Extasydata

Легендарный магазин HappyStuff теперь в телеграамм!

У нас Вы можете приобрести товар по приятным ценам, не жертвуя при этом качеством!

Качественная поддержка 24 часа в сутки!

Мы ответим на любой ваш вопрос и подскажем в выборе товара и района!

Telegram:

(ВНИМАНИЕ!!! В ТЕЛЕГРАМ ЗАХОДИТЬ ТОЛЬКО ПО ССЫЛКЕ, В ПОИСКЕ НАС НЕТ!)

купить кокаин, продам кокс, куплю кокаин, сколько стоит кокаин, кокаин цена в россии, кокаин цена спб, купить где кокаин цена, кокаин цена в москве, вкус кокаин, передозировка кокаин, крэк эффект, действует кокаин, употребление кокаин, последствия употребления кокаина, из чего сделан кокаин, как влияет кокаин, как курить кокаин, кокаин эффект, последствия употребления кокаина, кокаин внутривенно, чистый кокаин, как сделать кокаин, наркотик крэк, как варить крэк, как приготовить кокаин, как готовят кокаин, как правильно нюхать кокаин, из чего делают кокаин, кокаин эффект, кокаин наркотик, кокаин доза, дозировка кокаина, кокаин спб цена, как правильно употреблять кокаин, как проверить качество кокаина, как определить качество кокаина, купить кокаин цена, купить кокаин в москве, кокаин купить цена, продам кокаин, где купить кокс в москве, куплю кокаин, где достать кокс, где можно купить кокаин, купить кокс, где взять кокаин, купить кокаин спб, купить кокаин в москве, кокс и кокаин, как сделать кокаин, как достать кокаин, как правильно нюхать кокаин, кокаин эффект, последствия употребления кокаина, сколько стоит кокаин, крэк наркотик, из чего делают кокаин, из чего делают кокаин, все действие кокаина, дозировка кокаина, употребление кокаина, вред кокаина, действие кокаина на мозг, производство кокаина, купить кокаин в москве, купить кокаин спб, купить кокаин москва, продам кокаин, куплю кокаин, где купить кокаин, где купить кокаин в москве, кокаин купить в москве, кокаин купить москва, кокаин купить спб, купить куст коки, купить кокс в москве, кокс в москве, кокаин москва купить, где можно заказать, купить кокаин, кокаиновый куст купить, стоимость кокаина в москве, кокаин купить цена, продам кокаин, где купить кокс в москве, куплю кокаин, где достать кокс, где можно купить кокаин, купить кокс, где взять кокаин, последствия употребления кокаина

This last week, a sample was submitted and analyzed through EcstasyData that we clearly established was one of the three main ring-positional isomers of Methylethylcathinone aka MEC. So we ordered reference standards for 2-MEC, 3-MEC, and 4-MEC, to find out if our equipment and lab procedures could make use of having the actual verified isomers on hand, for the purpose of confirming whether sample contained one or more of these slightly different versions of the same parent compound. We ordered the standards on September 5th and they arrived at Drug Detection Laboratories the lab that EcstasyData contracts with on the 7th. In most cases, one of the positional isomers is easy to tell apart from the others, but the other versions overlap in complex ways by retention time or fragmentation patterns. On another note, we also ordered a lab standard for Benzyl fentanyl this week, and were able to confirm that sample contains only Benzyl fentanyl. After receiving lab standards for 2-fluorodeschloroketamine, we have been able to confirm that two samples, previously unidentified, are in fact 2-FDCK. Erowid is supporting the new International Day of Drug Checking , an initiative by a diverse group of organizations playing active parts in the delivery of harm reduction services. On the 31st of March we celebrate and raise awareness of drug checking. Here we mean not only the testing of substances; Drug Checking Day serves as a reminder for people to make a habit of testing their knowledge about drugs and their effects. We remind people that taking any drug always comes with risks, as does all human activity. By raising awareness and sharing knowledge, partners in International Day of Drug Checking hope to improve awareness of ways in which each individual and every community can reduce health risks. Drug checking is a sound harm reduction approach and we believe more people should have the opportunity to test their drugs so they can make informed choices and reduce risk. Seeking services of drug checking groups offers the best opportunity to connect with a professional who can offer expert harm reduction information. There is a 30 year history of drug checking in Europe with well-established test services in the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, Germany and France. Testing on-site at festivals has also begun in the UK. Drug checking programs in the United States date back to the s. International Drug Checking Day is also raising awareness about how people can check their drugs at home using reagent test kits. These can be bought online and can give a good indication of what a substance might be. While we recognize there are limitations to using reagents we still believe this is a great way to reduce risk and an essential way to introduce people to finding out more about harm reduction. People should be appalled that their governments want to discourage citizens from choosing to use disapproved drugs because they fear toxic adulteration and dangerous substitutions. Drug use is a global phenomenon. Many people around the world ingest some kind of substance on a daily basis, from caffeine to alcohol, cocaine to heroin. Drug use has become a moral and criminal issue with legislation and regulations generally following a global model of prohibition. Prohibition has led to networks of underground markets, with drugs being purchased on street corners, private homes, and through the internet. These clandestine markets are unregulated, with no consistent oversight or product verification, which is known to cause increased and unnecessary risks. Quality control standards may be in place at some labs producing illicit drugs, but not others. But once these products are picked up by distribution networks, any certainty of identity or quality is lost, without independent drug checking. There are no standard dosage units, no list of ingredients and no information leaflet about possible side effects, interactions or ways to minimize risk from use included with these products. Similarly, online pharmacies operate in legal grey zones that raise the risks of unregulated medicines reaching the public. We know that drugs that are sold in grey and black markets are sometimes substituted, mislabeled, or contaminated. Adulterants may be used to mimic the effects of more expensive drugs and while some may be fairly benign, others can produce toxic and fatal results. Global fatalities from drug use are rising, primarily because of the opioid epidemic, while the dynamic drugs market is becoming ever more fluid in response to legislative developments that attempt to limit the proliferation of New Psychoactive Substances NPS. Avoidable fatalities from unregulated and under-regulated drug distribution are an unfortunate part of the world, one that we can work toward trying to mitigate through drug checking. People who take drugs recreationally or who use pharmaceuticals from less reputable sources are at increased risk of harm through consumption of pills and powders with unexpected or unknown ingredients. While the use of any drug is not entirely risk-free, having an awareness of the chemicals contained can help people make informed choices about what they might put in their bodies, and help them to plan dosage and minimize the impact of use on their general wellbeing. Text adapted from DrugCheckingDay. Submit a qualifying experience report to the Experience Vaults before the end of April and be eligible for this giveaway. Describe your experience doing drug checking either personally, or as a harm-reduction worker or a situation that needed drug checking, or write about an experience taking a psychoactive drug of any kind. Winning submissions will demonstrate risk minimization principles. Description of utilization of drug checking preferred but not required to enter. Winners will be contacted in May. In May after winners have been contacted, Erowid will announce how many submissions were received and how many prizes were given away. I have some points I want to repeat and add, since this is something we care and know a lot about. Once people start thinking about and taking steps to mitigate the risks they expose themselves to, everything else is gravy. Leibie argues from confused and incomplete data that on-site pill testing is ineffective and may be worse than nothing. Second, to paraphrase one of our colleagues: The most common are reagent tests like Marquis, Mecke, Simons, etc. Liquids are dropped onto scrapings or dust from a sample and may or may not change color. To a person experienced in the use of reagents tests, the color and timing can tell a lot about a sample. They rule chemicals in and rule them out. If a pill shaving has Marquis reagent applied to it and there is no color change, then it is almost guaranteed that the sample contains, at most, a tiny trace of MDMA. MDMA is ruled out. Second, in every case I can think of, the use of a reagent test would be preferable to not using a reagent test at all. But back to the bigger error: Their methodology and expertise make it possible to not only identify drugs but to get approximate quantification as well. FTIR has a long history as a lab technique, returns results rapidly, and involves equipment small enough to potentially be workable for mobile on-site setups. FTIR can be used to positively identify chemicals and is considered a proper forensic lab method for identifying street drugs. The utility of portable infrared or Raman spectroscopy in on-site drug checking is on the near horizon. Raman, IR, UV, and other absorption or back-scatter analytical technologies work by shooting a laser source at a sample and then reading the patterns of reflected or transmitted light and comparing that against a database of known patterns. Not quite ready for real world use, but… not too far away either. In this very common paradigm, the goal is to make illegal drug use as physically risky as possible rather than trying to reduce the potential damage done to people. In most countries, harm reduction work is hamstrung by the fact that it is illegal as in go to jail to provide accurate drug checking. Water is a deadly poison. A high dose of water is often fatal by itself. Aspirin is a deadly poison. A high enough dose of aspirin is often fatal by itself. Leibie properly points out that MDMA and meth, even when they are of known quality and quantity, are not totally safe. And there are cases of people doing reasonable doses and still dying. But those cases are extremely rare. There is little evidence that people frequently die from taking MDMA or methamphetamine that is higher in potency than they expected. A small woman taking that amount of MDMA could be taking a serious risk, but the chances of her dying because on-site pill checking failed to give her clear quantitative information are nearly zero. It is very likely, in fact, that if the woman in this scenario visited a harm reduction table and asked about the tablet she was thinking of taking, she would have been immediately informed that it was a strong tablet. The information that drug checking harm reduction workers provide is not limited to whether a reagent test color change is consistent with MDMA. They provide a lot of useful info and harm reduction suggestions. LSD acid is also detectable using field tests. The Ehrlich reagent turns purple in the presence of LSD. This sample of liquid LSD far right was dropped onto paper towel and the field tests did a fine job of showing the presence of LSD. Leibie is arguing against having those educational opportunities at large festivals. Law enforcement groups may analyze samples of seized drugs, but results are not typically shared with the public. Leibie makes several errors in the text he uses to support this statement. First, there is nothing like a valid apples-to-apples comparison between the different countries. It is unclear why Leibie would feel qualified to offer a comparison of the effectiveness of unspecified relative amounts of harm reduction efforts in unspecified numbers of events with an unknown number of participants. It could be a deadly assumption. There is no question that many people misunderstand the risks of the drugs they are taking. The author showed little knowledge of the specific area of music event or festival drug-checking. Performing tests at hot, dusty, remote events, with bass vibrations and the complexity of imaginative combinations of substances will always present challenges, but the experts running these services do tend to be well aware of these limitations. The harm reduction projects that have been set up around the world are working within the parameters of government policies that seem at times to obstruct their efforts to serve the interest of public health. Despite all these conditions, and shoestring budgets, these groups are connecting people with specialist advice, mentors and peer support to ensure that on-site drug checking makes the world better, not worse. Different labs use different standards for reporting percentage purity assessments and also for mass when doing quantitative measurements for psychoactive drugs like MDMA. The peer-reviewed article was published in the journal Addiction: What does it mean when a lab reports that a tablet contains mg of MDMA? The reason for writing about this is that there are no simple answers to those questions, though it seems like there should be. An anion is a negatively charged counter-ion that balances the positively charged, nitrogen-bearing drug molecule. When freebases are turned into salts, an anion is added. In fact, normal table salt or culinary salt is usually considered Sodium Chloride, or NaCl. Remember your protective eyewear! In addition to chloride salts like HCl, there are numerous anion salts possible, such as sulfide, fluoride, and bromide. For some psychoactive chemicals, the specific salt form can make a big difference in determining a dose. Mescaline has been distributed historically as Mescaline hydrochloride, Mescaline sulfate, Mescaline citrate, and Mescaline acetate. All of these have slightly different mass ratios between the base mescaline molecule and the portion that is the partially-bound anion. But there are technical issues like having some salt anions that bind two-to-one or one-to-two in crystalline forms. See What is the molecular weight of LSD tartrate? When this question of MDMA mass came up again this week, we asked the authors of the paper and the folks who work at Trimbos the following:. It is not described in any of your papers that I can find, but perhaps these questions will simplify the issue:. Our lab has always left out the salt component of psychoactive substances, since this component is not psychoactive. The reason that an expert group like Trimbos would decide to report masses this way is to normalize all their information across all salt forms of MDMA. They answered the questions clearly:. SaferParty and the cluster of groups in Switzerland that do work around that brand are very clear in all of their caution and warning publications that they are using MDMA HCl as their basis. This is in contrast from what you get most times when buying solutions of reference standards from other companies e. They usually sell the free base as a solution. Due to that, we are using mostly salts for calibrations. The second reason for that is, most of the time we are obtaining samples in salt forms for analysis e. We have had quite good experiences with this so far, as the sum of e. When the results are displayed as free base one can calculate any possible salt form. We see it from the way that most dosage recommendations for a psychoactive compound to be taken orally or by snorting are given in the salt form if possible , so this substantiates the indication as salt. With DMT as an example, we indicate the free base as content. When having a chemically pure amphetamine sulfate e. When having chemically pure amphetamine hydrochloride e. When only seeing these numbers, which would you judge to be more pure? A problem that comes in is, when having, e. As long as one does not determine the counterion salt this remains problematic. The Loop offers analysis at music events in the UK to improve safety for partygoers and facilitate care by medical staff. When they report quantitative results for MDMA, they answered our questions as follows:. Austria very generously took their question to their technical staff and verified their answer before getting back to us:. HCl to prepare our standards for quantitative measurements. So if we would receive sample solely consisting of MDMA. So if a tablet contains mg MDMA. A question came up yesterday about whether we need to add different dose information to our 4-Acetoxy-DMT Dose Page for different salts. Our team believes that the primary salt sold over the last fifteen years of 4-Acetoxy-DMT has been the fumarate salt fumaric acid. However, after consulting with some of our friends in the Erowid Expert Network who are senior analytical and synthetic chemists, they were able to confirm that the fumarate salt of 4-acetoxy-DMT is always diprotic, with some small technical caveats. AFAIK, it is not possible to predict the stoichiometry of such compounds a priori, it all depends on whether the mono- or di-substituted fumarate remains soluble in the solvent or precipitates out. NMR would tell the story. In digging around in questions related to diprotic acids and how certain we can be that any given chemical salt has a given number of freebase target molecules, PD pointed out this obscure paper:. The paper demonstrated, via extreme drug geekery, that the two samples of pure, high grade LSD they had were not identical. Caymen finally got deschloroketamine available as a standard recently, so we got some and were able to confirm that two previously unidentified samples were deschloroketamine. See EcstasyData and EcstasyData This week, the lab took another look at the sample with some new standards and using more updated Mass Spectrum databases. The best match is now to 5-APDB. They all elute very early according to Cayman spectras, but in this order, 5, 6, 7, and then 4 at a later time. The GCMS output spectras of 5,6,7 in comparison to the sample have been attached, just for curiosity. Possible contamination of the standard we were sent? Or 6-APDB produces two peaks. I ran the standard three different times to confirm. GCMS output have also been attached. I will be developing a new method to help separate and better identified compounds with functional groups at a different carbons for APDB and the many other new drugs. What library matches are missing is exactly the gas chromotagraphic timing and the exact minor details around the edges of the spectrum that are unique to each type of analytic equipment. The lab ran the standard and then compared them against the submitted sample ID: Why International Drug Checking Day? How you can join us on the day Tweet, blog, share! Got an opinion about drug checking in your area? Want to know more? Know people who would benefit from drug checking? Write an experience report talking about your experience with drug checking or other risk minimization approaches. What you can win: Original submissions previously self-published or posted elsewhere online are eligible to win but must meet all other criteria. Erowid staff and volunteers of Erowid are not eligible. Thank you for participating in International Drug Checking Day! Cheap Portable Spectroscopy The utility of portable infrared or Raman spectroscopy in on-site drug checking is on the near horizon. Advanced Scientific Analysis Leibie statement: False Sense of Security: A Real Problem Leibie statement: When this question of MDMA mass came up again this week, we asked the authors of the paper and the folks who work at Trimbos the following: It is not described in any of your papers that I can find, but perhaps these questions will simplify the issue: And we got a very clear answer from the excellent Dr. Update Jan 17, They answered the questions clearly: Update Jan 18, Safer Party SaferParty and the cluster of groups in Switzerland that do work around that brand are very clear in all of their caution and warning publications that they are using MDMA HCl as their basis. On Jan 30, , they followed up with a long detailed answer to our questions. Dear Earth, Here the answer from our lab, i hope this clears things up: Best regards, For saferparty. The Loop The Loop offers analysis at music events in the UK to improve safety for partygoers and facilitate care by medical staff. When they report quantitative results for MDMA, they answered our questions as follows: Austria very generously took their question to their technical staff and verified their answer before getting back to us: Our chief chemist just got back to regarding your question. In digging around in questions related to diprotic acids and how certain we can be that any given chemical salt has a given number of freebase target molecules, PD pointed out this obscure paper: Although comparable mas spectral results were obtained from the two LSD samples, further investigation by 1-H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy showed the USP material to contain appreciable excess tartaric acid. Thanks Cayman and DDL! Page 1 Page 2 Next page.

Extasydata

About Tests and Data: Overview

reddit is a website about everything

ecstasydata

EcstasyData.org: Lab Test Results for Ecstasy/Molly and other Recreati...

Category: EcstasyData

Extasydata.org

Category: EcstasyData

About Tests and Data: Overview

reddit is a website about everything

EcstasyData.org: Lab Test Results for Ecstasy/Molly and other Recreati...

Category: EcstasyData

Extasydata.org

Category: EcstasyData

reddit is a website about everything

Extasydata.org

About Tests and Data: Overview

Extasydata.org

EcstasyData.org: Lab Test Results for Ecstasy/Molly and other Recreati...

About Tests and Data: Overview

ecstasydata

Report Page