Buying snow Sannes

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buying snow Sannes

Email or phone Password Forgot account? Create new account. It looks like you were misusing this feature by going too fast. Forgot account?

Norse Skis The Freeride: A Roof Rack Review (Haha get it?)

Buying snow Sannes

Thanks in advance, Tim Sannes tjs Tim, I bought the X8 last year and skiied it all season long. A really good all round ski that you can take into the bumps, steeps, cruisers, and hardpack. Very quick turning, too. Although some have criticized it for not being stable in fast long ie, GS turns, I haven't had that problem I'm 5'10 lbs. It's a very, very light ski, so the only drawback is that it won't track very well in crud. F Carl. Said that the X8 are almost identical to the assault V8, only exception being that the V8's are more flexible, and so better for the bumps and such, but otherwise weight, etc are the same. The MSL is all of this and more. It is stable in GS turns and it has a wood core. I might be wrong but I believe the dynastar has a foam core. The MSL. Skied that first in a , loved it. Short snappy turns, long ripping get whistled at by the patrol turns, whatever. I'd buy it in a or , or , whatever. Fun ski. Because we carry both skis, I felt the need to ski it in a to compare - the skied just as well, barley noticed the 4cm difference - not quite as stable at speed, but it was getting skied off by then. K2 was keeping on top of their bases. I liked it almost as much as the GS Race, one of my personal favorites, but it is more versatile, I think. About me - I am pounds, a GS skier by nature, advanced, I suppose, and I represent both brands at work. THese are my honest opinons. I feel bad saying the X8 was so lousy, but it was. Talking with other people who skied the Dynastars said the same - it is not just me. The Dynastar G9 is a fun ski - skied it with a good, almost to good, a bit hooky tune once - whee! I do not hate Dynastar. Just wanted to put my 2c in for anyone considering either of these skis. Also skied the K2 Four. Cant see the light blink, bummed me out! Interesting ski, though. I'd be happy to discuss in depth any of the above. Thanks, Mannix. I am 5'8, and am an advanced skiier looking for a good all mountain ski. Not too concerned with moguls, more so with powder. Recommendations concerning the above skis and my needs? Yes, I am larger than average, but as I said before, I can normally ski something like the X8 and understand it's purpose. Like the X8, the Rct is designed for an advanced skier looking for performance everywhere. To be honest, I prefer Dynastars over Elans - largley due to my size, as their Monoblock construction allows them to make a super soft ski longitudinally while stiff torsionally. This is great, but for me, I find myself pushing into the ski and feeling that there is nothing there. A good friend of mine skis the R3c and loves it - I like it when I am more subtle with my inputs and do not overturn it, same as the Rct. So, while my pounds is a contributing factor to my likes in skis, I do not think it is the reason I did not like the X8. I know the X8 can hold a good edge. Mine did not, and as soon as we mount our demos, I'm going to tune a pair myself and re-evaluate the ski for all of the Dynastar owners in disbelief that someone does not like their ski. Then I'll tell you what I think! Also, I skied the SCX from Elan - I have to be quick, more later, but it skis like an Elan - don't overpower it, but it is similar to the K2 4 - easy short turns, suprisingly stable in longer turns. Only problem I had with it was it's tendency to sink underfoot in softish snow. I was skiing Vail which is not too shabby right now!!!! Aside from that, it is fun! Take care, Mannix. Historical content remains viewable. Tim Sannes. Copy link. Report message. Show original message. Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message. Has anyone had a chance to ski either or both of these ski's, and what is your opinion of both. I can get the X8 for Seth Masia. I've skied 'em both. The X8 is lighter, quicker, feels more like a slalom ski. MSL is agile but feels more solid and stable underfoot, is more stable at higher speeds. I'd pick the X8 for short, quick turns, the MSL for cruising. X8 if you swivel your turns, MSL if you carve. Tim Sannes tjs Brian MacGillivray. The actual fact is that neither of these are good products because they are skies. I skied both yesterday, actually. Snow conditions ranged from packed to Colorado ice firm snow , and my vote goes unquestionably to the MSL. I tried the X8 in a , found it to be deadish, squirrley, and unable to hold a good solid edge. On soft pushpiles, it was ok, but I never found a turn it really liked - not short, not medium, definetly not long. Medium was the best, but not inspiring. I personally like a GS ski, but I can ski most skis and say 'I dont like it, but I can see why someone would. I blame a large portion of the ski's poor performance on the tune - it felt base high - but even with that in mind, it would not do anything on soft snow. For me. Ok, but it still felt base high. Ok, I guess your ski blows. Camden Kneeland. I love the X I have found none of what you say to be true. Everyone I have talked to loves the X-8 as well. I skied the 's and thought they were great short turn all terrain skis. I found everything the reviews said to be true. Best all terrain ski of I suspect you found them so dead because of the lbs. Barrett Nicholas. I've been lurking on this thread for a while, and would like to thank all parties for the depth of details and rational they've used to defend their likes and dislikes. I've not only learned a lot about the particular skiis in quaetion, but also ways to evaluate any skiis performance and to put it into words. A DeRocco. The MSL is an all glass braided core ski, with the K2's integrated suspension systembasically 2 braided cores separated by a viscoelastic layer that helps damp out unwanted vibrations. The upper core or isolator core is 33' long and separtes the binding interface from the main structure of the ski. This ski has 2 layers of. It shares the same The MSL is better off piste and as an all mountain ski. The GS Race is better at speed and is more stable on the hard pack. The k2 4 is our all new all mountain exper ski with a radical 14mm sidecut depth and 65mm waist width compared to The extra width under foot really makes this ski totally versatile in all snow conditions. These few mm's make a ton of difference in crud and powder and help the ski float. The shovel width on the 4's is 99mm vs 90 on the Lastly the The last thing is the piezoceramic module to control vibrations. I could right a ton of jargon on this but its probably better to just get to the next demo and get on these animals berfore they are all gone. The k2 4 you skied is an earlier graphic version where we did not have the clear window above the light. On the models that are currently shipping you can see the light easily in dead sunlight. Hopefully you will get some in your store soon. Anthony from K2. Well, I skied on the X8 about 20 years ago. Skis have come a long way since then. If you can, hold out for a few more years and get some x-screams when they come out The Real Bev. Scott Abraham. I like the Dynastar Max 6 that replaced them. My skiing hasn't improved since then, why should my skis? Eviel Dewar.

Buying snow Sannes