Галерея 3102077
Галерея 3102077
Microsoft Power BI Community
Power BI Spanish Community
Translated Spanish Desktop
Multiplica cada entrada antes de Suma
Multiplica cada entrada antes de Suma
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Mark Topic as New
Mark Topic as Read
Float this Topic for Current User
Bookmark
Subscribe
Printer Friendly Page
All forum topics
Previous Topic
Next Topic
Mark as New
Bookmark
Subscribe
Mute
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Permalink
Print
Report Inappropriate Content
Multiplica cada entrada antes de Suma
All forum topics
Previous Topic
Next Topic
Mark as New
Bookmark
Subscribe
Mute
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Permalink
Print
Report Inappropriate Content
Mark as New
Bookmark
Subscribe
Mute
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Permalink
Print
Report Inappropriate Content
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Tengo una tabla que enumera las piezas del motor que se acumulan hasta el número del motor.
Así que mi tabla solo enumera los números del motor y puede profundizar para ver las piezas.
Mi esperanza es que pueda obtener un costo por libra para cada motor de la mesa. Tendría que multiplicar la cantidad individual por el costo por libra. En cambio, la tabla multiplica la suma de la cantidad y la suma del costo total por libra. Me gustaría que hiciera el cálculo a nivel desplegable y luego sumara.
Parece que necesitaría usar la función SUMX dax. Sin saber cómo se ven sus datos, es difícil dar un ejemplo basado en ellos. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dax/sumx-function-dax
Submit your creative T-shirt design ideas starting March 7 through March 21, 2023.
Attend online or watch the recordings of this Power BI specific conference, which includes 130+ sessions, 130+ speakers, product managers, MVPs, and experts.
Find out more about the online and in person events happening in March!
Find out more about the February 2023 update.
Dashboard
Publications
Account settings
Log out
Journal List
PLoS One
PMC3102077
Create a new collection
Add to an existing collection
Unable to load your collection due to an error
Please try again
Published online 2011 May 25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020085
Daniel D. Shaye
1
,
*
and Iva Greenwald
1
,
2
,
3
,
*
1
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America
3
Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America
Thomas Jefferson University, United States of America
Received 2011 Mar 22; Accepted 2011 Apr 18.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
GUID: CBCF1AE4-7698-425C-8657-A54552C71ADD
GUID: 2E377223-0C2B-4398-9516-349E7C4E3457
GUID: 79CBA708-D65D-41C3-A579-33B5197403B3
GUID: E032AA66-D992-41DE-97F2-8A4F9BDFB377
GUID: 48DD4737-2F62-46AE-8630-4C35E97ED297
GUID: CEBB21EF-C1B1-457B-8E8D-BEAC569F08B5
GUID: 8ADE9194-3EA6-4117-9EC9-16F7519D1ADC
GUID: 44E75299-37A2-40DF-88FC-4C8C6F3EFF59
GUID: A0AD5816-6FAB-4C24-8340-2CB1E66B6547
GUID: 17471833-F35C-4B92-A0F2-E451397BA2BE
GUID: C2A239C2-8EAF-4825-AA53-C7E5752D6873
GUID: F01AF567-3A42-4A78-AED7-57188CED162B
GUID: 3B581FD1-7F15-4E83-A9A4-7E5D8F6A7C74
C. elegans and human genome releases underlying orthology prediction programs.
KOG and TreeFam [22] , [23] were not included in the meta-analysis used to generate OrthoList. KOG is shown for historical perspective, while TreeFam was used to confirm, or refute, orthology assignments. InParanoid, OrthoMCL, HomoloGene and Ensembl Compara [4] , [19] – [21] were used to generate OrthoList.
a For the KOG database, the number of reported proteins analyzed includes alternatively-spliced forms derived from a single gene. For the other methods typically a single (the longest) isoform was used in the analysis.
1. Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL, Cheng C, Arshinoff BI, et al. Integrative Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome by the modENCODE Project. Science 2010 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
2. Fitch WM. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool. 1970; 19 :99–113. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215 :403–410. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
4. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol. 2001; 314 :1041–1052. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
5. Koonin EV. Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2005; 39 :309–338. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
6. Schwarz EM. Genomic classification of protein-coding gene families. Worm Book. 2005:1–23. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
7. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature. 1998; 391 :806–811. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
8. Timmons L, Fire A. Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature. 1998; 395 :854. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
9. Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Zipperlen P, Martinez-Campos M, Sohrmann M, et al. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature. 2000; 408 :325–330. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
10. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003; 421 :231–237. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
11. Sieburth D, Ch'ng Q, Dybbs M, Tavazoie M, Kennedy S, et al. Systematic analysis of genes required for synapse structure and function. Nature. 2005; 436 :510–517. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
12. Ce SC. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans : a platform for investigating biology. Science. 1998; 282 :2012–2018. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
13. Lai CH, Chou CY, Ch'ang LY, Liu CS, Lin W. Identification of novel human genes evolutionarily conserved in Caenorhabditis elegans by comparative proteomics. Genome Res. 2000; 10 :703–713. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
14. Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R. Analysis of protein domain families in Caenorhabditis elegans . Genomics. 1997; 46 :200–216. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
15. Thomas JH. Genome evolution in Caenorhabditis . Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2008; 7 :211–216. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
16. Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C. Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009; 5 :e1000262. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
17. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Vermunt JK, Roos DS. Assessing performance of orthology detection strategies applied to eukaryotic genomes. PLoS One. 2007; 2 :e383. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
18. Hulsen T, Huynen MA, de Vlieg J, Groenen PM. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data. Genome Biol. 2006; 7 :R31. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
19. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003; 13 :2178–2189. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
20. Vilella AJ, Severin J, Ureta-Vidal A, Heng L, Durbin R, et al. EnsemblCompara GeneTrees: Complete, duplication-aware phylogenetic trees in vertebrates. Genome Res. 2009; 19 :327–335. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
21. Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35 :D5–12. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
22. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003; 4 :41. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
23. Ruan J, Li H, Chen Z, Coghlan A, Coin LJ, et al. TreeFam: 2008 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36 :D735–740. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
24. Antebi A. Nuclear hormone receptors in C. elegans . Worm Book. 2006:1–13. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
25. Sluder AE, Maina CV. Nuclear receptors in nematodes: themes and variations. Trends Genet. 2001; 17 :206–213. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
26. Manning G. Genomic overview of protein kinases. Worm Book. 2005:1–19. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
27. Thomas JH. Adaptive evolution in two large families of ubiquitin-ligase adapters in nematodes and plants. Genome Res. 2006; 16 :1017–1030. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
28. Jin J, Cardozo T, Lovering RC, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, et al. Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes Dev. 2004; 18 :2573–2580. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
29. Meissner B, Warner A, Wong K, Dube N, Lorch A, et al. An integrated strategy to study muscle development and myofilament structure in Caenorhabditis elegans . PLoS Genet. 2009; 5 :e1000537. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
30. Eisenmann DM. Wnt signaling. Worm Book. 2005:1–17. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
31. Hu PJ. Dauer. Worm Book. 2007:1–19. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
32. Greenwald I. LIN-12/Notch signaling in C. elegans . Worm Book. 2005:1–16. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
33. Savage-Dunn C. TGF-beta signaling. Worm Book. 2005:1–12. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
34. Sundaram MV. RTK/Ras/MAPK signaling. Worm Book. 2006:1–19. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
35. Chen N, Greenwald I. The lateral signal for LIN-12/Notch in C. elegans vulval development comprises redundant secreted and transmembrane DSL proteins. Dev Cell. 2004; 6 :183–192. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
36. Newfeld SJ, Wisotzkey RG, Kumar S. Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers. Genetics. 1999; 152 :783–795. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
37. Hardin J, King RS. The long and the short of Wnt signaling in C. elegans . Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008; 18 :362–367. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
38. Korswagen HC, Coudreuse DY, Betist MC, van de Water S, Zivkovic D, et al. The Axin-like protein PRY-1 is a negative regulator of a canonical Wnt pathway in C. elegans . Genes Dev. 2002; 16 :1291–1302. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
39. Oosterveen T, Coudreuse DY, Yang PT, Fraser E, Bergsma J, et al. Two functionally distinct Axin-like proteins regulate canonical Wnt signaling in C. elegans . Dev Biol. 2007; 308 :438–448. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
40. Thorpe CJ, Schlesinger A, Carter JC, Bowerman B. Wnt signaling polarizes an early C. elegans blastomere to distinguish endoderm from mesoderm. Cell. 1997; 90 :695–705. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
41. Myers TR, Greenwald I. Wnt signal from multiple tissues and lin-3 /EGF signal from the gonad maintain vulval precursor cell competence in Caenorhabditis elegans . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104 :20368–20373. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
42. Pierce SB, Costa M, Wisotzkey R, Devadhar S, Homburger SA, et al. Regulation of DAF-2 receptor signaling by human insulin and ins-1 , a member of the unusually large and diverse C. elegans insulin gene family. Genes Dev. 2001; 15 :672–686. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
43. Sönnichsen B, Koski LB, Walsh A, Marschall P, Neumann B, et al. Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005; 434 :462–469. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
44. Balklava Z, Pant S, Fares H, Grant BD. Genome-wide analysis identifies a general requirement for polarity proteins in endocytic traffic. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9 :1066–1073. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
45. Reece-Hoyes JS, Deplancke B, Shingles J, Grove CA, Hope IA, et al. A compendium of Caenorhabditis elegans regulatory transcription factors: a resource for mapping transcription regulatory networks. Genome Biol. 2005; 6 :R110. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
46. Hobert O, Mori I, Yamashita Y, Honda H, Ohshima Y, et al. Regulation of interneuron function in the C. elegans thermoregulatory pathway by the ttx-3 LIM homeobox gene. Neuron. 1997; 19 :345–357. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
47. Hueber SD, Weiller GF, Djordjevic MA, Frickey T. Improving Hox protein classification across the major model organisms. PLoS One. 2010; 5 :e10820. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
48. Van Auken K, Weaver D, Robertson B, Sundaram M, Saldi T, et al. Roles of the Homothorax/Meis/Prep homolog UNC-62 and the Exd/Pbx homologs CEH-20 and CEH-40 in C. elegans embryogenesis. Development. 2002; 129 :5255–5268. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
49. Jarriault S, Greenwald I. Suppressors of the egg-laying defective phenotype of sel-12 presenilin mutants implicate the CoREST corepressor complex in LIN-12/Notch signaling in C. elegans . Genes Dev. 2002; 16 :2713–2728. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
50. Lanjuin A, VanHoven MK, Bargmann CI, Thompson JK, Sengupta P.
Otx/otd homeobox genes specify distinct sensory neuron identities in C. elegans . Dev Cell. 2003; 5 :621–633. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
51. Merrihew GE, Davis C, Ewing B, Williams G, Kall L, et al. Use of shotgun proteomics for the identification, confirmation, and correction of C. elegans gene annotations. Genome Res. 2008; 18 :1660–1669. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
52. Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37 :D211–215. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
53. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000; 25 :25–29. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
54. Ostlund G, Schmitt T, Forslund K, Kostler T, Messina DN, et al. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38 :D196–203. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
55. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert CJ, Jr, Roos DS. OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34 :D363–368. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
56. Plowman GD, Sudarsanam S, Bingham J, Whyte D, Hunter T. The protein kinases of Caenorhabditis elegans : a model for signal transduction in multicellular organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96 :13603–13610. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
57. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37 :D229–232. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS
1. Gerstein MB, Lu ZJ, Van Nostrand EL, Cheng C, Arshinoff BI, et al. Integrative Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome by the modENCODE Project. Science 2010 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
2. Fitch WM. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool. 1970; 19 :99–113. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990; 215 :403–410. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
4. Remm M, Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol. 2001; 314 :1041–1052. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ] [ Ref list ]
5. Koonin EV. Orthologs, par
Бразильянка с двойным лиловым дилдо
Массажистка с хуем выебала клиента
Секс с толстячкой из Индии