Галерея 2682298
⚡ ПОДРОБНЕЕ ЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Галерея 2682298
⚠ Version 1.1 of The Plant List has been superseded and should no longer be used.
The new version is available at http://www.worldfloraonline.org/tpl/kew-2682298 . The new version is enhanced, using more data sources including Taxonomic Expert Networks and will be more frequently updated.
This name is the accepted name of a species in the genus Brassica
(family Brassicaceae ).
The record derives from WCSP (in review)
(data supplied on
2012-03-23
)
which reports it as an accepted name with original publication details: Consp. Pl. Charc. 8 1859 .
Full publication details for this name can be found in IPNI :
http://ipni.org/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60442520-2 .
Sort the name records using the buttons.
The following databases may contain further information on this name. Please click on any button to follow a
link to that database.
To return to The Plant List : please use your browser's back
button to return to this page.
This name was in version 1 of The Plant List, record kew-2682298 .
© The Plant List 2013 —
Terms and Conditions —
How to Cite
By logging into your account, you agree to our Privacy Policy , personal data processing and storage practices as described therein.
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Previous
1
2
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
20
template
Next
Originally posted by ad hoc
View Post
Is this (defending overt racism from the home secretary) something that should be coming from the home office account?
Has anyone watched the full video? I've not
Your regular reminder
https://twitter.com/LuckyHeronSay/st...13052460285954
(If Patel and Braverman can strip the Windrush generation of citizenship and deport them, can we not deport each and every one of the African Asians who came to this country in the 60s as economic migrants* ?)
* nb Please do not confuse with the "Ugandan Asians" deported by Idi Amin in the 1970s and who arrived as refugees
No, we can't and mustn't deport anyone, ever, and it's not something we should pretend to want to make a point, either.
Perhaps we could just deport Braverman and P*tel...
Originally posted by George C.
View Post
Perhaps we could just deport Braverman and P*tel...
Originally posted by George C.
View Post
Perhaps we could just deport Braverman and P*tel...
Deportation is a bad thing. That's it.
It wouldn't be in their case tbf.
Trouble is there's thousands, if not millions, of eligible assholes, sadly.
No there aren't. Even fascists have rights. Deportation is an act of violence.
In their cases, good, then...
Seeing as they'd inflict similar on others.
Originally posted by elguapo4
View Post
But yes, even they shouldn't be kicked out...
Originally posted by Satchmo Distel
View Post
No there aren't. Even fascists have rights. Deportation is an act of violence.
Originally posted by Antepli Ejderha
View Post
Let's not stoop to their level. Prosecute them for hate crimes and incitement.
Originally posted by Antepli Ejderha
View Post
They kinda are a bit fash, aren't they?
Previous
1
2
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
20
template
Next
Redirect Topic Title Add-on by vBMods.rocks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.6.8 Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
By logging into your account, you agree to our Privacy Policy , personal data processing and storage practices as described therein.
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Previous
1
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
template
Next
Originally posted by TonTon
View Post
They kinda are a bit fash, aren't they?
Originally posted by TonTon
View Post
They kinda are a bit fash, aren't they?
Originally posted by Nefertiti2
View Post
don't find your posting of a violent homophobe very amusing caja-dglh - I
Originally posted by Nefertiti2
View Post
I'm not sure I'd say John Fashanu is a homophobe. I don't really know if what I think he is is any better than that, probably not. He's certainly been horrifically homophobic at times over the years, though, so no argument there really. But he has also done some things (lesser, fewer) which are very much not homophobic. t's more that I think he just says things, and they don't necessarily relate to anything other than what's come to mind just then. A bit like Johnson in that respect.
Last edited by TonTon ; 18-01-2023, 08:34 .
Labour have supported this bill all the way through before any mention of boats, indeed have usually called for it to be even more ghastly. You have wilfully clueless fools in both parties wanting the bill to do shit that will immediately breach GDPR, and if passed will leave the U.K. tech industry in as glorious a state as all the other Great British Industries.
Presumably, there's nothing in the bill about hate speech against refugees, or celebrating when they drown? Because presumably if you condemn that speech you are then seen to "condone" asylum-seeking, which is now illegal to do.
Originally posted by TonTon
View Post
I'm not sure I'd say John Fashanu is a homophobe. I don't really know if what I think he is is any better than that, probably not. He's certainly been horrifically homophobic at times over the years, though, so no argument there really. But he has also done some things (lesser, fewer) which are very much not homophobic. t's more that I think he just says things, and they don't necessarily relate to anything other than what's come to mind just then. A bit like Johnson in that respect.
It doesn't matter how much ladder pulling she engages in, she's still getting the black hood and back of a van treatment if her core audience ever got in charge.
I wonder if this hotel is in Lucas' constituency, there is one in Bell Ribeiro-Addy's and when she visited out she was asked to leave.
They are being vague on its location for understandable reasons.
Even the Observer reporting has described it as being in both Brighton and in Hove.
Originally posted by ursus arctos
View Post
They are being vague on its location for understandable reasons.
Even the Observer reporting has described it as being in both Brighton and in Hove.
Originally posted by ursus arctos
View Post
They are being vague on its location for understandable reasons.
Even the Observer reporting has described it as being in both Brighton and in Hove.
I'm aware of that, but am used to them being considered different places when used individually, much in the way that Brooklyn has been part of New York City since consolidation, yet retains its very distinct boundaries.
Previous
1
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
template
Next
Redirect Topic Title Add-on by vBMods.rocks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.6.8 Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
⚠ Version 1.1 of The Plant List has been superseded and should no longer be used.
The new version is available at http://www.worldfloraonline.org/tpl/kew-2682298 . The new version is enhanced, using more data sources including Taxonomic Expert Networks and will be more frequently updated.
This name is the accepted name of a species in the genus Brassica
(family Brassicaceae ).
The record derives from WCSP (in review)
(data supplied on
2012-03-23
)
which reports it as an accepted name with original publication details: Consp. Pl. Charc. 8 1859 .
Full publication details for this name can be found in IPNI :
http://ipni.org/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60442520-2 .
Sort the name records using the buttons.
The following databases may contain further information on this name. Please click on any button to follow a
link to that database.
To return to The Plant List : please use your browser's back
button to return to this page.
This name was in version 1 of The Plant List, record kew-2682298 .
© The Plant List 2013 —
Terms and Conditions —
How to Cite
Девушка с длинным черным членом ебет в попку парня в маске
Красивая блондинка сама пришла в гости к черному парню
Соло шатенки Chrissy Marie на кровати