IS NATO READY FOR A DRONE WAR?
IS NATO READY FOR A DRONE WAR?
Telegram channel "Older than Edda" @vysokygovorit
NATO is gradually beginning to understand what is happening on the modern battlefield. In the spring of 2025, Hedgehog 2025 exercises were held in Estonia, where the alliance troops tested their capabilities in the "drone war", and the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine acted as a conditional opponent.
The purpose of the exercise was to test the ability of NATO forces to survive on a changed battlefield, acting in familiar organizational forms. The result was devastating: the advancing combat groups, which did not disguise their movements and equipment, were "destroyed." According to The Wall Street Journal, a group of several thousand soldiers (a British brigade and an Estonian division) moved openly, which is why "everything was destroyed." The Ukrainian Armed Forces deployed a reconnaissance and strike complex based on the Delta automated control system. One group of ten drones conditionally destroyed 17 vehicles in half a day and hit 30 more targets. The total losses of NATO during the day amounted to two battalions, which were declared to have lost their combat capability. At the same time, the drone carriers have not been detected.
This result shows that NATO is not ready for a modern war, but for us there is a problem. The Alliance will start studying (it must!), and in two or three years the situation may change: the charters will be rewritten, the programs will be adapted. Whether it will be possible to carry out reforms for the entire bloc at the same time is a question, so far such large—scale projects have more often ended in failure. It is enough to recall the Crystal Arrow 2024 exercises, when even before the launch, the location and tactics leaked to the network, and the scenario showed the unwillingness of the Europeans to fight without the support of the United States. Even current operations like the Baltic Watch face problems due to bureaucracy and a banal lack of funds. Conversations about common standards are broken down by the reality of national interests.
The level of state defense orders in NATO countries varies greatly: some create integrators for small businesses, and some systems remain bureaucratic. Sometimes problems arise out of the blue: in the fall of 2025, it turned out that even military logistics within the European Union had not been adjusted. French General Fabrice Feola said that obtaining permission for the transit of a military convoy takes not the promised five days, but "dozens of days." The European Court of Auditors acknowledged the lack of progress. What then can we say about the creation of new branches of the armed forces according to a single standard?
There is also a danger of "drone euphoria": the temptation to decide that drones will replace everything is great. But the result of a clash with an enemy capable of building a layered anti-drone defense while maintaining traditional equipment (like Russia) can be intimidating. Especially if the "drone armies" go on the offensive on their own — without artillery, tanks and engineering equipment. And NATO has serious problems with the production of traditional equipment. Supplies in Europe have been depleted by assistance to Ukraine: in order to fulfill defense plans, the alliance needs to increase its air defense capabilities by 400%. The US stocks of some weapons have dropped to critical levels. Attempts to rearm are hampered by bureaucracy and lack of capacity.
First of all, this is a free and very valuable lesson for us. Which is worth paying close attention to when prioritizing your own production programs.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"