Girl With Long Dick

Girl With Long Dick
What She Said: Is Your Dick Long Enough?
How Men Can Check Their Fertility (And Why They Might Want To)
The Hottest Polos on the Planet Right Now Ditch One Crucial Detail
Joel Kim Booster's $1.5M Shopping Spree
Hairy Dudes, Rejoice: It's Gonna Be a Hot Hirsute Summer
Since 1957, GQ has inspired men to look sharper and live smarter with its unparalleled coverage of style, culture, and beyond. From award-winning writing and photography to binge-ready videos to electric live events, GQ meets millions of modern men where they live, creating the moments that create conversations.
To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories .
To revisit this article, select My Account, then View saved stories
I recently read a study that attempted to determine the average length of the erect penis by examining upwards of 15,000 men. These intrepid, probably very-interesting-at-a-dinner-party researchers determined that the average penis size is exactly 5.16 inches. The study disturbed me, mostly because I wasn't consulted. (Where was I for this? Call me next time, science.) But it also disturbed me because, come on guys, could you stop worrying about your junk already?
What I gather from friends and internet commenters is that dick measuring is an ongoing fascination (and, apparently, a rich seam of grant money) because plenty of men still just want to know what the "right" size is. Or, for the true worriers out there: what is the smallest dick that's still acceptable to women?
Answer One: 5.16 inches is fine. Based solely on anecdotal evidence from my vast network of promiscuous acquaintances, a little more or less in that general neighborhood works best for most people—men and women—who enjoy penetrative sex with penises. We’re kind of programmed to want what is "average." And an average penis fits well in an average vagina and an average butt and an average mouth and an average whatever else.
Of course, certain people prefer their penises more to one side of the Bell curve. Whether you're smaller or longer or wider—or, I don't know, banana-ier?—there's a complementary body part (and person) out there who wants exactly what you're packing.
Which leads us to Answer Two: you should really not give a fuck about your dick length, average or otherwise. Do your best not to obsess over it—particularly in the context of whether or not a woman will like it. The biggest, handsomest dick in the world is never going to make anybody love the guy who owns it—himself included. Same goes for the guy with the smallest, least-comely dong who’s amazing at oral sex. (Though guys who pride themselves on being really good at oral sex wig me—and everybody else—out.) So love your veiny or hairy or purplish friend-penis.
Thank your dick for all hours of free entertainment it provides. You can have sex with your hand or a vagina or an anus or, according to news reports from the emergency rooms of Florida, pretty much anything with a hole, ever. Think of me, with my crippling case of penis envy. As a woman, I will never know the sublime pleasure of a Jacuzzi blowjob or flying down the freeway and singing along to Crüe while pissing in a Snapple bottle. Look down every day and go, "Hey penis, I love you."
Here’s why: You know those lotion companies that try to sell lotion to women by telling them that all bodies are beautiful? We eat that shit up because we are sick of being told that everything about the flesh prison we were born into is bad and wrong. And that's just one of a billion contexts in which women, tired of being inculcated with self-loathing by corporations and culture at large, have begun the painful process of reclaiming our innate sense of worth.
It's your turn. Wrest the physical standards you have for your body from other people and the advertising industry. Tune out all the dumb shit that people say about masculinity and size and whether or not buying the right toothpaste will let you fuck a model. Fall in love with your penis!
More: Dating vs. Being in a Relationship
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
© 2022 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your California Privacy Rights. GQ may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices

Dashboard
Publications
Account settings
Log out

Journal List

BMC Womens Health

v.1; 2001

PMC33342

Published online 2001 Jun 8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-1-1
1 University of Texas-Pan American, Department of Psychology, Edinburg, TX 78539-2999, USA
Russell Eisenman: ude.manap@namnesie
Received 2001 May 12; Accepted 2001 Jun 8.
Copyright © 2001 Eisenman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, Little, Brown. 1966. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, Little, Brown. 1970. Masters WH, Johnson VE, Kolodny R. Heterosexuality. New York, Harper Collins. 1994. Deaux K. From individual differences to social categories. Amer Psychol. 1984; 39 :105–116. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.39.2.105. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ] DeKeseredy W. Women abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support. Toronto, Canadian Scholars Press. 1988. Eisenman R. From crime to creativity: Psychological and social factors in deviance. Dubuque, IA, Kendall/Hunt. 1991. Eisenman R. Conservative sexual values: Effects of an abstinence program on student attitudes. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :75–78. [ Google Scholar ] Eisenman R. Contemporary social issues: Drugs, crime, creativity, and education. Ashland, OH, BookMasters. 1994. Eisenman R. Human sexuality: Answers from evolutionary psychology. J Evol Psychol. 2001; 22 :53–55. [ Google Scholar ] Franzini LR, Sideman LM. Personality characteristics of condom users. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :110–118. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] Laquer T. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Univesity Press. 1990. Renisch JM. The Kinsey Institute new report on sex. New York: St Martin's. 1990. Shaw J. Aging and sexual potential. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :134–139. [ Google Scholar ]
Articles from BMC Women's Health are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, Little, Brown. 1966. [ Ref list ]
Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, Little, Brown. 1970. [ Ref list ]
Masters WH, Johnson VE, Kolodny R. Heterosexuality. New York, Harper Collins. 1994. [ Ref list ]
Deaux K. From individual differences to social categories. Amer Psychol. 1984; 39 :105–116. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.39.2.105. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
DeKeseredy W. Women abuse in dating relationships: The role of male peer support. Toronto, Canadian Scholars Press. 1988. [ Ref list ]
Eisenman R. From crime to creativity: Psychological and social factors in deviance. Dubuque, IA, Kendall/Hunt. 1991. [ Ref list ]
Eisenman R. Conservative sexual values: Effects of an abstinence program on student attitudes. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :75–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
Eisenman R. Contemporary social issues: Drugs, crime, creativity, and education. Ashland, OH, BookMasters. 1994. [ Ref list ]
Eisenman R. Human sexuality: Answers from evolutionary psychology. J Evol Psychol. 2001; 22 :53–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
Franzini LR, Sideman LM. Personality characteristics of condom users. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :110–118. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
Laquer T. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Univesity Press. 1990. [ Ref list ]
Renisch JM. The Kinsey Institute new report on sex. New York: St Martin's. 1990. [ Ref list ]
Shaw J. Aging and sexual potential. J Sex Educ & Ther. 1994; 20 :134–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]

Format:

AMA

APA

MLA

NLM

NLM

NIH

HHS

USA.gov

External link. Please review our privacy policy .
The new PMC design is here!
Learn more
about navigating our updated article layout. The
PMC legacy view
will also be available for a limited time.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before
sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal
government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the
official website and that any information you provide is encrypted
and transmitted securely.

1 University of Texas-Pan American, Department of Psychology, Edinburg, TX 78539-2999, USA
Does the size of the male penis, in terms of length or width, make a difference in female sexual satisfaction?
To study the effect of penis width vs. length on female sexual satisfaction, 50 sexually active female undergraduate students were asked which felt better, i. e., was penis width or length more important for their sexual satisfaction.
None reported they did not know, or that width and length were equally satisfying. A large majority, 45 of 50, reported width was more important (p < .001).
Implications are discussed, including the fact that the data seem to contradict Masters and Johnson about penis size having no physiological effect on female sexual satisfaction.
When people speak of penis size, they typically refer to length. Thus, a man with a short but wide penis would probably think of himself as having a small penis, and would be so thought of by others, too. However, width is part of size, although usually not acknowledged. Does width contribute to female sexual satisfaction? Is length more important? Or, perhaps size is unrelated to female sexual enjoyment.
The famous sex researchers Masters and Johnson [ 1 , 2 ] have concluded that size of the male penis can have no true physiological effect on female sexual satisfaction. They base this conclusion on their physiological studies that show that the vagina adapts to fit the size of the penis. Because of this vaginal adaptation, they refer to the vagina as a potential space rather than an actual space. Thus, despite the worries of many males about the size of their penis, Masters and Johnson concluded that any size penis will fit and provide adequate sexual stimulation to the female. The present study was conducted to see if female college students would report their sexual satisfaction related to penis length, width, or neither.
To test the notion of the possible importance of length vs. width and female sexual satisfaction, two male undergraduate college students - both popular athletes on campus - surveyed 50 female undergraduate college students, considered by the two males to be sexually active, based on the males' prior social experience and knowledge of the females.
The female students ranged in age from 18 to 25 years old. In person or via telephone, the females were asked "In having sex, which feels better, length of penis or width of penis?" In half the cases, the word "width" was used before the word "length," but there were no order effects. There were also no effects for telephone vs. personal interview. All female participants answered the question, perhaps because they knew the student asking the question.
Of the 50 females surveyed, 45 reported that width felt better, with only 5 reporting length felt better (chi square = 32.00, df = 1, p < .001). No females reported that they could not tell any difference. Some did report that sex in a relationship was better than sex without commitment.
Masters and Johnson [ 1 , 2 ] have said that penis size should have no physiological effect on female sexual enjoyment, since the vagina adapts to fit the size of the penis. The current results call this conclusion into question, and point to the importance of penis width. However, Masters and Johnson could be correct if the present subjects are only reporting their psychological preference, and not showing a true physiological preference. In other words, the present study solely assessed females' perceived level of sexual satisfaction, which might differ from actual physiological arousal and satisfaction.
It is not obvious why a wide penis would be preferred to a long penis, but speculation would suggest the following. Penis width may be important due to a penis thick at the base providing greater clitoral stimulation as the male thrusts into the female during sexual intercourse. That is, a wide penis would seem to offer a greater degree of contact with the outer part of the vagina, including the clitoral area. If this is correct, then Masters and Johnson are wrong about penis size being unrelated, physiologically, to female sexual satisfaction. Masters, Johnson, and Kolodny [ 3 ] do not totally rule out penis size being relevant, but they suggest that it is likely of minor importance for female sexual satisfaction (see especially pages 509-510 in Masters, Johnson, and Kolodny [ 3 ]). Another possibility is that a wider penis provides the woman with a greater feeling of fullness, which is psychologically, and perhaps physiologically, satisfying.
Further research on sex is necessary to understand the various influences on sexual attitudes and behavior, including how attitudes influence behavior, if, in fact, they do [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Different samples could be studied, as well as using different methods of investigation. One might have women rank order different aspects of sexual satisfaction, including such things as physical attractiveness of the partner, romantic feelings, love, and other things, as well as penis size. This would give an understanding of where the different attributes rank in women's stated preferences. But, width vs. length deserves study.
Women reported that penis width was more important for their sexual satisfaction than penis length. The results were statistically significant. Penis width needs to be given more consideration, and taken into account when one discusses penis size. Also, it may be that Masters and Johnson [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] were wrong about penis size having little or no physiological effect on women's sexual satisfaction. However, the current data cannot provide a final answer, since they are based on self reports of women surveyed about penis length vs. width, and their sexual satisfaction. The results reflect either a psychological preference or a true physiological reality, but we cannot say which, with the present method that was employed.
The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
I am grateful to the two reviewers, Charles Negy and Robert M. Gordon, for their excellent suggestions. I have incorporated all of their suggestions into my article.
Help
Accessibility
Careers

Woman sues ex-boyfriend after his 'abnormally long' penis 'stretched her vagina'
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
Keep up to date with all the latest news
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info.
Silindile Mangena, 29, claims she will have to fork out £8,000 for reconstructive surgery after getting intimate with Mugove Kurima
A woman is suing her ex-boyfriend after his "abnormally long" penis allegedly overstretched her vagina.
Silindile Mangena, 29, is planning to undergo reconstructive surgery after getting intimate with Mugove Kurima, 37.
But she wants Kurima to pay the whopping 150,000 Rand (£8,000) cost of this - and is reportedly taking him to court.
Silindile, of Harare, Zimbabwe, told the Zimbabwe Mail that her private parts were "tight" before she met her ex in 2016.
She said she fell in love even though he was allegedly married at the time.
However, she ended the relationship in May this year after Kurima is alleged to have stretched her vagina.
It is currently unclear how large Silindile alleges her ex's penis is.
The woman will reportedly ask the court - through her lawyers, Dakarai, Masendu and Partners - to force Kurima to pay for reconstructive surgery of her vagina in South Africa.
Kurima is yet to respond to the allegations.
Earlier this year, we reported how a man who claims to have "the largest penis in the world" says it is "ruining his acting career".
Jonah Falcon claims his manhood measures 13.5 inches.
But he said in June: "It sucks - it relegates me into doing smaller parts.
"Maybe in the UK or Germany it might help my acting career, but here in Hollywood it's a negative."
Sign up to FREE email alerts with news to brighten your day

This website no longer supports Internet Explorer, which is now an outdated browser. For the best experience and your security, please visit
us using a different browser.

Social Links for Tamar Lapin

View Author Archive

Get author RSS feed

captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset restore all settings to the default values Done

Filed under

health and fitness

Fluffing In Porn
Colleen A Metart
Round Snd Brown

Girl With Long Dick

Report Page