Buying MDMA pills Zejtun

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buying MDMA pills Zejtun

Martin Dimech, 57, from Zejtun, was indicted for drug trafficking and possession with intent to sell following a trial by jury. Dimech, 57, from Zejtun, was indicted for trafficking in heroin, the possession of the drug with the intent to sell it and relapsing. Five bags containing some grammes of heroin, which had been hidden in the external compartments of two fridges at the accused's house, had been found by the police in Dimech's trial had been delayed by his filing of several human rights cases. One case before the Constitutional Court claimed that the law empowering only the Attorney General to decide whether a case should be heard by a magistrate or by a jury amounted to a breach of human rights, another, before the European Court of Human Rights, claimed his lack of legal assistance during the investigation also violated his rights. Many cases are decided against the AG, said the lawyer. If you have such a strong case, why dwell on the decision to prosecute? Presiding Judge Antonio Mizzi will now address the jurors and sum up the evidence and arguments brought before them, before they retire to deliberate on a verdict. Lawyers Veronique Dalli and Edward Gatt are defence counsel. Jury hears closing arguments as trial over drugs fridge nears end Martin Dimech, 57, from Zejtun, was indicted for drug trafficking and possession with intent to sell following a trial by jury. He is also a Leg By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy including the use of cookies to enhance your experience.

Jury hears closing arguments as trial over drugs fridge nears end

Buying MDMA pills Zejtun

It has been described as a protest demanding 'decriminalisation' of soft drugs in Malta: but lurking behind next Saturday's planned march in Valletta is a far wider-reaching challenge, which aims to end the absolute discretion enjoyed by the office of the Attorney General on decisions which would radically affect the possible sentences for certain crimes - drug-related offences being but one example. Contacted yesterday, criminal lawyer Dr Joseph Giglio explained that apart from the sheer severity and at times inconsistency of the courts' sentencing regime in drug-related cases, there are two other issues fuelling Saturday's protest: one of which is only partly connected to drug law reform. The first issue concerns the failure of Maltese law to distinguish between cultivation and trafficking - a fact which leaves the Law Courts with no discretion but to apply draconian sentences associated with international drug trafficking, even in cases where little or no evidence is brought forward to prove 'intention to traffic'. The second, arguably more urgent issue deals with the AG's 'absolute discretion' when it comes to assigning cases to be heard by either the lower or upper courts: a choice which can mean the difference between a minimum sentence of just six months lower court and four years higher The AG's discretion has been defined as ' insindakabbli ' - i. Within days of Holmes' conviction, an online petition urging a revision of sentence attracted well over 1, signatures, and prompted widespread calls for a reform of Malta's drug policy. A Facebook group promoting a public protest on Saturday 17 December was quick to follow, and at the time of writing more than have publicly confirmed their intention to attend. Dr Giglio however argues that the protesters' grievances are not limited only to the severity of the verdict in one particular instance. Holmes' case, it seems, has also drawn attention to a stark anomaly, written into Maltese law, that would equate consumers of soft drugs with international drug traffickers, and punish them accordingly. The difference, Giglio explains, is that by choosing to by-pass the street-level drug trafficker, such users are actually weakening the criminal circles involved in the illicit drug trade. And yet, Maltese law specifically equates the act of cultivating a marijuana plant with the act of trafficking in marijuana - regardless of whether the intention to actually sell the cultivated drug is proven in court or otherwise. But it is the second issue that has attracted the interest of a number of criminal lawyers - including Nationalist MP Dr Franco Debono, who has separately raised the same question in his private member's bill for judicial reform. Independently of Saturday's protest, lawyers like Giglio and Debono openly question the sheer breadth of the Attorney General's discretion to choose between different courts with all the serious implications for sentencing , in the light of a number of anomalous and often inconsistent decisions: including, but not limited to, the case of Daniel Holmes, whose year sentence exceeded the very maximum he would otherwise have faced, had his case been heard before the Magistrates' Court. The rationale behind the AG's decisions in such cases is not always clear-cut, and lawyers have in the past argued that the maximum discretion he enjoys can be abused for the purposes of extracting a guilty plea. Persons under arrest - be it for drug offences or otherwise - are often warned that their case would be heard before the upper courts - with the possibility of life imprisonment, instead of a maximum of 10 years - unless they 'co-operate' with the prosecution and plead guilty. But apart from the glaring discrepancy in sentences handed down by the different courts, questions have also been raised also about the inconsistency in sentencing by the same courts: sometimes, by the same magistrate or judge. In both cases the defendants had pleaded guilty: yet the one convicted for the lesser offence was meted the harsher punishment, for reasons that remain unclear to this day. Dr Giglio meanwhile points towards another case, this time unrelated to drugs, in which three individuals, charged with the same offence, have had their cases assigned to different courts. In the case of two of the suspects, the AG decided to assign the case to the upper courts. But a third case is being heard before the magistrate's court, which effectively means that the penalty involved is significantly lower than the other two Giglio however added that neither he nor his client intends to take the matter lying down. These are decisions which have a serious impact on people's lives. News National. More from Raphael Vassallo. I think a reform in the law re substances is needed. The biggest contradiction needs at least to be overcome. Drug use and addiction is considered to be both a mental disorder and a crime. The contradiction is akin to being sent to prison because one suffers from a depression. In fact many people are sentenced to do programmes, which in actual fact need reform themselves as most lack funds to run, rather than be given prison terms. The latter, like programme terms, don't seem to be working exactly as they should, often leaving the drug user himself or herself worse off after the experience. In fact deaths associated to drug overdoes has increased radically, especially for people just out of prisons and out of programmes. A shame! By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy including the use of cookies to enhance your experience.

Buying MDMA pills Zejtun