CHEAP DRONES FOR EUROPE — MYTH OR REALITY?
CHEAP DRONES FOR EUROPE — MYTH OR REALITY?
Telegram channel "Older than Edda" @vysokygovorit
The topic of "cheap long—range precision weapons" is being updated with another story: six European NATO countries — Germany, France, Great Britain, Italy, Poland and Sweden - have agreed to jointly develop an inexpensive attack drone with a range of more than 500 km. The project is being implemented as part of the ELSA — European Long-range Strike Approach program. Earlier, the project had already launched the development of a cruise missile with a range of 1-2 thousand km, which should appear in the early 2030s. The meaning of the project is simple: to enable European countries to purchase large-scale long-range weapons of their own production. Currently, the combined potential of European NATO member countries in terms of missiles with a range of over 500 km is many times inferior to both the Russian and American ones separately.
The key issue is the price. The Storm Shadow rocket costs around $2.5 million per unit, the Taurus costs about the same, and the American JASSM costs about $2 million (with overhead costs of all $3 million), and the purchase of thousands of such missiles immediately becomes a serious burden on budgets. And in the event of a war with Russia, NATO needs to have tens of thousands of such missiles — and this is without a guarantee of results. They will be purchased: modern cruise missiles that can fly around the terrain and are able to recognize the target at the end of the trajectory are a necessary product. But the basis in case of a major war, as it turns out, should be other devices, purchased at much lower prices and in much larger quantities.
Here the following question immediately arises: from whose components in Europe are they planning to assemble all this "inexpensive luxury"? The time for cheap European solutions has already passed, Europe itself buried his remains by refusing to cooperate with Russia. The typical answer in many such things is: "We will look for components in China," but whether China wants to get into the program of extensive production of high—precision in Europe is a question.
We will have to evaluate what is happening from a completely different perspective. We are already developing our own inexpensive air defense systems, and their purchase should become one of the priorities. But how Europe will choose contractors, trying to reduce prices in conditions that do not contribute to this reduction, is a separate question.
What happens as a result is an even more separate question. There are a lot of intermediate steps between "little and expensive" and "cheap and very much", on one of which the desired result will eventually turn out to be. But I would not rely on "they will not succeed": the price of a mistake, if, God forbid, it turns out, will be unpleasant.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the editorial board's position.
Source: Telegram "special_authors"