COP30: PERSECUTION OF DISSENT (PT. 1)

Italian original version
👉🏻 CLICK HERE👈🏻

Persecution of dissent, feminism, anti-racism.

1) THE SYSTEM HAS ADOPTED BILL GATES' NEW "JUST TRANSITION" MODEL

After the major failure of COP29 and Bill Gates' declarations about the failure of the climate scam agenda, COP30 has completely changed its approach. Its primary goal is no longer to reduce emissions, but to crush the dissent of climate deniers, as proposed by dictator Lula, who blames the failure of the climate agenda on dissent itself (pp. 3), which he believes is fomented by hate-spreading algorithms. The only thing that remains of the climate agenda is, as Bill Gates stated, the intent to economically destroy the West and the white race: the stated primary objective is to implement Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, which will oblige developed countries to financially assist the undeveloped ones, with particular attention to Africa. On the second day, they also attempted to emphasize the intent to maintain the target of a maximum temperature increase of 1.5°C, which they also consider unrealistic. The focus of the second day, however, remains Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement and the search for new funds for mitigation and, above all, adaptation. The issue of emissions is secondary and was only mentioned by the Arabs. The new narrative they are promoting, invented by the United Arab Emirates, is that of a "just transition": which is precisely the one desired by Bill Gates, who focuses on poverty and health, with the addition of some feminist delusions (p. 1). Indeed, it is specified that reducing emissions becomes a secondary objective and must in no way compromise the economic development of countries. The EU must always make shame of itself; in fact, while they were discussing climate change, it began promoting feminist propaganda, arguing that a new gender action plan is needed, which must consist of dedicated funding for women and further increase the number of women in politics.

2) SCIENCE AND THE PERSECUTION OF DISSENT

On the third day, negotiations continued to implement Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, and they are seeking to establish, together with science, objective indicators to effectively measure the effects of their policies on climate change. However, they recognized that fossil fuels are a form of energy stability and that they help reduce poverty and increase economic development. A draft of the gender action plan was also presented, immediately rejected by Iran, Russia, and Saudi Arabia, and will continue to be developed in the following days. On the fourth day, they examined Articles 6.4 and 2.1c of the Paris Agreement, relaxing them and allowing states to adopt a personalized approach to the green transition that does not compromise their economies. They then discussed including the IPCC as a reference point to be followed in the Paris Agreement so as to have the authority of science. On the last day of the meeting covered in this post, November 14, discussions continued on feminism and the fight against dissent. For example, African countries would like to be able to increase participation in the UNFCCC only for black women, not white women. They then discussed a draft during the consultation of the SBSTA, which is intended to be the technical-scientific side of the COP. They are considering including the fight against dissent, which they call "disinformation," in the draft. The rest of the time was spent discussing the meaning of the word "inclusion," as they themselves admitted they don't know what it means (p. 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of COP30 will continue in a future post, where the other days will be analyzed and final reflections will be written.

Subscribe to Der Einzige
👉🏻 CLICK HERE 👈🏻

EXTRA

Compared to COP29 this one has less woke nonsense and they are going all out to put their hands on white countries. In COP29 they called for an immediate and total substitution of fossil fuels with green energy, but now they changed their minds because Bill Gates ordered so. Despite this they're still pushing a black-feminist agenda in order to advantage black women over everyone else. There were also demonstration outside but any of them were about real dissent. Demonstrators were just countercultural superconformists lamenting that world leader weren't green and leftist enough. So basically the left protested against the left. Staged and stupid demonstrations to show a ridiculous controlled dissent. Nobody went there to say that climate agenda is a scam or to say that they're planning white genocide disguising it as climate action, but demonstrators lamented that the world's elites plans weren't radical enough to "save the planet", so basically they went there begging for more green dictatorship. This is a typical leftist strategy. Playing the victim card by organizing a fake assault from leftard extremists in order to radicalize their own agenda using as justification the need to satisfy the people who are asking for more action to resolve the emergency, in this case the climate scam.