Girls Who Spank Boys

Girls Who Spank Boys
Сервисы Google доступны на этих языках: English

Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
: large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is : done by women and not men.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
< cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu > wrote: >Debbb80148 ( debbb...@aol.com ) wrote: >: There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of why at least a >: large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is >: done by women and not men. > > Are there any feminists out there who would like to rally to >Debbb80148's banner?
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Debbb80148 ( debbb...@aol.com ) wrote: : There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of why at least a : large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is : done by women and not men.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu wrote: > > Debbb80148 ( debbb...@aol.com ) wrote: > : There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of why at least a > : large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is > : done by women and not men. >
> Are there any feminists out there who would like to rally to > Debbb80148's banner?
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Thomas Manuel wrote: > > cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu ( ) wrote: > > >Debbb80148 ( debbb...@aol.com ) wrote: > >: There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of why at least a > >: large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is > >: done by women and not men. > > > > Are there any feminists out there who would like to rally to > >Debbb80148's banner? > > > > > >Chris, who thinks hitting is bad for children of either sex. > > In this day of feminism and total equality for the sexes I think girls > should be spanked as much and as hard as boys. This should not only > apply for the same offences done by girls and boys but also for > comparable offences -- analagous to equal pay for comparable worth.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
LaVonne Carlson < carl...@maroon.tc.umn.edu > wrote: >Thomas Manuel wrote: >> >> cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu ( ) wrote: >> >> >Debbb80148 ( debbb...@aol.com ) wrote: >> >: There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of why at least a >> >: large number of feminists now support the spanking of boys, provided it is >> >: done by women and not men. >> > >> > Are there any feminists out there who would like to rally to >> >Debbb80148's banner? >> > >> > >> >Chris, who thinks hitting is bad for children of either sex. >> >> In this day of feminism and total equality for the sexes I think girls >> should be spanked as much and as hard as boys. This should not only >> apply for the same offences done by girls and boys but also for >> comparable offences -- analagous to equal pay for comparable worth. > >In this day of feminism and total equality for the sexes, I think it >is time we stop hitting both our little boys and our little girls.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Blair Zajac wrote: >In article <5fm152$ 7...@kira.peak.org >, god...@kira.peak.org (Marg >Petersen) wrote: > >snip > >> I agree! Hitting our children leads to......? Them, in their >> turn, hitting their children. We DO have the brains to find other >> better, less violent means of solving childish disobedience. Why >> not use them? Hitting children serves NO purpose at all, NONE. >> Other than allowing the parent or childcare giver an outlet for >> their own anger and frustration. >> >> >> Marg > > >Ya Ya. Lock the little demons in a dark room, or put them in a corner such >that they behave. Then the poor kid has dark roomitis and/or corneritis for >the rest of his/her life.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
In article < look-ya02408000R...@news.isomedia.com >, Blair Zajac wrote: >In article <5g5hlf$ 3...@kira.peak.org >, god...@kira.peak.org (Marg >Petersen) wrote: > >> In article < look-ya02408000R...@news.isomedia.com >, >> Blair Zajac wrote: > >snip > >> > >> >Ya Ya. Lock the little demons in a dark room, or put them in a corner such >> >that they behave. Then the poor kid has dark roomitis and/or corneritis for >> >the rest of his/her life. >> >> It is obvious (to me) that with your limited intelligence, you can >> think of NO other means of solving childish disobedience that locking >> them in a dark room or putting them in a corner. Please do NOT have >> and/or raise children. >> >> >I would think that spankitis would disappear by the time the kid is a >teenager. >> >> Yeah, I'll bet! Especially if that "son of a bitch" grows up to be >> bigger, heavier and stronger than you. Beware. >> >> Marg >> >snip > >You are too late Marg.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> Petersen) wrote: > > snip > > > I agree! Hitting our children leads to......? Them, in their > > turn, hitting their children. We DO have the brains to find other > > better, less violent means of solving childish disobedience. Why > > not use them? Hitting children serves NO purpose at all, NONE. > > Other than allowing the parent or childcare giver an outlet for > > their own anger and frustration. > > > > > > Marg > >
> Ya Ya. Lock the little demons in a dark room, or put them in a corner such > that they behave. Then the poor kid has dark roomitis and/or corneritis for > the rest of his/her life. >
> I would think that spankitis would disappear by the time the kid is a teenager. >
> -- > Life is hard. First you take the test, then you learn the lesson. > > Blair Zajac > bza...@isomedia.com
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Marg Petersen wrote: > > In article < look-ya02408000R...@news.isomedia.com >, > Blair Zajac wrote:
> >Petersen) wrote: > > > >> In article < look-ya02408000R...@news.isomedia.com >, > >> Blair Zajac wrote: > > > >snip > > > >> >
> >> >Ya Ya. Lock the little demons in a dark room, or put them in a corner such > >> >that they behave. Then the poor kid has dark roomitis and/or corneritis for > >> >the rest of his/her life. > >>
> >> It is obvious (to me) that with your limited intelligence, you can > >> think of NO other means of solving childish disobedience that locking > >> them in a dark room or putting them in a corner. Please do NOT have > >> and/or raise children. > >>
> >> >I would think that spankitis would disappear by the time the kid is a > >teenager. > >>
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
George Chatzipetros wrote: > > Careful now. I'm not saying that such things WILL happen, but that they CAN > happen as a result of spanking. Every child is different and reacts > differently. However, a large percentage of spanked children will carry > this psychological legacy of spanking with them during their whole life. > So, spanking doesnt leave you at your teens and affects you in a subtle way > that cant be easily recognised.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
John wrote: > > I'm not sure that spanking has any effect on children becoming violent > criminals and I'm not convinced that it could be proven, no matter what > books say. Many people were spanked who turned out ok, including me. For > every criminal who was spanked there must be hundreds of spanked kids > who turned out ok.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> Marg Petersen wrote: > > And with your very misogynistic attitude, I hope to the Goddess you > > have NO daughters. Ours is studying physics, math and literature. > > You know, like father/mother like daughter? :-) By the way, I too > > have two sons, one graduated from Electrical Engineering and CS and > > running his own company and the other working on his PhD in Math. > > Neither of them was *spanked*. > >
> I and many others were spanked as children. I and they turned out ok. > Maybe neither situation has the detrimental effect that people would > like to think.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> And with your very misogynistic attitude, I hope to the Goddess you > have NO daughters. Ours is studying physics, math and literature. > You know, like father/mother like daughter? :-) By the way, I too > have two sons, one graduated from Electrical Engineering and CS and > running his own company and the other working on his PhD in Math. > Neither of them was *spanked*. >
> >Blair Zajac > > Marg > > -- > Marg Petersen Member PSEB: Official Sonneteer JLP-SOL > god...@peak.org http://www.peak.org/~petersm > "At ease Ensign, before you sprain something." - Capt. Janeway
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
In article < 33270B...@sx.com >, John < w...@sx.com > wrote: >I and many others were spanked as children. I and they turned out ok. >Maybe neither situation has the detrimental effect that people would >like to think.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
: spanking to be more effective than consistent, positive, warm, and : involved parenting without spanking, why would anyone spank? : Subjecting a child to a needless risk with no proven benefit is : difficult to justify.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
: let me offer that "spanking" in and of itself, doens't appear, IMO, to : either limit or guarantee success.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu wrote: > > LaVonne Carlson ( carl...@maroon.tc.umn.edu ) wrote: > [snip] > : Considering that absolutely no research that I am aware of shows > : spanking to be more effective than consistent, positive, warm, and > : involved parenting without spanking, why would anyone spank? > : Subjecting a child to a needless risk with no proven benefit is > : difficult to justify. > > Actually, it is quite easy to justify if one abandons all pretense > of concern for the child's welfare and just says, "she's MY child and I'll > do what I *want* to do to her in order to meet MY OWN NEEDS! So put > *that* in your aluminum foil cigarette and bite my crank, Poindexter!!!" > > Yes, quite easy indeed...
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Marg Petersen wrote: > > In article < 33270B...@sx.com >, John < w...@sx.com > wrote: > >I and many others were spanked as children. I and they turned out ok. > >Maybe neither situation has the detrimental effect that people would > >like to think. > > Perhaps and perhaps not. However, when there ARE other less > violent means of dealing with childish disobedience, why would > *anyone* in their right mind wish to take that chance?
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> > I wonder whether Clinton was spanked as a child for telling lies? It has > gotten so bad, that his hand motions while speaking are an indication of > lying. >
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Blair Zajac wrote: > > In article <5gb3dt$ s...@carbon.cudenver.edu >, cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu ( )
> wrote: > > > LaVonne Carlson ( carl...@maroon.tc.umn.edu ) wrote: > > [snip] > > : Considering that absolutely no research that I am aware of shows > > : spanking to be more effective than consistent, positive, warm, and > > : involved parenting without spanking, why would anyone spank? > > : Subjecting a child to a needless risk with no proven benefit is > > : difficult to justify. > > > > Actually, it is quite easy to justify if one abandons all pretense > > of concern for the child's welfare and just says, "she's MY child and I'll > > do what I *want* to do to her in order to meet MY OWN NEEDS! So put > > *that* in your aluminum foil cigarette and bite my crank, Poindexter!!!" > > > > Yes, quite easy indeed... > >
> > Chris, who finds some actual recent statements on these threads to be > > quite beyond his ability to satirize. >
> It is interesting to note that both posters have an edu address. That means > they are members of the pointed head group. (How is that for satire, > Chris?) Stated another way, it is like asking an atheist about the > relevance of god to creation. >
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
Tammy wrote: > B wrote in article <332AD0...@NOSPAMmindspring.com> ... > > Blair Zajac wrote: > > > In article <5gb3dt$ s...@carbon.cudenver.edu >, cdd...@ouray.cudenver.edu
> > > wrote: > > > > LaVonne Carlson ( carl...@maroon.tc.umn.edu ) wrote:
> As far as the inference that spanking is used as a means to attack our > children for simply diagreeing with us. That is ludicrious. Please READ > previous post of those who use parental spanking correctly, open handed, on > a clothed butt, two or three swats only and ONLY after several other > methods have failed which is VERY rarely.
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
> > B wrote: > > > > > > > > > Studies do not show that people who were not spanked do all of these > > > things -- in fact, studies show that the more children are spanked, the > > > more they tend to practice negative behavior.
> > ************************************************************************* > > [This Not A Personal Attack] > > > > > > Which studies are these Blair.? > > I'd like to know...[Really] > > > > ************************************************************************* > > Aneon-6. > > Free Navigator. > >
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you
Izrah Indica
Phillipino Ladyboy
Shemale Cum Shots Video

Girls Who Spank Boys

Report Page