Interpretation of Inventive Step. Private Monopoly Vs Public Interest
👓 Kandadai Syamala,M. R. Sreenivasa Murthy,Upadhyaya SujataInterpretation of Inventive Step. Private Monopoly Vs Public Interest
✅ The book is a unique work focused on the inventive stepnon-obviousness, one of the criteria for qualifying an invention to be a patent with special reference to pharmaceutical sector. The interdisciplinary approach towards science and law will help lawyers, scientists, techno-legal researchers and academicians of various fields such as science, law, social sciences in understanding the legal, social and scientific perspective of interpretation of inventivestep non-obviousness. Thus, the Book is delved into the legal regimes of Europe and USA along with India vis-a-vis the requirement of inventive step. Further it discusses the challenges to the interpretation of inventive step and brings forth how the inventive step requirement strikes a balance between private monopoly and public interest and thereby fulfils the constitutional norms.
Также:
Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften «Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Philologischen und Historischen Classe der K. H. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Munchen. Jahrgang 1886 (Classic Reprint)»Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores «Correspondencia Diplomatica Con la Legacion de Bolivia. Con Motivo de los Sucesos Ocurridos en la Frontera Durante la Ultima Guerra Civil (Classic Reprint)»
Chile Chile «Constitucion Politica de la Republica de Chile. Jurada y Promulgada el 25 de Mayo de 1833, Con las Reformas Efectuadas Hasta el 26 de Junio de 1893 (Classic Reprint)»
Bernd Wagner «Lobbyismus als Instrument kommunaler Europapolitik»
D Narciso Gay,Ernest Legouvé «Historia Moral De Las Mujeres»