CC: Ceuta & the Israeli Connection - David M. Zsutty

August 6, 2026 | 1 comment

Ceuta & the Israeli Connection

David M. Zsutty

The Strait of Gibraltar as seen from Ceuta. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

1,893 words

Why are Jews celebrating Morocco’s migrant invasion of Spain’s strategic holdings in North Africa, Ceuta and Melilla?

Let’s begin by listing the public statements by conservative Jews. The most salient example is the son of Benjamin Netanyahu, Yair Netanyahu. On May 25, 2019, during Bibi’s second term as Prime Minister of Israel, Yair posted:

Yair then posted several follow up comments, which devolved into complaining about the anti-semitism he had caused:

The important part is when Yair does an OPSEC blunder while taunting the goyim:

Let’s make a deal, we won’t fund NGOs in your country calling you to give away Ceuta and Melilla, and you will *stop* funding NGOs in our country that calls us to give away Judea and Samaria

Thus, we have the son of the Israeli PM openly admitting that Israel is funding multiple NGOs calling for Spain to give away its strategic holdings to Muslims. On August 1, after the Ceuta crisis had drawn attention to his previous statements, Yair tried to walk back what he had said with a wall of text saying he was merely highlighting a perceived double standard amidst crying about anti-semitism and blood libel. However, he failed to address the issue of Israel financing NGOs.

Jews allying with Muslims against Europe isn’t limited to opening the Gates of Toledo in 711. Israel has close relations with Jordan, and the gulf sheikdoms were essentially client states of Israel and its golem the US, although that may be changing soon. And despite domestic opposition, the Moroccan government is friendly with Israel. For example, in 2020 Morocco established formal diplomatic relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords, and in return, the United States recognized Morocco’s sovereignty over Western Sahara which it had disputed with the Algerian backed Polisario Front. Israel would latter recognize Morocco’s desert claims in 2023. And according to Grok, Israeli-Moroccan relations are continuing to improve:

Military and defense cooperation is one of the strongest pillars. This includes major arms deals (e.g., Israeli Barak MX air-defense systems, drones, and other systems), joint military planning, technology transfer, and local production (such as Israeli drone manufacturing facilities in Morocco). A joint military committee meets regularly; a new work plan was agreed in early 2026. Morocco is viewed by Israeli officials as a key security partner in North Africa.

Economic ties: Bilateral trade has grown (reaching hundreds of millions of USD annually in recent years). Cooperation spans agriculture, technology, cybersecurity, and other sectors.

Yair is the most important example, but far from alone. Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the US, also commented:

And Yoav Kaufman, who is the Vice President of Negev Direct Marketing, which describes itself on X as “Direct Mail & Email Fundraising for Jewish Non-Profits Since 1991,” posted:

Some have argued that Danon, Kaufman, and other Jews are simply highlighting a double standard (it should be noted that Spain isn’t massacring thousands of civilians and has held the disputed territories for centuries). But this argument is weakened by Yair’s admission that Israel is funding NGOs to stir up trouble. And it is fatally undermined by Michael Rubin’s article for the American Enterprise Institute think tank in March, 2026 titled “Morocco Should Send a New Green March into Ceuta and Melilla.” (You can find more information on green marches on Morris van de Camp’s 2019 article which was republished due to current events.) But it wasn’t enough for Rubin to write in March that:

Moroccans should gather, send bulldozers to the border, and then enter Ceuta and Melilla unarmed to raise the flag. Sánchez and the Spanish press bleat, but they have no grounds to act. Nor, for that matter, would NATO, even if Moroccan forces entered the towns to restore order and organize the dispatch of settlers across the Strait of Gibraltar and back to Spain.

As the crisis was unfolding on July 30, Michael Rubin posted on X:

If Spain would return occupied Ceuta and Melilla to their rightful Moroccan sovereignty, Madrid would not be in this mess.

Rubin’s post received a community note stating:

Ceuta and Melilla are autonomous cities of Spain under continuous Spanish sovereignty since 1497 and 1668 respectively, and are not listed as non-self-governing territories by the UN despite Morocco’s claims.

Which is a lot older than Israel’s founding as a meme state in 1948. And it should also be noted that the American Enterprise Institute for the 2025 fiscal year had a $75 million annual budget, has net assets over $365 million, and was founded in 1938. It’s not an upstart with a shoestring budget like my beloved Homeland Institute. It has serious policy-making power.

Rubin is also a Director of Policy Analysis for the Middle East Forum and a Distinguished Fellow at the Usanas Foundation (an Indian non-profit, in yet another example of increasing Jewish-Indian cooperation). So he isn’t a random guy throwing wacky ideas around either.

But it isn’t just Jews and Israel siding with Morocco against Spain. The GOP, which has come to encompass MAGA, is also involved. Congressman Thomas Massie posted that:

2 weeks before migrants from Morocco invaded Ceuta, the GOP passed a bill with $40 million for Morocco and a committee report advising: Spanish-administered cities of Ceuta and Melilla are located in Moroccan territory and remain the subject of Morocco’s longstanding claim.

Zionists attempted to downplay this by saying the language was merely from a committee report rather than an official law. But drawing upon Grok, Massie retorted:

GOP Congress voted to give Morocco $40 mil and lent credibility to their claim to Ceuta. “the committee report (and final explanatory statement) tells agencies, and signals to everyone else, how Congress really wants the money spent and the programs run.”

US-Moroccan relations are also quite good, even though Morocco is classified as an anocracy, which is a regime between autocracy and democracy, and a “closed” rather than “open” anocracy at that. While technically a constitutional monarchy, the King of Morocco, King Mohammed VI, wields substantial power. This shows that ZOG is perfectly happy to allow countries to opt out of the dysfunction of liberal democracy for respectable forms of government provided that they link up with international finance and kiss the Kevetching Wall. “Dictatorships” are governments that Jews don’t like, just as “hate speech” is speech that Jews don’t like.

So why does Israel and its rabid pitbull, the US, back Morocco against Spain in general and particularly in a conflict over tiny pieces of land?

Part of it is longstanding resentment against Spain for how los Reyes Católicos kicked the Jews and Muslims alike out of Spain or demanded that they convert and then set the Inquisition to watch them, thereby ushering in an actual golden age (unlike the fake golden age that Trump is constantly proclaiming). Another reason is that Franco halted democracy, freemasonry, and capitalism from sliding into Bolshevism, all of which are ideologies of Jewish subversion.

Part of it is also history. Morocco in 1777, rather than France in 1778, was the first country to recognize America’s independence. The Spanish-American War is another factor. But these are minor factors.

The most important reason, however, is that Spain’s Leftist, open borders government didn’t get the memo that “human rights” was merely a tool for Jewish subversion in which nonwhites and losers, and especially Jews, have special rights and privileges that allow them undermine civilization.

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and his socialist government actually drank the magic Kool-Aid and for all their many faults, sincerely believe in human rights. Thus, they have applied the post-Nuremberg worldview in an even-handed, objective manner. They have gone beyond merely denouncing Israel’s genocide in Gaza with words to concrete action, such as providing aid to Gaza, banning ships carrying fuel for Israel’s military from docking in their ports, and enacting an arms embargo in October, 2023.

But the one act which probably drew the most ire was Spain denying the US and UK the use of its bases and airspace for the 2026 Iran War, including supporting roles such as tankers refueling other aircraft. This went beyond France, Austria, and Italy imposing more limited restrictions. Together, they have created a chain of denied or quasi-denied airspace to other NATO members.

Which flows into Ceuta being more than just a resort town or historical oddity. It is vital to Spain’s control of the Strait of Gibraltar and hosts 2,500-3,000 troops in a decentralized network of military installations which provide total maritime, radar, visual, and electronic surveillance of the Strait when combined with Spain’s mainland installations.

Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz appears permanent and unbreakable. And in July, the Houthis imposed a blockade on Saudi shipping through the Red Sea (Saudi Arabia is generally aligned with Israel and was planning on partially bypassing the Hormuz blockade by using the Red Sea). Thus, it is likely that Israel and their lapdogs would like to seize control of the Strait of Gibraltar partly out of neurotic spite but also for calculated geopolitical interests. If Spain were to restrict traffic to and from Israel through the Strait of Gibraltar, it would greatly reduce Israel’s maritime traffic. Combined with Turkey’s control of the Bosphorus and declining Israeli-Turkish relations, there is a non-negligible chance that Israel could become essentially landlocked.

This does not mean that the Spanish government is a hapless victim here. As Leftists, they foolishly think that migration is like a faucet that they can turn on and off, rather than a raging river and bioweapon which Russia and Belarus, and now Israel and Morocco, can use against their enemies. Welcoming legal migrants sets the stage for illegal migration because it is surprisingly easy for migrants to get their foot in the door of the legal system through fraudulent asylum claims under the “human rights” paradigm, and because it signals weakness which naturally invites aggression.

Donald Trump and Elon Musk both accurately denounced the migrant invasion of Ceuta and Melilla as being an invasion. Elon said “Spain’s entire budget will be destroyed by illegal migrants” and “Europe is committing suicide,” while Trump said “That same thing’s going to happen to us if the Republicans don’t get elected, except worse, much bigger, much easier to get into.”

But Trump and Elon denouncing Spain’s open borders government is hypocritical when it is only half of the problem, and they are firmly snuggled up with the other half, Israel and Morocco. If they were serious about ending the migrant invasion of a fellow NATO member, they would ask Netanyahu to cease funding the Israeli NGOs which push for migration into Europe and pressure, and if necessary punish, Morocco.

But Trump and Elon won’t because while they may care, or more likely appear to care about the Great Replacement, Jewish interests take priority over all other matters.

This also puts MAGA’s tensions with NATO into perspective. I predict that if America leaves NATO, the true reason will eventually be revealed as making American and/or Israeli aggression against Spain and or Turkey, both of which are in NATO, less messy.

Israel is an enemy of Amalek, which includes Europe. Thus, it is impossible for America to be a friend of Europe when it is not just a friend, but a slave of Israel. There will always be a latent conflict of interest lurking in the background, and every single time it surfaces, Israel will win out over Europe.