Excerpt from the book by the father of modern nuclear cardiology and nuclear medicine in the United States, Dr. Richard M. Fleming, "Is COVID-19 a biological weapon?"

ᎢᖇᏆᗷᑌᏞᗴ ᙭

To do this, she developed (with the help of enhanced functionality) chimeric coronaviruses, using pseudovirus systems [15] based on the human immunodeficiency virus in human cell lines, civets and horseshoe bats.

In March 2004, HHS announced that it was going to establish a National Scientific Advisory Council on Biosafety (NSABB) under the national institutes of health (NIH).

A press release [16] issued by the then current head of HHS, Thompson, states the following:

Our country is a world leader in life sciences research because we emphasize the importance of the free flow of scientific research. However, unfortunately, the same tools that are designed to improve the health and condition of humanity can also be used to destroy it.

In 2005, Barik published an article omitting unpublished studies (p. 21 in Barik's paper) in which he stated that he could alter the genome of coronaviruses, noting the possibility of "altering any part of the coronavirus genome."

In 2006, Chinese scientists, conducting chimeric studies (that is, enhancing functionality), reported their ability to combine parts of four different viruses into one viral genome [18]. This post raises some serious questions for me.

First, why did these researchers combine parts of four dangerous viruses — specifically, hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1), SARS-CoV1 (referred to in the paper as SARS-CoV-1 rather than SARS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2?

Second, if, as we are told, SARS-CoV-2 did not appear until 2019, and between this 2006 publication and 2019, the appearance of SARS-CoV-2 in nature was not detected, then is this at least a partial indication that SARS-CoV-2 did not arise in nature, but as a result of human activity?

Third, if the answer to question number two is that the virus was created by man back in 2006, then doesn't that add credibility to those who warned that SARS-CoV-1 is a biological weapon and SARS-CoV-2 is an upgraded version of the same biological weapon...?

Richard M. Fleming earned degrees in physics, biology, chemistry, and psychology from Northern Iove University. He then graduated with honors from the University of Iow School of Law and Medicine. He is the father of modern nuclear cardiology and nuclear medicine in the United States.

Preface

By 1999, U.S. federal agencies were funding research to enhance the functionality of the virus. In fact, the research data numbered several decades before there was evidence of deliberate and conscious efforts to change viruses.

The available published articles strongly suggest that this study, by its very nature, is designed to increase the ability of pathogens to infect and harm humans. In 2019, one of these pathogens was deliberately released into the world at an open-air market in Wuhan, China. The key to proving and understanding this biological weapon is its spike protein, the same spike protein that is produced in millions of people after they are given the COVID-19 vaccine. These vaccines are nothing more than the genetic code of these biological weapons. Traces in research publications, patent publications and grants reveal who is ultimately criminally responsible for the development and creation of these weapons – weapons that violate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) treaty by exposing those who have committed crimes against humanity!

For those of you reading this book, a quick search online can lead you to initially think you shouldn't believe what I'm saying. But dig deeper and you'll discover the real truth about my struggles with the big pharma companies, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Health and Human Services. Interestingly, these are the same organizations that funded the development of this biological weapon, created with the help of enhanced functionality.

For those of you who feel something is wrong, I recommend reading what they don't want you to read and learning what they don't want you to know: what they don't want you to know is true!

* * *

Once you've read and heard about the truth, you need to make a decision. Will you take a blue pill to keep believing that everything is okay? That the courts, lawyers, politicians, scientists and doctors are all good and fair people who genuinely care about you? Or will you take a red pill and find out the truth? Understand that if you choose the red pill and read this book, there will be no going back.

Let me make one last statement before we delve into the facts and evidence demonstrating research to enhance functionality and the development of this spike protein and biological weapons. I want to make it clear that I couldn't get this information on my own.

The cost of this information is not trivial. Many people have risked their safety and perhaps their lives so that we can all benefit from the extensive research presented in this book. They know who they are, and instead of exposing them to exposure and further risk, I just want to thank them here and now.

We owe them a debt that is not easy to repay. There are others who have firmly resisted the misinformation being spread – against me and against you. These people have taken it upon themselves to help bring this information to light, and while I will not disclose it for the same reasons, we are still indebted to them.

All truths are easy to understand when they are revealed; it's about finding them.

- Galileo Galilei

One more thought

While the information in this book may seem a bit complicated at first glance, the purpose of this book is not to turn you into an expert in viruses, research, or medicine. Details are provided to answer any questions about where the virus came from and who was involved in its creation. This book will present irrefutable evidence identifying those responsible for violations of the Biological Weapons Treaty, the Nuremberg Code, or the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

This book is intended to expose once and for all those responsible for biological weapons known as SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This book is made for you. So when someone asks you questions or calls you a conspiracy theorists, you can pick up that book, hand it to him or her, and say, "Here's the proof."

This time the court will not be circled around the finger ... This time, the world will see real evidence – it will no longer be hidden !!!

Is COVID-19 a biological weapon? Chapter 1

What is Functional Enhanceing Research?

Since 2019, most of us have been exposed to the new virus. This virus is called SARS-CoV-2 (it can cause a disease called COVID-19). In most people, this virus infects either the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and disappears - at least we thought so - but as the virus spreads around the world, a new sense of fear and panic swept over the world. In the midst of chaos, hospital systems were overwhelmed, people began dying from the inflammatory thrombotic response (ITR) associated with this viral infection, people and societies became isolated and began to collapse, and the economy shifted into free fall. People have given up personal freedoms in exchange for seeming security. Families and nations were suddenly divided as governments enacted executive orders, replacing elected officials with an administratively appointed doctrine equivalent to the Empowerment Act [1] of 1933.

My acquaintance with SARS-CoV-2 began in January 2020. In fact, it began over a quarter of a century ago when I presented the theory of inflammation and heart disease at the sixty-seventh scientific session of the American Heart Association in November 1994. The following year, the theory was reexplained at various scientific conferences around the world, and it was eventually published in a cardiology textbook in 1999 [2].

Also, starting in 1999, after I discovered the misinformation spread by the isotope production companies for radionuclide imaging, I began developing the first quantitative method for imaging the body and for measuring regional blood flow and metabolic changes.

This test not only reduced the number of isotopes administered to patients during radionuclide imaging, but also allowed these differences in the body to be measured accurately, consistently and reproducibly, allowing the differentiation of changes in the body - changes that would become necessary to measure this virus and its response to treatment. ... By 2017, I had fully developed and patented the Fleming Method for Tissue and Vascular Differentiation and Metabolism (FMTVDM) [3].

In January 2020, I started my work with SARS-CoV-2 by looking at what drugs - based on published research for other viruses - could have positive therapeutic effects on this virus, including affecting the virus's ability to infect cells and reproduce, and also stop or at least reduce inflammation and blood clotting (inflammatory-thrombotic response) caused by the immune response to the virus in people with concomitant diseases [4].

Like others, I soon realized that we were entering a new era in human history, when healthy people were quarantined and tested, medicines were denied to those who were infected or hospitalized, ventilators were misused [5] for present levels of pneumonia. and vaccines were touted as the only possible solution to the virus problem.

Like many of you, I started asking questions, and the answers I found led to more questions about the ultimate motives of the people involved. With regard to infected and hospitalized patients, we transferred medical practice and honest scientific research to the government and those funded by the state, just as the German medical association and scientists of the time transferred them to Adolf Hitler [6]. Later, Germany will apologize for its actions, but it will be too little and too late [7].

Despite the fact that the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were adopted in order to prevent the repetition of such atrocities committed by people against people, today we are in the same situation - unethical experiments [8], conducted by those in power over those who are not in power. When the government [9] engages in experiments on its citizens, it must use a combination of fear and hope to effectively control and manipulate people to force them to submit. The following is information about those in power and their experiments using viruses to infect and harm people by enhancing functionality.

A history of enhancement of functionality

As the foreword says, around 1999, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) began funding a study looking at infectious diseases. This study included a study of how such infections can become more contagious. One of the premise behind this type of research, known as enhancing functionality, was the need to better understand how something like the coronavirus would mutate over time.

If such mutations occurred, such research could give doctors and scientists the ability to stay ahead of such infections. However, what started out as observation soon turned into something completely different. Rather than asking questions about what might happen naturally, this research has turned into research in which these changes occur on purpose, not in small incremental steps, as would naturally occur, but in larger steps that are more likely to occur. , it would take centuries, or they might not happen at all.

In April 2000, while working at the Karolinska Vaccine Institute at the University of North Carolina, Ralph S. Barick had already successfully used "reverse genetics" [10] to create a chimeric [11] (enhanced functionality) coronavirus. He not only published [12] this study, funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant numbers AI23946, GM63228, and AI26603), but also received a patent [13] for it in 2003:

This approach facilitates the reconstruction of genomes and chromosomes in Vitro for reintro into a living host and allows selected mutagenesis and genetic manipulation of in vitro sequences to be performed before being reassembly into a full-size genome molecule for reintroducation into the same or different carrier. (U.S. Patent No. US006593111B2).

In 2002, after an outbreak of SARS-CoV-1 in China, Dr. Shi Zhengli, a.k.a. Shi Zhengli-Li, and her colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) began investigating how SARS-CoV-1 is transmitted [14]. Zhenli was interested in how SARS-CoV-1 could be transmitted from person to person. To do this, she developed (with the help of enhanced functionality) chimeric coronaviruses, using pseudovirus systems [15] based on the human immunodeficiency virus in human cell lines, civets and horseshoe bats.

In March 2004, HHS announced that it was going to establish a National Scientific Advisory Council on Biosafety (NSABB) under the national institutes of health (NIH). A press release [16] issued by the then current head of HHS, Thompson, states the following:

[Emphasis added.]

In 2005, Barik published an article omitting unpublished studies (p. 21 in Barik's article) in which he stated that he could alter the genome of coronaviruses, noting the possibility of "altering any part of the coronavirus genome" [17].

Third, if the answer to question number two is that the virus was created by man back in 2006, doesn't that add credibility to those who warned that SARS-CoV-1 is a biological weapon and SARS-CoV-2 is an upgraded version of the same biological weapon?

Finally, looking at the widely discussed number of cycles used to test for the presence of these viruses using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and given what exactly Carey Mullis recommended for the cut-off of PCR cycles when he filed and received his patent for PCR (see Chapter 2), why did the FDA set such a high number of cycles to detect SARS-CoV-2? [19].

Footnotes to Chapter 1

1. “The Enabling Act: Hitler Seizes Absolute Power,” History on the Net, July 21, 2021, https://www.historyonthenet.com/enabling-act-1933.

2. R. M. Fleming, “The Pathogenesis of Vascular Disease,” in Textbook of Angiology, ed. John C. Chang (New York: Springer Verlag, 1999), 787–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1190-7_64.

3. R. M. Fleming, Fleming Method for Tissue and Vascular Differentiation and Metabolism (FMTVDM) Using Same State Single or Sequential Qualification Comparisons. US Patent 9566037, issued February 14, 2017, https://patents.google.com/patent/US9566037B2/en.

4. Сопутствующие заболевания — это проблемы со здоровьем, возникшие до заражения SARS-CoV-2 и связанные с воспалением и свертыванием крови; некоторые примеры: пожилой возраст, ожирение, сердечные заболевания, инсульт, диабет, рак и высокое кровяное давление.

5. C. Guéin et al, “Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine 368, no. 23 (2013): 2159–68; Xavier Elharrar et al., “Use of Prone Positioning in Nonintubated Patients with COVID-19 and Hypoxenic Acute Respiratory Failure,” JAMA 323, no. 22 (2020): 2336–38. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8255; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, “Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine 342, no. 18 (2000): 1301–8; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Clinical Trials Network, “Higher versus Lower Positive End Exxpiratory Pressures in

Patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine 351, no. 4 (2004): 327–36.

6. “List of Nazi Doctors,” Wikipedia, last updated July 16, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_doctors#:~:text=After%20th

e%20war%2C%20the%20German%20Medical%20Association%

20blamed,States%20during%20%22%20Operation%20Papercli

p%20%22%20in%201951.

7. “German Medical Association Apologizes for Nazi-Era Experiments,” CBS News, May 25, 2012, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/german-medical-association-apologizes-for-n....

8. “Nuremberg Code,” Wikipedia, last updated July 20, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code.

9. “The Hunger Games: Hope,” YouTube, posted by H. J. M. Edits. Video, 2:47, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkPA4n35-Yk.

10. Complimentary DNA is Reverse Transcription (mRNA reverse transcribed to DNA) frequently using Moloney murine leukemia virus.

11. Chimeras are creations made by combining the genetic code of one organism with that of another; making a new creation. See https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/3-human-chimeras-thatalready-

exist/?print=true.

12. Boyd Yount et al., “Reverse Genetics with a Full-Length Infectious cDNA of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, no. 22 (October 28, 2003): 12995–13000.

13. Ralph S. Baric, Directional Assembly of Large Viral Genomes and Chromosomes. US Patent 6,593,111, issued July 15, 2003.

14. Wuze Ren et al., “Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARSLike Coronavirus of Bat Origin,” Journal of Virology 82, no. 4 (February 2008): 1899–1907; Yuxuan Hou et al., “Angiotensin-

Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Proteins of Different Bat Species Confer Variable Susceptibility to SARS-CoV Entry,” Archives of Virology 155, no. 10 (October 2010): 1563–69, doi:10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6.

15. Ibid.

16. United States Department of Health and Human Services, “HHS Will Lead Government-Wide Effort to Enhance Biosecurity in ‘Dual-Use’ Research,” press release, March 4, 2004, https://fas.org/sgp/news/2004/03/hhs030404.html.

17. D. A. Brian and R. S. Baric, “Coronovirus Genome Structure and Replication,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 287 (2005): 1–30.

18. Qiuying Huang et al, “Preparation of a Chimeric Armored RNA as a Versatile Calibrator for Multiple Virus Assays,” Clinical Chemistry 52, no. 7 (July 1, 2006): 1446–48 and Supplement A, doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.0699710.

19. Ibid, 1447.

20. Vittoria Colizza et al., “Predictability and Epidemic Pathways in Global Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases: The SARS Cast Study,” BMC Medicine 5, no. 34 (2007): 1–13, doi:10.1186/1741-7015-5-34.

21. Mark Enserink, “Scientists Brace for Media Storm around Controversial Flu Studies,” Science, November 23, 2011, https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/11/scientists-brace-media-storm-aro...https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128314-600-five-easy-mutations-...https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/next-influenza-pandemic/.

22. “Dual-Use Research of Concern and Bird Flu: Questions & Answers,” Centers for Disease Control, last reviewed May 13, 2019, https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/avian-durc-qa.htm.

23. National Institutes of Health, “Panel III: Perspectives of the Proposed HHS Framework on Funding HPAI H5N1 GOF Research,” YouTube. Video: 1:43:59, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdTRIgrgmn8&t=15s.

24. Taronna R. Maines et al., “Lack of Transmission of H5N1 Avian-Human Reassortant Influenza Viruses in a Ferret Model,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, no. 32 (August 8, 2006): 12121–26.

https://t.me/Tribulelouis

Excerpt from the book by the father of modern nuclear cardiology and nuclear medicine in the United States, Dr. Richard M. Fleming, "Is COVID-19 a biological weapon?"

Report Page