Get Private

Get Private



⚑ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE πŸ‘ˆπŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸ»πŸ‘ˆπŸ»

































Get Private


Sign up with email
Sign up




Sign up with Google



Sign up with GitHub



Sign up with Facebook




Asked
10 years, 6 months ago


Active
2 years, 3 months ago


12.4k 40 40 gold badges 99 99 silver badges 150 150 bronze badges


50.4k 19 19 gold badges 129 129 silver badges 153 153 bronze badges



Great! That's all I need. My issue here is that I can't change production code. Thanks a lot dcp ;)

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 19:52



If it solved the problem, please don't forget to accept the answer. Glad to help, however, I tend to agree with the others here that maybe this isn't the best idea in your situation for the great reasons already mentioned. Good luck!

–  dcp
Jul 21 '10 at 19:55



Hi pcd, I got compiler error that said I can't cast instance to MyClass object? Can you show me how to assign the value that we got into a string named "str"? Thanks,

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 20:02



Unit testing is the one time where it is NEVER acceptable. If you can't unit test something using just its public API then you have a serious design flaw that needs to be addressed.

–  Jonathan Allen
Jul 21 '10 at 20:05



Thanks for the answer; I needed those binding flags!

–  Zarepheth
Jul 10 '15 at 18:29


1.2m 784 784 gold badges 8640 8640 silver badges 8878 8878 bronze badges



Amen. If you can't produce a desired situation using regular code, that's probably an indication that it was programmed wrong. If you can't produce an undesired situation using regular code, that's all the better: no need to test that situation. If there are exceptions to this, they are very rare.

–  StriplingWarrior
Jul 21 '10 at 19:55



There are situations where you have to work with private fields to work around bugs in other peoples code. It isn't pleasant, sometimes there is no alternative.

–  Jonathan Allen
Jul 21 '10 at 20:03



@Jonathan: I can't remember when I've had to do so in production code, and when it's test code for production code in the same company, we're talking about a different kind of situation.

–  Jon Skeet
Jul 21 '10 at 20:06



I've had to only once. I really hated doing it, but I needed to override ObservableCollection.CollectionChanged . You can do this directly in C#, but in VB you have to fake it by accessing the private field directly.

–  Jonathan Allen
Jul 21 '10 at 20:09


4,395 1 1 gold badge 18 18 silver badges 28 28 bronze badges



Can you show me how to use Reflection. A minimal example would be sufficient. Thanks

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 19:50



See @dcp's answer. Be prepared that if the variable name changes in production code your tests WILL BE broken. Even if the program works as expected. That's one of the many reasons why you should stick to just testing the public API.

–  Jerod Houghtelling
Jul 21 '10 at 20:00






Thanks, I really did not think of the "name". Very good point indeed.

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 20:33






This is a useless answer, but it made me laugh.

–  Kelly Elton
Jan 18 '16 at 2:34


4,558 28 28 silver badges 33 33 bronze badges


227k 35 35 gold badges 386 386 silver badges 518 518 bronze badges



Sorry, I cannot use property here since the the actual production code is protected. I'm a QA/Dev, I need a way to get those private for writing User Acceptance Test. So I cannot change production code. Can you help?

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 19:43






Why are you checking private data for User Acceptance Testing? You should only really need to Test the public properties/methods of the class since those are what are going to be consumed.

–  Justin Niessner
Jul 21 '10 at 19:46



Because our customer just asked for that advance feature. The thing here is that we need to write the test first to show them that it won't be broken.

–  Chan
Jul 21 '10 at 19:49



Now I'm really confused. Your customer just asked you to provide a way to get the value of private values even though they've been explicitly marked as private by the developers? If that's the case, then this should really go back to Development and they should expose things properly through Properties.

–  Justin Niessner
Jul 21 '10 at 19:51



Indeed - how does the customer even know about the private field? What are they really asking you to test?

–  Jon Skeet
Jul 21 '10 at 19:56


3,978 4 4 gold badges 39 39 silver badges 51 51 bronze badges


399 5 5 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges


Highly active question . Earn 10 reputation in order to answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this question from spam and non-answer activity.


Ruby on Rails Developer (Remote UK-based)
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Moscow, Russia
The Remote Company No office location
(100% Remote) Senior Ruby on Rails Engineer at Client Portal Team in Toptal.
Senior Backend Engineer in Full Remote Environment

Stack Overflow

Questions
Jobs
Developer Jobs Directory
Salary Calculator
Help
Mobile
Disable Responsiveness


Products

Teams
Talent
Advertising
Enterprise



Company

About
Press
Work Here
Legal
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Contact Us



Stack Exchange Network

Technology
Life / Arts
Culture / Recreation
Science
Other


Join Stack Overflow to learn, share knowledge, and build your career.
I ran into a problem that I need to access to private field of a class. For example:
How can I get the value of someString outside MyClass ?
Sorry, I cannot use property here since the the actual production code is protected. I'm a QA/Dev, I need a way to get those private for writing User Acceptance Test. So I cannot change production code. Can you help?
As others have said, since the field is private you should not be trying to get it with normal code.
The only time this is acceptable is during unit testing, and even then you need a good reason to do it (such as setting a private variable to null so that code in an exception block will be hit and can be tested).
You could use something like the method below to get the field:
Again, this should not be used in most cases.
You can't - and you're not meant to. It's private . If this is someone else's class, then clearly they don't want you to have access to that field. The fact that it's private allows them to change the implementation later - they might end up with that value as part of another variable, or renamed, or possibly gone completely if it's no longer required in order to implement the public API.
If it's your own class and you're sure you want other people to be able to access it, just expose it with a property:
EDIT: Having seen your comments, you can access the private fields with reflection... but for an acceptance test you shouldn't have to. You should be testing the public API. For unit tests it makes sense to bend the rules sometimes, and treat the class as a "white box" rather than doing "black box" testing, but for acceptance tests I would definitely stick to the public API.
If this doesn't help, I suggest you talk to the developers of the production code: explain why you want access, and ask them to expose it via a property. They could make it an internal property, and use [InternalsVisibleTo] to get access to it in your test assembly. I would personally prefer this over using reflection - otherwise if the production code changes in a perfectly valid way, your tests will fail when they shouldn't.
Use reflections, but be prepared to be hit with a big stick from a fellow programmer.
Here is a working generics version as clean as I can get it.
If it's you're class and you want to provide access to it outside of the class, expose it via a public property:
Otherwise, don't use it outside of the class. You're not meant to.
Based on your comment that you're actually doing QA testing on production code, I'd question the reasoning behind needing to access a private value during your testing. You really should only have to test the publicly exposed Properties/Methods to verify that everything is functioning as intended.
All that being said, if there's really no way around things you can use Reflection to get the values.
If you are using it for unit testing, I implemented a generic version of @dcp 's answer which provides the following extras:
in addition to @dcp answer, this can be a lot easier by turning it into Generic Function...
To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.

site design / logo Β© 2021 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa . revΒ 2021.2.2.38474


How to remove Get Private (ads, pop-ups, banners)
How to get the value of private field in C#? - Stack Overflow
How to remove Get Private (removal guide)
How to `go get ` private repos using SSH key auth instead of password auth.
PHP: openssl_pkey_ get _ private - Manual


Remove Get Private automatically:
Use removal tool


Uninstall Get Private manually from:
Firefox
Chrome
IE
Safari
Opera


Problems Associated with Installation of Get Private
Price Ranges to get rid of Get Private
A Hundred Percent Assurance of Get Private Removal
Instructions to uninstall adware from browsers
Free antimalware scanner. Averina lab recommended.

Copyright Β© 2021. Averina LabΒ  Sitemap


Get Private is malware service minded to generate profits from spam advertising. This is very successful tactics, because users tend to trust developers. All the browser settings will be changed immediately after the invasion. This program cloistered to display visual ads permanently annoying users. Get Private will flood your screen with hundreds of rubbish offers that will make people acquire new things online. In addition, all sponsored links will lead to websites with coupons and discounts. Such programs bundled with other software will again invade your system with other viruses, looking like different toolbars and extensions. We recommend to remove Get Private from your computer shortly after the first signs of invasion.
There are a lot of techniques to uninstall Get Private from the PC. You are welcome to look through the page completely and choose the needed way of removal. Speaking about the facilest and the promptest method of removal, so I should notice the utilities that will help. According to my experience, it is better to find and use effective Get Private Removal Tool. Removal software that was written especially for a separate class of viruses is the most effective. You can also download any other antivirus tool that has Get Private in the base of viruses. The antivirus software that I advise you (Spyhunter 4) will find and remove Get Private completely, you can install it clicking this download button.
Speaking about the pluses of Spyhunter 4, I should mention the fact that it was created by the programmers who know their work effectively and have a great experience in malware removal. In addition Spyhunter will remove not only pop-ups from your system but also all the actual-to-date computer infections, such as rats, Trojans or hijacker.
Spyhunter 4 is a new version of efficient antivirus software that will delete all the elements of Get Private and other adware not only in browsers, but also from the registry entries. It an advantageous variant for those who do not know how to clean the registry from malware, because it will do everything for you.
Get Private is a program that was created to be helpful for computer owners in internet shopping, it is able to give the opportunity to encounter the best deals and discounts rapidly and to compare the prizes for one and the same assortment in different sources. More than that Get Private will display you different pop-ups that represent advertising information no matter want you see them or not. The applications that are able function like that are called adware or ad-supported. Such programs are considered to be a probably viral that is why it is not advised to install them or have on a PC.
Some people even do not become aware that Get Private is installed on their PC and think that all the mess that is going on in their browsers is due to the options of the browsers, therefore I want to itemize all the possible signs that will report you that Get Private is and the consequences of its installation:
These enumerated characteristics and symptoms of Get Private are also the motives why this application should be eliminated. If you want to stop all this mess on your computer, so you need to choose the way of removal.
Get Private installs not only into your browsers, but it penetrates all the spheres of your computer. It generates its registry elements, activate its process at the start up of the computer therefore it is so difficult to eliminate it from the computer and the removal process lasts for a long time.
Here are the efficacious ways to guard your PC from Get Private in the future in order not to permit this malware to be installed into the browser again. You are welcome to advise these methods to your comrades and members of your family to protect the computers from Get Private and any other possible adware:
It is obvious that the most expensive price is for professional support in any computer repair service. The price for the assistance can be different; it can be even more expensive, if your computer is full of any other computer infections. But you will get the guarantee that the PC will be safe and sound after it.
You can use free ways of removal, such as manual way of removal or free antimalware, but be ready that free of charge software can miss the malware and it will exist in your PC and manual way of removal (in case if it will be done with mistakes) can ruin your PC and it will not start next time. You are welcome to install a paid antivirus program, it can be a splendid choice among different techniques because it is rather cheap, but still the developers of paid utilities often produce some updates that will ensure that the Get Private will be in the signature base and the software will delete it and the system will be free of viruses in the future.
Spyhunter is a good antivirus software that will remove various kinds of up-to-date computer viruses, even those that almost all antivirus programs cannot detect. You can also use it if the endeavour to delete Get Private manually was not successful. Spyhunter will protect your system from viruses in the future due to the regularly updated signature base.
About Author: Material provided by: Averina lab
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fat Nudist Pic
Wtf Pass Pickup Porn
Overwatch Brigitte Mai Ashe
Outdoor Strip Lighting
Naked Beach Video

Report Page