Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Ltd 901 A2d 523 💕

Defending Snow and Ice Claims in Pennsylvania and New Jersey

HARVEY v ROUSE CHAMBERLIN LTD

Mertira v Lodge 1193 EDA 2024

Berry v Roger Dickson Rhonda Dickson Elite Prop Mgmt

Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Complete Opinion 2006

Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Ltd 901 A2d 523

Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Ltd Casetext

HARVEY AND CO v ROUSE

HH Manufacturing Co v Tomei T memorandum Justia Law

NONPRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT IOP 65

Clause F v Ace Hardwood Corp memorandum Justia Law

Pennsylvania Summary Judgment in Premises Liability Case

Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Ltd Pennsylvania Case Law

Harvey v Rouse Chamberlin Ltd 901 A2d 523

HARVEY v ROUSE CHAMBERLIN LTD 2006


v. MOTORCYCLE SAFETY SERVICES, INC. AND MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, PA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STEPHEN F. YAVOR, MARK BRZOZOWSKI AND JAMES PALMER, Appellees No. 618 EDA 2024 Appeal from the Judgment Entered April 1, 2024 In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Civil Division at No(s): 2024-02691. This is a slip and fall case. At the close of Appellants case-in-chief, Appellees moved for nonsuit arguing that the hills and ridges doctrine precluded a finding of liability. The trial court agreed and granted the nonsuit. After careful review, we reverse. 1 Appellants purport to appeal from the order denying their post-trial motion. See. 17 janv. 2006 · In Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd., 2006 PA Super 130, 901 A.2d 523 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2006), snow had fallen in the area from January 20, 2024, to the early morning of January 21, 2024. Summary of this case from Sarver v. Sherwin Williams Co. 2 juin 2006 · Nancy HARVEY and Jim Harvey, h/w, Appellants v. ROUSE CHAMBERLIN, LTD. and J.L. Watts Excavating, Appellees. Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court. 26 juin 2006 · The hills and ridges doctrine did not mandate dismissal of plaintiff's case because plaintiff alleged that she fell because of black ice, which was the result of plowing by defendants, and. 18 août 2024 · Summary Judgment Granted in Slip and Fall Based on “Hills and Ridges” Doctrine by Nigel A. Greene The Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas entered Summary Judgment in favor of an apartment complex and its management company represented by Rawle & Henderson LLP. Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd., 901 A.2d 523, 526 (Pa. Super. 2006) (citations omitted; emphasis in original). In Harvey, “evidence . . . suggests that the condition of the land was influenced by human intervention” and thus the ice slip causing the injury could not have been “the result of an entirely natural accumulation.” Id. at. OPINION BY: PANELLA, J: ¶1 Filed: June 2, 2006 Appellants, Nancy and Jim Harvey, appeal from the judgment entered on September 12, 2005,1 in favor of Appellees, Rouse Chamberlin, Ltd. ( Rouse Chamberlin ) and J.L. Watts Excavating ( Watts ), in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. This is a slip and fall case. At the close of Appellants. Nancy HARVEY and Jim Harvey, h/w, Appellants v. ROUSE CHAMBERLIN, LTD. and J.L. Watts Excavating, Appellees. Decided: June 02, 2006 BEFORE: MUSMANNO, PANELLA, and TAMILIA, JJ. Keith W. Kofsky, Philadelphia, for appellants. Theodore P. Winicov, Philadelphia, for Rouse, appellee. Joseph A. Chellew, III, Perkasie, for Watts, appellee. 2 juin 2006 · 02 June 2006: Citation: 901 A.2d 523: Parties: Nancy HARVEY and Jim Harvey, h/w, Appellants v. ROUSE CHAMBERLIN, LTD. and J.L. Watts Excavating, Appellees. Court: Pennsylvania Superior Court. 2 juin 2006 · Research the case of Harvey v. Rouse Chamberlin, from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 06-02-2006. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data. 26 juin 2006 · The hills and ridges doctrine did not mandate dismissal of plaintiff's case because plaintiff alleged that she fell because of black ice, which was the result of plowing by defendants, and because. Get free access to the complete judgment in HARVEY AND CO. v. ROUSE on CaseMine. HARVEY v. ROUSE CHAMBERLIN, LTD. View Case; Cited Cases; Cited Cases . Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.