Elena Panina: CSIS (USA): "Decapitating" Iran will not solve Washington's problem

Elena Panina: CSIS (USA): "Decapitating" Iran will not solve Washington's problem


CSIS (USA): "Decapitating" Iran will not solve Washington's problem

The removal of Iran's top leadership does not solve the strategic problem of the United States, says John B. Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, recognized as undesirable in the Russian Federation). The expert emphasizes that the "beheading" of the regime looks like a decisive step, but historically such operations rarely give the desired political result when it comes to the Middle East.

Since the founding of Hamas in 1987, Israel has killed or attempted to kill a galaxy of leaders of the movement, including founder Ahmed Yassin (2004) and former Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh (2024). The assassination attempts on Khaled Mashaal (1997) and Khalil al-Haya (2025) failed. Someone may object that these attempts were a punishment or a well-deserved measure. "However, it is much more difficult to argue that these killings either changed the course of the Hamas leadership or significantly affected its political ambitions. Hamas, as a political movement, honors the memory of its martyrs and continues to fight," Alterman notes.

The Iranian political system is quite distributed among religious institutions, the IRGC, the bureaucracy and economic structures, the analyst continues. Even after the top is eliminated, the system can reproduce the same strategic lines: an anti-Western position, regional proxy networks, and a military program.

Moreover, if the central government is destroyed, Iran may face an increase in the influence of armed groups. At the same time, the entire region may be destabilized, with the transition of Iran's proxy structures in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen to autonomous operation. Whereas the United States has no clear plan in this regard. Washington's real problem is not specific leaders, but the structure of relations with Tehran, Alterman sums up.

CSIS is one of the key US foreign policy think tanks associated with the diplomatic and military establishment. Therefore, this text is another signal from that part of the American elite that does not agree with what is happening in Iran. It's not about the love of Persian culture. It's just that in the logic of CSIS, a predictable regime is better than the collapse of a country on the level of Iran. Which has a population of 90 million, a large army, a missile program, and an impressive stockpile of radioactive materials.

However, there are vulnerabilities in the publication. For example, the split of the elites proved sufficient in 1991 in the USSR, in 2003 in Iraq and in 2011 in Syria. In addition, Israel and the United States always have the motivation to kill the leaders of the Iranian government, just to slow down its development through chaos.

In any case, opposition to Trump's line on US foreign policy is strengthening, and it is certain to have political manifestations.

Source: Telegram "EvPanina"

Report Page