FREEDOM ALLIANCE SA - PRESS RELEASE

FUNDING REQUIRED FOR A LANDMARK CASE SEEKING THE REVIEW AND SETTING ASIDE OF THE AUTHORISATION OF PFIZER'S MRNA VACCINE PRODUCTS.

A landmark case with global ramifications was filed on March 23, 2023, in the high court of Pretoria, South Africa. This case, in which international scientists and leading medical professionals have demanded urgent cessation and judicial review of Pfizer's mRNA COVID vaccine, requires additional funding. The case's anchor funder had to withdraw due to personal setbacks.

The full set of papers can be accessed HERE.

FASA, the case's applicant, kindly requests that any potential funders for the case peruse the court papers in the link below and contact the organisation should you be willing to aid in funding the case.

If you would like to donate a once-off amount or contribute monthly to the court case expenses, please click on the donate link HERE.

Freedom Alliance South Africa's bank details are included for EFT contributions. The case is strong on its merits, but its success depends on continued funding from faith donors. Many small donations can make a big difference.

FASA is South Africa's voice. We represent not only the approximately 13 million members of our affiliate organisations but all Africans—those that are aware of the onslaught on our Freedoms and Liberties, and those that are yet to come to this understanding.

We are a voice for the voiceless. Historically, many South Africans have fought to liberate our country from oppression, even paying the highest price. In more recent times, South Africans have suffered, and many have lost their lives, due to the onslaught on our Freedoms and Liberties that we have all witnessed, and that we continue to witness all around us. If ever there was a time for South Africans to rise in unity, it is now. Be part of history-in-the-making, as we walk towards liberating our Country from the shackles of today's oppression. Invest in your future and that of future generations.

Page 1 of 4

FASA is a movement of ordinary South Africans working to find solutions from the ground up. If ever there was a worthy and honourable cause to become part of, even only by donating, it is FASA’s selfless dedication to upholding truth, accurate science and freedom.

RISE UP, South Africa.

Be a part of today’s Liberation struggle.

Summary of court case:

Global data is showing alarming signals and correlations between the administration of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products and an unprecedented rise in serious adverse reactions in patients, including disability, foetal abnormalities, aggressive cancers and death. As the global medical community becomes increasingly aware of the problem, the Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) has taken on the government and the medicines regulator, SAHPRA, to safeguard public health.

FASA has approached the High Court in Pretoria, South Africa, to review and set aside the authorisation of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorisation was irrational and unlawful. If successful, this will result in the removal of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines from the domestic market. FASA’s aim is to subject the South African regulator’s decision to authorise the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to judicial scrutiny. They argue that the regulator’s decision was based on flawed and inaccurate trial data analysis presented by a heavily conflicted Pfizer and that it is therefore legally invalid. Their aim is not only to ensure legal compliance but to set a precedent by requiring a higher level of statutory scrutiny in the case of future vaccine authorisations in the interests of public health. Whatever the decision of the Court, this case is important. While it has arguably been possible to suppress and distort facts in the public narrative either for or against the vaccines, that will not be possible before our Courts. This case will see a full ventilation of all relevant facts pertaining to South Africa’s authorisation of the Pfizer vaccines.

The Court papers explain that Pfizer was the entity responsible for the commercialisation of their vaccine products, and yet SAHPRA relied solely on Pfizer’s data and interpretation thereof to authorise the vaccines without having subjected that data to any independent checks and balances.

The inherent conflict of interest is startling and, as FASA argues, renders the registration of the Pfizer vaccine products vulnerable to judicial attack on the basis of irrationality, especially when considering the alleged irregularities in the data itself.

As far as FASA is aware, this is one of the first judicial reviews of the authorisation of Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products in the world. The application is supported by eminent medical and scientific professionals and academics from South Africa and abroad, including a neurosurgeon, a cardiologist, an mRNA expert, and an expert drug trialist. "

These papers prove that the Comirnaty vaccine cannot, and should never have been, branded as ‘safe’ and ‘effective’,” says Dr Herman Edeling, a specialist neurosurgeon with over 40 years of experience, in the founding affidavit. He has extensive experience in medical ethics, general medical science, evidence-based medicine and rational interpretation of clinical studies, scientific and medical articles, and scientific and medical data. Dr Edeling’s evidence as an independent expert witness has been accepted by the courts, including the Constitutional Court, in South Africa.

Page 2 of 4

“The applicants set out clear evidence showing that Pfizer’s vaccine trial for Comirnaty appears to have been a whitewash, mired by what appears to be substantial data manipulation, data inaccuracies, and inaccurate statements of outcomes.” FASA will argue that this was done intentionally to mislead global regulators, like SAHPRA, into granting authorisation for Pfizer’s vaccine products to the detriment of public health. Dr Edeling and the other medical professionals in their supporting affidavits draw on extensive research data from global state authorities and peer-reviewed medical journals, Pfizer’s own data, and data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) to argue why the approval of Pfizer’s vaccine products must be urgently reviewed. The document includes case studies from 11 South African patients who experienced serious and sometimes deadly adverse effects following the administration of the Pfizer vaccine. " The applicants in this application call on Pfizer to explain their conduct; they call on the South African regulators and Government to hold Pfizer to account and to act in the best interests of the South African public, and they humbly request this Honourable Court to come to their aid in achieving these calls in the interests of the health of the South African public,” says Dr Edeling.

Dr Aseem Malhotra, an NHS-trained consultant cardiologist who himself took two doses of the Pfizer vaccine and initially promoted it for high-risk groups in the British media, says: “Having critically appraised the literature and the Pfizer trial data, the evidence is unequivocal. For the overwhelming majority of people, the Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine is significantly more harmful than beneficial and likely should never have been approved to be administered to a single human being. It is alarming to me that the local regulators are encouraging the vaccination of young children in these circumstances.”

“The rollout of the Pfizer vaccine products should, in my opinion, be halted pending a full investigation into how we got this so very wrong. That is, without question, the responsible and ethical move. I have reviewed the data and conclusions in Dr Edeling’s affidavit. In my expert opinion, the case is factually, medically, and scientifically sound. It is highly likely that there would have been substantially fewer deaths and illnesses in the global population if the vaccine had never been approved in the first place. South Africa’s Constitution and its Constitutional Jurisprudence have motivated, inspired, and led the World. My personal hope is that here, too, the South African judiciary will lead the way towards a global rectification of a serious injustice,” says Dr Malhotra.

(Please note that some text has been edited for clarity and grammar.)

ABOUT FASA

Freedom Alliance SA (FASA) provides a platform linking various associations, organisations and their members who stand for freedom of choice for the people of SA and across the globe. FASA is a growing human rights movement that seeks to reclaim our freedom and liberties, which have been stripped from us, and to establish a free and just society for all, irrespective of the narrative or greater game plan.

Freedom Alliance SA is not an “anti-vax group,” nor is its purpose centred around COVID-19; instead, it is a group of medical professionals, legal professionals, journalists, media, parents, and activists who have amalgamated across South Africa and beyond the globe to stand together against any totalitarianism where science and medicine are dictated to by politicians and corporations.

FASA stands for doctors’ freedom to uphold their Hippocratic oath: To do no harm and to honour human life; to respect patients’ rights to bodily integrity; and to understand the importance of informed consent. We stand for the freedom of the individual to share their fears and beliefs and refrain from bullying or shaming that aims to create one dominant view or opinion. 

Page 3 of 4

For donations to support FASA in this historic legal case:

Bank account details:

Name of account holder: Freedom Alliance South Africa

Bank: Standard Bank of South Africa

Account number: 10201683146

Branch code (electronic): 051001

SWIFT address: SBZA ZA JJ

For PayPal, debit, or credit card donations, CLICK HERE.

COURT APPLICATION: The full set of papers can be downloaded HERE.

Visit the Freedom South Africa Alliance WEBSITE

Page 4 of 4