Child Porn Comics

Child Porn Comics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| b1 = | b2 = | b3 = | b4 = | b5 = | b6 =
| b1 = | b2 = | b3 = | b4 = | b5 =
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:

To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:

We should replace that picture as it may be illegal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.64.138.199 ( talk ) 23:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Irony itself: going on a Wikipedia page about the legal status of cartoon pornography... and finding cartoon pornography, possibly cartoon child pornography. As for the laws, it's probably country-dependent. Then again, so are lots of forms of speech that wiki uses. Does Wikipedia have a policy on which countries it must be politically correct/legal in? 207.62.170.217 ( talk ) 12:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I see no problem if something like pornography is accessible hire on Wikipedia web coz all in all phonography is phonograph Mhepfa ( talk ) 01:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I am wondering why this page has links to pornographic sites. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, not a porn directory. If someone wants to find these kind of sites they can use a search engine. And the last link is a pay site, which means that this page is basically advertising for that site. I'm removing the links to the sites containing pornography but leaving the other link since it is informative in nature. TSchellhous 04:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I resent having my contribution being labelled as "vandalism", according to an edit from February 3. I was simply adding a section of my own knowledge of the Cartoon pornographic sites I have been forced to censor to avoid my children from seeing. I notice a pattern and decide to let people know about it. Sadly, that word "vandalism" proves that Wikipedia is run by people who are inconsiderate bullies. 71.194.44.46, 17:36, 7 February 2006 (GMT)

I fail to see how cartoon pornography can be considered parody or satire .-- Orthologist 23:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Someone has changed the picture... this might be more appropriate.-- Orthologist 00:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Awesome Mhepfa ( talk ) 00:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Regarding the "differences between cartoon pornography and hentai" I fail to see the validity of that article and it's claims that those are two different art forms. Especially as the source seems to be a payable hentai service. It seems obvious to me that hentai (actually called Adult animation or erotic animation by Japanese people) is a form of cartoon pornography, not a completely different art form. It's the same as anime can be called a type of cartoon which emerged in Japan. Hentai is just a type of adult cartoon which is also anime. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.206.233.213 ( talk ) 08:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

"Rule 34" directs here. Why, exactly? There's a lot more to Rule 34 than Cartoons. It should have it's own article, or at least be mentioned in the text of this one.
XKCD 305 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.252.128 ( talk ) 04:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

"Currently no such laws are in effect in the US, as any laws of this nature have been struck down by the US Supreme Court on constitutional grounds. However this striking down of the law was not retroactive. Anybody who at the time has been sentenced for such a crime, is still serving their sentence."

while the Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#18_USC_1466A implies that the law is still in effect and actively used to prosecute people (the simpsons case).

I'm not really sure which is accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.110.19 ( talk ) 07:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The article is supposed to be about cartoon pornography, but is almost entirely about illicit cartoon kiddie porn. Presumably the whole world of legal erotic comix ought to be in here -- instead, just this illegal crap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandrakos ( talk • contribs ) 02:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

We cannot include the name of an alleged cartooner working in porno without a reliable source , otherwise it is a WP:BLP violation and this we take very seriously. Make sure the ref you add is reliable before even thinking about restoring this name, and remeber I dont have to discuss this nor obey WP:3RR as a BLP violation is considered very serious♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

BTW, on the entries that have Wikipedia articles:
Bill Ward : Most of his work is describes as risqué, but...
"Ward dabbled in underground comics, drawing a pornographic "Stella Starlet" story in publisher John A. Mozzer's Weird Smut Comics #1 (1985) and a "Sugar Caine" story in issue #2 (1987); both were written by Dave Goode.[3]

Ward illustrated erotic stories, written by himself, in such men's magazines as Juggs and Leg Show — an article a month for the former in his later years.[7] During this period he also did cover and interior illustrations for various paperback publishers of softcore and hardcore pornography, especially those owned by William Hamling;[8] and illustrations (primarily covers) for Screw.[9]"

John Willie: "He is best known for his comic strip Sweet Gwendoline ." Also... He is clearly stated as being an erotic photographer. Why would anyone think that he would shy away from erotica, in his comics?
...yet you claim that there is a need for citations?-- ZarlanTheGreen ( talk ) 15:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

As I was saying four years ago, there's a whole world of erotic comics that has nothing to do with illegal child pornography. This article is almost entirely about illegal child pornography, and should be retitled to make that clear, or be rewritten to fill in the all the material currently excluded. Mandrakos ( talk ) 02:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

"Historical" cartoon or not, it's still considered an actual cartoon pornography so I don't see why it matters about the article mentioning nothing about it. However, hentai itself is mentioned only once in the lead, despite not appearing anywhere in the article. Furthurmore, some people don't consider anime and cartoons to be the same thing, especially true hardcore anime fans. Sandenig ( talk ) 11:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

First of all, Tutelary is right, edit warring and this nonsense with misleading summaries and minor edits has to stop. As for the image itself, the image should be a clear example first and well-drawn second. If a different image can be found in Commons (or properly contributed to Commons from elsewhere), so be it. A poorly-cropped, mediocre still frame from a historical animation, or an even older image that is only partially connected to the topic, don't belong. The later image is so surreal, and Marie Antoinette and the Marquis de Lafayette are so far outside of the scope of this article, that it's distracting and confusing to have them as the lead image. Grayfell ( talk ) 20:10, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Historical cartoons are off-limits, actual "cartoons" are also off-limits, there is no way this article can be expanded. Searching for sources only brings up a bunch of porn sites . I suggest a merge with the legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors or cartoon articles. That is unless someone can help to expand this article. Sandenig ( talk ) 22:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

In any case, the article is currently pretty much exclusively about cartoon child pornography, as have already been mentioned in above sections. We need help to work together if the article is to be expanded somehow, and anymore arguing would be counterproductive. In attempting to expand this article, it needs to start somewhere. I have already tried searching cartoon pornography in the news, to see if any reputable media outlets are covering it in any depth. Sandenig ( talk ) 00:59, 12 October 2015 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Personally, I feel this article is a bit one-sided. It could do with some criticism. - 2.97.74.198 ( talk ) 22:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Over the years there's been disagreement and confusion about what this article is about. I think the biggest cause for that is the title. " Cartoon " has three different meanings. The original meaning – a sketch made to plan a painting – isn't really used anymore. The two current meanings – a style of comics and a style of animation – are related and overlap in a few areas, but they're really two different topics: books and movies. So I think we're better off covering pornographic comics and pornographic animation separately. The former topic is covered briefly in a section of Adult comics ... I'd like to see that expanded into its own article at some point. The latter topic doesn't seem to be covered in any one place.... there's a bit in Adult animation and some in Hentai (one area where comics and animation do overlap significantly). So maybe this article could serve as a place to do that. But if so, I'd suggest that it be titled Animated pornography or Erotic animation , so people don't confuse it with comics. – Jason A. Quest ( talk ) 13:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Cleaning up this article was commendable, but considering the length of past discussions, rewriting it to be about animation was premature. Sources need to be found first, and the article needs to be built on top of that. I distrust Google hit counts, because, well, they lie, they include blatently unreliable sources, and duplicates, and also because Google really loves sloppy synonyms. Google is trying to provide "useful" results, not specific words, so it will give results for "comics" when searching for "cartoons", and probably "anime" when searching for "manga". I have some reliable books on my shelf which address the topic of adult comics. Flipping around looking for sources, most of them refer to artists as "cartoonists" ( Eric Stanton is one historically noteworthy example). This includes artists describing themselves as cartoonists. It's also significant how few of them use "cartoon" when talking specifically about comics . This could be interpreted to mean they do not view them as cartoons, or that they view them as a subset of cartoons, which would mean the exact opposite for our purposes. I think self-describing themselves as "cartoonists" suggests the latter. Grayfell ( talk ) 02:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

I like the title "Drawn and Animated pornography" myself. Or use separate articles for "Dawn pornography" and "animated pornography". Harizotoh9 ( talk ) 20:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Of course, there's another perennial attempt to remove the image to the lead, based on it being "objectionable", when WP:CENSOR is the guiding policy here. The image has due weight in accordance with the fact that Hentai is the most popular genre of cartoon pornography, and as such, should be given its weight as an image on said page. There has not ever been a policy on here for removing images, solely based on being objectionable. Again, quite the opposite. Tutelary ( talk ) 00:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Just because wikipedia isn't censored doesn't mean it needs to have hentai. It adds nothing to the article other than what is already written. El cid, el campeador ( talk ) 00:03, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

The merger is being discussed here: Talk:Erotic_animation#Merger . Tutelary ( talk ) 01:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

For the sake of peace, I'm going to plead the debate equivalent of nolo contendere , and redirect the better article title to this one, merging the contents in hopes of finally doing something useful with it. I think it's a mistake, but it isn't worth the kind of emotional distress this seems to be creating. - Jason A. Quest ( talk ) 15:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Idk 158.62.21.4 ( talk ) 12:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC) Reply [ reply ]

Wikipedia is not censored . Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image .
hide This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects :

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale .
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale .
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale .

Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Accessibility: not checked

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale .
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale .

Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale .
This article was nominated for merging with legal status of cartoon pornography on 10 February 2011. The result of the discussion was no consensus, no merger.

Published October 13, 2022 7:26am EDT

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten,
or redistributed. ©2022 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Legal Statement . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper .

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com.
The former mayor of Beaverton, Oregon, pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court to illegally possessing child pornography, according to a Department of Justice news release.
Dennis "Denny" Doyle, 73, waived indictment and pleaded guilty to a single count of possession of child pornography.
Between November 2014 and December 2015, Doyle knowingly and unlawfully possessed digital media containing child pornography. Several of the images Doyle possessed were of children under the age of 12 who had been identified as known sexually exploited minors by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, according to court documents.
Doyle was charged by criminal information with one count of possession of child pornography on March 3.

File photo of former Beaverton, Oregon, Mayor Denny Doyle.
(KPTV)
Doyle will be sentenced on Jan. 24, 2023, by U.S. District Court Judge Michael W. Mosman.
This case was investigated by FBI Portland’s Child Exploitation Task Force. It is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Oregon.
Anyone who has information about the physical or online exploitation of children is encouraged to call the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324) or submit a tip online.
Pilar Arias is a multimedia journalist with more than 10 years of experience in broadcast, digital and print production. She covers a wide variety of topics. @PilarFOXNews.
Get all the stories you need-to-know from the most powerful name in news delivered first thing every morning to your inbox
You've successfully subscribed to this newsletter!

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2022 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Legal Statement . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by Refinitiv Lipper .

Japanese Brother And Sister Seks
Funny Sex Positions
Sex Latina Tube Teenager Pussy

Child Porn Comics

Report Page