Dmitry Uglitsky has returned

1. Small Apocalypse

2. Dmitry's royal behavior

3. Good king

4. Attitude to religion

5. Russian Golgotha

6. Coat of arms Pravda

7. Analogies in the lives of Dmitry Uglitsky and Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa

1. Small Apocalypse

Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich (19 [29] October 1582, Moscow - 15 [25] May 1591, Uglich) - Prince of Uglich, the youngest son of Ivan the Terrible from Maria Feodorovna Nagaya, his seventh wife. Dmitry Uglitsky was the incarnation of Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa.

Dmitry Uglitsky lived only eight years, but the political crisis associated with his death continued for at least 22 years after his death. Canonized in 1606 as the blessed Tsarevich Dimitri of Uglich, “the miracle worker of Uglich and Moscow and all Rus'”. His life was a rehearsal for the coming of the Messiah and the creation of the Millennium Kingdom.

Soon after the death of Dmitry Uglitsky, a period began that in world history is called the “Time of Troubles.” There were rumors about the “good prince” who was not killed and hid from the executioners sent by Boris. It was noticed that someone strong enough patronized Grigory Otrepyev to save him from arrest and give him time to escape.

The end of the 16th – beginning of the 17th century was the time of the “small Apocalypse”. Then cosmic catastrophes occurred, there were two suns and two moons in the sky, and strong hurricanes occurred. People suffered from hunger. Three years, from 1601 to 1603, there were no harvests, there were frosts even in the summer, and snow fell in September. Up to half a million people became victims of famine. Large crowds of people flocked to Moscow, where the government distributed bread and money to the needy. Grain prices have risen tenfold. The landowners could not feed their slaves and servants and kicked them out. Left without a means of livelihood, people turned to robbery, increasing the general chaos. Some gangs grew to several hundred people. This time is described in Konstantin Balmont’s poem “In the Dark Days.”

Konstantin Balmont

On Dark Days

Tradition

In the dark days of Boris Godunov,

In the darkness of the Russian cloudy country,

Crowds of people wandered homeless

And at night two moons rose.

Two suns shone from the sky in the morning,

Looking at the world below with ferocity.

And a prolonged cry: “Bread! Bread! Bread!”

From the darkness of the forests he strove to reach the king.

Withered skeletons on the streets

They greedily plucked the stunted grass,

Like cattle, brutalized and unclothed,

And dreams came true.

Coffins, heavy with rot,

They gave stinking hellish bread to the living,

Hay was found in the mouths of the dead,

And every house was a gloomy den.

Towers were toppled by storms and whirlwinds,

And the heavens, hiding between triple clouds,

Suddenly they lit up with red light,

Revealing the battle of unearthly armies.

Unprecedented birds flew in,

Eagles soared screaming over Moscow,

At the crossroads, silently, the elders waited,

Shaking his gray head.

Death and malice wandered among the people,

Seeing the comet, the earth trembled.

And these days Demetrius rose from the grave,

I moved my spirit to Otrepyev.

Similar events are beginning to occur at the present time, but on a much larger scale. Now both Russia and Ukraine are ruled by fake kings, now God’s punishment will be even greater.

The “Time of Troubles” began in 1598 after the death of Fyodor Ivanovich, the heir of Ivan the Terrible. The current “Time of Troubles” began in 1991, after the collapse of the USSR.

1598 – Boris Godunov became king.

1991 – Boris Yeltsin became Tsar.

Boris Yeltsin is the new Boris Godunov. Both have the same name - Boris. Both had no right to become king. The reign of both fell on the “time of troubles.” During the reign of both, there was a famine (under Yeltsin there was a hidden famine).

The chronicle of the Romanov times accuses Boris Godunov of the murder of Dmitry Uglitsky. Dmitry was the direct heir to the throne and prevented Boris from advancing to it. Isaac Massa gives the same version.

If Boris Godunov spoke out against the tsar personally (the heir), then Boris Yeltsin spoke out against the legitimate tsar as a principle. He opposed the legal monarchy in general.

On September 16 - 17, 1977, Yeltsin, the first secretary of the Sverdlovsk Regional Committee of the CPSU, demolished the Ipatiev House, in the basement of which the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II was shot along with his family and servants on July 17, 1918.

In 2000, Yeltsin transferred power not to the legitimate heir to the royal throne, but to Putin, who subsequently started a war against Ukraine, where the future monarch lived.

In the poem by Konstantin Balmont there is a statement that in the “time of troubles” the spirit of Dmitry Uglitsky entered Grigory Otrepyev. He was called "False Dmitry I".

Grigory Otrepiev became dangerously ill and demanded a confessor. At that time, there was a custom that a person would call his confessor if he was near death. Sources of that time indicate that Grigory Otrepiev “fell sick to death.” This means that he experienced clinical death. At the moment of clinical death, the soul of Grigory Otrepiev left the body, and at the same moment the soul of Dmitry Uglitsky entered the body. When the priest-confessor came, during confession he revealed to him his “royal name.” He conveyed this important information to the Western Russian Orthodox prince Adam Vishnevetsky.

2. Dmitry's royal behavior

Dmitry behaved like a real son of a king.

Adam Vishnevetsky had a difficult and hot-tempered princely character. One day, while in the bathhouse, Vishnevetsky became angry with Dmitry, hit him in the face and cursed him with bad words. He could not stand such treatment and bitterly reproached the prince for not knowing who he had raised his hand against.

Vishnevetsky wanted to check whether Dmitry really was Tsarevich Dmitry Uglitsky. He ordered the applicant to be taken to the city of Bragin, where a Moscow defector, a certain Petrushka, who in Poland bore the surname Piotrovsky, served under the command of Lev Sapega. Petrushka once served in Uglich under Tsarevich Dmitry Uglitsky. Dmitry immediately recognized Petrushka in the crowd of servants and turned to him, and after that, casting aside all doubts, Adam Vishnevetsky surrounded the prince with luxury appropriate to his position.

When, under pressure from Bogdan Belsky and his supporters, the Boyar Duma decided to send its representatives to Dmitry, they saw his behavior, which was natural for the king. On June 3, 1605, the old prince I.M. Vorotynsky and several minor boyars and okolnichy went to Tula - Prince Trubetskoy, Prince A.A. Telyatevsky, F.I. Sheremetev, Duma clerk A. Vlasyev. Dmitry, angry that those sent did not have power, allowed them to reach his hand later than the Cossacks who arrived on the same day. The Chronicle says that he went on to "punish and scold them as only a true king's son can do".

3. Good king

Dmitry was a kind king. The British, who were in Moscow at that time, noted that no European state had ever known such freedom.

Dmitry remembered the kindness once shown to him. Putivl, who provided enormous services to the future king, was exempt from all taxes for 10 years.

Dmitry once remarked that “there are two ways to reign, by mercy and generosity or by severity and executions; I chose the first method; I made a vow to God not to shed the blood of my subjects and I will fulfill it.” He interrupted anyone who wanted to flatter him, speaking ill of the reign of Boris Godunov. In this case, Dmitry noticed to the flatterer that he, like everyone else, “proclaimed Boris as king,” but now he was blaspheming.

Not wanting to act by force, he made concessions to the peasants. They received permission to leave the landowner if he did not feed them during the famine. Hereditary entry into slavery was prohibited; moreover, the slave was supposed to serve only those to whom he voluntarily “sold himself”, thereby moving rather to the position of a mercenary.

During his short reign, Dmitry attended meetings almost every day and participated in disputes and decisions on state affairs. On Wednesdays and Saturdays he gave audiences, accepted petitions and often walked around the city, communicating with artisans, merchants, and ordinary people.

Peter Petrey, a Swedish diplomat and traveler, writes:

“They remembered that the new king loved to talk, surprised with his erudition and knowledge, and in disputes often cited facts from the lives of other peoples or stories from his own past as evidence.

He loved to eat, but after dinner he did not sleep, which was not the custom of previous tsars, he did not go to the bathhouse, did not allow himself to be constantly sprinkled with holy water, shocked Muscovites, who were accustomed to the fact that the tsar had to look sedate and walk, led by the arm of his neighbors boyars, because he walked freely around the rooms, so that the bodyguards sometimes could not find him. He loved to walk around the city, look into workshops and start conversations with the first person he met.

He knew how to handle horses very well, went on bear hunts, loved a cheerful life and entertainment. He did not like the gloomy Kremlin Palace, and Dmitry ordered two wooden palaces to be built for himself and his future wife. His personal palace was tall, but small in size and consisted of a huge entrance hall lined with cabinets with silver utensils and four rooms, the floors of which were covered with Persian carpets, the ceilings were covered with carvings, and the stoves were decorated with tiles and silver gratings. Another innovation was music played during dinners. He loved to organize holidays and feasts for the courtiers.

Unlike the previous kings, he abandoned the persecution of buffoons; neither cards, nor chess, nor dancing, nor songs were prohibited.

Near the palace, it was ordered to install a copper statue of Cerberus with a movable jaw, which could open and close with a clicking sound.”

Boyar and governor Pyotr Basmanov, who was killed along with Dmitry during the uprising, said that he was the best Russian Tsar: “Although he is not the son of Tsar Ivan Vasilyevich, still now he is our sovereign. We accepted him and swore allegiance to him, and we will never find a better sovereign in Rus'.”

4. Attitude to religion

During his stay in Putivl, Dmitry prepared for his future reign - he received Polish and Russian priests, addressed the people with promises to build a university in Moscow, and invite educated people from Europe. Dmitry did everything in his power to bring the Orthodox and Catholic clergy closer together. Representatives of different branches of the Christian clergy were equally present at his dinners.

Dmitry reproached those who tried to argue that the essence of faith and its external manifestations are different things. He did not show fanaticism in religious matters, giving freedom of conscience to his subjects. According to him, Orthodox, Catholics, and Protestants all believe in the same God, the only difference is in the rituals. He believed that rituals are the work of human hands, and what one council decided could just as easily be canceled by another.

Dmitry did not like monks, directly calling them “parasites” and “hypocrites.” He ordered an inventory of the monastic property to be made and threatened to take away everything “superfluous” and use it to defend the Orthodox faith, not in words, but in deeds.

After his accession, Dmitry doubled the allowance for service people and land plots for landowners. He did all this through land and monetary confiscations from the monasteries. In the south of the Moscow kingdom, the collection of taxes was canceled for 10 years, and the practice of cultivating “tithe arable land”, which belonged to the church, was also stopped.

Almost from the first day, a wave of discontent swept across Moscow due to the tsar’s failure to observe church fasts and violation of Russian customs in clothing and life, his disposition towards foreigners and his promise to marry a Polish woman. The people were irritated by the fact that the tsar, the more clearly he mocked Moscow customs, dressed in foreign clothes and seemed to deliberately tease the boyars, ordering them to serve veal, which the Russians did not eat. On May 9, 1606, St. Nicholas Day, a wedding feast was scheduled against all traditions, which continued the next day. The tsar treated the boyars to Polish dishes and again to veal, which was considered “filthy food” in Moscow. This caused a murmur from the people, to which Dmitry did not pay attention. On the same day, Martin Baer, pastor of the Lutheran Church, delivered a sermon to the foreign guards, which was previously only allowed in the German Settlement. This also outraged the residents of Moscow,

When a conspiracy aimed at the overthrow and murder of Dmitry was discovered in Moscow (according to the denunciation of a merchant named Fyodor Konev “and his comrades”), it turned out that Prince Vasily Shuisky was spreading seditious rumors throughout Moscow. The applicant is allegedly the defrocked Grigory Otrepyev and is plotting the destruction of churches and the eradication of the Orthodox faith. In a sense, these rumors were true. If Orthodoxy moved to a new level, it would already be a new religion. A similar thing happened with the advent of Christianity, which became a new religion and is a continuation of Judaism.

5. Russian Golgotha

Jerusalem in Moscow

The term “Place of a skull” appeared in the Russian translation of the Gospel of John: “And Jesus Christ bearing his cross went forth into a place called the place of a skull, which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha". This definition was used to describe the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in the 12th-century pilgrimage literature monument “The Life and Walk of Abbot Daniel from the Russian Land.”

In the 16th century (or earlier), Place of a skull, a monument of medieval Russian architecture, was built on Red Square in Moscow. Until 1917, the building was used for religious processions on Orthodox holidays, as well as for the public announcement of royal decrees. Also, the expression “Place of a skull” is often used to mean “scaffold”.

Probably, the idea of ​​building the Place of a skull in Moscow belonged to Metropolitan Macarius. According to the concept, the Intercession Cathedral on Red Square symbolized Heavenly Jerusalem. This is confirmed by the fact that in the 17th century the temple was sometimes called Jerusalem, and the Spassky Gate - Jerusalem. In 1549, the Place of a skull was first mentioned in the chronicles, when the young Tsar Ivan IV used the platform to publicly address the elected representatives of the Zemsky Sobor, while the tsar formally addressed his speech to Metropolitan Macarius.

Later, the Place of a skull was used during the Christian rite of the Donkey Procession, which took place on the feast of the Entry of the Lord into Jerusalem. There are numerous descriptions of the ceremony in the records of foreigners. Stanislav Nemoevsky, who arrived in Moscow in 1606, writes about this as an established tradition: “on the night of Palm Sunday, the Grand Duke [Tsar], on foot, as a duty, leads a horse under the Metropolitan [Patriarch], and from here he blesses the people.”

The ceremony was considered a major event in the life of the capital until its abolition by the decision of the Council of 1678. Representatives of diplomatic missions were required to attend the celebration. Handing over festive dishes from the royal table to the envoys was considered a symbol of royal mercy.

Golgotha of Dmitry Uglitsky

The murder of Dmitry Uglitsky was committed by people sent by Boris Godunov. Dmitry’s mother blamed “Boris’s people” Danila Bityagovsky and Nikita Kachalov, who were in Uglich, for this. They were immediately torn to pieces by the crowd that raised the alarm. Extremely important is the message of the English merchant Jerome Horsey, at that time exiled to Yaroslavl for a quarrel with the influential clerk Andrei Shchelkalov, about the arrival of the queen’s brother, Afanasy Nagogo, who told him the following:

“The Charowich Demetries is dead; his throat was cutt aboute the sixth hower by the deackes [diacks]; some one of his pagis confessed upon the racke by Boris his settinge one; and the Emporis poysoned and upon pointe of death: her hear and nails and skin falls of; hælp and geave some good thinge for the passion of Christ 'his' sake."

This child was killed not for what he did, but for who he was. In this case, the principle by which the execution of Jesus Christ took place was repeated. In a sense, the murder of Dmitry Uglitsky is Golgotha.

Resurrection of Dmitry

The first major event of the Troubles that took place at Place of a skull was the conversion of Dmitry. On June 1, 1605, it was read by Gabriel Pushkin and Naum Pleshcheev. Archangel Gabriel is known for constantly being in the presence of God and bringing good news from God to people. Gabriel Pushkin, like Archangel Gabriel, brought very good news to the people.

The letter announced an accusation against Boris Godunov for the assassination attempt on Tsarevich Dmitry, and declared the heir to the throne, Feodor II, a traitor. Dmitry promised to provide the governors with new estates, provide royal mercy to the nobles, provide tax benefits to Moscow merchants, and guaranteed a peaceful life for “all Orthodox Christianity.” When the envoys finished reading the appeal, the residents of Moscow “rejoiced with great joy, glorifying God, and there was great noise and rejoicing, and it was impossible to make out who was saying what.” After this, the excited crowd rushed to the Kremlin. Fyodor Godunov, his mother and closest associates were arrested, and robberies began in the houses of political associates of the overthrown tsar.

In 1591, the murder of Dmitry Uglitsky, Golgotha Child, took place. 14 years later, in 1605, Golgotha took place in the opposite direction - the rise of Dmitry, his revenge, his resurrection in the guise of a king.

Dmitry's Last Golgotha

The bodies of the murdered Tsar Dmitry and Basmanov were dragged through the Spassky (Frolovsky) Gate to Red Square and their clothes were removed. The departure of the king through the gate, the name of which comes from the word “Savior”, has a deep symbolic meaning. This means that the people were left without their Savior.

Having reached the Ascension Monastery, the crowd again demanded an answer from Queen Mary (nun Martha) - is this her son? According to contemporaries, she answered: “You should have asked about this when he was alive, but now that you killed him, he is no longer mine.”

It was decided to subject the bodies to the so-called “trade execution”. During the first day, they lay in the mud in the middle of the market, where the chopping block had once been placed for Shuisky. On the second day, a table was brought from the market, and Dmitry’s body was placed on it. A mask, one of those that the Tsar himself prepared for the court carnival, was thrown onto his chest (or onto his torn stomach), and a pipe was stuck in his mouth. Basmanov's corpse was thrown under the table. The abuse of the body lasted three days; it was sprinkled with sand, smeared with tar and “all sorts of abominations.” Jacques Margeret, a mercenary in Russian service, described these events:

The late Dmitry, dead and naked, was dragged past the monastery of the Empress - his mother - to the square... and Dmitry was laid on a table about an arshin long, so that his head hung on one side and his legs on the other, and Pyotr Basmanov was laid under the table.

To stop any pity for Dmitry, it was announced that the mask on his chest was an idol, a “muzzle,” which he worshiped during his life. They also read aloud a “letter” about the life of Grigory Otrepiev in the monastery and his escape. Nevertheless, many Muscovites cried at the desecration.

Basmanov was buried near the Church of St. Nicholas the Mokroy, and Dmitry was buried in the so-called “wretched house,” a cemetery for those who were drunk or frozen, behind the Serpukhov Gate.

Immediately after the funeral, God unleashed His wrath on the people. Unusually severe frosts struck, destroying the grass in the fields and already sown grain, and this was at the end of May, shortly before the beginning of summer. Many Muscovites saw Dmitry after his death and then said that “the dead man walks” and lights flash and move over the grave by themselves, and singing and the sounds of tambourines are heard. Rumors began to circulate around Moscow that the next day after the burial the body of its own accord ended up at the almshouse, and two pigeons were sitting next to it, unwilling to fly away. They tried to bury Dmitry’s body deeper, but a week later he again found himself in another cemetery by himself, that is, “the earth did not accept him.” Also, the fire did not accept him; it was impossible to burn the body. Then they dug up Dmitry’s body, burned it and, mixing ashes with gunpowder, fired from a cannon in the direction from which he came - towards Poland. According to the memoirs of Marina Mnishek, at this time the “last miracle” happened - when the body was dragged through the Kremlin gates, the wind tore the shields from the gates, and installed them unharmed in the same order in the middle of the road.

6. Coat of arms Truth

Truth, Pravdich or Pravdzits (Polish: Prawdzic, Prawda, Lew z Muru) is a Polish noble coat of arms. A golden lion rises from a stone well (or wall). The field is blue, the stone is natural color. The lion holds a ball (or circle) in his paws. Ball (or ring) gold (or iron). The shield is topped with a noble helmet with a noble crown, from behind which emerges the lion indicated in the shield. The border on the shield is blue, lined with gold.

The Nelidovs (Otrepievs) are a Russian noble family. According to a later genealogical tale, the ancestor of the Nelidovs / Otrepievs is Vladislav from Nilka Kashch-Neledzevsky, coat of arms of Pravdzic, “a noble husband of the Polish Crown,” who arrived in Moscow with Prince of Lithuania Dmitry Olgerdovich to help Grand Duke Dmitry Donskoy against Mamai (1367) and participated in Battle of Kulikovo (1380). He remained in the service of the Grand Duke and was granted the village of Nikolsky with villages in the Sukhodolsky camp of Borovsky district, upon rebaptism he received the name Vladimir and began to be called Nelidov. He had an only son, Yuri Vladimirovich. In the fourth generation from him there were two Nelidovs; the elder David Borisovich accidentally received the nickname Otrepiev from John III. The Otrepyevs came from him. His brother Semyon Borisovich retained the surname Nelidov and his descendants, who served in Galich from the 17th century, were always written as Nelidovs. Of the descendants of David Borisovich, the most famous was Yuri Bogdanovich Otrepyev (“False Dmitry I”), who was accepted into monasticism with the name Gregory.

By God's providence, Yuri Bogdanovich Otrepyev received the coat of arms “Truth” from his ancestors. God spoke through this Truth that this man became Dmitry Uglitsky, and this is the Truth.

7. Analogies in the lives of Dmitry Uglitsky and Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa

King Solomon and the Grand Duke of Kiev Yaroslav the Wise are incarnations of Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa. King Solomon was born in 1023 BC, three thousand years before 1977, when Bogdan was born. Grand Duke of Kiev Yaroslav the Wise was born in 977, a thousand years before 1977. Also, the incarnation of Bogdan was Dmitry Uglitsky.

977 – year of birth of Yaroslav the Wise

1582 – year of birth of Dmitry Uglitsky

Difference 605 years (605 = 1582 – 977)

The same number, 605, is present in the date of Dmitry’s coronation - 1605. Coronation is the appearance of the king, in a sense the birth of the king.

The year 1605 is the famous return of Dmitry Uglitsky, his second birth.

Dmitry's direct name (based on his birthday) is Varus. Uar (Greek Οὔαρος) - early Christian saint, revered among the martyrs, died ca. 307 years. The memory takes place on November 1. Bogdan was born on August 1, 1977. This means that the date of conception is November 1, 1976, on the day of remembrance of Uar.

Maria Fedorovna Nagaya (February 8, 1553 - 1608) - queen, last (seventh) wife of Ivan IV, mother of Tsarevich Dmitry Uglitsky. Maria Feodorovna Nagaya is the previous incarnation of Mother Bogdan, who was born in 1953, 400 years later.

In the epic “Grishka Otrepiev”, Maria Fedorovna Nagaya is called “Marfa Matveevna”. The name "Matveevna" is the same as that of Mother Bogdan.

The name of Grigory Otrepyev is Yuri Bogdanovich. Yuri is a variation of the name Georgiy, i.e. This is Georgy Bogdanovich. This name is Bogdan Georgievich in reverse.

Georgy Bogdanovich = Bogdan Georgievich

Bogdan Ivanovich is the name of Grigory Otrepiev’s father. Bogdan Ivanovich is the name of Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa in the prophetic books of Vyacheslav Vasilchenko.

Grigory Otrepyev lived for a long time in the Dermansky monastery, in Ostrog, which was then the possession of Prince Ostrogsky and Goshche, which belonged to the castellan Gabriel Goysky. Here, four hundred years later, Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa was born. Gabriel Goysky is a relative of Bogdan’s ancestors.

Tsarevich Dmitry regained his throne. This analogy will also soon be brought to life: Bogdan will regain his throne.

Tsarevich Dmitry received troops in the West. Bogdan will also receive troops in the West. Tsarevich Dmitry received troops from Poland, and Bogdan will receive troops from the United States.

Dmitry's throne was in Moscow. Due to the destruction of Ukraine by Russia, Bogdan will take both Ukraine and Russia for himself. Now the throne will not be in Moscow, but in Kyiv.

Dmitry's story was a rehearsal for Bogdan. Dmitry lived during the “small Apocalypse”. Now the time of the Apocalypse has come, and Bogdan will conquer Muscovy again.

In the popular consciousness, the “Time of Troubles” was perceived as “God’s punishment” because the real tsar, Dmitry Uglitsky, was killed and was not allowed to power, and the fake tsar, Boris Godunov, sat on the throne - this is the sin of the entire people.

The murder of the child Dmitry Uglitsky, who was killed for who he is, and not for what he did, is Golgotha. After 14 years, at a place called Golgotha, the return of Dmitry was announced. In a sense, he died on Golgotha, and was resurrected on Golgotha. The murder of Dmitry (“False Dmitry”) was his second mortal Golgotha.

God eliminated Boris Yeltsin, who was the new incarnation of Boris Godunov. Soon God will eliminate others like him who have no right to the throne, both in Russia and Ukraine. Dmitry Uglitsky has risen again and will soon regain his throne.

Bogdan Georgievich Lisitsa, 15, Zarichchja str, Kostopol, Rivne region, 35000, Ukraine.

yahovor77@gmail.com

Everlasting Gospel

https://telegra.ph/Everlasting-Gospel-10-23