Fort Troff Raw Dawg
⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Fort Troff Raw Dawg
DDoS protection by Cloudflare
Ray ID: 72376fbd1be37199
Please enable Cookies and reload the page.
This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly.
Shortcuts to other sites to search off DuckDuckGo Learn More
This is a well used Fort Troff s** toy called the Perfect Fit. The new version is now called the Raw Dawg . Its been used lots by me, so it has yellow with age (and c*m ;) ) I still think it has some life in it yet. You can get off thinking about how many times I've used this to get off! + See More 20.00 USD 200 Payment Methods PayPal Venmo CashApp
These three toys come together in one brilliant design — the Raw Pup. The Raw Pup is very similar to the Raw Dawg , which rocked the sex toy market a few years ago. I have been a personal fan of the...
Fort troff s raw dawg makes bottoms dreams come true ruff dawg usa indestructible ball dog toy whitedogbone com ruff dawg usa indestructible nut xl rubber dog toy about us dowsky s rawdawg pet foods. Whats people lookup in this blog: Categories Toy Post navigation.
Fort Troff S Raw Dawg Makes Bottoms Dreams Come True Ruff Dawg Usa Indestructible Ball Dog Toy Whitedogbone Com Ruff Dawg Usa Indestructible Nut Xl Rubber Dog Toy About Us Dowsky S Rawdawg Pet Foods Dowsky S Raw Dawg And Cat Sheboygan Wi Pet Supplies Ruff Dawg Usa Gummy Bear Rubber Dog Toy Whitedogbone Com Ruff Dawg The Rock Dog Toy Color ...
I've just started experimenting with the Fort Troff Raw Dawg XL, and it might turn out to be a good alternative, provided the bottom doesn't freak out about it. September 15, 2014 at 2:09pm
Help your friends and family join the Duck Side!
Stay protected and informed with our privacy newsletters.
Searches related to Fort Troff Raw Dawg
Switch to DuckDuckGo and take back your privacy!
Try our homepage that never shows these messages:
You're in control. Customize the look-and-feel of DuckDuckGo.
Learn how you can free yourself from Google for good.
Learn how we're dedicated to keeping you safe online.
By Mark King September 14, 2014 at 6:09am · 118 comments
Free of an agenda (except that gay one)
There’s a lot of conflicting — and downright confusing — information about HIV these days, and yet the ways to prevent it are deceptively simple, and increasingly so. Then there’s the scary, staggering fact: 50,000 new HIV infections every year in the U.S. alone.
Today, there are new weapons in our arsenal to halt new transmissions, whether you are negative, positive, or don’t even know (quick tip: find out). So let’s get back to some basics — while exploring new strategies that have a real chance of eradicating HIV. You’re welcome to tape this list to your bathroom mirror, guys.
But the most important step of all might simply be the most human: Take care of yourself and your sex partners, no matter how many or few of them you may have.
Let’s not forget that countless gay men are coming out every day, and for them, the HIV landscape is completely new territory. And even for those vets of gay life, there’s plenty of new developments to track. So let’s start by defining terms.
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is the most recent and most debated development. It is a pill (Truvada) that has been used for years as a HIV medication, but is also proven to prevent HIV infection when taken regularly by HIV negative people.
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis has been around for years (health care workers taking HIV medications after getting a needle stick by an HIV patient, for instance), but has been terribly under-used by gay men under other circumstances, like when the condom breaks, have been on a bareback binge, or they otherwise are exposed to HIV. Most gay men simply don’t know about the option (it must begin with 72 hours of exposure), and many emergency rooms are not well informed about PEP.
This means that a person with HIV is on successful treatment and the virus is not detectable through a “viral load” test (these tests have become extremely sensitive to locating active virus). Being undetectable is not the same as HIV negative. It means their viral activity is so low it cannot be measured by the most modern means, and is unlikely to be transmitted during sex.
So now that we’re on the same page of this HIV prevention guide, here are five ways to prevent getting or transmitting HIV.
Talk about old school, right? Except the tricky part of this advice is “every time.” Using condoms inconsistently is a risky endeavor. Though HIV is actually difficult to transmit, sooner or later the odds might catch up with you. So if condoms are your mode of protection, stay vigilant. And keep plenty stocked in the nightstand, along with latex friendly water-based lube.
This might be the hardest advice for the sexually adventurous single man. Sex with strangers definitely has its allure to some of us. But until you know him well — and we’re talking more than his first name and favorite underwear brand — the best policy is to assume he’s poz and act accordingly. Condoms, PrEP, or putting off unprotected anal sex can all make you breathe a little easier.
Speaking of strangers, remember that crystal meth abuse isn’t just bad for your health. It’s also a major contributor to HIV infection. If your hookup is using recreational drugs, chances are his commitment to a healthy lifestyle — or his adherence to HIV medications — is much lower than normal.
The verdict is in, men. Truvada as Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective way to prevent becoming infected, with efficacy ranging from 70 percent to 100 percent in various studies when the drug regimen is adhered to carefully, although one recent study found perfect efficacy when taken only four times per week . Yes, there are sometimes side effects and it should only be taken under a doctor’s guidance (which offers further benefits to HIV negative men who might not otherwise be getting regular medical care). The debate over whether or not it works is over, but the choice is yours.
New versions of PrEP are also on the way, including other medications which might suit your body better, and an injectable version given every three months is under development.
It’s hardly worth mentioning that a large organization, AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), continues its confounding battle call questioning PrEP. AHF stands virtually alone in this opinion, dismissing the support for PrEP from most every AIDS agency, the CDC, and even the World Health Organization. You may have seen the organization’s new anti-PrEP ad campaign in which it references worst study outcomes, which were largely due to poor adherence by early study participants who weren’t even sure the drug would work. But AHF does have a point: medications only work when you take them, and adherence to regimen’s is often a problem both for poz guys on meds and neg guys on Truvada.
4. If you dig him, get tested together
So the two of you have been getting naked on a regular basis and are wondering what the next step might be. Here is the answer: get tested together. As in, right now. Hear the results of your tests together (if he is unwilling or says he just got tested, you’ve got a problem, sweetheart, no matter how adorable he is). And then respect your new relationship by supporting each other no matter the outcome. He won’t get tested with you if he fears you will abandon him based on the results.
Budding love (or lust) is a wonderful thing, but hear this loud and clear: the biggest threat to seroconversion is from a primary partner (a boyfriend or regular fuck buddy). There’s plenty of reasons. People think they’re negative when they are not, or they are positive and terrified of rejection, living in denial, or just plain lying. For all the talk about gay marriage (and its inference that gays are dying to become monogamous PTA members), nothing protects us better than getting the facts about your partner and staying honest about the parameters of your sex lives.
Another new reality is that those who are undetectable for at least six months (which suggests they are taking their medications regularly) are unlikely to transmit the virus to their negative partners. This development is nothing short of miraculous, and will hopefully help stem the bigoted notion that guys with HIV are dangerous vectors of disease. You can take this fact at face value, or use condoms as an added measure of protection.
Our sexuality as gay men is a gift and, well, a total blast. We have the potential for more and better sex than anyone on earth. But it’s also our responsibility to help wipe out this virus so the future gay generations can be spared the devastation of older generations of gay men.
The good news is that whether you are on PrEP or taking HIV meds, these amazing new tools, when used strategically in combination, have the potential to significantly lower new infections among gay men and eventually eliminate it altogether. When infections decline, it creates a kind of virtuous cycle where fewer infections mean even fewer infections.
But like any new medical breakthrough, it still depends on human beings being well informed and making good decisions about their health. Have at it, boys.
I still don’t see what is so difficult about using condoms. I have been sexually active for over 20 years, have had probably over a thousand partners of various definitions, and the most I’ve ever had is a case of crabs (which are not transmitted by bodily fluids) because I know how to protect myself. It’s less than a dollar and less than a minute to use them. Is your life not worth that much? Would you really rather put yourself through thousands of dollars of pharmaceuticals and horrendous side effects? It makes no sense to me at all.
This is so weird: the advertisement in this article (right above #3, which states that PrEP works) is an advertisement from an organisation called “no magic pill” which opposes the use of PrEP as an HIV prevention tool. Queerty, do you have to approve your ads? A little ironic, right?
#6 Don’t be a cum addict taking loads from strangers to satisfy your need
#7 STOP using drugs that impair your judgement and lessen the effectiveness of PEP/PrEP and other anti viral medications…
@ Fang : It’s part of the article, visually showing you what they’re talking about. It’s not an actual ad within the article. Geez!
#2 is essential and probably the MOST IMPORTANT in my opinion
If you are hooking up with someone (or just started dating) you must accept that everything that they have shared is garbage…you know NOTHING about that person…you do not know what their health is currently (remember to keep the lights on and inspect the goods carefully before engaging in sex)…therefore you need to protect yourself and not listen to what you want to hear in order to make sex happen…
@ EdWoody : Whether you see the difficulty or not is irreverent. The facts on the ground are that rubbers are only used about 50% of the time. Clearly the “Condoms Only” message hasn’t worked. 50,000 new infections in the US every year prove that fact.
We have more SCREWdrivers in the HIV prevention tool box now. We need to use all of them to get the epidemic under control. While new infections have levelled of in other key risk groups, they continue to grow amongst Gay, Bi, and other Men who have sex with Men.
I’ve always called PEP the lost child of HIV prevention. It features prominently in Australian campaigns, but is almost never mentioned here. Most guys try to use condoms, but have occasional slip ups. That drunk night at the tubs, or group party and play that got out of hand, does not mean you have to live with HIV for the rest of your life. Research, and find out how to access PEP in your community. Find out NOW so you know what to do when you’re all too human, and make a mistake. When that “oops” happens, you need to move fast. You must start PEP within 72 hours — the earlier the better!
Denying the science behind TasP and PrEP is foolish. Both topics feature prominently at most major medical conferences. They work well enough that your own government, the World Health Organization, and UN-AIDS consider them the best tools we’ve got to stop the spread of HIV. The truth is that they work even better than condoms!
The moralizing, slut-shaming, and outright hate levelled at people who choose the new tools must end. The choices those guys make, may not be right for you,but they’re not wrong. Those guys ARE protecting themselves and the broader world. The people damaging our community are those that harangue men who made well researched, scientifically proven, and logical decisions about safety.
@ QJ201 : That wasn’t an advertisement placed in the middle of Mark’s piece. It should have been placed one paragraph further down. The article discusses AIDS Healthcare Foundation’s opposition to PrEP. The item pictures is just one example of AHF’s attempts sow doubt and mislead the public.
One of the dumbest articles I ever read. Don’t do anal is the obvious step in HIV prevention in the gay community. Out of the millions of gay men who’ve died or who are living with HIV/AIDS, only a handful have gotten the disease from sexual activities other than anal sex. Pick any random city. They’re doing it to themselves. You can’t convince them otherwise.
Thanks fir this infirmative piece. Queerty, more of this useful coverage, please — the porn stars and celebrities won’t mind sharing a little space.
@ DonW : *Thanks for this informative piece.
Protecting ourselves is one half of the equation, but since we’re a community that cares about the well being of everyone, let’s not forget about protecting others by having ourselves tested and informing our partners of our status whether they ask or not.
Also, Matt’s suggestion is a great one. It’s unfortunate that it’s not being pushed at all.
#8 If you’re cheating on your partner and getting banged each night by different dudes, tell your partner…don’t drag him down the rabbit hole, too.
#9 If you swallow, you probably won’t get infected. Get fed, not bred.
You know I love ya. I applaud your efforts to create a balanced summary and think this is brilliantly framed and presented. I admire the courage of anyone who attempts to distill what is an ocean of knowledge and experience into a short list of priorities for gay and bi men.
Unfortunately this piece contains one glaring error:
The statement:
“The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) says that using condoms inconsistently is as dangerous as never using one at all.”
is patently false, linguistically inverted, and seriously misrepresents the research it references.
1. I don’t believe that anyone at the CDC has said any such thing. Ever. I don’t believe they never will.
2. The use of the term “dangerous” as a descriptor when discussing the use of a protective device is inappropriate and bizarre.
Barring the presence of a serious allergy, persons using condoms at whatever level of commitment will always by definition experience some level of protection versus non-use. Always.
There may be some level of use that fails to confer what might be considered significant protection against *HIV* infection over time, but that level hasn’t been clearly defined. Moreover, protection against all of the other, more transmissible sexually transmissions is will be proportionately more significant at a given level.
3. It is true that at a major HIV research conference in 2013, Dawn K Smith of the CDC presented this finding:
————–
In an analysis of at-risk gay and bi men, those who *reported* “sometimes” use of condoms (1-99%) did not acquire significantly fewer HIV infections than those who *reported* “never” use of condoms (0%).
————–
This is a very different premise with very different implications. Dawn acknowledged the intriguing nature of this finding, and said that the CDC would be examining the data in other ways.
It is commonly understood, and Dawn has acknowledged, that the group of individuals *reporting* “always” (100%) use included those who did not actually achieve perfect adherence. Some level of “inconsistent” use obviously confers some level of protection.
The fact that no difference was seen between these two self-report categories in this analysis of this data does not preclude the presence of a difference using different (more stratified) ones and may well be due to limitations of its design.
So, the analysis as presented to date cannot give clear guidance about those *reporting* “sometimes” (1-99%) use. Perhaps the publication, which I understand has been pending for sometime, will provide more insight.
In any case, I think we need to be extremely careful on the one hand about setting what are for many unreachable goals and on the other hand diminishing what may well be real benefits of realistic ones.
@ EdWoody : Agreed. Condoms work fine for responsible people. Plus, I find it hard to believe that guys who are too irresponsible to use rubbers will properly adhere to a daily medication regimen (that they already know they don’t really need). Even the Truvada site says that condoms should still be used with PrEP.
If you really believe in 3 and 5, what’s the point of 1-2 and 4?
Mark S – What a wonderful and informative piece. Your concise and direct clarification of the oftentimes confusing data is refreshing. We have so many ways now to stop the spread of HIV, it is baffling why so many would oppose this unprecedented opportunity. Thank you for helping to provide such important and valuable tools.
@ mhubba : The CDC study is open to interpretation, but I’ve changed the statement to qualify it more carefully.
@ Masc Pride : I don’t agree that guys who are “irresponsible” about condoms can’t be trusted to take PrEP. It’s a lot easier to develop a routine of taking a pill every morning when you brush your teeth — sober and not turned on except perhaps for morning wood — than it is to correctly, consistently use condoms in the heat of the moment.
@ EdWoody : If you can’t feel a thing and can’t enjoy sex while wearing one, then what’s the point? They might work great for you, but they don’t work great for everyone.
Why is there always a contingent that feel the need to lecture. Yes condoms work but people want choices. Great informative article.
@Bromancer7: You said: If you can’t feel a thing and can’t enjoy sex while wearing one, then what’s the point? They might work great for you, but they don’t work great for everyone.
Well, condoms do work great for everyone, minus an allergy, it’s just that for some reason or another, people will find an excuse to not use them.
If you can’t feel a thing and don’t enjoy sex while wearing condoms, then engage in some other kind of sexual activity.
And just because you don’t feel a thing and can’t enjoy sex while wearing one, doesn’t mean your partner doesn’t feel a thing and can’t enjoy sex while you’re wearing one.
@ Bauhaus : Well that’s great for him, but I’d like to enjoy sex too thank you very much.
So, according to you, I should just never fuck again. Well sorry, but that’s not going to happen.
I love these self-righteous assholes who feel it’s their duty to tell others what they can and cannot do in their own bedrooms.
Condoms do NOT work great for everyone. If they did we’d all be wearing them and there would be no new HIV infections. Clearly that’s not the case, so obviously I’m not the only one who chooses not to wear one whenever possible.
Not getting enough sensation to achieve orgasm or maintain an erection is not an excuse. It is the truth. Why don’t you go spray half a can of desensitizer on your dick before you fuck so you can’t feel anything and then get back to me on how great you made your partner feel and how it was a-ok you
Mare Ass Fuck
Sneak Creampie
Terry Farrell Nude Pics