Buy weed Peyragudes

__________________________

📍 Verified store!

📍 Guarantees! Quality! Reviews!

__________________________

▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼ ▼▼

▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲ ▲▲

Buy weed Peyragudes

User account menu Not a Member? Join Today Sign in. Member Summary. Forum replies: Comments: 4. Lives in:. Search Query.

Ten Key Moments Behind Wout van Aert’s Tour De France Green Jersey 2022

Buy weed Peyragudes

The shortest road stage of the Tour and possibly the best thanks to the repetition of Pyrenean passes before a famous summit finish. Stage 16 Wrap The early breakaway went away and came back like a boomerang. Given it was one of the last chances for a breakaway to stay away and possibly the last chance, riders and whole teams were under orders to place someone in the move. Once the break was brought back it went clear again, or at least many of the same riders went away accompanied by more to make a group of 21 riders this time with a Garmin-Sharp rider, Tom Jelte Slagter. The move of 21 riders took more time than any other breakaway had been allowed so far in the race. Europcar played the numbers game on the descent with Gautier getting away. You need to end the numerical superiority and the best way to do this is to wait for one of them to attack and then jump clear when you can. Rogers did exactly this, chasing down Gautier and passing him just before a small rise during the descent. If Rogers won with a late move he was dressed for success, wearing a skinsuit for the longest stage of the race. While Rogers was winning the future of the sport was still racing down a mountain. Separate from the stage win we had second race with the GC candidates. The next big name to pop was Romain Bardet, this time less dramatically but enough to lose time. Both riders see their chances of a podium place evaporate but in this topsy-turvy Tour of surprises never say never. Pinot took things into his own hands with a series of attacks that dropped everyone including Vincenzo Nibali for a moment although arguably the Sicilian just let him take a few metres knowing the descent would let him come back. Pinot rode a fine descent and helped by fine team work put more time into Bardet and van Garderen. The start in St. Gaudens is right next to the foothills of the Pyrenees and the race heads straight up the Garonne valley and into Spain to continue up the Garonna valley. The descent is steep to start with before a gentle middle section and then another steep drop into Luchon. Like much of the Pyrenees, you drop down into the valley, cross a river, and climb straight up the other side. Further up the slope eases but the roads gets more narrow. The descent has two sections with hairpins and straight into St Lary Soulan. The Scenario : normally the GC teams will be keen to set a fast pace to control the race but will Astana want to do this? This might give a breakaway a better chance to stay away. So for the move to survive it needs some good climbers. Vincenzo Nibali though has been the most consistent uphill and voraciously so, he might want to add a win in the Pyrenees for the fun of it. Maybe Pierre Rolland could do the same but the Frenchman is starting to look stale. TV : live from start to finish. KM0 is at 1. Kudos to GvA and Koenig on their amazingly quick descents today and to Pinot for apparently overcoming this weakness. Every time I think the final podium is looking more predictable, someone falls away Teejay today : a sign of a good race I guess! Even if it meant a win by omerta loving Mick. Cycling has got to get away from negativity. Some of the quotes in that article are laughable. Levi, Big George etc — liars and hypocrits. The sport is better off without them. The sport will also take a big step forward when anyone who raced at this level prior to say retires! Omerta apologists and cowards. I wish him a flat about 4km from Paris. Well, was a pivotal year in the whole doping problem in cycling. But why did you post this 4-year old article here now? This article has all the now known dopers making statements that were all lies, and they represented themselves, or implied, that they were clean. And at that time, some fans likely believed that these riders were clean. Big George was the biggest disappointment for me. Hypocrites, yes! When Rogers won the stage, I thought like many of you likely about his boss, Bjarne Riis and what a dirty liar he is. Was Rogers clean? Time will tell. I certainly hope so. Yesterday, he nailed an outstanding road stage in the Tour de France. Neither that interview, or the supposed posting attributed to him, are likely to match. What is posted are the actual quotes that Michael Rogers said during his winning run at the Tour of California in After all, Stuey only used it once, but never inhaled or whatever he said. The teams and team mates make for interesting reading. In the meantime we have this stink in the elevator and everyone looking at the ceiling. Then again, you can just be unlucky by working for teams that end up full of dopers. Just ask Stevo. Mike, of course the scourge of doping is killing the sport, this is self evident. You need to direct your comments at those involved, not the readers here. I am afraid I was another to sigh when Rogers won the stage. Whilst the shadow of the past exists, wise men will continue to keep their own council. I was another to sigh. Glad to find some likeminded souls on here, and look forward to the day when all those with known baggage have retired. This will never change, the current crop of riders is being directed by riders from possibly the dirtiest era ever. Majka, another Riis product and his second stage win…hmmm. Anything can happen today, or especially tomorrow. Contador went up the road, Evans chased, Voeckler in yellow too but he cracked. Such a scenario might be more probable on the Tourmalet tomorrow. Looking at the route from the last few years it seems that certain climbs get used every year ie Peyresourde, port de bales etc. The short answer is yes. But the longer answer is that there are only a few cols in the Pyrenees so the race has to cross the familiar ones every year. The Tourmalet is by far the most used climb in the race with 79 crossings. Luchon and the surrounding area seems to have bought the full package, we had the stage finish at Peyragudes in the Tour recently and this was also used in the Vuelta too remember ASO owns the Spanish race now. The disappointment would be finishing somewhere boring. Haha indeed, I love the pyrenees for the climbs it brings every year, it does seem luchon get the big share of advertising each year which I presume they must pay handsomely for. Thanks for the response. Jewels must be heralded. It sickens me to see and hear on TV lovefest coverage of past dopers and how well they are doing now. Looking forward to them retiring, leaving, hopefully, a new clean generation. The TV images, jumped around a bit too much, but watching the break, and Voeckler showboating, just made watching Dodger take the win, apt. Dave Mackenzie sbs interview of Rogers was impressive, as was Dodger explaining his attitude change, to risk, etc. Honest and refreshing, worthy stage winner. That scenario has existed in lower ranks, for many many seasons. Lower level team sells their soul to get a start in the race, as it hopefully leads to exposure, which in turn, hopefully leads to financial marketing partnerships, occurring. In Rogers, I see a guy who has been riding better results ever since assumingly the peloton has become cleaner and cleaner. Every rider at the T-Mobile team has been linked to doping and therefore Rogers as well, but the fact that apart from the ridiculous clenbuterol case in Japan he has never been caught despite being a triple world champion and therefore getting plenty of attention speaks in his favor. But I have been wrong before. How much time can they lose as an estimate? On a stage time of roughly 3h40m, that means they have about 35 minutes. So, not being caught means nothing. Agree with other posters. Until the older generation are all retired, get caught and kicked out, die of old age, are assassinated or get run over by a bus, suspicion will remain and for good reason. Their job is to protect the sport, the riders should protect themselves by forming a Riders Union. Mick Rodgers being re-instated for accidental Clenbuterol injestion when Contador was punished makes almost no sense to me. It was in his body, tough! Did Alan Baxter Scottish skier, Winter Olympics who used an over the counter nasal spray for a cold which had a banned drug in it same brand in UK if I recall correctly was OK to use still lost his medal due to Strict liability. The athlete is completely responsible for everything they have in their body. Simply put, Mick Rodgers should not be racing — his Giro and Tour stage wins leave me feeling sick! The UCI need to actually wake up and admit they have loads to learn and are not actually good at managing cycling…yet. Alcoholics need to admit failure before they can really be cured. The sponsors should push for no inclusion of known cheats in their teams. Dopers should have to retire due to no work opportunities. It was Daryl Impey getting popped for a masking agent that got me. I came in thinking it was going to be dull relative to some of the spring classics, but the vast majority of stages have been great. Yup, the overall story and racing itself is crazy interesting, but is it real? Most are there for a reason. What I have seen with this particular profile is similar to those other profiles. The saddest thing… Fans unable to see cycling, they just see doping stats moving up and down the road. What about FDJ and Madiot? But are they interested in something like this? Recognising true cycling talent? I agree totally. If we love something, we tend to forgive easier — see Pantani-mania. If we hate something we expand on it. I thought Lance was brilliant! I admit it. But now, he is a disgusting cheat. He is still human though — he did raise millions for Cancer research so very likely saved lives. Should we try to weed them out — totally. Never accept cheats because winning clean gives the greatest satisfaction. I love the battle on the road and the inter-rider battle too! I just lament the hidden side of it all. Keep up the good work! Mais non siryou are totally more than that and i thankyou for your excellent work. Before I had scrolled down to your comment from pm while reading the comments I already intended to ask whether you regret that you made that comment in your text about Rogers. Bike riders cannot have it both ways. The scrutiny with which professional cyclists, team managers, team owners, et al, find themselves under, is a reflection of the current state of professional cycling. Is there actually one, possible? He, was simply one of the most technically efficient. Others, with far more connections, and skeletons, remain within. Also a manager with a personal doping past who became a manager and knew his riders were using EPO? But how many ex pro-cyclists are actually pro-PR men, pro-business men, pro-anything else other than hard-wired driven competitors? I think a lot of the responsibility has to come from the UCI doing the hard thing — catching the dopers, making a big deal out of it, cleaning up the sport as much as possible for the good of the clean guys, for the good of those who are trying to break in and for the good of the fans. Totally agree. A right way and a wrong way. Going straight to the most hypocrite and highly controverse team around? Show contrition while being often ambiguous about what he knew of the doping system in cycling? At least Basso subsequently showed a change in attitude. They were working with the riders without Madiot knowing anything? What did he think when he hired Berzin? So: when, how and why? Laurens ten Dam said something interesting today. He thinks Van Garderen and Bardet got in trouble yesterday because it was such a long stage. The only way to do such a thing is for the riders, teams, sponsors, etc. Short-term, win-at-all-costs, ends-justifies-the-means thinking is what brought the sport to this point, only reversing it will save it. What a farce! You all sound so ridiculous and utterly naieve. PEDs in one form or another have always been a part of cycling, whether you want to admit it or not. So why not allow a registry of pharmacology where riders and teams must disclose what they are on. This will allow transparency so that the UCI or whatever governing board can kepp track of, test and restrict, if necessary, the PEDs circulating throughout the peloton. In either scenario, cycling no longer is honest and praiseworthy. Like the abolition of prohibition, or the legalization of marijuana, it is time to look again at the issues and redraw the lines of what is tolerable, rather than have a knee-jerk reaction to the proposal of PEDs. Joe K, each to your own opinions. Most contributors to Inner Ring, are enthusiasts, usually bike riders, past or present, and have read elsewhere, similar voiced thoughts such as yours above. Quite wide ranging knowledge, backgrounds, etc, with some intelligent, thoughtful comments, to a variety of diverse subjects, over the years. Quite a few people, for a long time, have been trying to eliminate, or minimise the use thereof. The Route Km People will conveniently forget the fact or just not ask. This is the Aussie thinking, and goes for many US fans also. Just wish somebody from the GC riders attacks from the beginning…. Another great preview, thanks inrng! And relax! I friggin love the Tour de France. Hate Valverde yet hope Horner will win? My apologies, but I see that as very twisted. Are you so sure about FDJ as a healthy place?

Buy weed Peyragudes