Forced Triple Penetration
🛑 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Forced Triple Penetration
If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device.
Videos you watch may be added to the TV's watch history and influence TV recommendations. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to YouTube on your computer.
An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later.
by
Amanda Hess
December 4th, 2009 September 30th, 2020
"I live in D.C. and want local news."
"Y'all are doing real local D.C. journalism."
" Washington City Paper has made me feel like I am part of the D.C. community."
In today’s Sexist Beatdown, we discussed the reluctance to accept men as victims of sexual assault . Men, according to the Gender Police, are seen as unrapeable —-they are constantly expected to pursue sex, and are therefore impossible to violate. Commenter Drew noted another cultural barrier to male victims of sexual assault—-our tendency to conflate sexual violation with penetration. He writes:
to get into even more touchy territory, maybe the word “sex” isn’t specific enough. Because what really seems to be at issue here isn’t just anything that falls under the heading of sex, it’s really more what falls under the heading of “penetration.”
Because I’d bet those same (straight) men who have a hard time seeing/admitting a big problem with them being drunkenly led into having obligation/consequence-free sex would probably immediately see the situation very differently if the “sex” turned out to have involved them being on the penetrated end of a sex act (whether with a woman or a man).
The idea that rape is classified based on body parts isn’t just a cultural thing; it’s a criminal thing, too. According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting system, forcible rape is “the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” To the FBI, the carnal knowledge of a male forcibly and against his will is considered a different (and lesser) crime: “assault.”
Here, sexual consent is defined not only by a person’s will, but by their physical attributes. According to the FBI’s definition, female bodies can be raped, but male bodies cannot. I suspect this is why men are only seen as victims when their bodies are penetrated—-it’s perceived as a feminine sexual position, and only female bodies can be victimized. Under this model, physical characteristics become shorthand for consent.
When people who believe that men can’t be raped are forced to justify their position, the argument usually goes something like this:
A : If a person can’t legally consent to sex when they’re too drunk, what happens when both sex partners are too drunk to have sex? Why isn’t the man considered a victim of rape as well?
B : Even when two people are drunk, at least one of them has to physically initiate the sex act. When both partners are actively and enthusiastically participating, it’s sex. When only one person is physically pursuing sex, and the other person has verbally consented that that’s what they’re into, it’s sex. When only one person is physically pursuing sex, and the other person hasn’t provided their verbal consent, it’s assault. It’s impossible for two people lying around passed out to somehow violate each other against both of their wills. Sex doesn’t just happen .
A : OK. But why is it that only men are assumed to be the aggressor in a situation like that? Can’t a woman physically force herself on a guy who’s too drunk to have sex?
B : Because … his dick wouldn’t get hard.
Some people actually think that an erection is a physical indication of consent. It is not. According to the Rape Victim Advocacy Program , arousal is actually quite common in sexual assault scenarios involving both male and female victims:
Male victims/survivors are often ashamed and confused when their body responds during an assault. Frequently, men who are sexually assaulted or raped have an involuntary or forced erection or ejaculation. Also, muscles in the anus often relax when a man is raped. This does not mean that the survivor wanted to be raped or sexually assaulted. Involuntary erections and ejaculations are normal reactions to physical stimulation even when sex is non-consensual.
As the National Center for Victims of Crime notes, male victims of rape often blame themselves for their “involuntary physiological reaction” to a sexual assault. They, too, believe an erection automatically implies consent:
It is not uncommon for a male rape victim to blame himself for the rape, believing that he in some way gave permission to the rapist (Brochman, 1991). Male rape victims suffer a similar fear that female rape victims face—-that people will believe the myth that they may have enjoyed being raped. Some men may believe they were not raped or that they gave consent because they became sexually aroused, had an erection, or ejaculated during the sexual assault.
If we’re serious about addressing sexual assault against men and women, we must break down these physical barriers. The female body has long been invoked to justify sexual assaults against women—-we are too sexy to be left alone, too vulnerable to fight back, too feminine to be respected. A woman’s body should never make her a victim—-and a man’s body should never make him invisible.
We don't have one. Readers like you keep our work free for everyone to read. If you think that it's important to have high quality local reporting we hope you'll support our work with a monthly contribution.
Events: A heads up about City Paper events, from panels to parties.
Like sardines: Pros and cons of dorms' forced triples
Monica Vendituoli
| USA TODAY Collegiate Correspondent
Share your feedback to help improve our site!
Learning to live with one roommate can be a challenge, let alone two. However, this is Lesson No. 1 for students assigned to dreaded "forced triples," rooms designed for two students that house three, this fall.
Out of 400 college students surveyed by College Prowler in August, 8% of students reported their college used forced triples to combat on- campus housing shortages. Larry Long, a community director at Michigan State University, found that 99% of institutions had at least 1% of students in forced triples during the 2011-12 academic year.
There are some benefits to living in a forced triple, such as room-and-board discounts and higher lottery numbers in the next housing round, Long says. He also found that students in triples are more likely to stay in on- campus housing than those in doubles.
Most students report the experience is a mixed-bag of positives and negatives.
"Some days I like my forced triple, other days I hated it. I very rarely had the room to myself and privacy was non-existent. But there is something to be said about having someone around if you need them to be,"says Keila Munoz, a who lived in a forced- triple at Wheaton College in Norton, Mass. her freshman year.
Students cited space, or lack thereof, as the chief concern of forced triples.
"I didn't have much room for all of my belongings and sometimes my two other roommates would take up more room than they needed," says Nick Garrity, a junior at Keene State College in Keene, N.H, who lived in a forced triple his freshmen year.
Colleges have used forced triples and other temporary spaces, such as hotels, to accommodate students for decades. However, there are signs the need for overflow housing may increase in upcoming years.
The first reason involves "summer melt," which is the percentage of students who apply for on- campus housing but do not show up on move-in day. Due to increasingly tight finances, colleges would rather house students in forced triples than have empty rooms losing revenue.
"Some housing departments are expected to turn a profit -- some weren't expected to do this until relatively recently -- others are only expected to break even, but either way the margins are very thin. So it's better, from a financial perspective, to house some students in study lounges, then move them to standard rooms when spaces open, than to have empty spaces for most of the year," says Emily Glenn, the corporate librarian for the Association of College & University Housing Officers International.
These financial restraints further decrease the likelihood that college housing is renovated as it ages, which is likely to become an issue over the next few years.
"If you look at the history of college housing in the U.S., after the Korean War there was a surge in building. Now that housing is aging, so there is a lot of replacement going on," says Terry Webb, the assistant vice president for Student Life at Binghamton University in Binghamton, N.Y.
The necessary closure of some old, deteriorating dorms may increase the amount of forced triples on campuses.
Despite the fact that an oversupply of off-campus housing has prompted some landlords to decrease rent , students are still advised by experts to live on campus if possible.
"Students who live in campus housing, particularly as freshmen, do better socially, emotionally, and often academically than those who live off campus or at home," says Von Stange, the assistant vice-president for Student Life at the University of Iowa.
So what are some tips for students living in forced triples?
Some students suggest seeking out the bright side of the situation. "Use it as a tool for networking! That's two new friends," says James Murphy, a junior at Saint Anselm College in Manchester, N.H.
Other students suggest those in a forced triple bring fewer items.
In the end, communication is the key for students in forced triples, especially if they find the situation unbearable. Sometimes students can find other rooming arrangements if they speak up.
"Students in forced triples shouldn't be afraid to talk to their roommates or R.A. or hall director about moving out of a forced triple if they're not comfortable in it," says Megan Liu, a student at the University of New Hampshire in Durham, N.H. who lived in a triple her freshmen year and was able to move out a forced triple her sophomore year.
Monica Vendituoli is a junior at Wheaton College.
If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device.
Videos you watch may be added to the TV's watch history and influence TV recommendations. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to YouTube on your computer.
An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later.
0:00 / 1:01 • Watch full video Live
A young woman was gang-raped by five men for three hours in front of her husband when they were travelling in northern India.
The 20-year-old was dragged into a ravine after the pair, who had been riding on a motorbike, was stopped by the group of alleged rapists in Alway, Rajasthan on April 26.
The group allegedly stripped off the husband's clothes and forced him to watch his wife being raped as they filmed the three-hour attack.
Police have arrested all five men for carrying the brutal assault and detained a sixth person for uploading the sickening footage to social media.
Sakura Has Sex
Stepfamily Porn
Ashoka Tano Hentai