Fakes Mexicanas

⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Fakes Mexicanas
Fotografías de las ficheras mexicanas más famosas
Por: Diana Garrido - 20 de marzo de 2021
Las ficheras eran más que mujeres bailando en un escenario o película. Eran chicas talentosas que fueron opacadas por el machismo y la misoginia
10 Cosas que aprendimos de María Félix
Todos los derechos reservados 2022 © Cultura Colectiva.
Entre luces rojas, boas de plumas, un incesante clic clac de tacones altos y lentejuela suelta en los pasillos como si se tratara de migajas para no perder el camino de vuelta al solitario camerino, se podían ver algunas mujeres con maquillaje —quizás excesivo—, apresuradas, respirando hondo para salir al escenario en donde las esperaba una multitud que las ovacionaba, les aplaudía y despertaban sus más profundos deseos. Ellas: las fichereras , enfundadas en diminutos trajes de baño, en lencería que apenas cubría las "partes indecentes" y penachos altísimos, aparecían en escena bailando y moviéndose sensualmente.
Estas artistas se hacían llamar vedettes y reinaron el México de los años 70. Sus antecedentes directos eran Tongolele o Rosita Fornés, pero en esta nueva era, es decir de 1979 a 1980, aproximadamente, no bastaba con bailar, cantar o actuar en un escenario. Si querían el éxito, debían aparecer en la pantalla grande en producciones de bajos presupuestos, calidad actoral casi nula y argumentos que poco aportaban a la cinematografía nacional. No obstante, muchas de ellas eran el gancho para que el público pagara una entrada al cine.
En su mayoría, eran hombres los que, por una módica cantidad, entraban a su cine favorito y se tocaban viendo a su fichera favorita. Este mote, por cierto, proviene de aquellas mujeres que trabajaban en cabarets y juntaban fichas por cada bebida que ellas o el cliente al que acompañaba consumía. Sin embargo, la connotación de la palabra se modificó al grado de ser un adjetivo peyorativo e incómodo para las mujeres, en especial cuando el " cine de ficheras " era lo único que podía verse en pantalla.
De este modo, fanáticos, fotógrafos, cineastas y actores se volvieron el target de este grupo de mujeres que con poca ropa y su sensualidad natural, los sedujeron al mismo tiempo que recibían apodos de mal gusto, piropos molestos, tocamientos innecesarios y claro, un sinfín de propuestas indecorosas.
Eran «chamacas muy guapas y arregladitas», recuerda Juan Ponce Guadián, fotógrafo que trató de capturar lo más bello de las ficheras , pero el campo machista que habitaba —al igual que todo México— le impidió hacerlo para retratar únicamente cuerpos, siluetas, formas y sensualidad desbordada, misma que sólo alimentaba la imagen cosificada que reinaba sobre ellas. Jesús Magaña, otro de los encargados de la lente quien las retrató en su momentos más íntimos, en poses sugerentes, con peinados repletos de laca y plastas gruesas de maquillaje, trataba de hacerlas ver inocentes, de quitarles el estigma de prostitutas, pero no lo consiguió, al menos no con la autorización necesaria.
Ésa era la justificación de los medios masivos de aquellos años, quienes en su afán de seguir vendiendo la imagen de la mujer como la representación del erotismo, explotaron a cada una de las vedettes como Sasha Montenegro , Lyn May , Rossy Mendoz a o Gina Montes , quienes buscaban su mayor éxito en hacer algo más que desnudarse en un escenario o frente a una cámara, Olga Breeskin tocaba el violín, por ejemplo, pero no era suficiente. Los hombres querían ver piel desnuda y las mujeres, ofendidas, se resignaban a que sus novios o esposos adularan a estas mujeres de cuerpos exuberantes mientras las denigraban a ambas.
Los cabarets —sitios que presentaban con bombo y platillo a estas mujeres— eran lugares en los que reinaba la violencia, pero al mismo tiempo se sentían como en casa. Lo mismo sucedía en los sets de filmación y fueron ellas mismas quienes intentaron erradicar la cultura machista, pero por desgracia, les ganaba el sistema, la tradición y las amenazas. El cine en el que aparecían era burdo, sucio y machista, pero si ellas querían ser importantes en la farándula y en las altas esferas, entonces debían ser «menos quejumbrosas y soltar la ropa interior», según testimonios.
Las fotografías más famosas de aquellas mujeres son claramente una oda a la sexualidad y al erotismo, aunado al evidente machismo que sentaba las bases de esas imágenes, puesto que eran usadas para calendarios, postales y como trofeos de la masculinidad.
En la actualidad, las mujeres que son vistas de esta forma protestan y sólo se desnudan si así lo desean, en la mayoría de los casos. Pero a decir verdad, en la década de los setenta esta manera de ser estaba orquestada por el gobierno, ya que no había subsidios para el arte, sólo para ese tipo de producciones que no aportaban nada, pero sí atendían a las necesidades económicas y placenteras de un sector en especial. De este modo y dejando escapar el coraje entre sus manos y los tacones, las ficheras tuvieron que aguantar la connotación de ese apodo por mucho más tiempo del que creyeron, tan es así que hasta la fecha es una cruz que deben llevar a cuestas.
Y al parecer no lo hará por mucho tiempo. La decadencia del género llegó cuando el cine nacional resurgió y dejó de lado las producciones baratas y de argumentos simples para financiar proyectos más complejos, con mejores historias y actores cuyo nivel histriónico difería de los actores típicos del cine de ficheras . Pero aún con ello, las vedettes forman parte del imaginario colectivo y nos enseñan que cada quien tiene un momento de gloria y en determinado momento se debe terminar. Es precisamente por ello que estas mujeres de curvas pronunciadas y bellos rostros pretendían dejar algo más que su imagen en la pantalla, pero al no conseguirlo realmente, no tuvieron más que seguir con la imagen que se les impuso.
En efecto, la mayoría de las vedettes que en los setenta tuvieron fama y éxito son las mismas que son recordadas por sus shows y filmes , siendo aún sinónimo de prostitución , de erotismo y de dinero a cambio de sexo —directo o indirecto, es lo de menos—. Pero sobrevivieron y cuentan su historia con orgullo porque al final de día, fueron las divas más cotizadas, las más bellas y las más aduladas y agradecen —al menos— tener su amor propio intacto, aunque les haya costado años de vivir en la oscuridad, bajo el yugo del machismo y en las sombras de una mancha vigente, pero que el México contemporáneo intenta disimular.
*Este artículo fue publicado anteriormente y ha sido modificado
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para personalizar y mejorar el uso y la experiencia de nuestros usuarios en nuestro sitio web.

Just to drive the Open Borders wackos crazy!
says NO -- Second Time she has done this! She sure isn't backing down on her hard line stance and one has to appreciate her belief in the rights of her native countrymen. A breath of fresh air to see someone lead. Australian Prime Minister does it again!! The whole world needs a leader like this! Prime Minister Julia Gillard - Australia Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks. Separately, Gillard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying she supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote: 'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT... Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.' 'This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.' 'We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!' 'Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.' 'We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.' 'This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, 'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.' 'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.'

New Haven, CT – On Thursday, Superior Court Judge David Gold sentenced Jose Angel Moreno-Hernandez, 29, to 80 years in prison for repeatedly raping and beating a woman who offered to drive him home. The victim was a co-worker at a local restaurant. In October, Moreno-Hernandez was convicted of five counts of first-degree sexual assault, first-degree kidnapping, attempted murder and first-degree assault. The crime occurred on March 27, 2009. The victim testified that once in the car, her attacker propositioned her. When she refused his advances, he forced her out of the car near a park and dragged her by the hair into the woods. He then began raping her…he would do so several more times before the ordeal ended. During the assault, Moreno-Hernandez stomped up and down on his victim, twisted her neck and repeatedly punched her with a closed fist, according to court documents. The brutality only ended once the woman pretended to be dead. Once Moreno-Hernandez fled the scene, the victim staggered out the woods and managed to find help. The beating left her basically blind as her eyes were swollen shut. She told the courtroom: “He looked me in my eyes, laughed, shrugged and said he was sorry as I cried and begged for my life.” “Everything would go white as he beat me, and if I didn’t get up fast enough, I would get pulled up by my hair, only to be raped or beaten again,” she said. “The only way I can begin to describe his demeanor during the attacks is to say I saw and felt nothing less than pure evil.” She said Moreno-Hernandez “killed the woman that was in those woods. I now live in pain and fear constantly.” Before the sentence was handed-down, the victim’s mother testified to her daughter’s injuries, saying: “Her face was completely covered in blood, her eyes swollen shut, but she tried to turn her head to me.” “She told me, ‘Mama, I fought hard and he hurt me badly. I wouldn’t let him kill me, Mama. I just wanted to see your face again.’” In addition to her ongoing physical injuries, the woman now suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. She told the judge that she now sleeps with a hammer under her pillow. Throughout Thursday’s proceedings, the illegal alien showed no emotion and simply sat listening to the Spanish translation of his victim’s testimony through headphones. Though, he did tell the judge: “I don’t know what happened.” Moreno-Hernandez’ defense attorney, Tejas Bhatt asked the judge for a more lenient sentence, saying: “We ask that you give him one more chance, to breathe fresh air.” However, Judge Gold was not moved and told Moreno-Hernandez: “This is truly among the most savage and sadistic crimes I have ever seen. Your crimes reflect a level of depravity that borders on the barbaric and inhumane.” Moreno-Hernandez who is in the country illegally from Mexico will not be eligible for parole until 2079 and will more than likely die in prison.
What a load of you know what! If you are in ANY COUNTRY ILLEGALLY you should be looking over your shoulder for the law! What makes the USA any different? If you cross into Canada or Mexico Illegally you better keep an eye out for the law. If you went to those countries and tried to live there illegally you would have a hard time! Why make it EASY here? Plain and simple folks, whatever country you go to do it LEGALLY! If grandma is here illegally, send her home to someone there to take care of her! And don't bring your kids here illegally! Be a responsible PARENT! And also it is NOT about “Immigrants” it is about Illegal Aliens (45’s) who come into a country without doing it the right way! Maybe the writer need to inform themselves in using the proper terminology or quit using the AP Playbook and be real reporters! Or maybe they are trying to sensationalize the article to make everyone think that those of us who support the rule of law are against all Immigrants! Which is another load of you know what! And for all the farmers who have been hiring these illegal’s “May your crops ROT in the ground” you have done nothing more than aid in the slavery of thousands of people by not paying a fair wage! Time to get mechanized farmers! The days of cheap labor are over with. Hasn’t this so called reporter also seen the factories and chain restaurants’ that dumped the Illegal’s and then lines formed of AMERICAN Citizens out of work applying for the jobs?
We all know that many of the administrations have failed the American public in doing the job of enforcing Immigration laws for DECADES! It is not the fault of just one regime all of them are guilty. Americans must follow the rule of law that means schools, churches, corporations and us common folks. We don’t get the privilege to pick and choose which laws we will obey; a civilized society must continue to respect the rule of law, no matter what country you live in.
Americans are tired of waiting for the federal government to make political move that will favor them in the election races, we want actions and we want them done now it is not a right, left or TeaParty thing and has absolutely nothing to do with Race. Enforce the laws we have on the books, Illegal Aliens will self deport as they are doing now, impost heavy fines and jail time for those that hire IA’s and for those that house them, cut off all local, state & federal funding.
And yes, it will be hard on those who are here Illegally, but those who made the choice to be here illegally made that choice, not the American public and we don’t want to flip the bill any longer for them. We also need to lower the number of aliens we admit into this country until our unemployment numbers are satisfactory! We cannot be the home for everyone in the world who wants the American dream! Citizens of the world who want to come here need to make a home in the country they live in, if it is not how they like it then they have to rise up and make the sacrifices just like Americans have for hundreds of years and make it better there for them and their children.
The idea of giving out our tax dollars to people who are in the country unlawfully has to come to an end! No more hand outs for schools who educate the illegals, no more food stamp or social services programs, no more drivers licenses and no more special attention to any one Race!. Yes we have heard that IA’s pay taxes, and we all know that the majority of those are using false identification to do so.
If you don’t like these ideas, that is still your right, and I hope it remains you right until they move in next door to you and take over your community!
We need immigrants! We all know it, just not now, and not such high numbers of them. We need a common sense approach to government and from what I see, neither party has enough to give you change for a wooden nickel now! We don’t care where they come from generally; they can be “Green” and have 3 eyes and if they want to assimilate into the American society and does it legally, let’s welcome them so don’t pull out the RACE CARD!
Enough of the RACE card please!, you are either American or Not! Don't describe yourself as some other name like Latino-American, German-American, Russian-American or Chinese-American first.... We want Immigrants in America, but we want them to come here LEGALLY please and assimilate. If you cannot do that you disrespect this country and you really don't deserve to be here.
The federal government “AG” Office needs to stop bringing states into the courts for doing what it refuses to do, they need to tend to business that helps America survive and protect its resources. Go after corruption, crimes that actually need to be looked into! Look into Politicians for goodness sake that should keep them busy full time!
In an effort to confront a vicious attack against the Border Patrol Auxiliary by a well known very left leaning group known for years to be Anti-Patriotic we are addressing the following area of concern from National Leadership in the Border Patrol Auxiliary.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has declared that BPAUX is now included as a “Nativist Extremist Groups 2010” For years the SPLC has attacked many organizations around the country for being patriotic and in support of the rule of law. It seems that the SLPC is now declaring that BPAUX is somehow a “Militia” even though BPAUX has never stated that it is, and the organizations web site says it is not! We don’t quite understand where the SPLC got the idea that BPAUX is a Militia and have asked them to remove any reference to us from their web site.
BPAUX continues to assist all local, state & federal law enforcement agencies in drug & human trafficking as well as providing education to children in schools about the harms of drugs. BPAUX will continue to screen all members to ensure that there are no hidden agendas in membership, and that our members treat all persons with dignity and respect regardless of their legal status.
For the record, and to make it very clear to all current and future members of this organization, and to the SPLC. BPAUX is NOT a Militia, they never will be nor have they ever been one regardless of what other web sites or articles have written about the group. As posted online for everyone to see we exist to support local, state & federal law enforcement agencies in drug & human trafficking. BPAUX is also not a political organization, and is not involved with making fences, protesting, shooting Illegal Aliens or Drug smugglers or taking over the government! Our members undergo a background check, and a vetting prior to any actual participation. In the following 6 months every members is on a probationary period where they are closely monitored for any behavior that is unacceptable to our standards.
In the future if any organization wishes to know details about BPAUX, they would be advised to read ALL of the materials posted online for public access prior to any creative writing articles! Articles like this one from the SPLC only prove that they have not done any homework or research in investigating that BPAUX really is, they made no calls to National Leadership asking any questions about the organization, and they sent no emails to leadership asking for any clarifications.
In our opinion, the lawyers behind the SPLC should know better! Slander is a serious issue, and BPAUX National Leadership has requested that the SPLC web site remove any reference to BPAUX permanently.
Louisiana is trying to regain the congressional seat it lost after the 2010 census showed a population shift toward states with the largest numbers of illegal immigrants, such as California and Texas.
States are assigned seats in the U.S. House of Representatives based on their populations.
The Louisiana lawsuit appears to demonstrate the extent that illegal immigration is distorting U.S. population figures to the point it affects political dist
Female Massage Happy Ending
Dreams Porno
Submissive Male Humiliation