Gliwice buying Ecstasy

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Gliwice buying Ecstasy

Mary Westcott instructed by Birds Solicitors for the Applicant. This judgment was handed down remotely at on Tuesday 4 June by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives. The offending is punishable on conviction in Poland with imprisonment of up to 12 years. Leave to appeal was granted on grounds that the Judge was wrong to conclude that:. The arrest warrant and further information. The arrest warrant was issued on 30 July , pursuant to arrangements under the Trade and Co-operation Agreement and certified by the National Crime Agency on 7 July Box B of the warrant records that the decision on which the warrant is based is an enforceable decision on provisional arrest by the Court at Katowice. The conduct underlying the warrant is set out at Box E. At short intervals of time, acting with intent he participated in trafficking in substantial amounts of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Over a dozen transactions he bought no less than 3. The conduct amounts to narcotic offences under Article 56 of the Act on Counteracting Drug Addiction in conjunction with Rrticles 12 and 65 of the Penal Code. Further information issued by the Polish authorities dated 8 September provides additional detail of the offending as follows:. He is accused of placing on the market a total of no less than 3. This material had been collected since 12 May The decision to present the charges against him was issued on 15 September After verifying this information and collecting full evidence against him, on 15 September there was issued a decision to present him with charges. The Appellant gave a written statement and oral evidence before the District Judge. His former partner gave a statement and oral evidence. Both were cross examined. Taking the facts from the judgment, the following background is common ground:. He was a recreational drug user at that time. By his offending had escalated into supplying small amounts of drugs to other men in the area. On 7 March he was convicted in the District Court in Gliwice and received a sentence of three years imprisonment. The District Judge found the appellant was not a fugitive from justice. He has settled status. He has done various work. His daughter was born in and his son was born in His son stays with his mother during the week and with the Appellant at the weekends. The Appellant provides financial and material support to his former partner and has a close relationship with his children. He instructed a Polish lawyer and was told that there an outstanding case against him in Poland. The details are as follows:. From to August in Tarnowskie Gory and in Strzybnica he supplied marijuana in pipes, amphetamines and ecstasy pills in an unspecified amount and for an unspecified price. Between November and March in Tarnowskie Gory and Bytom he provided Tomasz Szal with drugs, namely two lines of amphetamine and two ecstasy tablets on each occasion. From to August in Tarnowskie Gory and in Strzybnica and Bytom he provided Daniel Kwiatkowski with hashish, amphetamines and ecstasy tablets for an unidentified number and price. From to August in Tarnowskie Gory and Bytom, he provided Daniel Kwiatkowski with a line of amphetamine and ecstasy tablets. In his written proof of evidence, the Appellant explained the background to the offending and its consequences as follows:. At some point between and I was arrested for possessing drugs. I was a recreational user. I did also have regular work going to a wholesale yard and collecting goods for a lady who ran a grocery store, but that was usually finished by the afternoon. By my offending had escalated into supplying small amounts of drugs to other young men in the local area. Essentially it was much cheaper to buy a larger amount and then share it out between us. At the hearing before me, Counsel for the Appellant and Respondent who appeared before the District Judge checked their notes of the oral evidence given by the Appellant before the Judge. There was agreement between them that the Appellant gave unchallenged oral evidence that he had admitted to additional drug related activity beyond that set out in the charges, in order for all matters to be dealt with in Whilst the warrant contains a short and concise statement of the allegation, it is supplemented by the contents of the further information of 8 September which confirms that the requested person is suspected of being involved in trafficking in significant quantities of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in not in significant quantities. He is accused of placing on the market no less than 3. He committed those acts in the Polish towns of Zabrze and Tarnowskie Gory. He explained his reasons as follows:. Subscribers can access the reported version of this case. Search over million documents from over countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more. Advanced A. Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world. Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document. Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case. Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments. Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case. Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received. Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found. VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. Your World of Legal Intelligence. Hearing dates: 1 February and 1 May Mrs Justice Thornton. Taking the facts from the judgment, the following background is common ground: a Between and the Appellant was arrested for possessing drugs. The details are as follows: i. The decision of the District Judge. To continue reading. You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits. Request your trial.