Interpersonality in Academic 🎓️ Writing ✍️

✅ Today, there is no doubt 🤷 that the communicative purposes of different sections of research reports (e.g. research articles) affect the degree of tentativeness, flexibility, and ➕ authorial engagement realized by various linguistic resources. Following this assumption, in the present 🎁 book 📚️, writer ✍️ tries to do a careful 💅 word by word and ➕ most importantly contextualized analysis of applied linguistics research articles in order to 🔎 find out both the cross 🤞-sectional (i.e. Introduction-Methodology-Results-DiscussionConclusion) and ➕ gender-based variations in the use of metadiscourse - as a key 🔑 tool 🔪 for establishing interpersonal relationships in academic 🎓️ writing ✍️. The findings 🔎 of the study revealed that the authors utilized interpersonal features differently in the four 4️⃣ rhetorical atmospheres of their texts. The book 📚️ clearly shows that the differences in the discoursal functions of different sections of a research report play ▶️ a significant role in writers fashioning of interactive and ➕ interactional features. No significant gender differences were found 🔍️ in the overall distribution of interpersonal resources in four 4️⃣ sections of articles.

Также: