Buying coke online in Risoul

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buying coke online in Risoul

Select the date range below to see all articles that appeared in the news that week. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription. Update payment details. We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate. Accessibility Links Skip to content. Login Subscribe. Log in Subscribe. Select a year. Who will be right? Why not? But how will they fare this year? Who are you kidding? Drunk mother reported by husband loses licence Danes sink new ferry routes Did Britons sit in sauna at wooden Stonehenge? Start weightlifting Keep you and your finances fighting fit Kinsellas fly the flags for Ireland and Great Britain Kim Jong-un hides icy edge behind Olympic thaw. M Michael Hamlyn Mind your step! Hard-left rivals are banned from using same pub Shop! W Wilfried Zaha avoids diving ban after penalty incident against Manchester City Why should the diaspora keep their votes? X Xi tightens grip by taking charge of paramilitary police.

Velon Means Business

Buying coke online in Risoul

Whether it now goes from a start-up to an established business will be the more interesting story to follow. What have we got? Each team has a director on the board of the company too. Teams say the current sponsorship model does not work. Cycling has a problem with its sponsorship model as teams come and go, dependent on being able to find a large sponsor. A worry for fans, a survival matter for team managers. More stable finances are the goal but securing this is not easy. Teams do not set aside money for a rainy day, pretty much all their annual income is spent on rider recruitment. One initial plan is to use the holding company to sell on-bike camera footage as a start. Some of this has been given away for free as part of the InCycle media project backed by the Project Avignon teams and IMG, a Swiss sports marketing company. Now the aim will be to make this commercially viable and lucrative. If images are being filmed from bikes then data telemetry is possible too and so on. How valuable this is remains to be seen. What does this mean? Well in reductive terms a season-long contest to determine the best rider of the year: imagine a version of the World Tour rankings you cared about. Interestingly it was not part of the UCI, merely a private prize offered by a drinks company and was so valuable that riders — on low salaries in those days — would adjust their tactics accordingly, especially as the season went on. If Velon created its own rankings it could earn money from them, for example imagine an end of season awards ceremony with all the trappings of celebrity shows with riders turning up in tuxedos on the red carpet, speeches, entertainment and more, all packaged for TV. These things can be big ratings draws. The language from teams has changed from slicing up the existing cake to growing the pie. More money, more problems Currently any increase in a team budget tends to flow in… and straight back out. So the Velon teams are likely to want a salary cap, something the UCI has been exploring. But this surely has to be a UCI initiative, Velon can lobby but imagine the case of a top rider who can chose between a Velon team with a salary cap and another outside the group that pays more. ASO A lot of races lose a lot of money but the Tour de France is the one event that makes beaucoup profit. Requests for revenue sharing in the past have been met with a firm non. The tension has continued, you might remember Oleg Tinkov talking about boycotting the Tour de France. Like many things he was being provocative rather than thinking aloud and since qualified his words. If non-French teams can attain this security via other means they too might enjoy stable sponsorship? How much would you pay to watch on-bike cameras? But there are risks along the way too. Project Avignon was a big deal without much publicity. Whether this continues will depend on the 11 member teams and the new CEO. If Velon has been launched this week the issues discussed at the time when Project Avignon broke cover. For more reading see these pieces from January:. Back to F1…the F1 championship is a sport as much as it is a competition in its own right. The guys that do it only compete in those cars in those GPs, there are no non-F1 or non-championship races that fill the rest of the season. Is the plan to use existing races or create new ones? As far as the cyclists are concerned, is putting so much emphasis on a season-long competition such a good thing? I thought we were supposed to be moving into a more credible age where the quality of the racing took precedence over the unbelievable performances? And can a season long story even make sense. Unlike Formula 1 and in fact almost every other sport cycling, to simplify, has a very odd calendar with flat races in the later winter and spring before mountain races in summer. So different riders have different times to shine. This diversity makes comparisons and picking the best rider a subjective test when few would disputed who wins the F1 title or tops a football league. The difficulty in making comparisons is the reason we have different shirts for different specialisms surely, so a similar approach could be taken. Just a thought — but basically pointing out that there are alternative routes that could be explored and avenues for Velon to go down. If they cannot take over a sport they will either set up their own version and chuck money and advertising at it or they will make various federations offers they cannot refuse by chucking a load of money and advertising at them. Where is this money? I have to wonder if the media rights holder of the race, and even the UCI when they do not own the rights, will forbid the sale of the on-camera rights or anything else they dare try. I think there are many opportunities outside the racing itself that are ripe for the taking where the UCI has no control. Imagine broadcasting a weekly highlights show straight to youtube. No need for the UCI. My understanding is the Sky rides are very popular. Imagine what would happen if a few WT riders showed up on an organized non-competitive ride and actually hung around. From a couple of years ago. Jompy — Sky highjacked the Premier League as a vehicle to get their satelite dishes stuck onto millions of homes, and despite the cost it worked. They are not about to pump untold millions into cycling for the couple of hundred thousand fans who might tune in. Comparisons to football, F1 etc are a bit tenuous as these sports are in a completely different financial league. Sky and BT have fought a fairly bitter battle over the rights to rugby coverage and the average viewing figure is less than K. I can see Velon pushing to get cycling much better exposure on free to air. The sponsors will love that and the viewing figures will increase significantly. Yes, the image rights issue had to be settled and its why teams have grouped together. But ASO and others could insist on a monopoly for video content. Ideally cooperation is needed, as broadcast image of an attack or crash from a moto and helicopter could be enhanced by bike cam footage. A UCI decree? They have the roads privatized for them each day and they can include just about anything they like in the Sporting Stakes document and the teams will have to agree to it and sign, surely? Why would ASO allow their broadcast rights to be undermined? And then telling them ASO have exclusive rights to the footage. No likey? Wanna boycott? See crowd attendances for Wimbledon, Noone wants to see a TdF with 11 of the usual WT teams absent. The idea of mandating that bike mfgs provide spaces for proprietary? Unrelated, but IMO, this issue of salability is what drives the hour record bike guidelines. TL;DR Bike guidelines are formulated around what the mfgs can sell to the public, so there will be forceful pushback of any proprietary modifications that may affect sales. Not mention that the shame may help prevent a recurrence of bad past behavior by the riders! Not sure all on this blog know what a dunk tank is? Its an colloquial US practice as a celebrity for profit events. That would be novel. I suggested an awards ceremony above but like all ideas making it would is another issue. This kind of out-of-nowhere comment is part of the reason cycling blogs keep winding up with the protracted conversations about doping you were so concerned about in the last inrng post! From the various statements the involved teams made it seems the only real problem they have with the current situation is that they are not the ones with the most power. It is all very tiring. I doubt Velon Felon, Melon…what is it again? How boring is that moniker? A significant proportion of the ethnic population of the UK are not Anglo-Saxons but they speak English. I believe those folks are behind this movement vs the more traditional cycling countries. The most important thing to do is stabilise the world tour teams. Surely if the team is permanent there is more chance of fan clubs as well. I would like to see the size of a TdF team reduced to 7 riders and the overall size of the peloton increased to 30 teams. Or more. Can you imagine 32 teams? That would give pretty much every serious team in the world a chance on the big stage. Let them sort it out from there, on the road. This would encourage strong Pro-Continental teams who have just enough funding to do it right, yet no interest in doing Australia, Qatar, Beijing etc; basically all the races I have no interest in watching. Teams that can build around a solid young GC hopeful and improve year-on-year. And give up the jersey space ASO so teams can sell sleeves and side packages with certainty and not be penalized for doing well Sagan — Sojasun. Though, controlled by the UCI using a secret process with only a few, consistent, participants that are mostly billionaire hobbyists. So, while different than a guaranteed spot, not necessarily better. The UCI churns through other WT corporate sponsors that do not traditionally support the sport due to fundamental governance problems and other problems with the structure of the sport. Value of TV rights should increase and also the value of sponsorship, i. The current calender can remain basically the same, with some minor tweaks that you list above, and it would be fine. Happy to wait and see if it comes off. Unless Velon can generate large additional revenue streams, it will remain an irrelevant talking shop. It is somewhat difficult to see how or where these additional streams might be generated. It is a shame that serious efforts are not being directed at correcting many of the sports existing shortcomings. These well known shortcomings are surely the greatest barrier to financial investment going forward. The evidence so far does not indicate a revolutionary change. The organization has been kicking around for eighteen months under a different guise, and there has been little to show in the public domain. Cameras on bikes are to be welcomed, but they will not generate the sort of income that is required to make a significant difference. To make any significant progress Velon will need to generate sufficient revenue, in the tens of millions pick your currency , for its voice to be heard at the top tables. If you are referring to the sports on going doping problem. I remain unconvinced that there have been any serious advances in this area, other than the BP. Some of the Velon members teams are still recruiting staff with a dubious past. The last comment may generate howls of protest from some, but until these people are out of the sport there can be no significant progress in terms of financial support. Companies will simply see the sport as untrustworthy. So to answer your question. The evidence required is large, sustainable revenue generation and an unambiguous stance on doping. Without meeting these twin requirements the group will just be more hot air. Pragmatism is the best M. I am only reflecting on known company details. These do not at this point in time include significant revenue generation I have plans for my own revenue generation, but they are plans and it also appears to be standing aside on the doping question — leaving it to the relevent authorities. Sorry, but I repeat my original two points. That without significant financial clout to give it a power base, and a robust attitude to the continuing doping problem, the company is just more hot air. What do you want done about someone like Andy Rhis who has owned teams in the past from which riders have been done? Sam: Final attempt and comment. I chose my words carefully! Those currently involved with WT teams know exactly too whom I refer — if many outside the inner circle are aware, then so are they. The culture and circle has to be broken, and be shown to be broken, at some point in time if the sport is to have any real chance of attracting meaningful investment. The refusal to do so by some teams tells us more about current attitudes within the WT, than any number of words. A strong view? Yes, maybe but I was one of the many innocent victims of the doping era, being cheated, hammered and having dreams stolen all over Europe by the glazed eyed bastards. It is not always just about the money. A purely personal observation. I would like to see team owners and those around them excluded — again their names are well known. This might be a little more difficult to implement. Money always talks. One final point. I am NOT against Velon in principal. I simply question its real purpose, and its ability to generate the revenue required to make whatever difference to the sport they might have in mind. In : current names! As far as I understand everybody is welcomed in theory, not just WT-Teams. Come on, when I launch a new project I make sure I have my ideas, visions, plans in order, so I can use the media attention of the launch to get as many people as possible behind my project. My fear is they want real power and they want to create whole new races — their own races, run by Velon and marketed and filmed by Velon. Same here. ASO has all the money, and for better or worse, all the power. Most of the folks involved in the thing seem to be the very same short-sighted folks who helped pro cycling get into its current mess. The French teams follow the lead of the ASO. As a media co. Movistar says they need more time to consider these details. FDJ also stated potential conflicts with their state lottery sponsoship for not signing on yet. What are the figures in different countries? However, in Italy the Giro and the Tour are broadcasted on public tv for free, and they usually have good audience results. The worst stage was the first, with a million viewers, from then on we had 1. Etienne at the start of the 2nd week. Obviously, the 3rd week was especially brilliant. We can look at the Giro for a comparison. Neither the Giro ever scored less than 1m spectators. Until the first w-e it averaged 1. Football was the driver that took them from 0 to 7. Cycling would just be a minor add-on to their established stable. Comparisons to football, F1, NFL etc models have little value in my mind. Audiences in Italy are huge because the Giro is on TV live for hours every day, plus remember we add on Il Processo as well as the evening highlights, TV news bulletins and more. The race, at least a 20 second clip but also the live, will reach millions. But in the US the audience for the Tour de France averages ,, for the Giro it must be a lot less. Same for Britain, the Tour audience is small and the Giro will be even smaller. About 2m people are watching the race live each day. UK viewership peaked at 3. ITV4 averaged , for the highlights show that year. Similar numbers on average in and No idea about the Giro, which is on Eurosport. Free to air is the answer. You guys, from my perspective are hitting close to the mark. We and I speak as a US cycling fan, most of the time can not get any meaningful coverage of any other then a few races. Say a Netflix model 24 hours after a stage of Paris-Nice finishes individuals in underserved countries Canada, US, Mexico, etc can through subscription view 24 hours after the stage or single day race is completed. In HD full screen. ASO will make some money, more individuals would see and be excited in emerging markets, cycling would be better off. The current model of broadcasting would not be interrupted. Europe would use the conventional model of TV stations and local broadcasters. The only loser might be the Russian women needing to talk to someone for money, on the pirate feeds of steephill. TV viewing figures have to be distorted! I for one dont have TV, i watch all content by choice via online play again services, are these channels counted towards viewing figures? Do viewing figures tell the ultimate story behind a sports popularity? At least, as long as Italy is concerned. Not a reason to undervalue the web, though, since the general trend goes that way. I wonder why RCS, who produced a quite succesful Giro live streaming for the Gazzetta website, decided to quit. Want more money in the sport? A good start would be to make the sport as clean as possible and then convince everyone that it is clean. Easier said than done of course! Yes and each time a few corporates get close to signing a new scandal comes along to send them away. The Tour de France is bigger than cycling and that in itself is a good thing. So cycling once made the Tour and the Tour once sustained cycling. They need each other and to me that is fine. Every sponsor backing the Tour is good for cycling. I keep seeing on this site that a lot of races are gasping for money. Would it be worth it for someone to start an initiative to get sponsors for races, not teams? Are sponsors holding back because of a perceived lack of television coverage? Big corporations love whatever they can buy and control with money even if barely legal… or not legal at all , and a doping-driven sporting system is much more similar to their usual environment. A doping-free cycling would see a little but significant share of power returning to the riders, in contractual terms between other things. Whoever ignored the role played by sponsors in the doping system directly or not would be really naif. There are enough unethical corporations around the world that would have an interest in most types of publicity…. Velon itself looks like a vehicle for team owners to defend and improve their position. Whenever this gets talked about there seems to been a common belief that more money and professionalization will be a great help to the sport. Like INRNG also claims in the article, the first and foremost result of pumping money into the sport will very likely be wage inflation. Should the discussion here not be more about what will happen if and when more money gets injected into the sport than how to do it? It is not all about viewers of the races themselves. I would have thought that exposure on the main channels in news broadcasts and guest appearances by the cyclists on other shows is what raises the profile. People can know of cyclists and talk about cycling without actually watching the races which with the time commitment required may always remain minority. Wiggins in the UK, for example, is known by far more people than will ever have seen him on a bike. When we are speaking of millions, it means that the demand gives you enough space to choose between different pricing options and pick the best one for you. The problem is that this kind of process would be awful for the sport for all its components and would quickly end in self-destruction of the broadcasting model itself. The real sponsorship income in Europe comes from races being background TV in the afternoon, the casual viewer often exemplified by the housewife. As for the US, one will have to explore different approaches, as the market is fundamentally different and most big races are on at awkward hours. A netflix subscription solution to get at least the ones who do care seems pretty good, no? Maybe in France. Very few of those will be housewives, since the category enjoys a specialized offer during that time slot, broadcast by the main channels. Good points gabriele! Made sense for Salvarani and SCIC to sponsor teams, so when Signora decided it was time for a new kitchen they might get the biz. With the specialized channels it would seem only the hard-core enthusiasts watch in any country. This would seem to make any sponsor trying to sell mainstream stuff look elsewhere, specifically at events popular enough to be broadcast on major, over-the-air TV channels. Cycling might find itself back in the pre-Nivea days if the viewers are just small numbers in comparison to mainstream TV of serious cycling fans. The bike industry may again have to bankroll the entire thing. Can you imagine how irate guys like Mr. Specialized would be about that? Unless of course it was brand-S bicycles that were used, and he could advertise the fact! The point being that cycling works well as background TV, and a lot of people use it that way. You certainly see the difference in target audience during the commercial breaks. The only other cyclists they know of is Pantani, Cipollini and Armstrong. Nor I want to enter now in a debate — which may ultimately be quite interesting — about what kind of audience you may prefer as a sponsor, or as a broadcaster, or as a fan of the sport and so on. Giro: min. Tour: min k, max 1. Just give a look to the images of the last stages of the Giro and the podia during … … … … Tv audience moves accordingly, both in absolute terms and in channels distribution. And the nature of commercial breaks partly confirms that even if a lately change can be seen there, too. Working in finance, these aspects of the sport intrigue me greatly and being in love with the sport I hope you are right about it changing for the better. I think people that are very passionate about something tends to overestimate its value, and looking at the Velon initiative it seems that this is exactly that. Bunch of guys who loves cycling and overestimates its value. The only markets where you can make a killing is the ones that are not already established. Sky basically created its own demand, and I think they got away with a lot more then they paid for. I would think this model can easily be emulated in different countries. But as a fan of the sport I love this unprofessionalism. I love the diversity of teams and how quickly things change. The Telegraph Cycling Podcast had a really nice case about it this weekend. But harder in practice than theory. Cap both and riders will take money in sponsorship and endorsements… maybe even a briefcase of cash as a welcome gift to a team. Maybe use the 12 months from August to July as the time frame to aggregate points. This way the teams are giving the ASO something heightened importance while asking for a cut of the broadcasting fees. Alternatively maybe Tinkov could lend some money for Velon to buy some of the struggling races in which Velon could experiment with. To give more power to the Tour risks subverting other races as mere qualifiers. And it adds some import to the last race leading up to it. That the tradition and essence of every event in every region demanding specific styles and characters to win them perennially flavors a richly diverse tapestry of this gorgeous sport. To even think of homogenizing a cycling season a la F1 or any other horribly canned and marketed professional sport makes my skin crawl and wreaks of a cadre of execs out to capitalize on a targeted perceived undervalued commodity with zero regard for whether it works or not. Better screen graphics and metrics — ok. There have been occasions, the Olympic road race is the best example, where some information was lacking making it challenging. But why would that make Velon necessary or why does UCI simply the governing body get involved. How much return they get on advertising. Cycling popularity is wonderfully grown organically. Grass roots. For better and worse, it swells and condenses with the characters and story lines. That there is a team element shocks them, the tactics intrigue them and the courses and scenery and crowds broaden their whole world. I get it. With better organisation of the sport, there should be more money to go around and, hopefully, fewer scandals. TV coverage should improve and those of us who watch football as well I might be the only one know that it can still improve in cycling. It wont happen without money! The way cycling is broadcast would be optimal if racing was not as poor as it is nowadays the problem is what is happening, or not happening, on the road, not the way it is conveyed to the viewers. Apart from that, it should cost a lot less to run a team teams should be smaller , so away with the WorldTour and the existing salary levels. From watching races for a good number of years, I think we do have the tendency to view past racing through rose-tinted glasses. Memories work like that to retain the ones that really stand out as massively exciting or with events that really linger for good or bad — and filter out the majority of races which really had little to commend them. In fact, I got into cycling this year, for the very reasons you described. An important question and one which we may never know the answer to is what is the current funding model for Velon? No organization can operate without capital. Such a venture is going to require significant resources to get started; this means people and money. Learning about the membership rules, shares distribution, current contributions along with future requirements , and what outside parties are involved might help us learn where this is really going. Presumably they are all contributing something but it should be substantial money in order to fund the staff, whether the CEO but the additional costs like expenses, legal advice and more. Is it a company? Or just an agreement by the 11 teams to work together, without a corporate structure? It could be a more fluid arrangement at present, with any additional costs covered by the participating teams. Good comments from Christopher ATX. Regarding the on-the-bike cameras, what about the image rights of the riders, who are featured in these vids with once again no extra remuneration. Yes the teams usually own the image rights of the riders, but for this additional use? Finally, I see the Velon thing as a just big money grab; Bartlett will try to jack the prices up by selling add-ons, but luckily, I believe ASO will never cooperate with revenue sharing as there simply is not enough to go around. I read that Velon wants some end of season culmination race. Could they be thinking of the Worlds as playing this role or something altogether new? Anybody else have any sense of what they may be shooting for? Sky and 21st Century Fox likely hold the keys to the whole thing as they have both the cash and the TV networks to make the whole thing work. So, no income and this will have to be divided by 11 or even more. Even 1 million divided by 20 teams, means just In the same place this million makes a difference to the organisers, and subsequently to the teams and the races they take part. Is it possible that merchandising revenue will ever amount to a significant sum? Hard to tell. Sure, people who do cycle and watch races etc, spend a lot. The only way, I see this work, for Velon and only, is to try and organise their events, too. Instead of Strade Bianche, they will organise their version of the race, and you know where the great names would be riding. Look the other way through the blinkers for a moment. Organisers like ASO, or RCS or the Flanders Classics work on an established base of petits commercants et entreprises that their main sponsors love to schmooze on a round-robin basis. An invitation to the village depart or arrivee is highly coveted and used as a reward to clinch deals. Every day for three weeks these companies get to work their clients and prospects in the framework of national TV coverage which shows the country in a way to be proud of. Cycling became the pretext over many years for the event because it was the only sport that had nationwide appeal, long before national TV. Le Tour has got heritage and not just for the sporting element. The international broadcast rights have become quite thick icing on a very nice cake. ASO owns the circus, inner ring and all. It will do all it can to protect the core and it will always do just enough to reward the troupe of players, starting with those teams that are sponsored by the same companies that work most closely with ASO every July. Quite so. Cycling means races. No race no cycling. Teams are not the necessary structure here. If someone with money wants to run a cycling show and try to make some profit, he should invest in a race. When teams or organizations such as this discuss the difficulty of finding sponsors, why do they never mention how doping problems in the sport have scared potential and existing sponsors away? I read a Marketing Week article the other day about how Team Sky are reaching new audience demographics through their social media channels, specifically people into music and cars. They can gather data on this to show to sponsors as evidence — one of the upshots has been that Jaguar increased their sponsorship of the team by a multiple of 5. I just use this as an example about how growing the size of the pie — the audience, the reach, the sponsors — is possible, in a number of ways. What will Jean-Etienne Amaury do? The UCI could be caught in the middle to adjudicate over bike camera rules too. Certainly more than the status quo of every team just looking out for itself. Cameron Isles, The idea of mandating that bike mfgs provide spaces for proprietary? Not so much of a ban — more a mini-break. Your comment, othersteve, was the funniest thing I have heard in a while. Rather that than unfailingly shout down every attempt to do something within the sport. So, would your ideal scenario be: — anyone who has every been sanctioned or to include: — anyone who has ever managed a team from which a rider has been sanctioned — anyone who has ever been a doctor on a team from which a rider has been sanctioned — anyone who has ever been a swanny on a team from which a rider has been sanctioned etc What do you want done about someone like Andy Rhis who has owned teams in the past from which riders have been done? I would love to see a arms manufacturer sponsoring a cycling team! Thanks, I enjoyed reading that. Nothing is ever, EVER only a black and white matter of old school romance vs new world business. As a company it will be registered somewhere so we might see the accounts in time.

Buying coke online in Risoul