Diana Submissive

Diana Submissive




🔞 ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻

































Diana Submissive

By
Staff Reporter
@ibtimesuk


10/02/13 AT 3:48 PM
IBT UK Morning Brief - Let the best of International News come to you
Sign up and stay up to date with our daily newsletter.

© Copyright 2022 IBTimes UK. All Rights Reserved.
Since her fatal car crash in 1997, Princess Diana's life and death have been the subject of conspiracy theories ranging from SAS murder, pregnancy rumours and Dodi Fayed being the real target.
The latest theory suggests Diana was murdered because she kept a dossier of the Royal Family's sex secrets.
IBTimes UK looks at some of the most scandalous conspiracies surrounding the late princess.
According to investigative writer Alan Power, Diana kept an X-rated diary about all the sordid affairs going on in the Royal Family. Power said he made the discovery while writing his book, The Princess Diana Conspiracy.
He said she wrote about Prince Charles's sex antics with Camilla Parker Bowles, as well as other members of the family.
"The dossier she was compiling was powerful stuff. But it also directly endangered the monarchy. It contained what Charles liked in bed, women he had affairs with and what he got up to with Camilla," Power said. "There are bits about a senior royal and a male servant. The royal was allegedly accused of being discovered in bed with one of his servants."
A police investigation was recently launched after the parents of a British Special Forces sniper, known as Soldier N, wrote a letter saying their son had boasted the SAS "was behind Princess Diana's death" .
"He (Soldier N) also told her (his wife) that it was the XXX who arranged Princess Diana's death and that has been covered up," the letter said. The soldier said they had shone light at the driver to cause the crash.
Speaking about going to work the day after her death, he said: "I'd just sat down when a colleague leaned over and whispered, 'I can't believe we killed her'. I was initially confused and said, 'Who?', and he added 'Diana'.
"At first I thought he was joking - but then I realised he was being completely serious. Many people who worked for MI6 at the time thought the organisation played some sort of role in Diana's death.
"My view was that Diana had become an embarrassment and if she had married Dodi it would have presented significant difficulties for the monarchy."
Following the allegation, the Metropolitan Police Service said it was assessing the claims.
Diana pregnant and planning to take Princes abroad
It has been claimed that Diana was "almost certainly" nine to 10 weeks pregnant when she died. French investigative journalist Chris Laffaille said he uncovered evidence from official archives of the hospital Diana was taken after the crash to show she was expecting.
He also said the baby was heart surgeon Hasnat Khan. Some conspiracy theorists believe the royal family could not bear the scandal so ordered the princesses death.
In his book, Power also suggests her relationship with Fayed led to her death. He said Diana was planning to move Princes William and Harry away from the UK to live in the US or France.
He wrote: "The possibility that Diana might marry Dodi and leave the country was a real one. Diana had already said her sons were always urging her to live abroad to be less in the public eye.
"However, this was repudiated by Queen Elizabeth, who ordered a new statement to be issued, disclaiming this possibility. Having the second and third in line to the throne living abroad, without the level of protection afforded by British security, was not an idea relished by the British monarchy."
Racist Prince Philip 'ordered death'
Mohamed Al Fayed said Prince Philip ordered his son and Diana's deaths. He said Philip had instructed MI6 to carry out the hit. "Prince Philip is the one responsible for giving the order. He is very racist. He is of German blood, and I'm sure he is a Nazi sympathizer."
A note sent to Paul Burrell from Diana also suggested the involvement of Prince Charles. "This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous - my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing but a decoy, so we are all being used by the man in every sense of the word."
Philips 'involvement' in her death was categorically dismissed by Lord Justice Scott Baker at an inquest, who said there was "not a shred of evidence" to support the claim. "Foremost among them is the proposition that Diana was assassinated by the secret intelligence service (MI6) on the orders of the Duke of Edinburgh.
"There is no evidence that the Duke of Edinburgh ordered Diana's execution, and there is no evidence that the secret intelligence service or any other government agency organised it."
Another popular conspiracy is that Diana was not the intended target in the crash, rather her death was an unfortunate accident during the assassination of Dodi Fayed.
According to the Daily Express, the killers were mercenaries working for Arab arms dealers. Investigative journalist Francis Gillery says American satellites had picked up on details to kill Fayed and that they were lured into the Alma Tunnel.
The news report says Fayed was conducting business during the weekend and that at the time of his death he had built up a reputation for being a bad creditor. Gillery says the couple was on the way to the Passy Kennedy for a business meeting.
"The aim of the meeting remains a mystery to this day, but I believe nonetheless that it was linked to transactions in the spheres of arms and petrol," he said.
The most unlikely conspiracy theory to emerge is that Princess Diana faked her own death, or that she died trying to fake her own death when the plan went wrong.
This theory was fuelled by a comment made to Daily Mail reporter Richard Kray on the day of the crash - she told him how she was about to "completely withdraw" from public life.
An auto expert has since said that surviving a crash at 121mph would be near impossible, so theorists say the survival of Diana's bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones show the crash was staged.

Painful pout I got my lips tattooed but now trolls say I look like Miranda Sings
INSANE STRETCH I have big boobs & tried Kim Kardashian’s Skims bra
POSING UP I'm 49 with big boobs and did a Hooters uniform try on - the reaction was insane
HIT & A MISS I have big boobs – my Shein haul had cute looks but a one item was a big no-go
WHEN voice coach Stewart Pearce was asked by a friend if he could work with a young woman who wanted his help, he had no idea what lay ahead.
It was November 1995 and having collaborated with everyone from the former prime minister Margaret Thatcher to Body Shop founder Anita Roddick, Stewart, then 44, assumed it might be another politician or businesswoman who wanted him to help transform their voice.
But when he was shown into the basement of London’s then famous San Lorenzo restaurant, it was to find no less than Diana, Princess of Wales waiting for him.
"She leapt up from her table, grabbed my arm and said ‘you will work with me, won't you?’ There were no airs or graces," he recalls. "She was just delightful from the start."
That encounter was just a week after the now notorious Panorama documentary in which Diana had laid bare her unhappiness. The world could talk of little else, but while Diana felt "liberated" by speaking out, she did not like the way she came across.
"She had been absolutely ready to burst her banks and speak out, but she was unhappy by the way she looked. By that I mean that while she was a beautiful woman in her thirties, she did not look like a person of power," he says.
"It wasn't to do with articulation - she could speak very clearly. It was to do with the position of her voice," he says. "She had this submissive tone, and she wanted to find weight and resonance."
And so began a near two-year relationship - conducted largely in secret - which ended only with Diana’s tragic and untimely end in Paris.
By then, says Stewart, he had helped Diana oversee her transformation into an assertive and confident speaker.
"She had found a way of balancing her private and public self so that there was no change between the two. She could stand on a platform and feel relaxed and confident about whatever it as she needed to say."
A former actor, turned voice coach and drama teacher, and a former Master of Voice at London’s Globe Theatre, Stewart, now 69, has just published a book, Diana the Voice of Change – something he describes as a "call to arms for women’".
He says he and Diana had discussed writing the book, but he has waited 25 years to do so out of respect for her memory.
The late princess is just one of an impressive roster of clients amassed by Stewart, over the years, among them actors Mark Rylance and Minnie Driver, and Benazir Bhutto, the former prime minister of Pakistan.
Margaret Thatcher, was among his first clients, introduced to him shortly after she had become leader of the conservative party.
"She had this weird strangled high upper middle-class sound," he recalls. "What I did was give her gravitas. I'm the man who gave Thatcher her voice."
They worked together late at night at the House of Commons, Thatcher reciting poetry and Shakespeare tracts as he walked backwards away from her.
"She was always charming and kind, and very smart," he recalls.
Fifteen years later, Stewart recalls how he was introduced to Princess Diana by Mara Berni, who ran London’s San Lorenzo, the famed haunt of everyone from Diana (who used to call Mara her "Mother Confessor”) to the Rolling Stones.
Their relationship was so confidential that even Diana’s butler at the time, Paul Burrell, knew nothing about it.
"I think she wanted this to be just for her. She always paid me my cash. It was never organised by private secretaries. She called me on her cell phone whenever she needed to," he says.
They met on average around once a week if her schedule allowed, Diana coming to Stewart’s flat in Chelsea straight from her regular workouts at the nearby Chelsea harbour gym.
"She would tumble in in her jogging pants and sweatshirt, no makeup, just looking ordinary," he says. 
"Often the first thing she would say is 'can I do some washing up?’ I would leave crockery in the kitchen for her to wash up. People were always doing things for her, and she longed for a bit of normality."
Stewart focused on Diana’s breathing, giving her special breathing exercises which helped her centre her breaths from deep in the abdomen.
"What that does is it gives us weight and grounded-ness, it roots the voice down," he says.
"In many situations Diana spoke with a tight-lipped breathy voice, because of living in a state of anxiety, and this kept her in a state of radical panic.
"That was also something we needed to change. Together we created a series of affirmations she could use to feel immediate change One was ‘Detach, Feel stillness, Observe and another was ‘I am safe, I am secure, all is well’."
I would leave crockery in the kitchen for her to wash up. People were always doing things for her, and she longed for a bit of normality
Stewart recalls that Diana’s transformation was swift. Shortly after they’d been working together, the princess had to give a speech in New York after receiving a humanitarian award from the American diplomat Henry Kissinger.
"She made a speech about the compassionate way we need to raise our children. And somebody in the audience made a rude heckle and shouted, 'Well, where are your children,' and she just replied very calmly, without missing a beat, 'at school’. And it wasn’t defensive or scornful, just very natural."
Her confidence continued to grow as the weeks went by.
"Naturally she was fit, and she had this sensuality, and over time she assumed this very natural way of being able to find her voice and then using it rhythmically in speeches so that it carried through," he says.
"She was acquiring this wonderful élan, she spoke with this really strong centred voice, and everybody started to say, 'wow, what's happened to Diana?’"
As time went by, Stewart says the princess also started to confide in him about the strain she was under. "During the very difficult times when she was negotiating the stuff between herself and the Royal household, she would often use me as a sounding board," he recalls.
It was not all seriousness though. "Away from the paparazzi Diana had a wonderful sense of humour, and anything could set her off," he recalls.
"It's rather like when we were children, and we would laugh and laugh, and forget what we were laughing about."
By the summer of 1997 the duo were still working together, but by now Diana was ensconced in a relationship with Dodi Fayed, the son of Harrods owner Mohammed Al-Fayed. Yet Stewart believes it was a distraction rather than an intense love affair.
"She was excited, enjoying herself," he says. "Was she in love with Dodi? She thought he was adoring, and he was a wonderful suitor in the sense that he was such a gentleman. But she wasn’t going to marry him."
His last conversation with the princess took place a few weeks before her death, when she telephoned to let him know she was going away for the summer. "I had no idea it would be the last time we would speak," he says.
He learned of her death from a newspaper headline while on holiday with friends in New Mexico. "I looked over somebody's shoulder as they were reading USA Today, and there it was: 'Diana is dead'. A sound came out of me that I've never heard," he says. "It was a great shock."
Cut off in her prime, Stewart believes that had she been alive today Diana would have grown into an "extraordinary stateswoman". 
"She had all the makings of it, and she had huge ambitions. She wanted to further all of her charitable interests, and she was really interested in making documentaries and working with child education.
"I am sorry she did not get to do that, but I do feel her legacy lives on.’
For more Royal Family related news, check out Diana's most iconic moments – from shaking the hand of an Aids patient to dancing with John Travolta.
Plus, here's everything you need to know about Diana's wedding to Prince Charles from guests in attendance to their honeymoon.
And those who met Diana reveal how the Princess of Wales changed their lives from raising money for charity to helping one woman deal with losing her legs.
I got my lips tattooed but now trolls say I look like Miranda Sings
I'm 49 with big boobs and did a Hooters uniform try on - the reaction was insane
I have big boobs – my Shein haul had cute looks but a one item was a big no-go
I’m 39 & everyone asks me what my anti-aging secret is - a decades-old hack
© 2020 THE SUN, US, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY | YOUR AD CHOICES | SITEMAP

By Louis Staples Published: Nov 1, 2021
Actress Judy Garland, another revered queer icon, in 1940.
Princess Diana and George Michael in 1993.
[Diana] provided the blueprint for navigating hostile surroundings.
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
How the people's princess became an icon for LGBTQ+ people like me.
My earliest memory of Princess Diana is actually of myself, as a young gay boy, playing dress up. Wearing a tulle skirt, a plastic tiara and a selection of rings that were far too big for my fingers, I’d do my very best Lady Di.
I was only four years old when she died, and I don’t remember how I learned the news. Everything I know about Diana today has come from documentaries, TV dramas and films made after her death, but when I see her big blue eyes giving one of those glances, I still feel emotional. Right now, pop culture shares my fixation with Diana. The latest film to take on her story is Spencer , starring Kristen Stewart, whose performance is already generating Oscar buzz. Emma Corrin also played the princess recently, taking home the 2021 Golden Globe Award for Best Actress for her performance in Netflix’s The Crown . Corrin’s portrayal was darker than anything we had seen before, delving into Diana’s miserable marriage and her loneliness in the spotlight.
Twenty-four years on from her sudden death, I am certainly not the only LGBTQ+ person who still feels a special connection with Diana. In fact, the most recent portrayals by Stewart and Corrin – two actors who are part of the queer community – are just one part of a wider queering of her legacy.
It might seem strange to hear someone like Diana – a presumably heterosexual and cisgender woman – being associated with the word “queer.” Particularly during her lifetime, it’s a word that was often hurled as an insult. But it has since been reclaimed as an identity itself and an umbrella term for various identities across the LGBTQ+ spectrum.
There is also a long history of “queer” being used in an academic setting, in ways that are less rigidly tied to sexual orientation and gender identity. Dr Noreen Giffney, for example, defines queerness as a “radical resistance of categorization and norms.” In this school of thought, queerness is a political force that is constantly evolving to question the status quo.
Viewing Diana through the academic lens, her queer icon status is both easier and more difficult to understand. Some would argue that there is nothing “radical” about marrying into the royal family – an institution that exists to uphold elite norms and structures, not least heterosexuality. But Diana has increasingly been portrayed as a rebellious figure, who wrestled with the constraints of royal life and frequently challenged them. In the final seconds of the Spencer trailer, for example, Diana is told: “They know everything.” Her response? “They don’t.”
LGBTQ+ people perceiving a queerness in public figures or characters who aren’t explicitly queer isn’t a new phenomenon. Gay men, for example, are known for often making icons out of famous women rather than gay male celebrities. Queer academic José Muñoz calls this process “disidentification”, which he thinks could be a “coping mechanism” for feelings of exclusion from mainstream culture. He uses Judy Garland as an example: “When a gay man ‘identified’ with Garland, he was writing his way into the mainstream culture in which his own story could never be told,” he wrote .
The connections between Garland and Diana are obvious. Both were beautiful women who died young in tragic circumstances after being thrust into the spotlight at an early age. They were both let down by people close to them and exploited by the press . The fairytale narrative of being plucked from obscurity, as Garland was via her breakthrough role as Dororthy in The Wizard of Oz, is another story they share. Academic Richard Dyer argues that this rejection of “ordinariness” is key to to becoming a gay icon. “Like Judy Garland, gay men are brought up to be ordinary,” he writes . “One is not brought up gay.”
The same logic applies to Diana. Not only was she transformed from a relatively unknown (albeit very wealthy) teenager into the world’s most famous woman, but she also refused to be an “ordinary” royal, flouting the gendered expectation to be submissive and rule-abiding. So it is unsurprising that queer people who felt “different” growing up, or even shunned by their own families, might “disidentify” with Diana. She provided a blueprint for navigating hostile surroundings.
Being an outspoken LGBTQ+ ally isn’t a prerequisite for having a queer fanbase. But the queering of Diana’s legacy feels connected to the fact that she was supportive of the LGBTQ+ community while she was alive. Her public life was punctuated by events including gay people: she he had close friendships with George Michael, Gianni Versace and Freddie Mercury. It was reported that Mercury once dressed her up in “
Sloppy Mouth Fuck
Mommy Fox
Pornstar Miss Hybrid Xxx New 2022

Report Page