Dp Series Game Of Thrones

🛑 TOUTES LES INFORMATIONS CLIQUEZ ICI 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

Dp Series Game Of Thrones
Travelling or based outside United States? Video availability outside of United States varies. Sign in to see videos available to you.
Get in the 'Game'! Experience the first season of this visionary HBO series set in a mythical world whose inhabitants vie for control of the Iron Throne. But in a land where seasons can last a lifetime, winter is coming...and an ancient evil has awakened.
Starring Sean Bean , Mark Addy , Nikolaj Coster-Waldau Genres Drama , Fantasy , Adventure , Action Subtitles English [CC] Audio languages English
By ordering or viewing, you agree to our Terms . Sold by Amazon.com Services LLC.
Series Premiere. Lord Ned Stark is troubled by disturbing reports from a Night's Watch deserter; King Robert arrives at Winterfell.
The Lannisters plot to ensure Bran's silence; Jon and Tyrion head to the Wall; Ned faces a family crisis en route to King's Landing.
Jon impresses Tyrion at Castle Black; Ned confronts his past and future at King's Landing; Daenerys finds herself at odds with Viserys.
4. Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things
Ned probes Arryn's death; Jon takes measures to protect Sam; Tyrion is caught in the wrong place.
Ned refuses an order from the King; Tyrion escapes one perilous encounter, only to find himself in another.
Ned makes a controversial decree; Tyrion confesses to his 'crimes.'
Ned confronts Cersei about her secrets; Jon takes his Night's Watch vows; Drogo promises to lead the Dorthraki to King's Landing.
The Lannisters press their advantage over the Starks; Robb rallies his father's northern allies and heads south to war.
Ned makes a fateful decision; Robb takes a prized prisoner; Dany finds her reign imperiled.
Season 1 Finale. A new king rises in the North; a Khaleesi finds new hope.
David Nutter - director See profile
EllisScottPollard Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2016
This Review is Largely Spoiler Free (aside from implications): Game of Thrones is everything that critics and fans alike have said it is: a realistic fantasy world that explores the non-fantastical elements with a degree of sophistication that puts it in the ranks of certain highly praised television dramas--that so many snobbish critics would have otherwise overlooked--but also slowly grooms its more fantastical elements so that we are given a fresh and very human look at the genre. If you compare it to Tolkien, without whom there would be no Game of Thrones, the literal magic content is subdued (for now) and mutated progressively while the particularities of character psychology are brought to the forefront. These are all fully realized characters, capable of beautiful articulation and provocative change, who must negotiate with the world they are thrust into and the identities that were written for them before they were even born. Compacted into the epic are explorations of family and title, political authority, religious critiques (that acknowledges the complexity of a world where many religions co-exist in tension, very much like our own), the true freedom of an individual, how history informs the present (and how it is written), sexuality in many of its forms, and what is dangerous (what is most pressing as opposed to what it pressing in the long run). You have heard correctly if someone has mentioned to you that in this show "anyone can go at anytime." No matter how evolved their arc is, or what part it seems to be leading towards, virtually any small detail can alter the fate of any character. While there are some characters that can be considered to have "longer lifespans" than others, the number who are partially above this rule can be counted on one hand. Season one has to do a great deal to set up the structure, poetics, and thematics of the seasons that follow, so the major point of season one is to establish what has happened in the fictional world of Westeros, how it has become a more unstable realm through actions that are not shown but spoken of before the the show actually begins, and imitate Martin's prevalent death poetics so that there is a quasi-sense of certainty about how the show works in the future, even though paradoxically every plot has at least some degree of uncertainty. The weakness of season one is how quickly the events that led to Robert Baratheon assuming the Iron Thrown are glazed over, though the event's of what is known as Robert's rebellion are further elaborated in future seasons. Since we as viewers enter the world in medias res, it can be difficult to discern what has happened to place the characters where they stand at the beginning of the series. Though I am elaborating on the dangerous edge of this double-ended approach. By discussing the events that take place before the show actually begins creates an immediate sense of realism, where the facts of the history of Westeros are very common and the characters can continue to grow without needless background exposition that would halt the flow of the story. The story we see begins with the re-emergence of a an ancient race of demonic ice creatures who are known as the mythic ultimate threat to all men. However, these White Walkers have come to be understood more as fables, and, if you continue to watch the series, you will see how these creatures are biding their time, and to what end this tactic proves beneficial. Robert Baratheon, The King of Westeros, which houses a number of lands ruled by lords who hate each other and have decades old feuds augmenting their contemporary rivalries, overthrew a prosperous dynasty who enforced their power with the aid of dragons. The dragons have "died," and the dynasty fell because of the increased cruelty of its last King, called The Mad King, and Robert's own feud with this mad king's son. When the story begins, Robert appoints Eddard "Ned" Stark to the position of Hand of the King, a sort of grand vizier/secondary ruler, in order to make the King's very dubious counsel more honest (that is a simplistic assessment). Ned Stark is a good man, but (unlike a great deal of popular fantasy literature, television, and film) good and evil are no so polarized: tact and foresight are where power lies in the world of Westeros, regardless of intention. One threat that Ned constantly finds himself in conflict with is the members of the aristocratic and wealthy Lannister house. The patriarch of the Lannister's is Tywin Lannister, played masterfully by Charles Dance, who is family oriented in the most solipsistic way. His daughter, Cersei, is Robert's queen, and the major antagonist of the first season. Her twin brother Jaime acts as one the King's body guards, but is very much blinded by his own privilege without acknowledging the sacrifices or larger goals of others, though he does have a few redeeming qualities. You'll quickly discover that even the most despicable characters have empathetic sides and the most noble have numerous faults. Jaime is also tormented because he killed the former King while still being a member of the King's guard. The third Lannister child, Tyrion, was born deformed and marked by his stunted growth. Tyrion, however, manages to drink, sleep around to the point of notoriety, spout beautiful wisdom and caustic criticisms, and maintain a much deeper sense of decency than most of his family. I elaborate on the Lannisters because, to me, they are by far the most interesting characters (with a few exceptions) on the show as a whole, from the very beginning. Their dialogue is rich, they are all played fantastically by phenomenal actors (Peter Dinklage's Tyrion and Lena Headey's Cersei will remain two of the most interesting characters for the rest of the show). and much of the plot unfurls through their actions. The Starks are more "wholesome" I suppose, but many of them aren't as entertaining in this first season. This changes drastically in the second season and continues. The Starks are most interesting when they have convinced themselves of their own righteousness even when their motives lack foresight or even fully explored logic: basically they are interesting when they drop their collective family idealism and break off on individual paths. One character to look out for as a major player is Jon Snow, Ned Stark's bastard son, whose first season arc consists of his training to be a part of the Night's Watch that guard the Wall, which was established to prevent an invasion by White Walkers hundred of years ago. Even the members of the Night's Watch are skeptical of the existence of the ice demons and are primarily concerned with attacks from the free men tribes that attack the wall. The Wall plots, I will warn you, can be overly tedious or exceedingly action packed. Intrigue at the Wall is a flip of the coin for each episode, even later when it becomes far more crucial to a larger plot. King's Landing, the Capital, is the setting where most of the dramatic action takes place. While comprised of previously mentioned characters, two members of the King's Small Council reveal a larger understanding of how the events of the narrative play to a far more drastic and permanent change in how the world is ruled that seems to loom consistently over the horizon. It could be argued that Varys, the King's Master of Whispers (a sort of spymaster), and Petyr Baelish, the Master of Coin (the realm's accountant), are two of the only individuals, at least in season one, who understand the bigger picture and can look beyond house rivalries and short-term political actions. Conleth Hill plays Varys as a man with a very prevalent poker face, which is perfect considering the uncertainty regarding his loyalty. Aiden Gillen's Baelish is more of a man playing many part, and his intentions are arguable the most dangerous of any character. He also owns a very prosperous brothel in King's Landing, which helps me address the role of sex in the series. Sex is explored, in a refreshingly graphic way and as more than just an outlet for desire: it holds political power not only in the sense that things can be attained through sexual bartering but also how what is considered "deviant" is put into question, especially in a medieval-esque setting where sexual values and attitudes did not reflect our contemporary understandings and conventions. Yes, the sex is very graphic. I'm a fairly sex positive viewer, but, even if my assessment were harsher, I don't see any encounters as gratuitous, much less pornographic as even certain fans of the show have stated with smirks on their faces (though what would be wrong with a little gratuitous sex?). Again, as with many of the controversial elements of the show, sex's multiplicity only adds to the realism that the show strives for, and 9.8 times out of 10 achieves. There are so many different sexual themes addressed throughout the series that I don't want to spoil any of the surprises, that range from shocking to hot (or, even better, both). Aside from the Westeros plots, there is the very intricate story of Daenerys Targaryen, one of two surviving children of the Mad King who Robert usurped. She is accompanied by her slimy, entitled brother Viserys, who plans to take back the realm that he believes to be his. In order to accomplish this seemingly impossible feet, he quite literally sells his sister to a warlord on virtually the furthest side of an eastern continent with the promise of said warlord's renowned nomadic army as payment and the way back to the Iron Thrown. One of the joys of season one is Danerys's development, and how the relationship between Drogo and herself changes from that of tyrant with a concubine wife to a very unique pair of lovers.. I have overlooked a few characters who are certainly worth mentioning. Joffrey Baratheon, Cersei's son and horrible little demon boy that he is, is possibly one of the best love-to-hate characters ever conceived, though still manages to maintain a sense of depth. Arya Stark is the best kind of youthful and mischievous trouble, but she will become so much more than that. There aren't that many disappointing characters, though there will of course be characters you prefer and others you despise. My intention in this review to is speak to how much work the first season has to do in order to set up a very precise understanding of the fantasy world it seeks to render. The writers, directors, actors, and the rest of the crew are all very successful, though it can be a little daunting going into a show that has a deep history behind it that isn't so well addressed in the premier season. I can say that light is shined on what happened before the the game of thrones commenced in the first season, and that later seasons do elaborate on these histories to the point where a viewer can feel safely informed without having to seek extra material or read the books if they do not want to. I have not read the books myself, and it is not my intent to dissuade anyone from reading them. I would suggest, for a more enjoyable viewing, that you consider why the series starts where it does. Game of Thrones is without question on the best dramas on television, that is historic for also being fantasy--though endowed with enough breadth to provide viewers who aren't fans of that particular genre with enough intrigue and sophisticated artistry that will create a very worthwhile addiction.
Ann Reviewed in the United States on August 16, 2022
Its such a great series. A shame they only made 7 seasons. She is the queen we chose. Dracarys.
ron graves Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2022
Order shipped quickly, was well packaged and protected, arrived intact and as described. Thanks ! I'll be back.
Deborah M. Smith Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2022
Of course it’s awesome’ it’s GOT! And I don’t have to keep track of it or look for it when I want to watch! It’s always right there on my TV!
Art Scott Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2013
This series, based on Martin's "A Song of Fire and Ice" double trilogy, is unparalleled in just about every category one would look for in a show. Be it the writing, directing, casting, acting, wardrobe, or set production, you won't be let down. In fact, not only won't you be let down, but you're in for a visual treat, and one that grips you emotionally. You'll laugh, cry, and in every way blown away by how well the show is put together. Very basically, the show is about the King's throne, and who will out maneuver whom to get their family, or someone in their family to the top, to be King. You'll watch with rapt attention how the choices each of the 10 or so major characters affect the rest of the world. Peter Linklage absolutely dominates his role as "the Imp"--the youngest son of the richest family in what they refer to as "the 7 Kingdoms," and just dares you to root against him as he is the dwarf son of the patriarch of the Lannister family. As amazingly acted as this show is, it's hard to find even a single flaw in the entire show. If the show has any weaknesses, it would be in trying to pass 20 something year old actors as 14 and 15 year olds, and, if you want to call it a weakness, there are only 10 shows per season and as the show keeps delivering one of the most epic, addictive performances, I've found it hard, personally, not to watch the 20+ episodes which have been made because you'll always be yearning for more. For the parents, I would strongly suggest you watch an episode before allowing anyone under the age of 13 from watching as you might find yourself forced into having "the talk" with them long before you want to. When they warn you about the sex, nudity, and violence, they're not kidding. There's plenty of each, however none are used gratuitously. They're used as needed to show the character of each, well, each character. So, pros would be: Acting, Directing, Production, Writing, Costuming/Wardrobe, make-up, special effects. The negatives would be: only 10 shows a season, only available through either pay-cable, or pay-amazon, though quite honestly, it's worth every penny, and, for those who've read the books, the age-inappropriate casting. Since the very first episode I was highly dubious when I saw 2 characters who, in the books, are only 14 and 15, but both arrive sporting beards any 30 year old would envy, and a girl who's supposed to be 12 looking closer to 20 than 12. With that being its worst flaw (and quite explicable by saying, quite simply, the show was never meant to be exactly the same as the books. Those who haven't read the books won't even notice it), again, it's a show without equal. To sum up, it's as I said in the title. In my opinion, to date, this is the very best show ever made for the small screen. The scope of the story, and the glorious visuals just beg you to watch the show with a projector so you can watch it on a 120" screen. The producers spared no expense in making this show everything it could be. Other than giving us 20 hours of viewing per season instead of 10, I'm not altogether certain there's anything which could've been done better.
Karl Weaver Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2014
Almost all the reviews of Game of Thrones have been very positive. Written by those who have gobbled it up. My review is tentative as I've only gotten through the first 2.5 shows so far, and I didn't read the books. I read that the writer loved J. R. R. Tolkien's works [a plus for me, but it's extremely difficult for anyone else to match the quality of Tolkien's main work] so I am not able to comment on the original writing in the books. As for the show: The acting so far is very good. The cinematography is very good. Costuming and integration of real with CG elements so far is spectacular. About the story? Yes most of the characters are self-centered, manipulative, deceptive, untrustworthy. In that sense it's like a lot of history, but in a fantasy setting. As for the fantasy: SO FAR, little is in evidence. One sees that apparently dragons are going to appear at some point, and there are vague "white walkers" and strange things beyond a high wall, protecting the civilized areas. Something not immediately apparent in very brief reviews: if this world were real, it must have had a highly elliptical orbit. Summers last for many decades. Winters can last an entire lifetime. As the story starts, summer is beginning to change to winter. Kids and young men who have known nothing but summer are in for a rude awakening. The elderly remember, or at least they know the stories. To be hooked on a story one must sympathise with at least some characters. The focus initially is on the Stark family, who rule the northern of 7 centers of power. Interestingly the father is first seen in a harsh light, executing a man some would think deserved some mercy. But he tells his son, "It's important to carry out a decree you order." [Presumably so you can witness the ugly consequences, and know the implications]. In his world rules are rules and can't be bent, for the protection of everyone. As we later watch his interaction with his family I felt sympathetic to all of them [which I suppose means they won't do well...] Yes there is some nudity and there is some violence, though so far neither full frontal nudity, nor gratuitously graphic violence. In that respect, "The Tudors" was definitely worse so far. I find myself becoming hooked. It's expensive to produce high-quality shows [which is why many get cancelled early]. I think it deserves the audience support it is getting. If I get all the way through four seasons I shall update my review with a much broader perspective but so far find myself wondering: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
Sunnie Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2022
Steeny G Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2022
I am so hooked on GOT, and I bought all the seasons. . .but something is wrong with some
Jeu De Sexe Sans Inscription
Film Porno Jakie Et Michel
Petite Bite Vs Grosse Bite