Ccbill Wiki
⚡ ALL INFORMATION CLICK HERE 👈🏻👈🏻👈🏻
Ccbill Wiki
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Open source software
Spam
Computer security
Memory card
Internet Engineering Steering Group
Bridge loan
CAPTCHA
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Open source software
Spam
Computer security
Memory card
Internet Engineering Steering Group
Bridge loan
CAPTCHA
Case-U.S.-DMCA
Copyright
DMCA
2007
↑ 17 U.S.C. §512
↑ 47 U.S.C. §230(c)(1).
↑ 17 U.S.C §§ 512(a)-(d)).
Categories :
Case
Case-U.S.-Federal
Case-U.S.-Copyright
Case-U.S.-DMCA
Copyright
DMCA
2007
Add category
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
Explore properties
Fandom
Cortex RPG
Muthead
Futhead
Fanatical
Follow Us
Overview
What is Fandom?
About
Careers
Press
Contact
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Global Sitemap
Local Sitemap
Community
Community Central
Support
Help
Do Not Sell My Info
Advertise
Media Kit
Fandomatic
Contact
Fandom Apps
Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat.
The IT Law Wiki is a FANDOM Lifestyle Community.
Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007) ( full-text ).
The plaintiff, Perfect 10, is the publisher of an adult entertainment magazine and the owner of the website perfect10.com. The website features around 5,000 images of models that were created by the company, which are accessible to only registered paying members. Perfect 10 holds publicity rights on many of the models in these images . It also has the registered U.S. copyrights for images and owns several related registered trademarks and service marks . Perfect 10 has filed suit against CWIE, a web hosting and connectivity service company and CCBill LLC, a payment service company.
Defendant CWIE provides web hosting and related Internet connectivity service to many different websites . It provides "ping, power and pipe" services by making sure that the server is on, that power is provided to the server , and that the clients are connected to the Internet via a data center connection.
CCBill, the other defendant, provides payment services that allow consumers to use credit cards or checks to pay e-commerce venues.
On August 10, 2001, Perfect 10 sued the defendants for violated copyright, trademark, and state unfair competition, false advertising and right of publicity laws by providing services to websites that posted images stolen from Perfect 10’s magazine and website .
The district court found the following:
1. Based on the DMCA , CCBill and CWIE qualified for certain statutory safe harbors from copyright infringement liability. The court also found that they are immune from liability for state law unfair competition and false advertising claims under the CDA .
2. The defendants violated Perfect 10’s publicity right . Defendants were ordered to pay for Perfect 10’s costs and attorney’s fees under the Copyright Act .
Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the District Court.
The DMCA established certain safe harbors to "provide protection from liability for: transitory digital network communications; system caching; information residing on systems or networks at the direction of users; and information location tools." [3] However, Perfect 10 alleged that defendants did not qualify for safe harbor protection for various reasons.
Reasonably Implemented Policy. A service provider must satisfy a series of conditions per 17 U.S.C §512(i) in order to be eligible for any of the four safe harbors . One such condition requires that it adopt and reasonably implement a policy that will terminate users who are repeat infringers in appropriate circumstances. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision that CCBill and CWIE did implement a repeat infringer policy. The court found that defendants largely kept track of the webmaster for each website .
Reasonableness. 17 U.S.C §512(c)(3) protects a service provider from monetary liability if it does not know of infringement , or if it acts "expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material" when it has actual knowledge , is aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent, or has received notification of claimed infringement meeting a list of elements that should be included in a notification.
Perfect 10 claims that defendants unreasonably implemented their repeat infringer policies by tolerating flagrant and blatant copyright infringement by its users despite notice of infringement from Perfect 10, notice of infringement from other copyright holders , and "red flags" of copyright infringement . However, both courts rejected plaintiff's arguments.
Red Flag Test. A service provide may lose safe harbor immunity if it fails to take action when it is aware of the infringing activity because the activity is apparent (§512(c)(1)(A)(ii)).
Perfect 10 asserted that CCBill and CWIE were aware of a number of "red flags" that signaled apparent infringement . Plaintiff claimed that defendants provided services to websites with names like illegal.net and stolencelebritypics.com or disclaimers that suggest apparent infringement .
However, the Court of Appeals found against Perfect 10's claim, stating that there was no "red flag" of infringement .
The Ninth Circuit found that evidence of notice and "red flags" raised by third parties other than Perfect 10 were relevant. They therefore remanded to the district court the issue of whether CCBill and/or CWIE responded to notices appropriately and whether they implemented its repeat infringer policy in an unreasonable manner in other cases.
Perfect 10 also asserted that defendant directly infringed its copyright through its website . Even though defendants argued that they did not have an interest in the website , some evidence suggested that they may be involved more deeply. Therefore, the Court of Appeals remanded the issue to the district court.
Plaintiff Perfect 10 claimed that CCBill violated standard technical measures by blocking Perfect 10's access to certain websites in order to prevent Perfect 10 from discovering copyright infringement . Plaintiff also claims that as a result of this interference with standard technical measures, CCBill does not qualify for the safe harbor protection per 17 U.S.C. §512(i)(1)(B).
The Court of Appeals was not able to establish whether this action was a standard technical measure and remanded to the district court.
Section 512(a) allows safe harbor protection for service providers who offer "the transmission , routing , or providing of connections for digital online communications , between or among points specified by a user , of material of the user's choosing, without modification to the content of the material as sent or received." The court states that the information and proof of payment conveyed by CCBill were indeed " digital online communications ."
However, because the appellate court could not conclude whether or not CCBill is a service provider under §512(a), it remanded this issue to the district court.
Section 512(d) states that service providers are protected against copyright infringement by reason of referring or linking users to an online location containing infringing material or infringing activity by using information location tools , including hypertext links . Defendant CCBill argued that it was protected by this safe harbor because it showed a hyperlink to provide access to the user to access the client website at the end of the consumer transaction .
Nonetheless, because most of CCBill's functions fall outside providing information location services , the court decided that CCBill should not qualify for the §512(d) safe harbor.
Section 512(c) limits liability for claims of infringement for storage . Here, the court found that defendant CWIE is entitled to safe harbor protection if the district court finds that CWIE meets the threshold requirements stated in §512(i).
While this Act grants federal immunity to providers of interactive computer services (like CWIE), it does not protect against violations of " intellectual property " for federal intellectual property , not state regimes, as is the case here.
The court found that CDA immunity applies to CCBill and CWIE, and there are therefore eligible for CDA immunity for all claims raised against them by Perfect 10.
Please don't test your biller setup with CCBill Web900's test account—it won't work correctly.
Setup your Web900 sub-account with the following instructions.
After your account is approved, CCBill will send you an six-digit
account number; save this number.
You can set this up by requesting a client support specialist add it or
you can enable or modify your existing Datalink setups in the webmaster
admin by going to Premium Features->Value Added Features->Data Link
Services Suite. Both username and password will must be 6 to 8 alpha
numeric characters.
NOTE: You will need at least two sub-accounts set up even if you do not use one.
Go to Billers Admin , find CCBill Web900 in the drop-down, and
click Add. Enter your CCBill Account Number.
Go to Sites Admin , edit or create a site, and go to the Biller
Details section. In the sub-account field, enter the four-digit number
CCBill gave you for additional sites. In the Web900 form, enter the
name of the Web900 form CCBill should display (ends in t9 .). Go
to the Special Join Options section and select CCBill Web900 from the
drop-down. In the Join Form Text field, enter the text to appear on the
submit button. In the Biller Code field, enter the Subscription Type ID
assigned to each pricing option.
Our CCBill web900 option only has one price point. When you look at the site join form, there are 3 price options, how should we treat this?
You would use the CCBill Web900 (standalone) option which will create an
additional button on the join form. First go to the Billers admin and
select CCBill Web900 (standalone) from the dropdown. Use the same biller
info as the main CCBill account and save. Now a new section will open up
on the sites edit page called Special Payment Options... . In the first
box under this header select CCBill Web900 (standalone). The Join Form
Text box put what you would like that button to read such as pay by
phone. In the Biller Code box place the code for the price point.
Now an additional button will appear on the template under Prefer a
different Payment Method?. This will be the button for the standalone
option. Also your system will use an additional join form template
called join_ccb900.tpl to collect additional info.
Features
Mobile
Actions
Codespaces
Copilot
Packages
Security
Code review
Issues
Discussions
Integrations
GitHub Sponsors
Customer stories
Explore GitHub
Learn and contribute
Topics
Collections
Trending
Skills
GitHub Sponsors
Open source guides
Connect with others
The ReadME Project
Events
Community forum
GitHub Education
GitHub Stars program
Plans
Compare plans
Contact Sales
Education
In this repository
All GitHub
↵
In this repository
All GitHub
↵
In this user
All GitHub
↵
In this repository
All GitHub
↵
CCBill
/
restful-api-guide
Public
Code
Issues
Pull requests
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Failed to load latest commit information.
curl - POST 'https://api.ccbill.com/ccbill-auth/oauth/token' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
--header 'Authorization: Basic Merchant_ApplicationID:Merchant_Secret ' \
--data-urlencode 'grant_type=client_credentials'
data-ccbill='[corresponding field]'
const widget = new ccbill.CCBillAdvancedWidget(applicationId);
try {
const result = widget.createPaymentToken(oauthToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc, clearPaymentInfo, clearCustomerInfo, timeToLive, numberOfUse);
result.then(
(data) => {
console.log("SUCCESS");
return data.json();
},
(error) => {
console.log("ERROR");
return error.json();
}).then(json => {
console.log("RESULT :[" + JSON.stringify(json) + "]");
}).catch((error) => {
console.error("ERROR2 [" + error + "]");
});
console.log(`FINISHED`);
} catch (error) {
const errors = [];
error.forEach(function(item) {
const msg = item.message.split(".");
errors.push(msg[1]);
});
console.error(`ERROR ` + JSON.stringify(errors));
alert("ERROR: Unable to generate Payment Token: " + JSON.stringify(errors));
}
const result = widget.createPaymentToken(oauthToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc);
const result = widget.createPaymentToken(oauthToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc, clearPaymentInfo, clearCustomerInfo);
const result = widget.createPaymentToken(oauthToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc, null, null, timeToLive, numberOfUse);
const result = widget.createPaymentToken(oauthToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc, clearPaymentInfo, clearCustomerInfo, timeToLive, numberOfUse);
{
target: Object,
message: string,
propertyName: string
}
const result = widget.isScaRequired(authToken, clientAccnum, clientSubacc, currencyCode);
{
target: Object,
message: string,
propertyName: string
}
const result = widget.isScaRequiredForPaymentToken(authToken, paymentTokenId, currencyCode);
{
target: Object,
message: string,
propertyName: string
}
const result = widget.authenticateCustomer(authToken);
const result = widget.authenticateCustomer(authToken, form);
const result = widget.authenticateCustomer(authToken, form, iframeId);
const result = widget.authenticateCustomer(authToken, form, iframeId, paymentTokenId);
{
"clientAccnum": 900000,
"clientSubacc": 0,
"initialPrice":19.99,
"initialPeriod":30,
"recurringPrice":19.99,
"recurringPeriod":30,
"rebills":99,
"currencyCode":840,
"lifeTimeSubscription":false,
"createNewPaymentToken":false,
"passThroughInfo":[
Botw Mipha Porn
Pansy Parkinson Porn
Unscripted Anal