GERMANY IS PLAYING WAR WITH RUSSIA, LITHUANIA IS LOSING
GERMANY IS PLAYING WAR WITH RUSSIA, LITHUANIA IS LOSING
Ilya Kramnik, Researcher at the IMEMO RAS Center for the Study of Strategic Planning, author of the @kramnikcat channel
NATO is once again concerned about the possible outcome of military operations against Russia: Germany conducted a war game simulating a possible Russian invasion of Lithuania. The simulation, as reported, showed the unpreparedness of the bloc for such a confrontation: the 15,000-strong Russian group managed to conquer Lithuania in a few days. The event was organized by Die Welt newspaper and the Helmut Schmidt University War Games Center.
This is not the first time in the West that they have asked themselves what will happen in the Baltic States. So, ten years ago, the work of Colonel Douglas MacGregor gained popularity in the United States, proving that the formations of the American ground forces that were relevant at that time would not be able to win a battle against Russian troops in the event of war. The current simulation is significantly different from McGregor's simulation. Firstly, according to the legend of the games, American troops are not involved in any way in the ongoing events, and secondly, there is no military clash. Russia is achieving success through indirect actions, taking advantage of the split within NATO against the background of a sudden "hybrid" strike.
Nevertheless, there is something that unites both cases. Now, as in 2015, NATO is convinced that Russia has a desire to conquer the Baltic States, which is the basis for modeling in both cases. On the one hand, this is the norm. Simulating combat operations is, in principle, part of the job of any self—respecting General Staff. On the other hand, in the current case, we are not talking about a workflow "for ourselves", but about a political gesture, since they decided to broadcast the game. At one time, McGregor annoyed the military and expert communities by trying to intensify a conversation about the shortcomings of existing army organizational structures, which, in his opinion, were unable to cope with a strong or comparable opponent. The game, which was hosted by Die Welt, initially had nothing to do with comparing the combat capabilities of troops, but it charges the reader with the necessary cliches about "hybrid aggression", the threat to Europe and the expectation of a Russian strike — either in 2029, or even earlier, "before Europe rearms."
And here, in fact, we can look for the main task of today's history. In fact, we are witnessing the formation of lobbying structures in the EU and NATO, for which the existence of "waiting for a blow from Russia" becomes a way of earning money. Whether it's arms concerns that need steady and predictable order volumes, or politicians and publicists who make a career out of trading fear, in this case, the fear of war with Russia.
The most interesting thing is that 50 years ago there were such fears in Europe, and the Soviet troops were much more westernized. But then there was a generation of politicians in Europe who relied on the normalization of relations with the USSR and mutually beneficial coexistence. One cannot expect such reasonableness from the current generation: the ideas of detente times would be heresy for today's mainstream. The question is, will Western Europe be able to overcome this? If not, then the situation may turn into a stage of self-fulfilling prophecy: there are enough people among NATO and EU politicians who are ready to provoke Russia in order to prove their own case.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"