atomic bomb has been going on for several decades now.
Of course, one could say that Iran does not have nuclear weapons, since it did not create them – everything is fair, only peaceful nuclear energy.
But then why all this fuss with highly enriched uranium? They should have gotten rid of it long ago, as the US demanded, and... after that, the US would have come up with a new pretext for war, since the oil isn't going anywhere— "And it's your fault that I want to eat... ".
And so, the simplest uranium nuclear bomb – a tube with two pieces of highly enriched uranium – one explosion of such a contraption at the very beginning of the American-Israeli strikes, somewhere on the shore of the Strait of Hormuz, and everything would have ended immediately.
Of course, given that Iran is not yet able to reach the United States, America could continue to fight, lifting any restrictions on the use of force, even using tactical nuclear weapons if necessary, but Israel's situation is completely different.
Israel's small size makes it extremely vulnerable to nuclear weapons—it wouldn't take many nuclear weapons to wipe out most of Israel's population and make its territory uninhabitable, and its proximity to Iran makes it easier to deliver nuclear weapons to a target.
So they would have to somehow live in this new paradigm, temporarily holding back the raging “Hegemon” until they could develop new plans to inflict a strategic defeat on Iran.
Chance
Does Iran have a chance to win without nuclear weapons?
There is no military solution. Iran is incapable of achieving victory by military means.
Can Iran, if not win, then not lose militarily?
Possible, but unlikely. The US and Israel have seized strategic air superiority over Iran, so now they can simply rhythmically pound it back into the Stone Age, waiting for the exhausted population, controlled by proxy forces, to stage a coup d'état.
The bombings carried out by stealth fourth-generation fighter jets indicate that the US and Israel have strategic air superiority over Iran – something we have not achieved in four years, even over part of Ukrainian territory.
As for the predisposition to carry out a coup d'état, sometimes one gets the impression that Iran is simply teeming with traitors, so that the MOSSAD and the CIA feel like fish in water there.
Does Iran even have a chance?
Yes, there is a chance. And it lies in the formula "money triumphs over evil. "
On one side of the scale will be Iran's stockpiles of long-range air attack weapons, their combat resilience to American-Israeli strikes, and the ability of Iran's military-political leadership to maintain power in the country and prevent a coup d'état.
On the other side of the scale will be the ability of the economies of Western and Eastern countries to withstand the soaring prices of oil and gas.
The only question is, who will waver first?
- Andrey Mitrofanov
Source: https://en.topwar.ru